I want to block access of some clients from the vlan1 to acces internet blocking their MAC address. How can i do this?
I have tring this way:
access-list 700 deny mac address 0000.0000.0000
access-list 700 permit 0000.0000.0000 ffff.ffff.ffff
int fa00
bridge-group 1 {input-address-list 700 output-address-list 700}
but it's not working .
I have very strange behaviour on my Cisco 2801 router when I applied access list on wan interface.
Architecture:
SIP Provider <----> Cisco 2801 <-----> CUCM 6
Problem:
We are using Cisco 2801 as Voice gateway for CUCM 6. so only one purpose of this router is just receiving calls on sip dial-peer and transfering to internal network.
If you look on access list below, if 'log' words don't present on these 2 lines, access list didn't work. Problem with it is that when I establish call from us or to us I can't hear incomming RPT stream, but other side can hear me. But when I type word 'log' there, everything stars working immediately.
Cisco 2801 IOS version:
Cisco IOS Software, 2801 Software (C2801-ADVENTERPRISEK9_IVS-M), Version 12.4(6)T9, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
[Code].....
The goal is to add a 2801 router between a DSL modem and a switch and obviously still access the internet. I connected and configured as explained below and the results are:
- I am able to ping internet addresses from the 2801 router
- I am not able to ping internet addresses from userlaptop but I am able to ping LAN gateway (192.168.254.254)
I cannot understand why the internet requests from the user laptopuser are not routed to the internet but the router itself can access the internet.
INTERNET====DSLmodem=====CISCO2801=====unmanagedSwitch=====userlaptop
DSLmodem:
non-bridged mode and does the PPPOe authentication.
WAN interface: Dynamic IP address assigned by ISP
[Code].....
I was just recently hired in my company, we have an sf300-24p switch but I cant find the console cable for it, I think it needs a female to female db9 serial cable, all I have is a DB9 serial to rj45 console cable for the 2801 router, also I cant find the IP address of the sf300 switch, it is directly connected to the 2801 router, I issued a show arp to the router but didnt find the switch's IP add for web access, to sum it up I have no way of configuring the switch, is there any way to find the IP address of the switch? It also dosnt show on show cdp neighbors?
View 13 Replies View RelatedI am trying to allow telnet to port 551 but i couldn't get it to work.I am using a cisco 1720 router running on IOS 12.2.I am using the below commands to set the access list to allow access to port 551 using remote telnet to the Cisco router.hostname R1!interface ethernet0ip access-group 102 in!access-list 102 permit tcp any any eq 551.After i enter the above command the router will disconnect me and i will not be able to connect to it for awhile. Once the router is up i am still unable to telnet to port 551.
View 14 Replies View RelatedI want to set up my LAN to have internet access via my 2801 router.The 2801 router is connected to my home ADSL router.Now do I just configure a 0.0.0.0 'gateway of last resort' on the 2801 router pointing to the interface leading to the ADSL router ?Therefore, all traffic from my PCs that is internet bound will head out to the ADSL router and onto the internet.
View 3 Replies View RelatedHow to implement mac access-list in 881 and 892 router ? As you now that we can get additional switch-port in the same router but I can't see the function in this router. I guess the switch port must function like the catalyst 2960 switch.
View 3 Replies View Relatedwe installed a cisco router in a school with two vlans (VLAN 1 & VLAN 2) VLAN 1 is for teachers and Admin and VLAN 2 is for students. We want so that VLAN 2 shouldn't be able to access any device in VLAN 1 but VLAN 1 should be able to access all devices in VLAN 1 & 2
VLAN 1 192.168.11.0/24
VLAN 2 192.168.12.0/24
I am using VLAN interfaces. I know we have to use some access lists but if i apply
access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.255 any
access-list 100 deny ip 192.168.12.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255
With this access list two subnets can not access each other. How these access list should look likes ?
I reported a really strange issue on a Cisco Router 3945. Here below info about release software used: [code] Please look at a brief extract of router running configuration file: [code] It’s an easy configuration of Extended ACL and the application on an Ethernet interface. The expected result is:
- The interface works properly (because access list is permitting every kind of data traffic in input)
- Checking “show access-list 180”, the counter of matched packets increments for all the packets that are forwarded inside the fa0/0/1.
But actually the Fastethernet 0/0/1 drops all the packets as if all the packets don’t match with access list (And this behavior is really incredible). The interface couldn't be used anymore because any kind of data traffic is denied.
I have a router in front of a few firewalls on an internet link. All traffic from the inside network must go through one of the firewalls to get out through the router and similarly there is a dmz on one of the firewalls.I am trying to make sure the router is fully hardened.Should I apply an access list on the outside interface of the router along with the access list for management access?
View 11 Replies View RelatedI am having some issues with creating an ACL for my gateway router.I want to block external access to my network 192.168.1.0/24 from internet so i set up the ACL on the WAN port of my 7200 router asI am using named extened access list -
{
deny ip any 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 log
permit ip any any
}
and i applied this inbound accesslist on the WAN port of router as
"ip access-group acl-in in"
Now i have blocked the external traffic to my network 192.168.1.0/24 but the issue i am having is i am also unable to reach outside now. All i want is to block external traffic on the router WAN port but allow internal traffic to outside. Did i miss anything in the access list?
I have a router 2811 that it's configured with VPN remote access and I'm trying to block clients based on their MAC address, I tried configuring access interface as routing/bridging, configured an ACL 750 for 48-bit MAC address access list and enable "bridge-group 1 input-address-list 750" command on bridged interface, but the only match I got when VPN clients access the LAN is from router interface.
Internet(VPN) ---> Router1 (FE 0/1) ---> Router1 (FE 0/0) --> Router2 (FE 0/0) --> Router2 (FE 0/1) --> LAN
I tried configuring on Router1 (FE 0/0) interface and also on Router2 (FE 0/0) interface with same behaviour. Router2 is used for internal NAT.
bridge irb
bridge 1 protocol ieee
bridge 1 route ip
[Code].....
I have a Router 2801 What conf should i make to access the webserver from the same LAN.
!
no ip dhcp use vrf connected
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.63
[Code].......
I have a FWSM in my 6509, this firewall is managing three VLANs, one of which holds a file server. As you all know, FWSM do not support VPN like the ASAs and PIXs do. I have been trying to add remote access to this file server LAN all week. The only VPN device i have is a 2801 router.
first layout: VPN router behind FWSMstatic translation from FWSM LAN (private) to VPN WAN (public)default route was facing back at FWSMip address pool was to be NAT'd on the interface facing the FWSM the idea was that my VPN address pool would be NAT'd back to the FWSM on it's VLAN. since the FWSM was managing this VLAN and recognized the source IP of the translated address pool, i would have access to my precious file server.
second layout: VPN router fa 0/1 on a /30 with 6509 (public)VPN router fa 0/0 still on the same LAN as FWSM (private)address pool for VPN once again NAT'd to fa 0/0default route pointed to fa 0/1static route of FWSM LAN pointed to fa 0/0 this idea was to have more of a 'inside' and 'outside' interface on the VPN router. this too did not work, having used every trick in the book, i could still not ping anything on the FWSM LAN while VPN'd in the network (aside from the LAN interface on my router)
trace route was showing that the all routes were headed out fa 0/1 (default route) and all to my FWSM died. i really don't think my address pool is being NAT'd, though my route map statement applied to the NAT policy is permitting my VPN address pool.
I am new to VPN technology, one of those things that happened to land on my lap. how this layout could work? there are no good VPN Remote access walkthroughs for a situation like this (2801 allowing access to a FWSM controlled LAN)
Where can I find a log or list of devices that attempted to access my EA4500 wireless network?I am using the cloud services to monitor my EA4500 usage in an apartment environment.
View 1 Replies View Related I was trying to setup an Remote Access VPN using ISR 2801. I was able to establish the vpn tunnel from my house using DSL Connection (behind NAT), the ISR give the IP address which is from the ip pool that I configured on the ISR. The problem that I have right now is that it fails reaching the corporate LAN network.
[code]....
I have a 2801 router. Is there another way to deny access to a specify web site ( like youtube, facebook .. etc ) without create acl's with specifed ip's ? The router doesen't support url filtering. I thought to do something like redirect traffic to another site : for example if one client want to access url.. that the browser will open url...
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am having an issue where I cannot access certain files on websites. It looks as though the files are accessed via ftp. Could my router be blocking it. I have a Cisco 2801 router acting as a firewall.
View 13 Replies View RelatedI'm creating an access-list that will contain all networks and host that will be redistribute into EIGRP.Till now, this access-list contains 72 entries but this number can increase anytime.
I'm using a 3750-x layer 3 switch, and I'm wondering how big this access-list can be, regarding CPU and memory utilization and performance.
I was reviewing some old configs at work today and noticed somthing weird in the access-lists. What is this?
View 6 Replies View RelatedCreating an Access Control List
View 2 Replies View Relatedso far i also knew that if u assign an access-list to an interface:
for example:
int vlan1
ip access-group 150 in
and the access-list does not exist in the configuration it will block everything meaning it will be an implicit deny empty access-list but lately i've noticed on new routers that its different,if i assign an acl to an interface where the acl doesnt exist in the configuration it acts as permit all,
this is a project and my configred file:I can't config access list according to the project.
View 19 Replies View RelatedHow to apply access list on Vlans ?
my Scenario is
13 Vlans in cisco 3560 switch (Vlan 10,20,30........ 130)
vlan 10 ---- ip range 192.168.10.0/24 interface vlan 10 ip add : 192.168.10.1
vlan 20 ---- ip range 192.168.20.0/24 interface vlan 20 ip add : 192.168.20.1
here i want to block vlan 10 access to vlan 20 i created extended access list deny ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255
and applied in interface vlan 10 as out now i cant able to access any host in vlan 20 (host 192.168.20.1) but i can able ping vlan 20's gateway 192.168.20.1
I have a question about access-lists on ASA: (5520 running 8.4)Often I want to permit all traffic from networks behind an interface (let's say DMZ in this example) to Internet, but NOT to internal networks. Then I first configure a Deny from DMZ to all internal network and then a Permit to ANY. If I forget the first Deny I will allow all traffic also to my internal networks. Is it possible to configure an access-list that permit all traffic from a network to all networks that are reachable via a given interface? In this example: Permit all traffic from DMZ to all networks that are reachable via the Outside-interface? This should permit traffic to Internet and deny traffic to internal networks in one statement.If I specify the outside-interface as the destination only traffic to the interface itself will be allowed.
View 1 Replies View Relatedhow to perform port security or mac access-list on LAN ports of router 861 or 881.There are commands access-list 700-799 , but I don't know how to apply that access list on configured vlan or particular port.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am having a problem getting this to work and I have always done it with 2 Static ip address. but now this company changed to 1 and I am doing something wrong.
I have comcast with 1 static IP, I have a local LAN with 6 host and 1 server that does Mail and remote access and web traffic.
I need a config that allows me to use 1 static ip on the outside interface of the PIX and allow with an ACL 7 ports open to the server and allow all the local host out to the internet.
I'm new to this forum and Cisco in general but I feel it may be very resourceful to me as I am a new network administrator fresh out of school for a local credit unionHere's my situation:We need to limit access to one of our servers to only 3 workstations used by our IT department. The server is on a Cisco 3560G on port 17, which is the interface I'm trying to apply a standard, basic ACL to, which looks like this:
View 10 Replies View RelatedI've been working on an application recently that practice ACL configuration, and since finishing I figured it should be put on the internet as there wasnt much more work to do to make it suitable for a website. It allows you to practice both standard and extended ACL configuration by generating a random number of ACL actions for you to configure, and provides the correct config to compare yours against to see if you were correct. It also emulates a router at a very basic level to allow practice when there is no equipment available.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have an extended acl on my VLAN interface in bound and it is working like I need it to, securing one side of my network from the other allowing only what I want from my desktops to my servers. The acls look something like this:
vlan70 -----> inbound acl (allows 80/443) ---> vlan100
I need vlan100 to have access to something on vlan70 now and I cannot get it to work. My question is would this work?
vlan70 -----> inbound acl (allows 80/443) ---> vlan100
vlan100 <----- outbound acl (allows 9100) <---- vlan70
Traffic is initiated from vlan100 not from vlan70 then back through so an established rule does not work. Also there are many more ports open in my inbound acl but this is simplified for ease of reading.I want to make sure if I place both an inbound and outbound rule on my vlan and that it is in the right place, both on the same vlan.
I have a sip gateway (AS5400) that is used to connect sip providers to our internal voice network.Internal gateway (10.1.1.2 LAN) -- SIP trunk -- AS5400 (10.1.1.3 LAN/ 8.23.23.43 WAN) -- SIP trunk -- Internet SIP Provider We encountered the following problem :A SIP call from internal gateway to the sip provider could establish but was muted on our side (sip provider could hear us)On the WAN interface of the AS5400, there is a ACL that filter traffic IN coming from SIP Provider
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
ip address 8.23.23.43 255.255.255.224
ip access-group 101 in
I log the deny on this ACL and I saw some udp packets denied with LAN addresses !*Mar 3 15:24:44.001: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 101 denied udp 10.1.1.3(0) -> 10.1.1.2 (0), 1 packet I did not bind anything on the sip config.When I changed the ACLs, calls went well.Why do I see LAN packets on the WAN interface ?
I am trying to create a user restriction to allow one user to access only two networks (10.192.3.0 and 10.192.5.0) I have range of networks but I want to permit only two networks for limited user and full access for the admins. I know this was possible with ACS 3.3 but I am not too sure if this is also applicable with ACS 5.2.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm configuring Control Plane Police in a Catalyst 6509. This equipment is using IS-IS like its IGP routing protocol, and iBGP. In order to make CoPP work Im classifying the traffic entering the control plane like CRITICAL, IMPORTANT, NORMAL, UNDESIRABLE and DEFAULT. Obviously routing protocol traffic must be classified like CRITICAL. Doing so is easy to BGP because it runs over TCP/IP and I can configure the following access list to classify BGP:
ip access-list extended CP-CRITICAL-IN
remark #### CONTROL PLANE CRITICAL TRAFFIC INBOUND ####
remark #### ROUTING TRAFFIC - BGP ####
permit tcp host [BGP neighbor addr] eq bgp host [local BGP addr]
permit tcp host [BGP neighbor addr] host [local BGP addr] eq bgp
deny ip any any
But IS-IS is also a CRITICAL traffic, but IS-IS doesn't run over TCP/IP, rather it exchange its own PDUs. So, how do I classify IS-IS traffic with an access list?