I was trying to setup an Remote Access VPN using ISR 2801. I was able to establish the vpn tunnel from my house using DSL Connection (behind NAT), the ISR give the IP address which is from the ip pool that I configured on the ISR. The problem that I have right now is that it fails reaching the corporate LAN network.
[code]....
I want to set up my LAN to have internet access via my 2801 router.The 2801 router is connected to my home ADSL router.Now do I just configure a 0.0.0.0 'gateway of last resort' on the 2801 router pointing to the interface leading to the ADSL router ?Therefore, all traffic from my PCs that is internet bound will head out to the ADSL router and onto the internet.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am trying to set up Remote access vpn in 1841 router. The vPN client is connecting to router, but cannot ping to remote LAN Here is the config.
Current configuration : 3625 bytes
!
version 12.4
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
[code]....
I am not getting any hit on the deny statement of 102 when i try pinging to client ip address (10.0.0.10).
I have a problem with ASA 5510 8.0(4) This is a remote-access VPN setup and it's functional, no problems here...
But I keep getting logs like this every few seconds:
Group = <censored>, Username = <censored>, IP = <censored>, Reaper overriding refCnt [0] and tunnelCnt [0] -- deleting SA!
Group = <censored>, Username = <censored>, IP = <censored>, SA lock refCnt = 0, bitmask = 00000080, p1_decrypt_cb = 0, qm_decrypt_cb = 0, qm_hash_cb = 0, qm_spi_ok_cb = 0, qm_dh_cb = 0, qm_secret_key_cb = 0, qm_encrypt_cb = 0
I have setup a Remote access VPN on my ASA5505 firewall through the ASDM wizard.I can successfully connect with the Cisco VPN client. My firewall also shows me the VPN session and shows incoming Rx packets. However, Tx packets remain 0, so no traffic is going out. My ASA5505 is configured as router on a stick with 25 different VLAN's. I want to restrict traffic to one specific VLAN using a crypto map.When I issue a ping -t command on my connected Windows box, the firewall log shows me the following message:
"IKE Initiator unable to find policy: Intf outside, Src: 10.7.11.18, Dst: 172.16.1.1."
"This message indicates that the IPSec fast path processed a packet that triggered IKE, but IKE's policy lookup failed. This error could be timing related. The ACLs that triggered IKE might have been deleted before IKE processed the initiation request. This problem will most likely correct itself." [code] I have really no idea what's going on. I have setup a Remote access VPN countless times but this time it shows me the error as described above.
I'm trying to setup remote access for my linksys 3200 so that I can configure it through the WAN port. I have turned on remote access, however when I try to connect I get a 404 error. The settings I have are:
When I try to access xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:9999 I just get a 404 error. I have allowed RDP access to a computer behind the router and this works fine on the same IP address. what else I have to do to allow remote management access?
UPDATE: I tried changing the port to 80 and it works. Change it back to any other number and it doesn't work. Modem is setup with a DMZ to the router's IP. Why does it only work on port 80? BTW I can't use port 80 because there is a website hosted behind the router.
I have a newly aquired asa 5505 that I just set up to the bare minimum configurations. I followed a cisco paper on how to create a "remote access vpn" setup for ipsec. I can sucessfully connect and establish a VPN, but when I try to access an inside resource from the vpn address, the asa blocks it.
Specific error is: Code...
I had IPAD setup IPSEC Remote Access VPN to try to conect to ASA5540 and Cat65 VPN service module(V1).I works fine on Cat65 VPN service module using IPAD client, but it is fail on IPAD client connect to ASA5540.THe message should be "VPN server is no response".My laptop Cisco VPN client(Windows 7) works fine on both (Cat65 VPN module and ASA5540).There is any special setting for IPAD client on ASA5540 ? The IPAD ios version 5.1.1.The ASA5540 version 8.4(4)1 ADSM 6.4(9) The Cat65 version is quit old binding with CatOS V12.2 etc.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am looking up setting a VPN using ASA 5505s so we can connect a mobile network of computers to our base network of computers. The base network has a static public IP address, but the mobile site will not. I was thinking of using a remote access VPN setup, but I am unsure if I can have a network of computers connecting in to the remote access VPN setup.
View 5 Replies View Relatedhow to setup the E4200 so that I can access the media server when I am in office? I was browsing on the Cisco website and unable to find it.
View 8 Replies View RelatedRegion : Ireland
Model : TL-WR740N
Hardware Version : V1
Firmware Version :
ISP :
I am trying to setup my DVR for remote access but my public IP and the routers WAN are not the same?
I have setup an eBGP session to a Cisco 2801 CE router. The BGP session establish, however, the session keeps resetting after 90 sec which is the BGP keepalive holdtime value.
On the PE router I found that the OutQ doesn't clear = 22 when doing a "sh ip bgp x.x.x.x summary" - Session reset at 1:30.When I filter the amount of routes advertized to the CE neighbor with the "neighbor x.x.x.x prefix-list out" - I see the OutQ clear = 0 and the BGP session remains up.
-Number of NRLI advertized without prefix filter = 172
-Number of NLRI after filter = 52
why the OutQ doesn't clear.
I have a Router 2801 What conf should i make to access the webserver from the same LAN.
!
no ip dhcp use vrf connected
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.63
[Code].......
I have a FWSM in my 6509, this firewall is managing three VLANs, one of which holds a file server. As you all know, FWSM do not support VPN like the ASAs and PIXs do. I have been trying to add remote access to this file server LAN all week. The only VPN device i have is a 2801 router.
first layout: VPN router behind FWSMstatic translation from FWSM LAN (private) to VPN WAN (public)default route was facing back at FWSMip address pool was to be NAT'd on the interface facing the FWSM the idea was that my VPN address pool would be NAT'd back to the FWSM on it's VLAN. since the FWSM was managing this VLAN and recognized the source IP of the translated address pool, i would have access to my precious file server.
second layout: VPN router fa 0/1 on a /30 with 6509 (public)VPN router fa 0/0 still on the same LAN as FWSM (private)address pool for VPN once again NAT'd to fa 0/0default route pointed to fa 0/1static route of FWSM LAN pointed to fa 0/0 this idea was to have more of a 'inside' and 'outside' interface on the VPN router. this too did not work, having used every trick in the book, i could still not ping anything on the FWSM LAN while VPN'd in the network (aside from the LAN interface on my router)
trace route was showing that the all routes were headed out fa 0/1 (default route) and all to my FWSM died. i really don't think my address pool is being NAT'd, though my route map statement applied to the NAT policy is permitting my VPN address pool.
I am new to VPN technology, one of those things that happened to land on my lap. how this layout could work? there are no good VPN Remote access walkthroughs for a situation like this (2801 allowing access to a FWSM controlled LAN)
I want to block access of some clients from the vlan1 to acces internet blocking their MAC address. How can i do this?
I have tring this way:
access-list 700 deny mac address 0000.0000.0000
access-list 700 permit 0000.0000.0000 ffff.ffff.ffff
int fa00
bridge-group 1 {input-address-list 700 output-address-list 700}
but it's not working .
I have a 2801 router. Is there another way to deny access to a specify web site ( like youtube, facebook .. etc ) without create acl's with specifed ip's ? The router doesen't support url filtering. I thought to do something like redirect traffic to another site : for example if one client want to access url.. that the browser will open url...
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am having an issue where I cannot access certain files on websites. It looks as though the files are accessed via ftp. Could my router be blocking it. I have a Cisco 2801 router acting as a firewall.
View 13 Replies View RelatedThe goal is to add a 2801 router between a DSL modem and a switch and obviously still access the internet. I connected and configured as explained below and the results are:
- I am able to ping internet addresses from the 2801 router
- I am not able to ping internet addresses from userlaptop but I am able to ping LAN gateway (192.168.254.254)
I cannot understand why the internet requests from the user laptopuser are not routed to the internet but the router itself can access the internet.
INTERNET====DSLmodem=====CISCO2801=====unmanagedSwitch=====userlaptop
DSLmodem:
non-bridged mode and does the PPPOe authentication.
WAN interface: Dynamic IP address assigned by ISP
[Code].....
I was just recently hired in my company, we have an sf300-24p switch but I cant find the console cable for it, I think it needs a female to female db9 serial cable, all I have is a DB9 serial to rj45 console cable for the 2801 router, also I cant find the IP address of the sf300 switch, it is directly connected to the 2801 router, I issued a show arp to the router but didnt find the switch's IP add for web access, to sum it up I have no way of configuring the switch, is there any way to find the IP address of the switch? It also dosnt show on show cdp neighbors?
View 13 Replies View RelatedI have very strange behaviour on my Cisco 2801 router when I applied access list on wan interface.
Architecture:
SIP Provider <----> Cisco 2801 <-----> CUCM 6
Problem:
We are using Cisco 2801 as Voice gateway for CUCM 6. so only one purpose of this router is just receiving calls on sip dial-peer and transfering to internal network.
If you look on access list below, if 'log' words don't present on these 2 lines, access list didn't work. Problem with it is that when I establish call from us or to us I can't hear incomming RPT stream, but other side can hear me. But when I type word 'log' there, everything stars working immediately.
Cisco 2801 IOS version:
Cisco IOS Software, 2801 Software (C2801-ADVENTERPRISEK9_IVS-M), Version 12.4(6)T9, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
[Code].....
how to setup remote management...
View 4 Replies View Relatedsetting up a link between a Head Office UC540 and a remote SR520 which I want to use a PC and an IP Phone from. This remote site is the first of several.I've found several examples of site to site IPsec VPNs, but none with references to voice and data VLANs, do I need to worry about this or will the phone just work.
View 5 Replies View Relatedhow to Setup remote control console
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have setup a vpn connection at my remote offices with a 5505. At my main office I have a 5510.From my remote offices I can PING my Main office server. However when I go to set up a vpn connection through windows network and sharing center I can't seem to have the connection connect.....
View 15 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to set up a new switch, a 4506e, for a remote site. Most of our newer remote sites are using a 4506 and this is the first time I'm working with a 4506e. Our standard configuration, which was in use before I started here, has QoS settings. I'm not that familiar with QoS. Most of the QoS commands in our standard config aren't working in the 4506e. Does the 4506e have QoS? Is there some guide as to setting it up? Below are excerpts from the config we're using that are QoS related:
qos dblqos map dscp 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 to tx-queue 2qos map cos 3 to dscp 26 qos map cos 5 to dscp 46 qos aggregate-policer XYZ_AGG 64 mbps 8 mbyte conform-action transmit exceed-action drop qos!class-map match-all match_XYZ match access-group 142!policy-map police_XYZ class match_XYZ police aggregate XYZ_AGG!interface GigabitEthernet4/1 description server qos dscp 48!interface GigabitEthernet4/30 description server service-policy input police_XYZ!interface GigabitEthernet4/48 description upstream connection qos trust dscp tx-queue 1 shape 98 mbps tx-queue 2 shape 1 mbps tx-queue 3 priority high
I have a couple WinXP Pros and Win7s connected to the same router wired and wirelessly. All of them have Remote Desktop enabled (via System settings) and have Windows Firewall exceptions setup. They all have AVG Anti Virus and no other firewalls installed. They all also have static ips assigned.Windows file sharing is working fine between all of them. VNC also works with no problems.But for some reason, I could not get Windows Remote Desktop to work between any of themAnother weird thing that may or may not be related is that they can't ping other computers on the same network.This leads me to believe that this might be a networking issue.I have a DLink router (can't remember model) with a Tomato Firmware.I do not have port forwarding setup for Remote Desktop because I think (although I may be wrong) that they are only used for connecting from the internet, which I don't need. I only want local connections right now.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI remember the Virtual Server instead of Port Forwarding can be setup for multiple PCs to be Remote Desktop accessible from the Internet, but I forget how.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a small network in my garage, it's basically made up of a bunch of test servers. Those and a win xp machine are all hooked up to a switch, and the win xp machine also has a wireless usb stick that is connected to my wireless router, and is being used to share internet to the rest of the machines. The test servers along with the NIC card on my win xp machine sit on a different subnet, however.When I remote into the win xp machine from my house, i can run a second remote desktop in the first session, into any of my servers. I want to do work on them, but its very laggy.
Is there a way I can setup a port either on the win xp machine or my wireless router so that i can remote directly into one of the servers? so if the win xp machine has a wireless ip address of 192.16.13.102, and one of the servers on the 2nd subnet has an internal ip of 192.2.2.4, can i have it so i can make, for instance, 192.16.13.102:6333 forward to 192.2.2.4? If not, is there any other way i can directly remote into one of the servers, by passing the first remote desktop into win xp? What settings would have to be the same across the line?
i want to setup a remote desktop connection for 3 computers on the same network to connect to remotely. Originally i was going to port forward the original windows RDP port and run the windows rdp service but learnt that XP Home Edition doesn't support this feature. I want to be able to log onto these computers at any time remotely with the need of accessing the computer before i connect.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI want to be able to login to a router remotely and foward a port on the router. I thought i saw a spot for remote management but don't know how to use it. I have a dyn account and can create a dns for it.
i setup security dvrs on the internet so clients can see cameras from outside their homes. I would like to be able to login to a router if i need to foward a port or something similar.
I'm trying to set up a VPN tunnel between a Linux machine and a RVS4000 at a remote site (served via satellite connection). After many efforts, I finally succeeded (based on Openswan). However, while PINGing is OK, big packets (from the RVS4000 LAN to the Linux box) arrive corrupted.
I lowered the WAN MTU, with no success. What finally did the trick is to lower the MTU at the RVS4000 LAN interface. Since this is not possible via the Web I/F, I did it via telnet ("ifconfig eth0 mtu 1400"). However, this change is lost after router reboot. How can I make the LAN MTU setting permanent?
I bought 2 RV180 to setup a VPN tunnel between a remote site and central office.The VPN tunnel is established, I can ping from central office to remote site but browsing on that server fails. [code]
Seems the routing is not really working through the VPN Tunnel.
I have created remote access vpn in my ASA 5505. The tunnel is established but i am not able to access the internal network.
View 3 Replies View Related