Cisco WAN :: 2801 Router Can Access Internet But Not LAN Users
Feb 9, 2012
The goal is to add a 2801 router between a DSL modem and a switch and obviously still access the internet. I connected and configured as explained below and the results are:
- I am able to ping internet addresses from the 2801 router
- I am not able to ping internet addresses from userlaptop but I am able to ping LAN gateway (192.168.254.254)
I cannot understand why the internet requests from the user laptopuser are not routed to the internet but the router itself can access the internet.
I want to set up my LAN to have internet access via my 2801 router.The 2801 router is connected to my home ADSL router.Now do I just configure a 0.0.0.0 'gateway of last resort' on the 2801 router pointing to the interface leading to the ADSL router ?Therefore, all traffic from my PCs that is internet bound will head out to the ADSL router and onto the internet.
I'm currently undergoing CCNa academy so I got a "job" from my boss to configure Cisco 871 router. Unfortunately we just finished first semester at academy so there are some things that I'm still having hard time to understand. I managed to configure router so it connect to internet or to be exact it has internet access through another adsl modem that is in bridge mode. url...The problem is that users are not able to use internet when connected to this router. I'm able to access router through telnet ( ip 192.168.13.10) but that's it.192.168.13.0 255.255.255.128 is network that we use at work. 192.168.13.5 is IP address that is assigned to zyxel adsl modem ( If I'm correct, we could have used any address here since we are connecting this directly to router ? ) Zyxel adsl modem is connected to FA4 port on Cisco router. LAN cable is connected to FA0 port and from there it goes to switch ( it's some asus switch with 50 ports). [code]
If I ping google dns from router e.g. ping 8.8.8.8 it works. If I ping url... it doesn't work. Also I'm able to access router via 192.168.13.10 but if I use router as default gateway then I'm not able to access the internet.
We have an ethernet port on Cisco router 1800 connected to the ADSL modem. The router does ip nat translation, but users complained it is slow when they access to internet. [code]
I was just recently hired in my company, we have an sf300-24p switch but I cant find the console cable for it, I think it needs a female to female db9 serial cable, all I have is a DB9 serial to rj45 console cable for the 2801 router, also I cant find the IP address of the sf300 switch, it is directly connected to the 2801 router, I issued a show arp to the router but didnt find the switch's IP add for web access, to sum it up I have no way of configuring the switch, is there any way to find the IP address of the switch? It also dosnt show on show cdp neighbors?
I'm having trouble setting up a Cisco 2801 as an internet router between our firewall & our ISP.I've setup FastEthernet0/0 as the WAN port & FastEthernet0/1 as the LAN port. I've setup a default gateway pointing the next hop (the ISP),when I plug in a pair of laptops configured to mimic our IP scheme, I'm able to ping thru, but when I put the router between our firewall & ISP I'm not able to get out to the internet (can't ping google) I can still ping the next hop.,Our old router died, so I am unable to pull up its configuration. Here is the code I'm come up with so far.
got myself the Netgear internal PCI wifi adapter today & it works just fine on my Windows XP SP3 desktop.
The only problem I have is the question of restricting access to kids @ home. If it was an external USB adapter, I could have just taken it away but the concern is the device being an internal & always available one. The user configuration on the PC is such that there is 1 main administrator (The actual windows "administrator" account) that no one uses. Apart from that,
- 1 user with admin privileges (me)
- 1 limited account for the kid
- 1 admin privilege account for the kid again (for purposes like installation of games which require an admin account as mandatory)
I would like for the wifi PCI card to work only when I login to my account. There must be someway by which I could disable the device or make the internet inaccesible in the other accounts,, (but pls bear that 1 of the account that the kid uses also has admin privilege)
I tried disabling the device from control panel but in vain.. (tried something like the sys admins do in corporates ..) disabling the usb ports on the PC's in my office..!
got myself the Netgear internal PCI wifi adapter today & it works just fine on my Windows XP SP3 desktop.
The only problem I have is the question of restricting complete internet access to kids @ home. If it was an external USB adapter, I could have just taken it away but the concern is the device being an internal & always available one.
The user configuration on the PC is such that there is 1 main administrator (The actual windows "administrator" account) that no one uses. Apart from that,
- 1 user with admin privileges (me)
- 1 limited account for the kid
- 1 admin privilege account for the kid again (for purposes like installation of games which require an admin account as mandatory)
I would like for the wifi PCI card to work only when I login to my user account. There must be someway by which I could disable the device or make the internet inaccessible in the other accounts,, (but pls bear that 1 of the account that the kid uses also has admin privilege)
I tried disabling the device from control panel but in vain.. (tried something like the sys admins do in corporates ..) disabling the usb ports on the PC's in my office..!
restricting access to internet for roughly 20 users. Right now we are connected using broadbandand using dhcp as assigned by common switch. All pc's are in a common workgroup. recommend me the hardware / software required to restrict this access.
1. Will I require a router as well as a switch ? or should I simply get a new switch ( for more then 20 users ) This would mean static ip for all users.
2. My idea is to create a AD server and use websense on it so that users who require internet access can still open internet sites but will be restricted through websense proxy.
Currently we have a cisco router 2801 for Wireless Internet connection. And we are going to have another ISP that can provide us Fibre Optic internet connection rather than wireless.My question is that can we use this router for fibre optic internet connection? how do we go about this? what is the maximum bandwidth that the router can support?
I have configured and tested an ASA-5505 that will be deployed at a customer's home. The ISP cable modem will connect to the E0 (outside) interface of the ASA. All other interfaces on the ASA are configured for the inside network 192.168.5.0/24. I have created a VPN site-to-site tunnel between this ASA and the UC540 to allow 192.168.5.0/24 subnet access to the internal networks on the UC540.
The user has requested that all the network devices used by the rest of the family will only need to connect to the Internet. They will not need access to the VPN tunnel and they will not need access to the computers on the 192.168.5.0/24 inside network. I was planning on performing the following tasks to get this to work.
We have a Cisco 3750 stack connecting to the MPLS router, able to ping 8.8.8.8 - [URL], the internal users on their own Vlan can ping the default gateway the 3750 switch but no further, trace route from the PC/Servers stops at the 3750 stack.We have the switch configured to ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 to the public interface in the MPLS router, from the switch I'm able to ping the internet.
I am able to successfully connect to my ASA5505 via AnyConnect via a mobile device. Upon doing so, I lose internet connectivity. My access list appear to be correct to I'm sort of at a loss.
How does one configure the router so that Internet users can access internal company websites? The only thing that appears is the Cisco router login. Also I need to configure Terminal Services and its not on the list under Service.
I currently set up two LAN networks. But one of them (Router 2) will be open (no password). Will this create a security compromise? Can the Router 2 Users access information of users of Router 1?
Modem WAN > Router 1 WAN Router 1 LAN > Router 2 WAN
The router 1 and 2 are broadcasting different networks and SSID.Is there any setting that I need to change, or this configuration is perfectly safe? both of them have DHCP enabled.
I have a FWSM in my 6509, this firewall is managing three VLANs, one of which holds a file server. As you all know, FWSM do not support VPN like the ASAs and PIXs do. I have been trying to add remote access to this file server LAN all week. The only VPN device i have is a 2801 router.
first layout: VPN router behind FWSMstatic translation from FWSM LAN (private) to VPN WAN (public)default route was facing back at FWSMip address pool was to be NAT'd on the interface facing the FWSM the idea was that my VPN address pool would be NAT'd back to the FWSM on it's VLAN. since the FWSM was managing this VLAN and recognized the source IP of the translated address pool, i would have access to my precious file server.
second layout: VPN router fa 0/1 on a /30 with 6509 (public)VPN router fa 0/0 still on the same LAN as FWSM (private)address pool for VPN once again NAT'd to fa 0/0default route pointed to fa 0/1static route of FWSM LAN pointed to fa 0/0 this idea was to have more of a 'inside' and 'outside' interface on the VPN router. this too did not work, having used every trick in the book, i could still not ping anything on the FWSM LAN while VPN'd in the network (aside from the LAN interface on my router)
trace route was showing that the all routes were headed out fa 0/1 (default route) and all to my FWSM died. i really don't think my address pool is being NAT'd, though my route map statement applied to the NAT policy is permitting my VPN address pool.
I am new to VPN technology, one of those things that happened to land on my lap. how this layout could work? there are no good VPN Remote access walkthroughs for a situation like this (2801 allowing access to a FWSM controlled LAN)
i have a dsl modem tht is also wi-fi and has multiple ports to connect to internet. I want to be able to use a cable to connect to net on my desktop while allowing my bro to connect to net on his laptop through the wi-fi. Right now, we have to disconnect from the net on one to be able to connect on the other. Is there a way to do so without disconnecting?
I was trying to setup an Remote Access VPN using ISR 2801. I was able to establish the vpn tunnel from my house using DSL Connection (behind NAT), the ISR give the IP address which is from the ip pool that I configured on the ISR. The problem that I have right now is that it fails reaching the corporate LAN network.
I have a 2801 router. Is there another way to deny access to a specify web site ( like youtube, facebook .. etc ) without create acl's with specifed ip's ? The router doesen't support url filtering. I thought to do something like redirect traffic to another site : for example if one client want to access url.. that the browser will open url...
I have some problem with the ASA 5510 ver 7.0(6). My manager wants to keep this as backup. tried lots of things but still users not able to access internet nor can i ping anywhere.For example when i ping 4.2.2.2 i dont get any reply.The runing config is below for ur ref :
I have a normal setup of ASA5505 (without security license) connected behind an internet router. From the ASA5505 console I can ping the Internet. However, users behind the Firewall on the internal LAN, cannot ping the Internet even though NATing is configured. The users can ping the Inside interface of the Firewall so there is no internal reachability problem. In addition, I noticed that the NAT inside access list is not having any hit counts at all when users are trying to reach the internet.
When i replace the ASA5505 with a router with NAT overload configuration on it, the setup works normally and users are able to browse the internet.
The ASA5505 configuration is shown below.
hostname Firewall
interface Ethernet0/0 description Connected To Internet Router switchport access vlan 10
I am having an issue where I cannot access certain files on websites. It looks as though the files are accessed via ftp. Could my router be blocking it. I have a Cisco 2801 router acting as a firewall.
I have a file server running windows 2003 and five computers (1 windows 7, 4 windows xp-sp3).There are two shares on the server.When the router is setup with wpa2, three of the windows xp machines will have problems with mapped drives. Directly after the drives are mapped, everything works, but 10 or so hours later, users can no longer access these mapped drives and there is no way to reconnect them it seems.The other two machines (windows 7 and one windows xp machine) have no problems whatsoever.
The only thing that the three computers have in common is that they are also sharing a printer (an hp j4680) attached to one windows xp machine (not the server).If I set everything to wpa, everything works fine, but of course my wireless network speeds drop to 56mbps.
I have very strange behaviour on my Cisco 2801 router when I applied access list on wan interface.
Architecture:
SIP Provider <----> Cisco 2801 <-----> CUCM 6
Problem:
We are using Cisco 2801 as Voice gateway for CUCM 6. so only one purpose of this router is just receiving calls on sip dial-peer and transfering to internal network.
If you look on access list below, if 'log' words don't present on these 2 lines, access list didn't work. Problem with it is that when I establish call from us or to us I can't hear incomming RPT stream, but other side can hear me. But when I type word 'log' there, everything stars working immediately.
Based on my diagram, my computer A (192.168.100.11) can ping and access my computer B (192.168.10.14). But, when i'm home and i use remote access vpn (192.168.200.x) in cisco asa 5520 to connect to my computer A is okay. But, when i try to ping my computer B is not okay. I already do the exemption for 192.168.100.x and 192.168.10.x in nat rules for inside interface (192.168.100.2) ...
Should i put routing from outside 1.1.1.2 to 192.168.10.x by using 192.168.100.1 as a gateway?
I am working on Videoconferencing solution between two location. locations are now being connected through IPSEC site to site VPN. Since we are having a common internet link for VPN as well other corporate use we have to prioritize the internet bandwidth for Videconferencing. is there any way i can prioritise videoconferencing traffic by ports? following are the configs done on the cisco 2801 router with Version 12.4(15)T10.
!interface FastEthernet0/1description ILL_12Mbpsbandwidth 20480ip address 94.*.*.180 255.255.255.248duplex autospeed autopriority-group 1! ip forward-protocol ndip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 94.*.*.* !!no ip http serverno ip http secure-serverip pim ssm default access-list 199 permit ip host 94.*.42.* host 78.*.*.130 ( VPN peer IPs both ends)priority-list 1 protocol ip high list 199
how do I block IP/Internet Adresses for ALL users without adding the sites manually per user in the Parental Control panel? I want to block a certain IP/internet adress for all users but can't find this feature within my EA6500 anywhere?Is this a firmware bug? Has linskys forgotten that some sites want to blocked for all users and how do I do it all in one?
I looked but could not find any information on what's the use of the USB interface on my 2801 router. I saw something about Cisco USB memory module and eToken by Aladdin. Is this interface restricted to Cisco and Aladdin only?
I have a Cisco RV110W small business router setup at my home. It has one of those HTML GUI interfaces, check the boxes, etc.., to get things working. Basically, your typical home router with VPN. I have enabled the VPN, it's PPTP, added the password, and now it's automagically configured! I can successfully VPN to my home with a Windows7 client. Here's my problem, I now need to VPN into my home router with a 2801. Is this possible? Everything I found on the subject has only been to setup a Cisco IOS router as a VPN server or tunneling to another IOS router. No examples using an IOS based router as the client.
We have one Router Cisco 2801 at the customer site and facing issue of having very High CPU coming to 99%.CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%/28%; one minute: 99%; five minutes: 98%
