Cisco WAN :: VPN Tunnel Between 831 And Pix 501?
Dec 21, 2010Is it possible to create a crypto IPSec VPN tunnel between A Cisco c831 and a Pix 501e using a back to back set-up with a cross-over cable?
View 4 RepliesIs it possible to create a crypto IPSec VPN tunnel between A Cisco c831 and a Pix 501e using a back to back set-up with a cross-over cable?
View 4 Repliesi have a 7201 router with NPE-G2. i have a design which i have the option to send all the traffic through a GRE tunnel or a L2TPV3 tunnel.which method is more CPU consumption ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm in process of purchasing a new Cisco routers for our branches that will be used primary to enable IPSec virtual tunnel interfce with "tunnel mode ipsec ipv4". does the default IOS IP Base supports this feature? or i need to purchase DATA license or SECURITY license?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am using a Cisco RV110W (Firmware 1.2.09) in a branch and I would like to create a VPN Tunnel to another site that has a Cisco RV042 (firmware v4.2.1.02)
What would be the correct Configuration? the current configuration I am using is
in the RV042 i am using
Check Enable
Local Group Setup
Local Security Gateway Type : IP Only
IP Address : RV042 Pulbic IP address
[Code].....
Environment :linksys wrt300n v1.1 which can have ddwrt-mega. Willing to tunnel all lan's outbound traffic through an ssh tunnel.
View 2 Replies View RelatedThere are a few situations were I'd like to be able to use the locally configured account on a device but still have ACS in place.I want to complete this WITHOUT adding the locally configured account into ACS.I have tried setting the advanced option under Identity for if an account is not found to "Continue" however this causes the account to be allowed as long as a password is typed (any password, as long as its not blank).
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have my Router, not asa, with IOS Easy VPN Server established. If I use split tunneling my clients can access the net all day long and access hosts and resources over the VPN on the other side of the network as if it were plugged into the lan. The hard part I cant figure out is how to force tunnel. I want all internet access to go through the router and not to split tunnel in addition I want to retain the ability to access local resources as if I were plugged into the LAN. I have security reasons for doing this and I am not worried about a little extra load on the router. Let me know where to start looking. I can provide configs if necessary. If I do be warned I am trying to learn what all this nifty Cisco Config Pro GUI can do so my config is gonna be full of all kind of stuff that is messy. I wont post unless asked.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHave a lab in which I am trying to configure a VPN tunnel between an ASA5520 (running ASA ver 8.0(2)) and a router (3725 running C3725-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M) - see pic below for topology.
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have a problem with ip-sec lan to lan tunnel
Location A ASA5505 192.168.100.0/24
Location B ASA5510 192.168.58.0/24
I created a ipsec site to site vpn Also create the nat exempt rule Now i have also a second interface on Location B with subnet 192.168.100.0/24 Now can i access from location a the devices on location b But when i wil connect from location b to location a i get no connection i think that the asa the traffic not send over the ipsec tunnel but it keeps in the asa?
is there a way in LMS 4.0 to generate a notification when a VPN tunnel drops on an ASA 5500?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCan i use at one site ASA 5520 and another site Router to configure VTI tunnel with OSPF routing?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco 819 router and it's the first time I've configured any Cisco product. Starting from scratch, I have managed to get 3G working and the VPN to connect but so far no packets can route down the VPN tunnel (the other side is openswan/shorewall on CentOS5).I've been pawing over lots of guides and forum discussions but seem to be a bit lost. I suspect I'm missing some access-list definitions but don't really know how to go about it. I want the network behind the Cisco 819 (10.x.x.0/20) to be able to access the internet through the interface Cellular 0 but also the VPN remote network (192.y.y.0/24)When I ping from the other (non-cisco) end I see on the Cisco 819.
View 9 Replies View Relatedi got a person who connect with vpn on a adsl connection to the corporate network.this person is using cisco ip phone on his remote location and i did configure the ASA 5505 to priorize voice over data.i still get voice skips when the remote pc is uploading data to the corporate network...what i've done is :
1.with asdm i did create 2 priority queues one for inside (queue limit 2048 trans ring limit 512) and outside (queue limit 2048 trans limit 256)
2. with the service policy wizard i did create a global service policy (all interface) and a traffic class for dscp 46 ef and on qos tab i did check the "enable priority for this flow"...
3. When using the phone, i clearly see that packets are growing on the LLQ queue (show priority-queue statistics)
4. i still get voice skips when uploading data to the corporate network... upload bandwidth is about 800k for upload the pc and the phone is on the same subnet
i have one interesting problem with local PBR on 2921 router. Here is the case,On HQ site there is 2921 router with two directly connected ISP, and there is Branch which is connected to only one ISP. The configuration should be to connect HQ router to Branch router with two VTI tunnels, so that each tunnel on HQ site should be terminated on different ISP, and EIGRP will be monitoring each VTI status.The problem is on HQ site, there is only one way to specify router with LOCAL PBR configuration, so router should send on ISP1 terminated tunnel traffic to ISP1, and on ISP2 interface terminated tunnel traffic to ISP2.
As I know this configuratino should work, but I could't make it work on c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.M4.bin IOS, and on c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.152-2.T1.bin.
Here is simple config:
ISP1 ip is 1.1.1.1
ISP2 ip is 2.2.2.2
3.3.3.3 is Branch ip address.
!
ip vrf BRANCH
[code]....
when I configure one default static route, it starts workig, but both tunnels go with specified ISP, and also there is no vrf problem,when there is no any vrf config it also don't work. gre tunnels also dont work.
Currently I have users that connect with the Cisco VPN client to our PIX 515e. Our corporate network is also directly connected to our partners network, sharing common address space. I want to be able allow our VPN users to connect to certain resources on their network. Since they already have routing for our address space, can I allow the VPN to only NAT traffic to certain destination addresses with a local IP address on our network? That way the partner's network does not have to change any routing since they would see the source address as a local IP on our network.
View 1 Replies View Related- Ipsec tunnell between two 881's
- An Aruba access point trying to set up a tunnell back to controller through the ipsec tunnell, on udp 4500
- Even though traffic shouldn't be NAT'ed (and other traffic is not), udp 4500 is NAT'ed
I guess this might be default behaviour, thing is that it used to work when it was set up as a route based easy vpn.
I finally got the VPN tunnel between 2 asa 5505's up and running, but I have some error codes on the initiator side that I can not figure out. [code]I have looked at the Crypto transforms on both sides, and they match just fine as far has the DH ID code, Group Number and the encryption. The remote side however, does not have any of there errors.
Is this something that I have skipped over, or missed that I should be looking for? The IP address that is listed above is not in my static addresses, not sure where theose are coming from. I believe that they are outside public IP's.
We're setting up a site to site VPN with a customer. Our side is a Cisco sa520 and there side is a Checkpoint. The tunnel is up, we've verified phase 1 and 2 are good. The issue is passing traffic across the tunnel, our LAN ip address are private addresses 10.10.1.0/24 but the customer states that we need to have a public IP address for our LAN in order to access there server on there LAN. So looking through all the forums, I see that you can NAT before crossing the VPN tunnel, but our issue is that our site only has 6 IP addresses assigned to it and those are the Comcast router, the WAN side of the SA520 firewall.
So we were wondering was there a way that we can either use the WAN interface on the SA520 or use another available of the 6 that were assigned to NAT and pass traffic across the tunnel. Sounds confusing? sorry but it is, rarely do I have a customer say I have to have a public IP for my side of the LAN. Now I also say this is a SA520 firewall, but if it's not possible to do with that is there a way were could with an ASA5505?
Recently i attempted to build a LAN 2 LAN VPN tunnel from an Asa to a 2911 running zone based firewall. This was a standard IPSec psk tunnel nothing fancy. I got the tunnel to establish but i could only get traffic to encap on the Asa side and decap on the 2911 side. I couldn't get return traffic.I followed this doc here for classic IPSec in the last example. URL
And I am sure the Asa is right I built a ton of those but I am new to zfw. I did not see anything about a NAT exempt rule. But since everything uses real IPs instead of NAT I wasnt sure and I could not find any info. Do I need to do NAT exempt? If so do you use a route map on the end of you NAT overload config line like in the past?
Also I have a zone-pair to "self" and I was not sure if I needed anything there to be able to ping the inside interface of the 2911 when the tunnel is up from the remote end.
I find it hard to understand tunnel and transport mode, the differences between them, and NAT. Ok so I have this scenario: Site2site VPN with 2 Cisco routers.
View 8 Replies View Relatedhow to create ip sec tunnel using these parameters. customer ip where tunnel has to be connected 1.1.1.1
ISAKMP Parameters: (Phase I)
Encryption: AES-256 or 3DES
Authentication Mode: Pre-shared key
[Code]......
We're trying to establish a "simple" vpn tunnel between a cisco 800 and a draytek 2910, situation:
LAN (192.168.2.0 ) --cisco800 ----- internet ------ draytek ----LAN (192.168.20.0 )
WAN-ports , internet access on both sides are working fine.vpn configuration part cisco:
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
authentication pre-share
group 2
[code]....
What can be wrong: other protocol? something with pfs? diffy hellman group: i heart draytek used 1 and cisco 2?debugging on the cisco site keeps on ginving the error message:
entry number 487 : CRYPTO-4-IKMP_BAD_MESSAGE
IKE message from x.x.x.x failed its sanity check or is malformed
timestamp: 4002880
I try to make a gre tunnel with 2 cisco routers 2901, ping responds between tunnel ip's ends, but I don't have pings from the pc's inside the networks. [code]
View 7 Replies View RelatedWe have a Cisco 2820 that serves as a hub and our spokes are Cisco 871s. Its been working for a while and for some reason last week. Http and https traffic over the tunnel is having connection issues. I can Remote desktop or PCanywhere into the remote PCs. From that PC I can ping internal IP address or IP of the webmail server or internal webserver with no issue. But if I access it over the browser it times out or it will work and stop working again. Basically ica, icmp, pcanythere, rdp traffic works over the tunnel but not http or https.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have created the tunnel interface on cisco 1841 router. The tunnel is up but can't ping to it's interface ip, the ping drops.
R1#show ip int brief
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
Tunnel10 10.10.10.1 YES manual up up
[Code]......
I have two ASA 5505 on two different locations(main office and remote office) and I need the remote office to be in the same subnet as the main office since they move computers betweend the offices and they have fixed IP addresses on those computers and they have no right to cahnge to dhcp mode when they move to remore office. Is it possible to create like a bridge over the VPN tunnel so it extens the LAN ?
View 18 Replies View RelatedDue to the annoying WWAN issues with the old Cisco VPN client (IPsec) I am trying to establish remote access to a LAN behind a Cisco 1803 using Anyconnect and SSL VPN.But I simply cannot make it work.I have a Cisco 1803 running IOS Version 12.4(15)T15 and I have tried Anyconnect 3.0 and 2.4 on Windows XP and MacOS 10.5, none of them established a VPN connection to the router, saying not a single word more but "Connection attempt has failed". [code] And do I have to install any particular svc.pkg in the flash? As far as I have found out you can install only one client package (how do you server different clients then?). But if I use permanently installed AnyConnect on my client system the installed svc.pkg on the router doesn't matter at all, right?
View 2 Replies View Relatedcan I force an IPSEC L2L tunnel to use NAT-T encapsulation no matter what? Automatic detection says none of the endpoints are behind NAT. I know I can disable it by the "crypto map XXX set nat-t-disable" command, but I want the exact opposite.
I have a very strange issue where asynchronos routing is making my life as a technician very hard.
A side question; Can I do something about an ISP that is policy-base-routing its ESP traffic (and/or translating it)?
ASA5505 ===>===>===> ISAKMP traffic ===>===>===> ASA5510
212.178.155.73 80.62.yyy.xxx (traffic source IP: 212.178.155.73)
[Code].....
I have several PIX 501's and one of them is extremely slow accessing network resources and does not have Internet access. I would like to use split tunnel and have them access the Internet throught their DSL connection and any traffic for network resources sent over the VPN. How can I improve the speed and set up split tunnel via the command line? I dont have the PDM software so I guess I will need to do all the configuration via the command line. Below is the configuration:
PIX Version 6.3(1)interface ethernet0 autointerface ethernet1 100fullnameif ethernet0 outside security0nameif ethernet1 inside security100enable password k4HlcGX2lC1ypFOm encryptedpasswd y5Nu/Nt1/5dK8Iuf encryptedhostname
[Code].....
We have configure a L2L vpn between Asa and 1841 router. We are facing this issue.The tunnel is not getting up from the 1841 site never. When we are trying to generate traffic from the ASA site the tunnel is up and we can see decryps and encryps packets.
Router 1841 Config:
crypto isakmp policy 100
encr 3des
hash md5
authentication pre-share
group 2
crypto isakmp key * address 213.249.XX.XX
[code].....
I've setup a VPN tunnel between an ASA and Cisco 877, both internal network can communicate.I want to be able to access the Internet via the remote site of where the 877 is located. From my understand the 877 needs to be able to do hairpinning, but I am not able to find the same cmd used on the ASA to do hairpinning. [code]
View 3 Replies View Relatedi have 2 routers, 2821 and 2811. they are connected via GRE over IPsec, and all of the traffic from 2821 is being routed to 2811 with a default route to its tunnel interface. 2821 needs to access internet through 2811 valid ip address, my question is that how should i nat the traffic on 2811 so that 2821 can access the internet?
View 1 Replies View Relatedwe are trying to establish VPN tunnel between ASA5550 and RV042. The tunnel is connected but I cannot access any resources that are behind ASA5550. I can ping the servers but that is about it.
View 1 Replies View Related