I've setup a VPN tunnel between an ASA and Cisco 877, both internal network can communicate.I want to be able to access the Internet via the remote site of where the 877 is located. From my understand the 877 needs to be able to do hairpinning, but I am not able to find the same cmd used on the ASA to do hairpinning. [code]
View 3 Repliesi have a 7201 router with NPE-G2. i have a design which i have the option to send all the traffic through a GRE tunnel or a L2TPV3 tunnel.which method is more CPU consumption ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm in process of purchasing a new Cisco routers for our branches that will be used primary to enable IPSec virtual tunnel interfce with "tunnel mode ipsec ipv4". does the default IOS IP Base supports this feature? or i need to purchase DATA license or SECURITY license?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am using a Cisco RV110W (Firmware 1.2.09) in a branch and I would like to create a VPN Tunnel to another site that has a Cisco RV042 (firmware v4.2.1.02)
What would be the correct Configuration? the current configuration I am using is
in the RV042 i am using
Check Enable
Local Group Setup
Local Security Gateway Type : IP Only
IP Address : RV042 Pulbic IP address
[Code].....
I'm configurig a VPN profile with NO split tunneling. The tunnel is working to the inside, but I'm not able to get internet access. Below are the NAT statements that I created.
nat (outside) 2 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
global (outside) 2 (ip address)
I'm familiar with 8.6 nat statements, but with 8.2 it's not letting me put in the same commands.
we have two offices connected with a lan-to-lan ipsec tunnel. My question is about one of the sites.
At the site a Cisco 870-series router is used for connection to the internet and setting up the tunnel. Two subnets exist, 172.22.x.x and 10.30.x.x.
The router itself has an address in the 172.22.x.x-range. Traffic from the 10.30.x.x subnet needs to be able to reach:
- A host in our network over at the other office (also 172.22.x.x but other range). NATting is needed otherwise it won't traverse the tunnel because the lan-to-lan has only 172.22.x.x in its properties. - The internet. NATting is also needed otherwise it won't be routable on the internet. The packets need to go out of the router directly, not through the tunnel.
How do I accomplish this?
Here is a snippet from the config:
interface ATM0.1 point-to-point
ip address <public ip address>
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
pvc 8/35
class-vc Office(code)
we use the Cisco VPN-Client to connect to our CISCO1921 Router and want to go out again on the same interface to the internet. We configured the connection with the IOS scurity package, have no split tunneling - so the client is forced with it's default gateway to our router - we also have pushed our local dns-server to the client and he gets dns results. Now I think we have to got out with some kind of NAT, because our client has a private IP from the IPSec Client pool. At the moment we have no NAT inside/outside, bacause we only use official IP addres in- and ouside (data-room usage).
- Is it possible to get the NAT function going in and out on the same interface with crypto_map IPSec user comming in and going out to the internet ?
- Is it more secure to configure this with vrf ?
- Has some a link to example configurations for this ?
getting internet access via a easy vpn tunnel on a cisco 877 router. Basically we would like roaming users to be able to use the internet via the vpn rather than using a split tunnel. The reason for this is we have multiple sites that are tied down via external IP access lists for some services. We would like roaming users to be able to interact with these sites through the central router and use the routers external IP address to acess the secured sites. I know we can use a proxy but we also use some other non proxy bases services at these sites so would rather direct routed access.
View 1 Replies View RelatedEnvironment :linksys wrt300n v1.1 which can have ddwrt-mega. Willing to tunnel all lan's outbound traffic through an ssh tunnel.
View 2 Replies View RelatedThere are a few situations were I'd like to be able to use the locally configured account on a device but still have ACS in place.I want to complete this WITHOUT adding the locally configured account into ACS.I have tried setting the advanced option under Identity for if an account is not found to "Continue" however this causes the account to be allowed as long as a password is typed (any password, as long as its not blank).
View 2 Replies View Relatedhere is my situation:
home users ------ internet ------ ASA 5510----- CORP LAN
we have anyconnect VPN and remote Ipsec VPN, i think the solution should works on both of them. my question is : "How to enforce home user internet traffic to VPN tunnel ?" we have "split tunnel" to pass only ""interesting traffic" to VPN tunnel access CORP LAN. but now , i need enforce all user traffic (internet +CORP LAN) pass through VPN tunnel. so far , i did what i know :
1. remove "split tunnle" from group-policy
2. the address in "remote VPN user address pool" are could be NAT/PAT through ASA5510
but i don't get that why it doesn't work.
inside network----ASA5505========internet===========Remote VPN client.
The ASA has one public IP on its outside interface and using PAT to the internet. It only has two interfaces, inside and outside using vlan. I created a IPSec VPN through CLI. My goal is for the remote client to browse the Internet throught tunnel.
Q1: Is it possible?
Q2: The remote side gets connected and has IP from the pool, with is part of inside network. But it cannot ping anything, including the gateway, which is the inside interface. I debug it, it shows the ASA receives the ping packages, but it doesnt send anything back to the client.
We have ASA 5540. We setup Site-to-Site VPN and Remote Access VPN (Cisco VPN client). If are running full tunnel on the Cisco VPN client, the internet access is slow. For example, when we are running full-tunnel, the internet speed is 16 Mbps based on Speedtest.net. When we go to Speedtest.net, some of the graphics do not load. If we are running Split-tunnel, the internet access speed is 78 Mbps based on Speedtest.net and the Speedtest.net web site loads all the graphics.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have setup a site-to-site VPN tunnel between 2 sites using CISCO rv120w.Everything works fine; any PC on one site can access all systems on the other site and vice-versa.The issue I have is when I start a VPN connection another site on Internet using IPSecuritas.I can initiate a VPN to site 1 and site 2; but when connected, I can only access servers that are located into the same site I'm connected to; I cannot ping the remote site.The Range of IP addresses on the internet during my tests is 192.168.11.0 (I 'm using a Mac)
-Systems with IP 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.10.1 are bridges
-Systems with IP 192.168.1.2 and 192.168.10.2 are CISCO rv120w
How can I configure an ASA 5505 NEM client to allow access to the Internet when the tunnel to the headend is down? I am planning on deploying back to back ASA 5505s in network extension mode but I do not want to block Internet access on the client side if the tunnel to the server should go down.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have successfully setup the AnyConnect VPN (connecting to our ASA5510) and have split tunneling configured. My remote users can access inside LAN servers as well as the Internet from their remote location. What I would like to know is is it possible to change the split tunnel and not allow access to the Internet from the remote location but force the remote client to go through the VPN and out our internal edge firewall to the Internet? Basically I need my remote clients to access the Internet but I would like for their Internet traffic to go through the VPN and out our edge firewall. This will allow the same security as if they were sitting in the office.
View 4 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to configure remote access (IPSEC client) to force all traffic through the tunnel (no split tunnel) yet still limit the internal hosts that can be accessed?
I have been asked to provide remote access (via ASA5510) with the following requirements:
- the client should have unrestricted internet access via the ASA (the source address will appear to be the outside interface of the ASA)
- the client should have access to only two internal hosts (192.168.10.10 and 192.168.44.10)
Is there a way to limit access to those two internal hosts, while still providing secured internet access? The only way I can see is to use an access list on another device (for example our core switch).
we have a cisco ASA 5505 and are trying to get the following working:
vpn client (ip 192.168.75.5) - connected to Cisco ASA 5505
the client gets a specific route for an internet address (79.143.218.35 255.255.255.255 192.168.75.1 192.168.75.5 100) when i try to access the url from the client i get a syn sent with netstat when i try the packet tracer from the ASA i see the following:
<Phase>
<id>1</id>
<type>FLOW-LOOKUP</type>
<subtype></subtype>
<result>ALLOW</result>
[code].....
I have configured Ipsec vpn tunnel beetween two routers (from site A to site B) over untrusted internet connection by cisco 3825 routers and i can successfully access both of this routers. But now i need to access internet on site B router sitting on site A router. So that if i run traceroute from A site machine then the gateway by which internet passing through shows the ip of site B.
The Architecture of our both site routers :
Site A 10.1.11.0-----Router A 172.18.12.1-----VPN tunnel----Router B 172.18.12.2-----Site B 10.4.11.0
/////Create IKE policy
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr aes
authentication pre-share
group 2
[Code] .....
One of our remote sites want to use our firewall for internet access. We have setup a site-to-site VPN with a default route from the remote site to us. All traffic is routed to our firewall (5520). VPN traffic works perfect. Now the internet does not work for our remote site. Is it possible to route internet over the site-to-site tunnel?
View 3 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to create a crypto IPSec VPN tunnel between A Cisco c831 and a Pix 501e using a back to back set-up with a cross-over cable?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have my Router, not asa, with IOS Easy VPN Server established. If I use split tunneling my clients can access the net all day long and access hosts and resources over the VPN on the other side of the network as if it were plugged into the lan. The hard part I cant figure out is how to force tunnel. I want all internet access to go through the router and not to split tunnel in addition I want to retain the ability to access local resources as if I were plugged into the LAN. I have security reasons for doing this and I am not worried about a little extra load on the router. Let me know where to start looking. I can provide configs if necessary. If I do be warned I am trying to learn what all this nifty Cisco Config Pro GUI can do so my config is gonna be full of all kind of stuff that is messy. I wont post unless asked.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHave a lab in which I am trying to configure a VPN tunnel between an ASA5520 (running ASA ver 8.0(2)) and a router (3725 running C3725-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M) - see pic below for topology.
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have a problem with ip-sec lan to lan tunnel
Location A ASA5505 192.168.100.0/24
Location B ASA5510 192.168.58.0/24
I created a ipsec site to site vpn Also create the nat exempt rule Now i have also a second interface on Location B with subnet 192.168.100.0/24 Now can i access from location a the devices on location b But when i wil connect from location b to location a i get no connection i think that the asa the traffic not send over the ipsec tunnel but it keeps in the asa?
is there a way in LMS 4.0 to generate a notification when a VPN tunnel drops on an ASA 5500?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCan i use at one site ASA 5520 and another site Router to configure VTI tunnel with OSPF routing?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco 819 router and it's the first time I've configured any Cisco product. Starting from scratch, I have managed to get 3G working and the VPN to connect but so far no packets can route down the VPN tunnel (the other side is openswan/shorewall on CentOS5).I've been pawing over lots of guides and forum discussions but seem to be a bit lost. I suspect I'm missing some access-list definitions but don't really know how to go about it. I want the network behind the Cisco 819 (10.x.x.0/20) to be able to access the internet through the interface Cellular 0 but also the VPN remote network (192.y.y.0/24)When I ping from the other (non-cisco) end I see on the Cisco 819.
View 9 Replies View Relatedi got a person who connect with vpn on a adsl connection to the corporate network.this person is using cisco ip phone on his remote location and i did configure the ASA 5505 to priorize voice over data.i still get voice skips when the remote pc is uploading data to the corporate network...what i've done is :
1.with asdm i did create 2 priority queues one for inside (queue limit 2048 trans ring limit 512) and outside (queue limit 2048 trans limit 256)
2. with the service policy wizard i did create a global service policy (all interface) and a traffic class for dscp 46 ef and on qos tab i did check the "enable priority for this flow"...
3. When using the phone, i clearly see that packets are growing on the LLQ queue (show priority-queue statistics)
4. i still get voice skips when uploading data to the corporate network... upload bandwidth is about 800k for upload the pc and the phone is on the same subnet
i have one interesting problem with local PBR on 2921 router. Here is the case,On HQ site there is 2921 router with two directly connected ISP, and there is Branch which is connected to only one ISP. The configuration should be to connect HQ router to Branch router with two VTI tunnels, so that each tunnel on HQ site should be terminated on different ISP, and EIGRP will be monitoring each VTI status.The problem is on HQ site, there is only one way to specify router with LOCAL PBR configuration, so router should send on ISP1 terminated tunnel traffic to ISP1, and on ISP2 interface terminated tunnel traffic to ISP2.
As I know this configuratino should work, but I could't make it work on c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.M4.bin IOS, and on c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.152-2.T1.bin.
Here is simple config:
ISP1 ip is 1.1.1.1
ISP2 ip is 2.2.2.2
3.3.3.3 is Branch ip address.
!
ip vrf BRANCH
[code]....
when I configure one default static route, it starts workig, but both tunnels go with specified ISP, and also there is no vrf problem,when there is no any vrf config it also don't work. gre tunnels also dont work.
Currently I have users that connect with the Cisco VPN client to our PIX 515e. Our corporate network is also directly connected to our partners network, sharing common address space. I want to be able allow our VPN users to connect to certain resources on their network. Since they already have routing for our address space, can I allow the VPN to only NAT traffic to certain destination addresses with a local IP address on our network? That way the partner's network does not have to change any routing since they would see the source address as a local IP on our network.
View 1 Replies View Related- Ipsec tunnell between two 881's
- An Aruba access point trying to set up a tunnell back to controller through the ipsec tunnell, on udp 4500
- Even though traffic shouldn't be NAT'ed (and other traffic is not), udp 4500 is NAT'ed
I guess this might be default behaviour, thing is that it used to work when it was set up as a route based easy vpn.
I finally got the VPN tunnel between 2 asa 5505's up and running, but I have some error codes on the initiator side that I can not figure out. [code]I have looked at the Crypto transforms on both sides, and they match just fine as far has the DH ID code, Group Number and the encryption. The remote side however, does not have any of there errors.
Is this something that I have skipped over, or missed that I should be looking for? The IP address that is listed above is not in my static addresses, not sure where theose are coming from. I believe that they are outside public IP's.
We're setting up a site to site VPN with a customer. Our side is a Cisco sa520 and there side is a Checkpoint. The tunnel is up, we've verified phase 1 and 2 are good. The issue is passing traffic across the tunnel, our LAN ip address are private addresses 10.10.1.0/24 but the customer states that we need to have a public IP address for our LAN in order to access there server on there LAN. So looking through all the forums, I see that you can NAT before crossing the VPN tunnel, but our issue is that our site only has 6 IP addresses assigned to it and those are the Comcast router, the WAN side of the SA520 firewall.
So we were wondering was there a way that we can either use the WAN interface on the SA520 or use another available of the 6 that were assigned to NAT and pass traffic across the tunnel. Sounds confusing? sorry but it is, rarely do I have a customer say I have to have a public IP for my side of the LAN. Now I also say this is a SA520 firewall, but if it's not possible to do with that is there a way were could with an ASA5505?