How can I configure an ASA 5505 NEM client to allow access to the Internet when the tunnel to the headend is down? I am planning on deploying back to back ASA 5505s in network extension mode but I do not want to block Internet access on the client side if the tunnel to the server should go down.
View 4 Replieswe have a cisco ASA 5505 and are trying to get the following working:
vpn client (ip 192.168.75.5) - connected to Cisco ASA 5505
the client gets a specific route for an internet address (79.143.218.35 255.255.255.255 192.168.75.1 192.168.75.5 100) when i try to access the url from the client i get a syn sent with netstat when i try the packet tracer from the ASA i see the following:
<Phase>
<id>1</id>
<type>FLOW-LOOKUP</type>
<subtype></subtype>
<result>ALLOW</result>
[code].....
we use the Cisco VPN-Client to connect to our CISCO1921 Router and want to go out again on the same interface to the internet. We configured the connection with the IOS scurity package, have no split tunneling - so the client is forced with it's default gateway to our router - we also have pushed our local dns-server to the client and he gets dns results. Now I think we have to got out with some kind of NAT, because our client has a private IP from the IPSec Client pool. At the moment we have no NAT inside/outside, bacause we only use official IP addres in- and ouside (data-room usage).
- Is it possible to get the NAT function going in and out on the same interface with crypto_map IPSec user comming in and going out to the internet ?
- Is it more secure to configure this with vrf ?
- Has some a link to example configurations for this ?
Any connect vpn client no internet access.
Below is configuration.
ASA Version 8.2(1)
hostname ciscoasa5505
Interface Vlan1
nameif inside
security-level 100
ip address 172.16.0.1 255.255.0.0
[code]...
Is it possible with ASAVPNSERVER 5520 and an EasyVPN 5505 Client to have the client do split tunnel to a single public IP address? Both devices are on 8.2(5) 33. Could you possible provide sample config for split tunnel?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to confgure a L2L VPN tunnel to a service provider using an ASA 5505.My problem is that the service provider will not accept traffic from a LAN subnet, they will only accept traffice from a public IP.We have a small public subnet of x.x.x.50/255.255.255.248, our public IP (outside interface IP on the ASA 5505) is x.x.x.50 and the service provider wants to see traffic coming from us on x.x.x.51How can I NAT our LAN subnet (10.0.0.0/24) to one public IP (x.x.x.51)?
View 14 Replies View RelatedSo I have three ASA 5505 firewall. my firewalls we are in the test environment. I read on the net that when you have a situation like in my company where are headquarter and two offices, i should put in each branch office and headquarter one asa firewall and a firewalls should be configured as easyvpn.
VPN server is in headquarter and easyvpn's are in branch offices. i tried everything, but we could not configure them. maybe it's not a problem that in my test environment at my the external interfaces which have static addresses on these three firewalls, respectively serever 192.168.2.1, 192.168.2.2 and 192.168.2.3 client client. I seted firewalls by following the instructions, but does not work
[URL]...
I solved the problem with the server as a remote access VPN. client workstations that are on the 192.168.2.0/24 network can access a local LAN via VPN. But when you put the ASA 5505 firewall. clients on the LAN side of the firewall can not access the VPN. I use software products Cisco VPN Client 5.0.06, but when I create a connection and try to connect to get an error secure vpn connection terminated locally by the client. reason 412: the remote peer is no longer responding.
Can I configure a PIX (515), as PPTP client to establish a tunnel with non-Cisco PPTP server ? Can my PIX initiate this type of connection ?Today, I use a PC with PPTP client to establish this and I want replace this with a PIX and I don´t want depends of a PC.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI recently purchased a Cisco 2911 to replace my Cisco 1711 router. I copied the configuration from the Cisco 1711 router to the Cisco 2911 router. Everything seemed to work correctly except when I VPN tunnel into the Cisco 2911 router using Cisco's VPN client version 5.0. I can ping the router LAN interface from my PC that is VPNed into the router but I can no longer ping or access the devices on the LAN side of the router as I did on the Cisco 1711 router. I don’t see errors in the log or hits blocking anything in the acls. It’s using the same configuration that I had on the Cisco 1711 router, and this did work on the Cisco 1711. The Cisco 2911 router is running IOS Software, C2900 Software (C2900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.0(1)M1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1).
Here is the VPN clinet portion of the configuration: The LAN is addressed as 192.168.0.0/24. The router LAN interface is 192.168.0.1, which I can ping and access. I can't ping or access anything on the LAN (192.168.0.0/24) beside the router.
aaa authentication login vpnclientauth local
aaa authorization network vpngroupauth local
!
crypto isakmp client configuration group remote-clients
key 6 xxxx
pool clients
[Code]....
i have a client who needs to establish a VPN tunnel from his satellite office (Site A) to his corporate office (Site Z). His satellite office will have a single PC sitting behind the ASA. In addition, he needs to be able to VPN from his home (Site H) to Site A to access his PC.The first question I have is about the ASA 5505 and the various licensing options. I want to ensure that an ASA5505-BUN-K9 will be able to establish the site-to-site tunnel as well as allow him to use either the IPsec or SSL VPN client to connect from Site H to Site A. Secondly, I would like to verify that no special routing or configuration would need to take place in order to allow traffic not destined for Site Z (i.e., general web browsing or other traffic to any resource that is not part of the Site Z network) to go out his outside interface without specifically traversing the VPN tunnel (split tunneling?)Finally, if the client were to establish a VPN session from Site H to Site A, would that allow for him to connect directly into resources at Site Z without any special firewall security rules? Since the VPN session would come in on the outside interface, and the tunnel back to Site Z goes out on the same interface, would this constitute a split horizon scenario that would call for a more complex config, or will the ASA handle that automatically without issue?
View 1 Replies View Relatedinside network----ASA5505========internet===========Remote VPN client.
The ASA has one public IP on its outside interface and using PAT to the internet. It only has two interfaces, inside and outside using vlan. I created a IPSec VPN through CLI. My goal is for the remote client to browse the Internet throught tunnel.
Q1: Is it possible?
Q2: The remote side gets connected and has IP from the pool, with is part of inside network. But it cannot ping anything, including the gateway, which is the inside interface. I debug it, it shows the ASA receives the ping packages, but it doesnt send anything back to the client.
There is a Cisco VPN client (running on Windows 7) and an ASA5505. The goals are client could use remote gateway on ASA for Skype and able to access the devices in ASA inside interface.
The Skype works well but I cannot access devices in the interface inside via VPN connection. Following is the config, how to correct NAT or VPN settings?
ASA Version 7.2(4)
hostname ciscoasa
domain-name default.domain.invalid
enable password wDnglsHo3Tm87.tM encrypted
passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
names
[code].....
I have an ASA 5505 that is on the perimeter of a hub & spoke vpn network, when I connect to this device using the VPN client I can connect to any device across the VPN infrastructure with the exception of the sub net that the client is connected to, for instance:
VPN client internal network connects to 192.168.113.0 /24 and is issued that ip address 192.168.113.200, the VPN client can be pinged from another device in this network however the client cannot access anything on this sub net, all other sites can be accessed ie. main site 192.168.16.0/24, second site 192.168.110/24 and third site 192.168.112/24. The ACL Manager has a single entry of "Source 192.168.113.0/24 Destination 192.168.0.0/16 and the "Standard ACL 192.168.8.8./16 permit.
how to configure AP1522 in my possession.
I have 2 AP1522 and I have to configure them so that clients can connect either 2.4 GHz or 5.0 GHz. Each of the two AP1522 must be autonomous, but has to bear in mind that are close together.
To do this I have:
- Defined the two AP1522 as RAP mode
- Set the flag on the "client access on backhault link", but I have not enabled the sub-flag "Extended backhaul Client Access" (what is this sub-flag?)
- Set 2 BGN different (but this is indispensible or I can put the same BGN? what is the difference?)
- Set the two AP1522 on two different channels (but this is necessary? or is importan only if I set the same BGN?)
- The two AP1522 appear on the WLC as a way bidge (is correct?)
How can I check if my laptop will connect using the 5.0 GHz?!? It's just turn off the antenna of 2.4 GHz?!? On my laptop I haven't found a way to force it to connect in 5.0 GHz.
I have two ASA5505 with a site to site VPN.One of the ASA is connected to the internal network 192.168.150.0.The other one is connected to 192.168.151.0.
I have also configured IPSec Cisco client VPN to the one which is plugged to 192.168.150.0.
I would like to know if it is possible for a client connected with the Cisco VPN to access the network 192.168.151.0 through the site to site VPN.
I´m tring to configure ASA 5505 with VPN Cleint, to access a remote network over a L2L with another ASA 5505, but no sucess. Is there any special feature to this work?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have one user who is unable to Access Remote Network resources when connected to the VPN on his home network. VPN shows connected and he is given a remote IP from the VPN Pool, but he cannot ping any IP on our network. When connected using Sprint Wi-Fi card he is able to connect and access remote network from the same laptop. Maybe there is some network overlap that I am missing.
see attached firewall config (zzz... being firewall public IP) and remote user route table. ASA 5505 VPN Client 5.0.07.0290
I am trying to configure RV082 router with Mac Native VPN Client for my remote access. However, no matter what I did, I am not able to make it works. Can any one can give me an example of how to conguration my RV082 router and Mac Book Pro(Mountain Lion)?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am configuring remote access vpn on ASA5505.Everything is working fine so far, except when the client got connected, it still used the local DNS server provided by the ISP. How do I force the client to use the DNS server configured on ASA?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have a closed network that is not connnected to the internet, just other sites that we want to communicate with. We have a cisco router connected to the outside interface on an ASA5505 and a cisco router connected to the inside interface on the same ASA5505. I have an inside interface that connects our management LAN, five separate DMZ interfaces with a separate LAN (VLAN) on each DMZ interface and the outside interface that connects to the other sites. Data is not allowed to mingle between the five DMZ's.
Alll connections to the other separate nodes are handled with the router on the external interface. IPSEC GRE tunnels have been established between all sites and BGP routing has been verified. Pings are good between inside, dmz and external interfaces and between the DMZ's and the other sites, to include hosts on our local networks and hosts at the remote sites. Inter and intra traffic is enabled.
When a remote site attempts an https connection, the initial ACK handshake makes it through the ASA5505, but the return SYN/ACK is being knocked down and I don't understand why (it is not because of ACL's, they are any any at this point).
Why the return SYN/ACK to the remote site isn't getting through the ASA5505 outbound. Will probably have the same issue with FTP, but right now, just trying to solve one problem at a time.
ASA5505 is in routed mode, not looking to NAT since the IP addresses in the DMZ need to be reached by their real IP address.
I'm configuring this asa for to connect home users to my network using the native microsoft vpn clients with windows xp over internet.This asa have on the outside interface one public intenet ip and in the inside inferface have configured in the the network 192.168.0.x and i want to acces to this network from internet users using native vpn clients.I tested with one pc connected directly to the outside interface and works well, but when i connect this interface to internet and tried to connect on user to the vpn i can see in the logs this, and can't connect with error 800.TCP request discarded from "public_ip_client/61648" to outside:publicip_outside_interface/1723"
(running configuration)
: Saved
:
ASA Version 8.4(3)
!
hostname ciscoasa
enable password *** encrypted
[code].....
We are in the process of determining and going to subscribe the speed/bandwidth required from Telco for our DMVPN HUB Headend.
Apparently we are going to have max of 30 remote sites(spokes)
Our design is basically just 1 single headend(hub) and spokes.
1x ISR 3925 (HUB)
30x ISR 2911 (SPOKES)
Spokes subscribed speed is either 512kbps or 1Mbps depending on sites.
How we can determine the optimal speed/bandwidth to subscribe on our HUB.
is it possible to configure an ASA 5505 with two internet connections? One dedicated for VPN and the other one for Internet access only.
View 9 Replies View Relatedi have a question about tunneling a software EasyVPN client to a client ASA Network. It looks like this:
EasyVPN Server 192.168.202.0/24 Network extension mode to Client EasyVPN ASA 192.168.1.0/24 This works fine in both directions. But now i want to connect the client ASA network via EasyVPN software client from outside. The user are already able to connect to the ASA Server on its static outside IP obtaining an IP from a 192.168.21.0/24 pool. This works fine. But how am i able to connect to the 192.168.1.0/24 network from this client?
Currently I have an ASA setup as a Firewall with 1 outside interface and 2 inside interfaces. Initially, the Guest interface was setup to receive DHCP from the ASA and everything was working. I'm adding router and a server for the guest interface and what I'm trying to accomplish now is the following: ASA 5505 > Airport Extreme with a public static IP (69.xx.xx.6), handling DHCP and NAT > Mac Server as DNS Server.Right now, when I connect to my Airport Extreme with any computer, I don't have internet. I don't understand what's wrong. My DNS Server has a reserved IP address: 192.168.226.2 and it's pointing to itself and forwarding the ISP DNS servers, the Airport Extreme is handling the DNS Server IP and the ISP DNS Server IP but I can't connect to the internet from the server. [code]
View 31 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to learn Cisco ASA IOS commands, I have bought myself a 5505 ASA for my home network and plan to implement it. How best to configure it.
I have attached a diagram of how I want my network to look. The internet connection is via the Virgin Media cable modem.
getting internet access via a easy vpn tunnel on a cisco 877 router. Basically we would like roaming users to be able to use the internet via the vpn rather than using a split tunnel. The reason for this is we have multiple sites that are tied down via external IP access lists for some services. We would like roaming users to be able to interact with these sites through the central router and use the routers external IP address to acess the secured sites. I know we can use a proxy but we also use some other non proxy bases services at these sites so would rather direct routed access.
View 1 Replies View Relatedwhy my client can't internet access from my config
(INTERNET)-------->[ROUTER]---->[CLINET]
Clinet :
Ubuntu LTS 12.04
IP 192.168.100.2
Netmas 255.255.255.0
Gateway 192.168.100.1
DNS Server 202.134.1.10
We have ASA 5540. We setup Site-to-Site VPN and Remote Access VPN (Cisco VPN client). If are running full tunnel on the Cisco VPN client, the internet access is slow. For example, when we are running full-tunnel, the internet speed is 16 Mbps based on Speedtest.net. When we go to Speedtest.net, some of the graphics do not load. If we are running Split-tunnel, the internet access speed is 78 Mbps based on Speedtest.net and the Speedtest.net web site loads all the graphics.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have setup a site-to-site VPN tunnel between 2 sites using CISCO rv120w.Everything works fine; any PC on one site can access all systems on the other site and vice-versa.The issue I have is when I start a VPN connection another site on Internet using IPSecuritas.I can initiate a VPN to site 1 and site 2; but when connected, I can only access servers that are located into the same site I'm connected to; I cannot ping the remote site.The Range of IP addresses on the internet during my tests is 192.168.11.0 (I 'm using a Mac)
-Systems with IP 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.10.1 are bridges
-Systems with IP 192.168.1.2 and 192.168.10.2 are CISCO rv120w
I want to connect my clients from the Windows WS to a VPN Tunnel using 3925 router w/o Cisco VPN client. Is there the way to use native IPSec client on Windows XP or Windows 7?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have successfully setup the AnyConnect VPN (connecting to our ASA5510) and have split tunneling configured. My remote users can access inside LAN servers as well as the Internet from their remote location. What I would like to know is is it possible to change the split tunnel and not allow access to the Internet from the remote location but force the remote client to go through the VPN and out our internal edge firewall to the Internet? Basically I need my remote clients to access the Internet but I would like for their Internet traffic to go through the VPN and out our edge firewall. This will allow the same security as if they were sitting in the office.
View 4 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to configure remote access (IPSEC client) to force all traffic through the tunnel (no split tunnel) yet still limit the internal hosts that can be accessed?
I have been asked to provide remote access (via ASA5510) with the following requirements:
- the client should have unrestricted internet access via the ASA (the source address will appear to be the outside interface of the ASA)
- the client should have access to only two internal hosts (192.168.10.10 and 192.168.44.10)
Is there a way to limit access to those two internal hosts, while still providing secured internet access? The only way I can see is to use an access list on another device (for example our core switch).