I connected my intranet cable to coreswitch 4510 created one vlan 600,that vlan gateway is routable from asa5580.now my intranet people able to ping my vlan gateway but iam unable to ping their ip.i added static route on asa route inside 192.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.100.106.1 1 but iam unable to ping remote ip.
View 2 RepliesWe have recently purchased a Cisco SG300 and have been configuring it. [code] The VLANs have ACLs set up to prevent any communication between the Holly and Tempo VLANs (and their associated WAN VLANs).Each VLAN has a WAN available for it's use, which connects to external networks (including the Internet).In order to facilitate this, we have set up all the necessary ACLs and routes and confirmed that this all works.However, the problem comes when we assign the static routes that specify the default gateways.We add the two static routes below:
-0.0.0.0 next hop 10.10.200.254 metric 1
-0.0.0.0 next hop 192.168.200.254 metric 1
In this case, only one of the VLANs has WAN access. It is either Holly or Tempo (it can be either if the order the static route is added is changed).What we need is to force Holly to use Holly WAN and Tempo to use Tempo WAN, but we cannot see a way of doing this.Effectively, we want the following static routes: [code]
I picked up a pair of RV220W's and before I spent loads of time at a remote site, I figured I'd go through some VPN testing at home to make sure I could get it setup properly. What this means is I've plugged the Internet uplink into a switch, then from the switch into both routers & configured them (using unique static IP's for each) from there. For what its worth: While I have some IT experience, I don't have strong networking experience.
I setup several VLAN's on the local RV220W, and the end result is to make it so that an asset at the remote site with an IP in any of the ranges (192.168.121.0/24, 192.168.131.0/24, 192.168.141.0/24 and any future VLANs) can communicate with/access resouces at the local site. Likewise, an asset at the local site with an IP in any of the ranges (.121, .131, .141 + any future VLANs) should be able to reach the remote resources (currently just 192.168.181.0/24, but future VLANs as well).
This evening I tried to focus on the relevant VPN pages of the Administration Guide to get the VPN up. Leaving the defaults I got as far as establishing a link between both sites and it seems that things are working right: From the remote site (.181) I can access the local site (.121, .131, .141); and from the local site I can at least ping resources (a laptop) on the remote site. (Yay!)
However, when I physically connected an asset that had a 192.168.121.X, 192.168.131.X and 192.168.141.X IP addresses to the remote RV220W (which is 192.168.181.0/24), I couldn't see it from the remote or local sites.I assume this is expected. But I'm reaching out to the community to see what other possibilities might be available becuase networking is a weak area for me. I figured it might be something like a Static [or Dynamic] Route but I really am not 100% sure.
'TECHNICAL' SPECS
Local Router LAN/WAN Settings:
LAN IP: 192.168.121.1 on default VLAN (1)
VLAN 13 defined 192.168.131.1 with DHCP enabled; Reservations created outside of DHCP scope
VLAN 14 defined 192.168.141.1 with DHCP enabled, Reservations created outside of DHCP scope
Inter VLAN Routing enabled for all VLANs
[URL]
i need to solves this little problem on 2960S lan BASE but i dont know if it is possible.
Uplink port config for gi 1/0/28 is:
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk alloved vlan 10,11
but on interface gi 1/0/1 i want to have data from vlan 10 tagged as VLAN 20.
At this time i have solved this issue very primitively
I have set up gi 1/0/2 as int mode acces, acces vlan 20 and i have connected gi 1/0/2 with gi 1/0/3 with eth cable. int gi 1/0/3 is switchpor mode acces, switchport acces vlan 10
I have a Netgear GSM7248R switch with 5 different Vlans including th management Vlan. Each of the vlans are connected to my layer 3 switch for routing. I want to access the management vlan form any of my Vlans so my layer two switch can be detected by my snmp manager.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI've been given the task to clean-up our network config, and have walked into a disaster zone.We have a 4510R on site with everyone using the default VLAN, VLAN 1.I have created 4 new VLANS, VLAN100, VLAN150, VLAN200, VLAN250 I have assigned interface addresses to each VLAN and configured Inter VLAN routing.I can route to and from each new vlan with no problem, i.e VLAN250>VLAN100 VlAN100>VLAN200 etc but I can't route to VLAN 1(Default VLAN) from any of them, I can ping the interface on VLAN 1 from any VLAN , but any hosts are unreachable. On the flip side , from VLAN 1 I can route to all of the VLANS.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco 2960 ( WS-C2960-8TC-S) running 12.2(46)SE C2960-LANLITEK9-M image.I would like to set an ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 87.101.156.97 but the current image does not allow.Will ip default-gateway 87.101.156.97 work or do I need ip routing ?The ISP has provided a /30 address and we are using an additional /29 for our network devices. I dont think this image can be upgraded. I need to forward routes directly out to ISP. [code]
View 5 Replies View RelatedMy issue: I have installed a firewall within my network. Currently all my clients default gateway defaults to GW:192.168.1.1. I would like all my internet traffic to route to the firewall ip 192.168.1.30. My Primary switch ip is 192.168.1.10, which is a 3560G running 12.2(25)SEE2 IPBASE-M.
My main problem is, I do not have access to the gateway, so I am trying to route internet traffic from within my switch to the firewall. I have already tried Route-Map, but seems this version of the OS does not support. I have already tried Policy-Map, but same as above. I have also tried IP ROUT command, but it did not work either.
And remember, I would like to perform the routing from the switch, because I do not have access to the default gateway which is a router to perform forward internet traffic to the firewall.
Recently we observed that newly installed WS-C3560CG-8PC access switches are able to communicate without a default route or default gateway.The 3650 switches are used as a layer2 access switch behind a layer3 distribution/core. They have only the management VLAN configured for IP with a single address.
The ARP table looks like there is an implicit proxy-ARP request sent for any IP address.
We definitely have no configuration whatsoever which would explain this.
Is this a new feature? We don't observe that with the older 2960-series...
Here is a brief trace of what's happening (debug arp):
host41#ping 1.1.1.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 1.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
Sep 20 14:44:06.706: IP ARP: sent req src 10.1.8.41 1833.9dc9.wxyz,
dst 1.1.1.1 0000.0000.0000 Vlan1
Sep 20 14:44:06.711: IP ARP: rcvd rep src 1.1.1.1 2c54.2dd3.wxyz, dst 10.1.8.41 Vlan1..
[code]....
The mac address if of course the mac address of the layer 3 interfaces of the distribution switch, no surprise here (proxy ARP is turned on by default).
Why is the 3560 sending out proxy arp requests without being told to? As far as I understood proxy ARP on Cisco IOS it only means it will reply to a proxy ARP request but will not send out proxy ARP requests by default.
I have a 3560G and an ASA FW, for which I am trying to use PBR to append the next hop. The gateway is the switch VLAN address and the amended net hop is the same VLAN interface on the ASA. Trouble is, I can ping the FW from a client, but not the switch. If I remove the route map, I can ping both. Even more strange is this is the case for some VLANs, but not all!
Config:
HOST ON VLAN 96
IP 10.11.120.99
S/M 255.255.255.240
[Code].....
Last week we had some forwarding issues with our cat 6509e VSS pair, wherby clients could ping the gateway but couldnt route through it! we identified this as being core 2 in the vss pair, yesterday we rebooted the 2nd switch and now the issue has been resolved.
View 4 Replies View RelatedJust picked up a ISA550 and have been playing around with it a bit but seem to be having some trouble. I have two LAN subnets in my small business with approx 10 hosts per subnet. I'd like to use the ISA550 to route between them (and to the internet) but can't seem to figure out how. Is it just as simple as creating two VLANS? Can the ISA550 route VLAN traffic?With my old RV042G, I had the option to setup multiple subnets inside the setup menu but I don't see any such area with the 550.
View 2 Replies View Relatedthis is router 887, its vlan is 192.168.3.1/24. If I'd like to add a static route via different host within same vlan, rather than the router, like:
ip route 192.168.100.0/24 192.168.3.6
How can we achieve it? I tried adding it directly and failed:
(config)#ip route 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.6
%Invalid next hop address (it's this router)
we have applied route-map on vlan interface in the form:
ip access-list extended TEST
permit ip 172.16.1.128 0.0.0.127 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255
route-map TEST permit 10
match ip address TEST
set ip next-hop 172.16.111.1
interface Vlan11
ip policy route-map TEST
The problem is in the traffic matching by the rule - there is matches not only for 172.16.0.0/16 prefixes but for the whole traffic in that VLAN.
I have a 3560G that I cannot apply a policy route-map to one of the VLAN interfaces. I am running up to date software, c3560-ipservicesk9-mz.150-2.SE2 and it accepts the command, but does not show it in the sh run of the interface. I updated to this code as I had seen previously someone said it needed to be version 15 before you could apply route-maps to VLAN interfaces.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI’ve recently brought a SG 300-52 for my company with the main intention of using the L3 switching, I’ve recently gone on a 3day cisco course and came backing thinking i knew what i had to do but as always if you don’t have the experts next to you to answer the questions you soon have problems.
I have setup 3 VLANS, the switch is basically on its default settings and VLAN 1 connects straight to the router/gateway and on the internet but VLAN 2 and 3 do not, they are completely localy contained to their own Non DHCP networks.how do I get VLAN 2 and 3 on the internet and able to talk to each VLAN?
The keywords I’ve came across in my search are static routing between VLANs and InterVLAN, I’m assuming i need to do one of these??
I just got my Cisco SG300 28, but I have some problems getting the routing to work. I get the vlans to get to the router, with the default route. But not getting them to talk with each other. I can ping the IPs from the cisco, but I am not getting traffic to go from vlan 1 to vlan 2. When I try to google, it say that it should do it automatically, and I found no setting for it. It looks like it not creating any route for the interfaces.
View 2 Replies View RelatedFirewall: ASA 5510
Switch: Linksys SRW2048
Physical topology: PC - > VLAN99 - > SRW2048 - trunk - > ASA5510
Switch Setup:
I've been tasked with breaking up a network that has run out of IP's, and have decided to use VLANs to accomplish this. I have to use an ASA5510 to accomplish all the routing between hosts in different VLANs.Port 48 is trunked to the ASA eth0/0 interface, with VLAN 99 and VLAN 20 tagging packets, VLAN 1 Untagged. Hosts hooked up to appropriate ports on Switch.
I am a complete newbie to Cisco equipment. So far I've been able to figure out how to do most of what I needed by using the ASDM but I have run into something that is a little more complicated that just opening a port. We currently have a connection to our remote site. This site has a T1 internet connection. Our connection is a site to site VPN with an ASA-5510 on this end and a ASA-5505 on the other.
We are upgrading this connection to a 75mbit hybrid microwave/fiber link. The provider is going to hand it off to us as an untagged VLAN. We made the decision to route all of the remote site's internet access through this location as to avoid having to split off part of the bandwidth of this link to dedicate to internet access.........
Cannot set route map on interface vlan. which in non default vrf on Cisco 3750.IOS c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE.bin sdm prefer route in enable ip vrf users rd 200:0 route-target export 200:0 route-target import 200:0 interface Vlan201 description Users 1 ip vrf forwarding users ip address 10.31.76.1 255.255.252.0 ip helper-address 10.31.4.57 route-map fromuser permit 10 match ip address fromuser set ip next-hop 10.31.128.155 When I enter "ip policy route-map fromuser" to interface Vlan 201 I heve the message:
% Remove VRF configuration from interface Vlan201 first
My operations manager says "Could you go on-site and configure a new clients new internet connection?" I make the arrangements and go on-site. As I'm working with the providers tech he says "Do you have a sub-interface confgured for a dot1q VLAN id of 1057?", I say "What?". Anyway my firewall is not capable of dot1q VLAN, so he says "Do you have a Cisco router that can provide the trunking?", I say "Yes, I tink so but not with me". The question is can I use an SR520 between my firewall and the provider demarc to route the VLAN he is talking about? My initial discovery says yes but I am not quite sure of the details on how to achieve this on the SR520.
View 2 Replies View Relatedi'm already has one internet connection is connecting directly to the Core Switch 6509,Vlan 500 (1921.168.1.0) and the Switch is route any internet request with default route:
SW6509-conf)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.170.10.10
10.170.10.10 is --> Next hop for the DSL router internal IP, and it's working fine.
The Problem: We have a new internet connection with new Vlan 600 (172.16.1.0) another ISP/ with another DSL router, so i need your kindly support and suggest how to connect both of them to exit from the Core Switch 6509. is it ok if i make another default route to the Next hop to the new DSL router as:
SW6509-conf)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.80.10.10
10.80.10.10 is --> Next hop for the new DSL router internal IP.
is there any way like default route , route-map or any other features to :
route Vlan 500 (192.168.1.0) to exit from DSL 1 --> 10.170.10.10
route Vlan 600 (172.16.1.0) to exit from DSL 2 --> 10.80.10.10
I am trying to configure policy based routing however when i try to apply to an interface vlan. The configuration does not show in the interface.
route-map OTHER_ROUTE permit 10
match ip address OTHER_ROUTE
set ip next-hop x.x.x.x
[Code]....
I have some specific traffic that I am attempting to pull off of VLAN 310 at the router, apply a route-map that sends this specific traffic back down to the switch on VLAN 55 (and the private address) and once it hits the switch apply a route-map on that VLAN 55 interface directing the same traffic over to the 72.x.x.9 address which goes through a FAP box back up to the router on another interface.
I have attached the config information, I know this isnt the best practice way to do this however right now this is how I have to do this.When runing a trace from the net traffic stops at .2 and when running a trace from my test /30 it stops at .2 as well. I am not sure what to do at this point
[code]...
Here is my configuration below , i have upgraded my C-3750 switch IOS from IPbase to IPservices , after upgrading i have tried to apply PBR on my Vlan 4 and failed , when i am tying to apply route-map to Vlan4 the command was taking but i am unable to see the route-map when sh run , i am giving the command as "ip policy route-map TTSL" in my Vlan4 , below is the configuration.
In Vlan2 i have connected one ISP and Vlan4 I have connected one ISP , my local subnets are 192.168.1.x and 192.168.2.x , now i want to route the 192.168.1.x traffic from Vlan2 and 192.168.2.x Traffic from Vlan4 .
sh boot
coreswitch#sh boot
BOOT path-list : flash:c3750-ipservices-mz.122-35.SE5/c3750-ipservices-mz.122-35.SE5.bin
[Code].....
I'm trying to figure out how to (or if I can) setup the management interfaces (fa1) on a couple of new 4500X switches. My issue is that the 4500X's themselves are the gateway for my management VLAN (.1 HSRP virtual, .2 and .3 SVIs on the pair of switches).
I would like to assign addresses from the management VLAN to the router Fa1 management interfaces but the software configuration guide seems to note this is not supported (and indeed it doesn't seem to work).
Physically I have Fa1 from core-1 into a port on an adjacent switch. Fa1 from core-2 also goes into a port on that adjacent switch. Both are in my management VLAN, whose SVIs are on the cores themselves.
We have two catalyst 3560 switches running c3560-ipbasek9-mz.122-58.SE2.bin They are connected using etherchannel using gi 0/21 - 24 interfaces.
on 3560-1 switch, there isn't any ip-default gateway or ip route configured. It only have 1 interface vlan configured.
on 3560-2 switch, there is ip default gateway configured along with 1 interface vlan.
What i dont understand here is that, i can reach out to other subnets from 3560-1 switch in which the routing is not enabled?
I have an ASA that houses 11 VLANs, and I am trying to add a 12th.One of the VLANs is for PCs that have internet only access.The new VLAN will be similar, but for multifunction printers only.VLAN 99 is for internet only and works fine, I can ping the gateway of 10.99.3.33 from any PC in that VLAN.I am creating VLAN 98, modeling it after VLAN 99, and I cannot get a PC in the vlan to ping the gateway of10.98.3.17.Both switch and ASA show the new VLAN 98 as UP, switchport is UP/UP.I have deleted and recreated VLAN 98 a few times, but I cannot get a PC VLAN 98 connectivity.Once it is working on the core switch, I will add it to the trunk to the IDS switches. VTP is not in use, everything is manual. [code]
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have created two vlans, vlan 1 data and vlan 200 voice. the issue is that when an on one vlan i cannot ping the default gateway of the othe vlan from my PC. An using sge 2010p switches.
below is my configuration
p route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1
ip dhcp relay address 192.168.0.100
ip dhcp relay enable
ip dhcp information option
interface vlan 1
ip dhcp relay enable(code )
I have six Cisco 300 Series switches in Layer 2 mode. They are all connected using ports in Trunk mode. These Trunks are tagged members of all VLANS.
I have one 300 series in layer 3 mode with IP address assigned to each VLAN.I would like to use one Internet gateway for multiple VLANS. This gateway has numerous IP ports that forward to internal ip addresses on various machines.
All i9nternal clients use their respective VLAN IP as their default gateway.The Layer 3 switch is connected to one of the Layer 2's using a Trunk that is a tagged member of all of the VLANS.
I understand how traffic routes from a client to its respective VLAN gateway. Where I am confused is how it routes from there to the Internet gateway? Internet gateway is 192.168.1.1.VLAN IP's are 192.168.2.1, 192.168.3.1, etc...
Should the Internet Gateway be patched into the Layer 3 switch or one of the Layer 2's using a separate "Internet" VLAN?
Q: If i m going to do a Bonjour Gateway deployment, do i still need the vlan select feature on the wism's or is enabling multicast enough?
Details of the Q:
I m working with WISM s and WISM2;s, 1130 and 3602 ap;s. Cores are 6509-E's.
i m going to implement a Bonjour gateway (which is an Aerohive ap, no wifi enabled, its just a Bonjour gateway)
This ap is connected with a trunk port (to a 6509-E) and has the wifi client vlans on the trunk as allowed vlans. It also has an allowed vlan for AppleTV;s which will be wired devices.
The Aerohive gateway gets an ip address in every wifi subnet, so far so good.
I was thinking that if i enable multicast :
- globally on the wisms, with mcast-mcast distribution
- on the SVI's for the wifi client vlans
- on te SVI's of the vlans for cisco aps
- on the SVI for AppleTV
- SVI for wism management
- SVI for the Bonjour gateway
then do i still need vlan select? Maybe a stupid question, but i m not sure how to interpret some things in this document.
I have a design hurdle that I cannot seem to cross. I have two sites and I need the same VLAN to span both sites. I have accomplished this using L2TP but my issue is that I can no longer assign a gateway for this VLAN on the router. The 2 routers are 2821's and are connected with a dedicated fiber run.
Ant recommendation for how this could be accomplished? It would be great if I could have the same gateway at both sites by leveraging some sort of bridged interface (BVI so I've heard) but I am at a loss as to where I should start with this. Also, this is not the only VLAN that needs to traverse the link.
Currently, we have a plain network and we are planning to 'upgrade' it a little. We want to implement VLANs to separate wireless clients, workstations + servers and infrastructure devices form each other.As of now, we have no VLANs, and no managed Switches. We only have an RV016 that handles two ISPs and a 3rd party connection service to the office branches ( I belive they're using Frame Relay, but as far as we know, we are not concerned since we cannot touch their devices)
The reason behind the title, pointing towards the famous SGE2000P, is that my workplace is located in Argentina... and we don't have as many choices as some of you guys have ! In fact, I was unsuccessful trying to get a Cisco partner to contact me. We would like to replace the RV016 with a cisco 1941 (and a HWIC switch card).
So, back to business..! Assuming we will be using the SGE2000P switches, I was thinking about setting VLANs using 802.1Q through seven of these switches, along with a 1941 Cisco router. I'm expecting the 1941 to handle load balancing between both ISPs and the 3rd party link. Now, as for Inter VLAN routing, I would like to have gigabit traffic between VLANs.
Is it possible to use one SGE as Layer 3 mode to hande inter VLAN traffic (gigabit speeds) while using the 1941 as a end point device to reach internet (using PAT) ?Would you suggest me to use the 1941 for Inter VLAN routing, despite the 10/100 limitation(*) and use all SGE's in L2 mode? We need two ISPs, a third link for the FR connection, and finally the LAN interface. As far as I know, I'm limited to the gigabit builtin interfaces for WAN purposes, am I right?