Unfortunately it's not particularly obvious as the error that's thrown when trying to apply an IPv6 access-list to a DAP policy is pretty vague:
View 2 Replies
I got this 3640, trying to apply a service-policy (output and input), but seems like I do it something wrong...because he only apply the output policy... here the config, I already try to config the service police inside the fa0/0, but is not showed at all, he only show the output, its like I never apply that
View 1 Replies View Relatedwe have a nat exemption rule for 10.0.0.0/8 to w.x.y.z followed by some static nat rules and then dynamic policy nat rule for 10.0.0.0/8 to w.x.y.z natting to IP a.b.c.d.When I do a packet trace from 10.10.10.10 to w.x.y.z, it shows the packet first matching against the nat exemption rule, and then immediately afterwards it matches the dynamic policy NAT rule. The static nat rules are being successfully bypassed (which is what I want), but why does the dynamic policy nat rule apply if an exempt rule has been hit already? An actual test between the IPs above reflects the result of the packet tracer as well (IP a.b.c.d is seen on server w.x.y.z).We are running the following software on an ASA5520.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have a 3560G that I cannot apply a policy route-map to one of the VLAN interfaces. I am running up to date software, c3560-ipservicesk9-mz.150-2.SE2 and it accepts the command, but does not show it in the sh run of the interface. I updated to this code as I had seen previously someone said it needed to be version 15 before you could apply route-maps to VLAN interfaces.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI've run a across a strange issue that I've not encountered before and after the things I've tried am beginning to think it's a limitation of the router itself. What I have are 3 Cisco 1941 routers that are all endpoints for a customer's MPLS network. STL is the headquarters and both remote offices have a link back this router. Each of the remote locations only have 1 serial interface. It is a flat network with few routes and a small shoretel voip system running across it. Each router is running C1900 Software (C1900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.0(1)M5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2).
QoS is configured as follows on each router:
class-map match-any AutoQoS-VoIP-Remark
match ip dscp ef
match ip dscp cs3
match ip dscp af31
class-map match-any AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-UnTrust
match access-group name AutoQoS-VoIP-Control
class-map match-any AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-UnTrust
[code]....
If I try to apply the policy map to serial0/0/0, I get the following error:
% policy map utoQos-Policy-Untrust not configured
I've tried to create a different policy map with the same settings and get the same error. We thought that when it was first set up, each interface belonged to the same network, so we separated things out (hence the .252 mask). I'm not sure what else to try and I'm hoping its something painfully simple that I'm missing.
Here is my configuration below , i have upgraded my C-3750 switch IOS from IPbase to IPservices , after upgrading i have tried to apply PBR on my Vlan 4 and failed , when i am tying to apply route-map to Vlan4 the command was taking but i am unable to see the route-map when sh run , i am giving the command as "ip policy route-map TTSL" in my Vlan4 , below is the configuration.
In Vlan2 i have connected one ISP and Vlan4 I have connected one ISP , my local subnets are 192.168.1.x and 192.168.2.x , now i want to route the 192.168.1.x traffic from Vlan2 and 192.168.2.x Traffic from Vlan4 .
sh boot
coreswitch#sh boot
BOOT path-list : flash:c3750-ipservices-mz.122-35.SE5/c3750-ipservices-mz.122-35.SE5.bin
[Code].....
I am facing problem with ACE configuration. I want to redirect 443 traffic to my Proxy Server. But I am not able to do this. I want to redirect only subnet 192.168.80.0/24..Then only it is working but I dont have to have this policy to be applied on all the users only one subnet I want to have under HTTPS policy.
how can I apply the policy only on specific subnet so that port 443 traffic can be redirect and rest of all subnets can go direclty to Internet.
Example config
int g2/24
service-policy output test
#and/OR
int g2/24.10
encap dot1q 10
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
service-policy output test
Have C3750 Version 12.2(25r)SEE3 , Trying to run:
kron policy-list backup
cli write cli copy running-config tftp://xx.xx.xx.xx/swi06-confg
kron occurrence backup at 22:00 Mon recurring
policy-list backup
There are nothing backup and nothing in the log.
I want to send a particular data stream (source-A destination-B) through only one of two WAN routers to a remote site. The remote site also has two WAN routers. Traffic from source-A will travel through a core and distribution layer of 6500 L3 switches, running 12.2(33)SXH8, to the WAN routers which are two ASR1006s. The remote end is the same - two ASR1006 WAN routers to 6500 distribution and Core L3 switches. All 6500s are L3 uplinked to each other and to the WAN routers. All traffic from the local site to the remote site routes throuh only one of the two WAN routers. I want to move only traffic from source-A to source-B to the second WAN router to the remote site.
Would it be best to use policy-based routing or an offset list of some sort to accomplish this? I've done PBR before where you just hand off traffic described in an ACL to a particular outbound port and basically hand carry the traffic to a point in the network where EIGRP prefers the route you want.
ASA 5520 to get it to authenticate VPN users against and Active Directory environment plus allow management access as well. I created a Dynamic Access Policy on the ASA stating that if you are a member of the Active Directory group "Managment" the continue. I chagned the DefaultAccessPolicy to "Terminate". So with that, VPN users cannot connect because they are not a member of that group, but the access to manage the ASA is allowed because of that policy.Is there a way through using Dynamic Access Policies that I can allow management access (SSH, ASDM, etc) by matching to a group membership and will allow normal users to VPN in successfully but not allow them access to managing the ASA?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to allow telnet to port 551 but i couldn't get it to work.I am using a cisco 1720 router running on IOS 12.2.I am using the below commands to set the access list to allow access to port 551 using remote telnet to the Cisco router.hostname R1!interface ethernet0ip access-group 102 in!access-list 102 permit tcp any any eq 551.After i enter the above command the router will disconnect me and i will not be able to connect to it for awhile. Once the router is up i am still unable to telnet to port 551.
View 14 Replies View RelatedWhat happen to my router linksys e1200, after i update the firmware to the latest version "Access Restrictions" is change to "Access Policy". how can i revert it back to "Access Restrictions" do i need to downgrade the firmware?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am using window 7 on my laptop. I am using broadband internet (not wireless etc) via my external lan card but IPv4: IPv6: No Internet access shows.
View 4 Replies View RelatedHow to implement mac access-list in 881 and 892 router ? As you now that we can get additional switch-port in the same router but I can't see the function in this router. I guess the switch port must function like the catalyst 2960 switch.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm creating an access-list that will contain all networks and host that will be redistribute into EIGRP.Till now, this access-list contains 72 entries but this number can increase anytime.
I'm using a 3750-x layer 3 switch, and I'm wondering how big this access-list can be, regarding CPU and memory utilization and performance.
we installed a cisco router in a school with two vlans (VLAN 1 & VLAN 2) VLAN 1 is for teachers and Admin and VLAN 2 is for students. We want so that VLAN 2 shouldn't be able to access any device in VLAN 1 but VLAN 1 should be able to access all devices in VLAN 1 & 2
VLAN 1 192.168.11.0/24
VLAN 2 192.168.12.0/24
I am using VLAN interfaces. I know we have to use some access lists but if i apply
access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.255 any
access-list 100 deny ip 192.168.12.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255
With this access list two subnets can not access each other. How these access list should look likes ?
I was reviewing some old configs at work today and noticed somthing weird in the access-lists. What is this?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have a new DIR-655 and have successfully added three access policies. I am trying to add a fourth, and have gone through the wizard making all the necessary entries. After saving, I get back to the list of existing policies, but the one I just added does not appear.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCreating an Access Control List
View 2 Replies View Relatedso far i also knew that if u assign an access-list to an interface:
for example:
int vlan1
ip access-group 150 in
and the access-list does not exist in the configuration it will block everything meaning it will be an implicit deny empty access-list but lately i've noticed on new routers that its different,if i assign an acl to an interface where the acl doesnt exist in the configuration it acts as permit all,
this is a project and my configred file:I can't config access list according to the project.
View 19 Replies View RelatedHow to apply access list on Vlans ?
my Scenario is
13 Vlans in cisco 3560 switch (Vlan 10,20,30........ 130)
vlan 10 ---- ip range 192.168.10.0/24 interface vlan 10 ip add : 192.168.10.1
vlan 20 ---- ip range 192.168.20.0/24 interface vlan 20 ip add : 192.168.20.1
here i want to block vlan 10 access to vlan 20 i created extended access list deny ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255
and applied in interface vlan 10 as out now i cant able to access any host in vlan 20 (host 192.168.20.1) but i can able ping vlan 20's gateway 192.168.20.1
I have a question about access-lists on ASA: (5520 running 8.4)Often I want to permit all traffic from networks behind an interface (let's say DMZ in this example) to Internet, but NOT to internal networks. Then I first configure a Deny from DMZ to all internal network and then a Permit to ANY. If I forget the first Deny I will allow all traffic also to my internal networks. Is it possible to configure an access-list that permit all traffic from a network to all networks that are reachable via a given interface? In this example: Permit all traffic from DMZ to all networks that are reachable via the Outside-interface? This should permit traffic to Internet and deny traffic to internal networks in one statement.If I specify the outside-interface as the destination only traffic to the interface itself will be allowed.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI reported a really strange issue on a Cisco Router 3945. Here below info about release software used: [code] Please look at a brief extract of router running configuration file: [code] It’s an easy configuration of Extended ACL and the application on an Ethernet interface. The expected result is:
- The interface works properly (because access list is permitting every kind of data traffic in input)
- Checking “show access-list 180”, the counter of matched packets increments for all the packets that are forwarded inside the fa0/0/1.
But actually the Fastethernet 0/0/1 drops all the packets as if all the packets don’t match with access list (And this behavior is really incredible). The interface couldn't be used anymore because any kind of data traffic is denied.
how to perform port security or mac access-list on LAN ports of router 861 or 881.There are commands access-list 700-799 , but I don't know how to apply that access list on configured vlan or particular port.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI want to block access of some clients from the vlan1 to acces internet blocking their MAC address. How can i do this?
I have tring this way:
access-list 700 deny mac address 0000.0000.0000
access-list 700 permit 0000.0000.0000 ffff.ffff.ffff
int fa00
bridge-group 1 {input-address-list 700 output-address-list 700}
but it's not working .
I am having a problem getting this to work and I have always done it with 2 Static ip address. but now this company changed to 1 and I am doing something wrong.
I have comcast with 1 static IP, I have a local LAN with 6 host and 1 server that does Mail and remote access and web traffic.
I need a config that allows me to use 1 static ip on the outside interface of the PIX and allow with an ACL 7 ports open to the server and allow all the local host out to the internet.
I currently have ipV4 as the setting on my DIR-825. Other posts seem to want ipV6 which is more secure but is not possible with a DIR-825 Rev A1. I have two routers, a primary router (DIR-825 Rev B1) capable of ipV6 and a secondary router (DIR-825 Rev A1). If I implement ipV6 on the Rev B1 router but keep ipV4 on the secondary router, will this improve the security, or will it just mess things up so nothing works?Certain devices (cell phones and most Tablets) don't deal with ipV6 very well at all. The ones I have tested flat don't connect to the wireless network if the router is set at ipV6. Is ipV4 adequate for a Home/Small Business Network when trying to implement Remote Access and VPN?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am new to v5.3, and I am not good at VPN.I just have my consultant to configure this correctly just today. Currently, there is only one rule for the access policy (Single Result Selection). That rule is to use Active Directory as the source for the authentication. And by default will deny any other access which is not found in the rule.Now... I just got an order that I need to setup a new user who will need to access to our network by using Cisco IPSec VPN (the software one). But that user is not setup in our Active Directory, and we do not want him to access our domain anyway. He only needs to access non-domain resourse...such as airconditioning controller by IP. So I am thinking to setup his account by using "internal identtity". If I do this way, what do I need to do to setup another access policy? May you give me some steps with little more details? OR... if it is not the way I should do...what else can I do to achieve this goal? Also, he said he could provide his static IP trying to access from. I have a ASA 5520.
View 4 Replies View RelatedWould there be some reason why I cannot change the Access Restriction to Allow? I also can't add anything into the Website Blocking by URL Address or the Website Blocking by Keyword. I can't type anything in the fields. I've tried rebooting, other browsers and even other computers but nothing seems to work.
View 14 Replies View RelatedI'm new to this forum and Cisco in general but I feel it may be very resourceful to me as I am a new network administrator fresh out of school for a local credit unionHere's my situation:We need to limit access to one of our servers to only 3 workstations used by our IT department. The server is on a Cisco 3560G on port 17, which is the interface I'm trying to apply a standard, basic ACL to, which looks like this:
View 10 Replies View RelatedI've been working on an application recently that practice ACL configuration, and since finishing I figured it should be put on the internet as there wasnt much more work to do to make it suitable for a website. It allows you to practice both standard and extended ACL configuration by generating a random number of ACL actions for you to configure, and provides the correct config to compare yours against to see if you were correct. It also emulates a router at a very basic level to allow practice when there is no equipment available.
View 9 Replies View Related
