Is it possible via Group Policy to prevent the domain computers from automatically creating default favorites when the users log in? Currently on the Favorites Bar it creates "Web Slice Gallery" and "Suggested Sites", as well as a "Websites for United Kingdom" folder. The domain controller is running Windows Server 2008 R2, and the clients are running Windows 7.
I try to map LDAP Group to ASA Group policy following documentation:
This is a config for ASA 8.0. I would have expected it to work on 8.4 as well but I do run into problems. The mapping as shown in LDAP Debug and ASA Log will actually happen but it is overwritten by the "GPnoAccess" Group Policy configured locally in the Tunnel Group. From earlier works with RADIUS I would have expected the user specific Attribute to be "stronger"? ASA Log:
AAA retrieved user specific group policy (correct Policy) for user = XXX AAA retrieved default group policy (GPnoAccess) for user = XXX
dell 3000 xl os 149gb I set up a home office. to try to transfer files to my new one.oce i found out you can't do it. there was a group policy in place.how do i get rid of it. it's interfering with a lot of stuff, including my firewall. had to buy another.
I have 4-5 machines connected to each other in network which are in workgroup. Now I want to change one group policy on remote machine. The name of that policy is " Network access: sharing and security model for the local accounts :- Guest only" . How can I change this policy from remotely?
I have a Cisco ASA (8.2) with several group-policies setup. By default, I can hit the SSL page, and have a selection of available group-policies for a user to login to. I want to have different ACLs for each group, to go along with the subnet that each particular group hands out. Right now, as long as a user is authenticated through AAA, they can log in to any group they select, and therefore, have more permissions than another group.
I know how to hide the list, but I need to be able to assign a specific group to a user based on an attribute in ACS.
I've setup ACS to use the "CVPN3000/ASA/PIX7.x-Tunnel-Group-Lock" Atttribute, to which I match the group-policy name in the ASA, to the attribute on the user account in ACS.This doesn't seem to work, and it just throws the user into DfltGrpPlcy, which doesn't give the user anything. So it's either wide-open, or it's broken.
I'm using RADIUS authentication and not TACACS, so it should retrieve the attributes, and according to the ACS, it grabs the attribute during the authentication process.
I am interested in knowing how to check on my 2003 Server what usernames are blocked from downloading. Many of the clients seemed to have downloaded Google Talk and also Spotify. I was wondering if I can check -where it is located and how to enforce this policy. (or create it if it isn't in effect correctly)
I'm running a Windows Server 2008 Enterprise Edition server that is currently the domain controller, and a Windows 7 Ultimate client. I have a 'Test' user for messing around with group policy - anyway, on the client Start Menu it has 'Test User' which leads to some form of libraries folder. Is it possible to restrict the link without removing their name?
installing the Cisco NAC agent through the Active Directory Group Policy. (Windows 2008 R2)Currently Cisco NAC CAS servers has been installed, configured and the switches are added. But the ports are not active. Currently users are not passing through the NAC. When the ports are active and the users trying to access the network, the browser will ask the users to install the Cisco NAC Agent.I need t by pass this by installing the Cisco NAC agent through the active directory Group Policy. How to install the Cisco NAC agent (4.9.1) to all the users in the Network (Windows XP / 7 )through Active Directory so that the users will not know that the Cisco NAC agent has been installed in their computers. By this way the users need not install the Cisco NAC agent through the Web browser and will just login their user name and password and get into the network.
When you use Group Policy to determine whether a link is fast or slow, fast links may be incorrectly flagged as slow links.
This problem may occur when a network that you are trying to detect a slow link to is configured to control the size and flow of Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) packets. For example, if a router allows for only ICMP ping packets that have a size of 1,024 bytes, the slow-link detection feature may flag the connection as a slow link. This is because the router discards ICMP packets that are larger than 1,024 bytes. If the router discards the packet because it exceeds the allowed size, fast links may be reported as slow links.
According to Microsoft, the default ICMP ping packet size of 2048 is used.Microsoft recommends changing every single Windows machine's ICMP size...but my customer would rather just change the router. It is a 2821 router, running 12.4(24)T4, using MLPPP to bundle two T1s.
How to set the default outbound policy as block in access rules of rv220w? I configure my company router RV220W to block all outbound service traffic, just allow outbound service as : http, https, smtp, dns_tcp / udp. it works fine for some hours, the next day, the rules like expired, the https / smtp / DNS service fail to outgoing, only the http is still ok? What happen? Now I just set the default outbound policy as allow, all traffic can go out, but that is meaningless for a firewall device.
On FWSM (running version 4.1 in my case) the default global policy uses the following class map:class-map inspection_default match default-inspection-traffic
What "default-inspection-traffic" includes? Is it all traffic? If so, do I really want all my traffic to go through the inspection engine? I would imagine this would have a performance impact on traffic that is not part of the protocols being inspected.
I got a new 1042 AP and connected it to the network. I have a 2504 contrller with 6 AP's already on it. I thought I could just plu in the new AP and it would show up in the AP group. Instead it shows up as a rouge AP. How do i get the new AP to show up in the default group?
My company recently failed a PCI scan because our router was returning 56bit des encryption for isakmp negotiation on an existing default isakmp policy. How do I remove this default isakmp policy. I am not running 12.4(15)T1 so the no crypto isakmp policy default does not work. Is there any way other than upgrading the IOS?
Is there any way to configure a maximum number of isakmp policies that an authenticating router will check? I have 2 configured higher priority ISAKMP policies. Maybe if there is a command to limit the number of isakmp policies the router checks, that would eliminate this default policy being matched?
We have a problem with some websites being blocked every now and then. Everyone inside can access this external website for weeks, and then suddenly it's not available for a few hours, and then it comes back. All without me making any changes to the firewall, ASA5510. The external website that has nothing to do with us can be accessed from anywhere outside our network, example on my iphone through Verizon.
We have not set up any rules about blocking websites, all I found was the Default Service Policy. After backing up and then deleting the rule we are able to access all sites.
i have removed the icmp inspection from my default policy-map in my ASA 5520,now i could not able to ping to 184.108.40.206 from my LAN even though i have configured an ICMP Access-list in my asa like ,but I can't ping 220.127.116.11 for testing the Internet connectivity,what shall i do to allow only my self as admin to ping outside?
I want to set up FWSM 4.1 on Cat6509 with multiple bridge groups in one transparent context. (as the manual says it can support up to 8 bridge-groups and the intent is to save security contexts) For a host in VLAN21 (b1_inside) to talk to a host in VLAN41 (b2_inside), traffic needs to be go out to MSFC which routed back the traffic through the FWSM. My question is how can I define a default route per bridge-group, I would assume FWSM should take the following two default routes per bridge-group interface but it won't;
I have a 1941 router configured for Policy based routing with two ISPs.Two static default routes configured to point the gateways of respoective ISPs with same metric.But the problem is, packets are going throug the one ISP only while doing traceroute.
ISP1-----> <----------------------> LAN1 | Router | ISP-------> <----------------------> LAN 2
Below is my configuration :
Current configuration : 5958 bytes ! ! Last configuration change at 05:18:56 UTC Mon Jun 25 2012 ! version 15.0 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption
how to associate an AD group - which i have defined in users and identity stores/external identity stores/Active Directory/Directory attributes to associate with the relevant identity groups - Users and identity stores/identity groups Is there an example of this being done somewhere as i am having problems understanding how to do this from the user guide.All i want to do is associate identity groups with ad groups.
I have been using aes 256 with dh group 2 and pfs group 2 for my site to site vpn tunnels.Now I am considering modifying the dh groups both for p1 and pfs to group 5 or keep it group 2.Is this a must to have dh group 5 with aes 256 or having dh group 2 with aes 256 is also common ?
we're evaulating the Cisco SM 4.2. After adding my ASA 5520 the Policies are discovered from the device except the RA VPN Policies.I tried to trigger the discovery process manually and i got this errormessage Please verify the device "IP address", "hostname", "domain name" and "port number" are correct, there is network connectivity between the CS Manager server and the device, and the device is configured to accept https connections, the device is running, and then retry this operation.which i don't understand because the other policies were retrieved just fine.
sample config for ASA 8.4 L2L VPN using Policy NAT?We could have multiple VPN tunnels terminated on the central ASA and our customer's LAN subnets could be interfering.Basically I need to build something like this [URL]but the problem is that I have ASAs running 8.4
i want to establish a video conferencing system based using desktop computers so that at a time about 7-8 users are in a video conference simultaneosly. i have the media connectivity already established i.e on OFC. will i have to make a server.