I have a problem with my 2 networks which are 1000 meters apart.One is my HOME the other is my CARAVAN SITE. both networks are working fine independently, the problem occurs when i join the networks together.I need to connect the said networks together in order to view my IP cameras which are dotted all around the campsite, i need to be able to view these from HOME.The problems i am having is DHCP servers are stealing clients from the other sides and directing them to the wrong gateway.please see below network map (these routers are all running DDWRT)if(GetCookie('computingnet_image') == 'yes') { document.write(''); }Below is another network map which someone on another forum told me to do but its still not working(DHCP servers are still clashing and still stealing clients)by the way, on both of the network maps all routers are connected with the LAN interface.someone told me to connect certain routers with WAN and it didn't work, or it was not explained correctly.Also please note that assigning clients with Static IP's is completely out of the question due to most of the clients being campers who come and go.
One is my HOME the other is my CARAVAN SITE. both networks are working fine independently, the problem occurs when i join the networks togetherI need to connect the said networks together in order to view my IP cameras which are dotted all around the campsite, i need to be able to view these from HOME.The problems i am having is DHCP servers are stealing clients from the other sides and directing them to the wrong gateway.please see below network map (these routers are all running DDWRT)Below is another network map which someone on another forum told me to do but its still not working. (DHCP servers are still clashing and still stealing clients)by the way, on both of the network maps all routers are connected with the LAN interface. someone told me to connect certain routers with WAN and it didn't work, or it was not explained correctly.Also please note that assigning clients with Static IP's is completely out of the question due to most of the clients being campers who come and go.
I have a problem with my 2 networks which are 1000 meters apart.One is my HOME the other is my CARAVAN SITE. both networks are working fine independently, the problem occurs when i join the networks together.I need to connect the said networks together in order to view my IP cameras which are dotted all around the campsite, i need to be able to view these from HOME.The problems i am having is DHCP servers are stealing clients from the other sides and directing them to the wrong gateway.please see below network map (these routers are all running DDWRTBelow is another network map which someone on another forum told me to do but its still not working. (DHCP servers are still clashing and still stealing clients)y the way, on both of the network maps all routers are connected with the LAN interface. someone told me to connect certain routers with WAN and it didn't work, or it was not explained correctly.Also please note that assigning clients with Static IP's is completely out of the question due to most of the clients being campers who come and go
I'm currently taking a networking course and was having some difficulty answering the following questions and could use a little clarification.Question: When pinging a non-existent device on your subnet, why doesn't the source node issue a ICMP echo request.My thoughts on this was because there was not a receiving node therefore any ICMP packets were not issued.Question 2: when pinging another non-existent device but not on your subnet, why doesn't the source node issue a ICMP echo request.
I have a Netgear modem/router [DGN1000] (192.168.0.x) that serves as a the router for network 1 and also as the internet gateway. I have a Cisco [E4200] (192.168.1.x) router connected to the Netgear modem via the WAN port on the Cisco. This serves as the router for network 2.
DHCP is turned on for both routers. I can access all devices on network 1 using any device o network 2 including the Netgear modem configuration page, but I cant access any device on network 2 from network 1. Is it possible to have access to devices from both networks? [URL]
I have a Linksys WAG120N Wireless-N ADSL2+ Modem Router. The firmware version is V1.00.12.I run a Windows machine attached to the router which has a certain sub network address. On that same machine I run a Virtual Machine with Linux which has its own address, 192.168.1.102. I've been noticing that whenever I shut down either machine and then turn them back on later, they acquire another address, which makes it annoying for me to make them communicate between each other (by, for example, trying to load a webpage hosted on the VM from the physical machine) without knowing the actual address, which, as I said earlier, seems to change every time.
I'd like to know if there's a way (with my router model) to configure it so that the sub network address of both machines remains the same, no matter whether or not they've been shut down and restarted.
I have 4 x 2960 switches in a remote site. These are managed by an NMS in our DC, the NMS IP ends in 35.100 with a /23 mask.
When they are first booted, the switches are visable to the NMS, but after a week or 2, 3 of them drop connection to it. If you reboot them again they are fine. You are able to log onto them form thier local router and use a Radius server which is in the same subnet as the NMS.
The odd thing is, whilst they can not ping the NMS, they are able to ping any other addresses in the 34.0/23 range.
The config on the one that does not lose connection is the same as the other 3 and I have also rebooted the NMS.
An 1841 is conencted to the internet by DSL, it works fine. I have added it to the 10.98.8.x subnet off a 3750 switch.When I connect other devices to the same switch port, I can ping/browse to them fine, but when I connect the 1841 I can only ping it from the 3750, not another subnet connected to the same router. [code]
Based on my diagram, my computer A (192.168.100.11) can ping and access my computer B (192.168.10.14). But, when i'm home and i use remote access vpn (192.168.200.x) in cisco asa 5520 to connect to my computer A is okay. But, when i try to ping my computer B is not okay. I already do the exemption for 192.168.100.x and 192.168.10.x in nat rules for inside interface (192.168.100.2) ...
Should i put routing from outside 1.1.1.2 to 192.168.10.x by using 192.168.100.1 as a gateway?
I have setup my network with two subnets (192.168.0.x and 192.168.1.x) and have a number of clients on both.I am using a Vigor 2750n router as my 'primary' router, and have a Server 2008 machine running RRAS as my other 'router'on the 192.168. 1. x subnet.On the 192.168.1.x network I have a server running DNS for local queries on that subnet and have 8.8.8.8 setup as a DNS forwarder. On the 192.168.0.x subnet I use the google DNS 8.8.8.8.I have setup a static route between the two subnets and am able to ping clients between each subnet.With regards to internet access, I am unable to get access to the internet from the 192.168.1.x subnet (no problems from 192.168.0.x subnet) and am unable to even ping a web IP address, and am wondering if I need to make any changes to the 2750's configuration to allow traffic from the other one to get out to the internet.
I have a server which has multiple NIC's.NIC 1 is connected to the network / internet etc.NIC 2 is connected to a NAS drive.Obviously I can access the NAS drive from the server, but how can I access the NAS drive from devices on the network i.e. on NIC 1?Is it possible to access the NAS from a different subnet?
I have setup my network with two subnets (192.168.0.x and 192.168.1.x) and have a number of clients on both. I am using a Vigor 2750n router as my 'primary' router, and have a Server 2008 machine running RRAS as my other 'router' on the 192.168.1.x subnet.
On the 192.168.1.x network I have a server running DNS for local queries on that subnet and have 8.8.8.8 setup as a DNS forwarder. On the 192.168.0.x subnet I use the google DNS 8.8.8.8.
I have setup a static route between the two subnets and am able to ping clients between each subnet.With regards to internet access, I am unable to get access to the internet from the 192.168.1.x subnet (no problems from 192.168.0.x subnet) and am unable to even ping a web IP address, and am wondering if I need to make any changes to the 2750's configuration to allow traffic from the other one to get out to the internet.
I have old interface hardware with Static IP 10.2.2.200 and on the same switch I have computers with IPs of 10.4.1.0 If I change subnet to 255.0.0.0 old hardware with 10.2.2.200 will be accessible. The problem is that I would like to have 255.255.255.0 as subnet but it should still be possible to access 10.2.2.200. Can I add Static route for oldhardware in XP without adding gateway settings? The most simple would be to put all on same subnet but it is not possible due to a various reasons. The computers are running Windows XP
I am working with a device that does not have a physical reset button on it, and have mistakenly typed in 127.x.x.127 for it's IP. I was trying to use 172, but mistyped and didn't catch it until after I had rebooted the unit. Is there anyway that I might be able to gain access to the device. My PC is running Windows 7, but I am familiar with linux as well. I have attempted to change the loopback adapter IP to 128 on a ubuntu live disc and set my ethernet port to the subnet the device is on with no avail. (I am also using vlans on the device, but believe I have them set up correctly)the device is set to IP: 127.x.x.127 netmask 255.255.255.128. [code] I know that the last octet of 127 is the broadcast IP for the range, but have been able to address similar blunders before by forcing myself to a /24 subnet to correct that.
I have an RV042 with the PPTP server configured, which is working because I can connect with my iPad and droid phones, however, I'm unable to access resources on the RV042 side (192.168.1.X) when my local network is the same ip scheme (192.168.1.x). It works fine when I'm on a different network like 3G or someone else's Wifi network (192.168.11.X).
i have 2x 27 subet ( we will call first /27 fip and call second /27 sip) we assign sip subnet to our virtual machine and we do not want assign ip from sip to our physical node and we wan assign ip from fip subnet to our physical server, because we want sip can not spoof physical server ips, so when we create vlan in our switch we set port 1 and fip and sip subnet access to this vlan in this senario can my virtual machine spoof our physical node ip ? some one in my datacenter technical team told me we should create vlan for fip and create a seprate vlan for sip then set vlan fip and vlan sip access to switch port #1 is it right? if it is ok can some one give me the commands for this senario which create 2 spetare vlan and access them to port siwtch #1 for exaple? we have cisco 2960 48 port ,
it is each wireless access point need to have different subnet, if 24 users connect at the same time? will it be slow down if 24 user put in the same network?
Got a shiny new SG 200 26P which seems to work fine operationally.owever, when I am trying to access the web interface from a different IP subnet, the web brower just times out.If I put my PC on the same IP subnet, it works just fine. From the other subnet, I can ping the switch fine. The default gateway is set on the switch, and from the web interface I can ping and dns resolve other hosts and on the internet. I've tried to create a management profile to 'allow all from everywhere' basically, but still no luck.I'm completely stumped. I've tried to reset to firmware defaults, and I'm now runinng the latest firmware. I woudl suppose that the switch would allow itself to be managed via the web interface from all subnets by default. Any thoughts? The fact that the switch can ping internet hosts makes be believe it's own default gateway and IP are all ok and working.. (and I can ping it from anywhere in my network).
First off, let me preface this by saying that I'm a novice when it comes to firewalls and more specifically, the ASA. I do however, have an above average understanding of switches/routers.
We have an ASA 5510 running 8.3 and recently I've decided to clean up the last admin's mess. All hosts and servers are on the same subnet, multiple subnets on the same VLAN... and a slew of other problems. Anyway, I recently placed the IT department on another subnet to test some things out before I migrated other departments to different networks. Everything seems to be working as it should be with the exception of one of our servers. The IT subnet is 192.168.150.0/24 and the problem server is on the 192.168.10.xxx network. I'm guessing the issue lies somewhere in the fact this server does have a static NAT and is accessible from the public. Let me give you an overview of what our network looks like:
ISP ---->ASA----->3750----->2960
My workstation is directly plugged into the 3750 switch, and the server is plugged into the 2960. I'm able to ping this server by both IP and hostname. However, I cannot access port 80 by IP or hostname. The users that are on the 192.168.10 and 192.168.11 (sadly both of those are on the same VLAN) network are able to access this server without a problem. Thinking logically, I thought I would send a packet from my workstation, it would head to the layer 3 switch's VLAN interface corresponding to my subnet, realize the .10 network is directly connected and then forward the packet straight to the server. However, it doesn't seem to be working that way. It look like it's being routed to the ASA then being dropped. I guess there's an access rule or firewall rule preventing me from getting to the server. Is there a specific part of my config you will need to see...
I am working on a site that has recently added a new subnet and I am unable to ping any of the stations on this new network. I have configured an Exempt NAT rule just the same as the rules allowing access to other networks. I have a feeling the problem is in the Site-to-Site VPN configuration since the new subnet is at the primary location over the VPN.
In the site-to-site configuration I added the new subnet to the list of "Remote Networks" and I still can't communicate with any of the devices on the network. If I go to the main site I have no problems so it appears to be related to the VPN or a configuration in the ASA on that site.
A port scan shows that all the traffic is "filtered" so somewhere either the site ASA or the main ASA is blocking the traffic.
I have an RV042 with the PPTP server configured, which is working because I can connect with my iPad and droid phones, however, I'm unable to access resources on the RV042 side (192.168.1.X) when my local network is the same ip scheme (192.168.1.x). It works fine when I'm on a different network like 3G or someone else's Wifi network (192.168.11.X).
Main Site allows communication from Remote Site via VPN to Windows ServerMain Site also has a secondary subnet that communicates ONLY through internet but NOT to the Windows Server.Sonicwall 192.168.168.x is main siteRemote Site is 192.168.0.x connecting to Main Site to access shared folders on serverSecondary subnet at Main Site is 192.168.0.x using Windows XP PC's. They are accessing a linux server at 192.168.0.215 which Main Site has no access to.VPN remote ip's are 192.168.0.x - they can successfully access the Windows Server at 192.168.168.100 BUT NOT 192.168.0.215.GOAL: Want to connect Remote Site to Secondary subnetWilling to make router changes or whatever is necessary to get Remote Site to access Secondary Subnet with the only exception that the Secondary Subnet REMAINS.VPN DHCP is turned off but willing to turn it on.Willing to make the Linux Server 'discoverable' on the Windows Server. Don't know linux at all but another co-worker set it up and can make changes.
i cannot access the web managemnet interface of this router from a different subnet.THe WAN interface is a 4G LTE connection,I have disabled both the SPI firewall and NAT and enabled remote management from any ip address but i cannot access the admin web page from a remote subnet.Doing a port scan of the routers WAN or LAN address i cannot see any ports open at all...its as if firewall or NAT is still enabled somehow.
I can't access the bvi interface I use to manage the AP1261N from an IP address that is not in the same subnet of the bvi interface. The AP is configured as root bridge. Obviously I've the same behaviour for the non-root AP connected to it. For sure it's an ap configuration problem as other devices in the same vlan (vlan1) are reachable by the vlan I'm connected to. This is the conf:
version 15.2 no service pad service timestamps debug datetime msec
setting up an ACL on my ASA 5510 to permit access only to the Nat subnet from inside to the outside interface. This firewall is setup for the DR solution in the production network. I am applying following acl in the inbound direction on the inside interface.
permit ip any "Nat_subnet"
After appliying this acl to inside interface I observed that I can ping to the destinations in NAT'ed subnet but unable to ssh to the servers. Following is the summary of my configuration.
I have an ASA 5510 running v8.4(3)9 and have setup a remote user VPN using the Cisco VPN client v5.0.07.0410 which is working appart from the fact that I cannot access resources on a secondary subnet.The setup is as follows:
-ASA inside interface on 192.168.10.240 -VPN clients on 192.168.254.x
I can access reources on the 192.168.10 subnet but not any other subnets internally, I need to specifically allow access to the 192.168.20 subnet,[code]
Have a problem with a laptop connecting to a Wireless Router. The laptop was working fine on the last router which was on an ADSL Network.. (not that that matters),When the new router (Virgin Media / Cable) was installed all other laptops where connecting to it without any probs, but not this one.The laptop in question still receives an IP address, Subnet mask and Gateway from the router - Vista says Local only, no internet access. It cannot ping anything else on the network either. When I do ping it comes back destination host unreachable.
I have a network with 3 sites that are on different subnets. Each site has an ASA Right now, I am only able to connect to the ASA that is connected to the subnet I am connected to.I want to be able to connect to the ASA that are on the remote subnets on the address of the inside interface.The sites are connected all together by site-to-site VPN.Is there any way I can achieve that without opening the outside interface directly on the Internet?
I have a weird problem which I have already submitted a TAC ticket about. When users authenticate through AnyConnect into our HQ ASA 5510 they grab an address from 172.16.254.x. What we have been noticing intermittently is that when logged into our network through the client they are unable to access their resources at one of our remote offices which is connected over l2l to the HQ ASA. This problem just started randomly a week ago and we have been working with Cisco trying to create a solution.
My quick fix is logging into a device at the remote office which is trying to be accessed and pinging the gateway of the virtual subnet for AnyConnect users. When I ping 172.16.254.1 it goes through after a few dropped icmp packets and then the issue is resolved for about 8 hours or so.
What I am trying to do is I have one switch with say a 10.1.9.1 sub-net I need to have one of the ports to be trucked with two vlans one for DSL and the other for a local connection with the sub-net of 10.1.5.1 both of the sub-nets are configured in the core as 9 and 5 so I have port 0 set up as a trunk and it is set up as ge-0/0/0.0 vlan_5, vlan_192 on the 10.1.9.1 subnet switch. The DSL is working but the local is not pulling a 10.1.5.1 IP and has no connectivity. Everything looks as if it is configured correctly but still the DSl is working but not the Local connection.
I have two offices connected with an IPSEC VPN tunnel using RV220W routers. The Tunnel works fine for local users between the two sites(Site 1:10.0.0.x; site 2 is 10.0.2.x). I have also set up PPTP users for remote access. PPTP users that connect to site 1 cannot access site 2 and vice versa. The PPTP users have no trouble accessing the resources on the site that they connect to. I have tried activating RIP and adding various static routes with no success. If I PPTP connect to site 1 and I tracert to an IP address on site 2 the route goes to the site 1 router and then goes to the internet(connected to the site 1 router) where it stops.
I recently installed a couple of Cisco Aironet 3600 Series Wireless Access Points at a remote site. While I was at the site everything seemed OK, The clients were able to get connected to the access points, the guest network worked fine, I could SSH into the access points, and I could ping them. The problem is when I went back to my home site I tried to SSH into the access points through an ASA IPSec VPN Tunnel and it couldn’t find it. When I try to ping the access points they “time out”. I can ping and connect all other addresses (via RDP, HTTP, etc..) on the same subnet which should rule out an access list problem. A couple of notes to be aware of:
The WAP’s have the Autonomous IOS installed (Version 15.2(2)JB) The WAP’s are connected to Dell PowerConnect 5724 (Not by choice.. We are a Cisco shop, these were already there and have plans this year to replace)
I can ping and SSH with Putty to the WAP’s from the local subnet I cannot ping or SSH from a remote subnet to the WAP’s. I can access all other IP’s and Computers from a remote subnet.
