I have two 5508 and a few hundred 1142 in our internal net. Now I bought some OEAP 600 to do tests in some small branch offices, but I would like to enable AP policies with MAC filtering to block that anyone else can connect an OEAP through our firewall. If I enable 'Accept Self Signed Certificates (SSC)' and 'Authorize MIC APs against auth-list or AAA' as suggested in Cisco document 'Aironet 600 Series OfficeExtend Access Point Configuration Guide', will that effect only my OEAP 600 or will I have to also include the MAc addresses of my internal 1142?
We have cisco 5508 office extend in dmz running code 7.3.112. 1132 AP seems to register and authenticate fine but OEAP 600 series dont seem to authenticate. they seem to join the controller and download the SSID but just wont authenticate ? not even registering on the AAA server
I have found that there are only few configuration to the Cisco Aironet 600 OEAP. The settings are just for basic configuration for a wireless network when it is in autonomous mode.
A need for a Wireless LAN Controller to perform advance settings.
Also, there are no firmware available in Cisco. No upgrade/downgrade firmware avalaible for download.
Pool of oeap 600 aps 1x 2504WLC as OEAP WLC (@DMZ) 1x ASA 5515
Scenario:
My OEAP WLC located at ASA - DMZ is NATted to a public ip (primary internet ISP), then my pool of OEAP-600 were configured to communicate with this OEAP WLC.
My question is:
I want to automate the failover of OEAP-600 (I don't know if this is possible) to the secondary internet ISP whenever the primary internet ISP fails. The secondary ISP is terminated on the same ASA 5515-X doing PBR and IP SLA stuff.
I know that OEAP 600 can only be pointed to one WLC ip address I know that the WLC can only be NATted to one public IP address.
What would be the best solution to perform the OEAP backup connectivity? Or just buy another set of WLC/ASA then just manually configure the OEAP-600 APs to point to the secondary ISP.
I have a customer looking to deploy OEAP & wants to know if it possible to disable the local ports 1-3? Reason being, they don't want the home user connecting devices & causing more support tickets to troubleshoot an Xbox or Google TV just b/c it's connected to a company provide AP/Switch. I have read all the docs & it makes no mention of this.... I can see in 7.2 the ability to disable the local SSID but no mention of the ability to shutdown ports 1-3..Also see support in 7.2 for Dual RLAN... but that still leaves 2 local ports.
I have some trouble with the setup of an oeap 600 ap. The ap has joined the controller as it should and the remote-lan connection to my corporate network works well, but i can't connect to the corporate wlan.
When i check the event log on the ap it says:
" *Oct 02 07:36:56.662: (Re)Assoc-Req from 00:1a:73:d2:82:8c forwarded to WLC, wired: no *Oct 02 07:36:56.665: received assoc-rsp for wireless client, status=0011 *Oct 02 07:37:11.712: DisAssoc-Req/DeAUTH from 00:1a:73:d2:82:8c forwarded to WLC, wired: no *Oct 02 07:37:11.713: WTP Event: Delete Mobile sent to wlc00:1a:73:d2:82:8c"
and a debug on the controller gives me:
apfMsConnTask_6: Oct 02 08:52:05.034: 00:1a:73:d2:82:7f Adding mobile on LWAPP AP ec:c8:82:c2:3a:20(0) *apfMsConnTask_6: Oct 02 08:52:05.034: 00:1a:73:d2:82:7f Association received from mobile on AP ec:c8:82:c2:3a:20 *apfMsConnTask_6: Oct 02 08:52:05.034: 00:1a:73:d2:82:7f Sending Assoc Response to station on BSSID ec:c8:82:c2:3a:20 (s tatus 17) ApVapId 1 Slot 0
The web GUI of the OEAP itself only has a single field to enter the address of a single controller.
But, I wonder if once the OEAP is talking to your WLC across the Internet, you can allocate HA settings to the OEAP so that it can fall back to a secondary WLC if your main WLC fails.
This is sort of hinted at in the docs I have read, but I have not been able to find it explicitly stated anywhere.
It would be nice to have 2 DMZ-based WLCs at two different data centres to allow remote users to have a fail-over solution, but I need to be sure that this is supported before implementing.
I have a TAC case open, but it doesn't seem to be making any progress.I upgraded my 5508 controller from 7.2.111.3 up to 7.4.100.0..Most of my APs are fine. 3500s, 1100s etc.except for 602i APs. The APs associate, they update software etc, but they won't broadcast the WLAN.An interesting thing, on the 602 AP, in the log, I see this:*Mar 06 15:08:12.667: SSID remote, WLAN Profile Name: RemoteOEAP, added to the slot[0], disabled..So the AP is definately talking to the WLC and being pushed the correct WLAN profile.On the controller, the AP shows the the Admin status of the radios is showing DOWN, but the Admin status on the AP itself shows UP
I've done a factory reset on the APs to no avail. I have a 2504 WLC as well that i'm in the process of implementing in a DMZ specificially for these APs, and for testing purposes, I associated the 602 Ap to that WLC as well. This one is running 7.4.100.0 too, same results. It would appear to be a problem with this version of software?
Only fifteen users are allowed to connect on the WLAN Controller WLANs provided on the 600 series at any one time. A sixteenth user cannot authenticate until one of the first clients de-authenticates or a timeout occurred on the controller. Note: This number is cumulative across the controller WLANs on the 600 series. For example, if two controller WLANs are configured and there are fifteen users on one of the WLANs, no users will be able to join the other WLAN on the 600 series at that time. This limit does not apply to the local private WLANs that the end user configures on the 600 series designed for personal use and clients connected on these private WLANs or on the wired ports do not affect these limits. This is from the Configuration Guide for teh 600 series Office Extend AP. Is this count per AP or total per WLC? If I have 10 APs deployed to our remote users, can each AP support two simultaneous users? Would I need to use separate WLANs for each OEAP?
I've got a strange problem here. In the office, my OEAP 600 can join WLC if there is no MAC authentication. When i enable MAC authentication at WLC, AP will fail to register. However, I try it at home and it works with both MAC authentication enable or disable. I suspect it is because of firewall in my office, but there shouldn't have any different in discovery and joining procedure for AP with MAC authentication enable or disable.
I have a Flex 7500 with 200 1142AP's working fine in remote office and local setup. We have since purchased 3 OEAP 602's and looking to distribute to teleworkers.
I have configured the OEAP to point to the NAT'd IP of the WLC, the OEAP does connect and is listed briefly in the WLC wireless listing but I am not able to make any configuration changes, it will then dissassociate and try the join process all over again. I have attached below the OEAP 600 event log. I see that the WLC does not support data DTLS encryption and looking to make this work.
I have tried to install the DTLS license file from the Cisco website, but says license failed to install, with no other errors.
*Jun 18 15:18:43.938: Build version 7.0.112.72 (compiled Feb 3 2012 at 01:56:39, [L]). *Jun 18 15:18:47.859: CAPWAP State: Init. *Jun 18 15:18:47.860: CAPWAP State: Discovery.
I have established dual-rlans on different segments.I have a 2960g switch. I created vl2 (management) and vl3 (data).I connected rlan1 (port4) to vl2 and rlan2 (port3) to vl3.My laptop receives a dhcp address on vl3 and the switch (in dhcp mode) receives it's proper address on vl2.Unfortunately a MAC is assigned to each vl and to the management interface. Thats 3 out of the 2 sets of 4.
So a managed switch is NOT the desired device to have on the back side of an OEAP600.In any case doing a show mac address-table revealed that all the vl2 MAC addresses were duplicated on vl3.To the tune of 216 addresses. 108 in each vlan. Which is a close match to the current host counts for each segment 98 + 18.Obviously this application is not what was envisioned by the OEAP team during work-up.The goal of 4 host devices on the rlan is proving difficult to achieve.The client wants 2 pc's and 2 digi-port servers.
We have two device groups ASAs for VPN accessWireless ControllersThere are 2 AAA devices in each group.
We have 4 Identity Stores
ACS Internal User Store - This is used for external suppliers doing SSL VPN on ASAsExternal Radius server - this is a two factor authentication server that in turn looks up our AD and its own internal token database. This is used for IPSEC VPN access for internal employees.We have mapped AD groups - this is used for allowing access for wireless users.LDAP group mapped from other AD domain - used for allowing wireless access to an associated organisation. Our requirements
We need to create a rule for the VPN access that first of all looks through the ACS internal store - if a user is not found there then it checks the external Radius server. If no users are found there then access is denied.We needto create a similar rule for wireless users so that it will check AD - if a user is not found there then it checks LDAP. If no users are found then access is denied.
I am trying to configure a Unified Wireless solutions with ACS 5.1 and am having trouble with the access policies. We have corporate laptops authenticating via PEAP and 7921 phones authenticating using EAP-FAST.
I have one access service configured to allow PEAP and authenticate against AD and another access service configured to allow EAP-FAST and authenticate the 7921 phones against the "internal user" database.
I have configured 2 service selection rules. Each one points to one of the access services. The only condition I have currently configured is the "protocol" field to be RADIUS. Because both the 7921 phones and the client laptops are generating RADIUS requests I can only have one EAP type working depending which rule is at the top. Because the RADIUS protocol field is always matched, requests never get past the first rule.
how I modify the rule to be able to distinguis between VoIP handsets on one WLAN and client laaptops on another so that correct access policy is used for each device?
A bit of a Catch-22 here: I am trying to delete VPN Group Policies but receive the error message that the policy is in use by a particular Connection Profile. When I try to delete the Connection Profile I receive the message that it is in use by a VPN Group Policy..
What else is there to delete or do I have to use the CLI?
Using Microsoft IAS as the auth server, how do I get the ASA (v.8.2.1) to take different user groups defined in AD, and control access to different group policies on the VPN? We're setting up the ASA for many different vendors, and need to control access for each vendor with different policy.
For example, Vendor one is in AD group Vendor1 and will only be permitted access to a specific group of defined IPs in our network. Vendor two is in AD group Vendor2 and will only be permitted access to a different group of defined IPs in our network from Vendor1.
We just upgraded to ASA 8.4.4.1 and the latest CSD image, 3.6.6203. We currently have a DAP set up to scan one group policy for a secific AV but wanted to start implementing this for all group policies and including several different flavors of AV (so anyone could connect from anywhere as long as a pre-approved AV is installed). We are going to allow about 20 different versions of different AV's and I've tested a couple already and they're successful.
My issue right now is trying to allow (or deny) AV that is installed on an Android tablet (and potentially Apple devices). The tablet has avast Mobile Security installed, and even if I select Vendor: Alwil as a whole, it still does not recognize it and denies the user. I have tested on a PC and it works fine. Is there something that I am missing or are mobile AV programs not included in the DAP policies? Is this going to be considered for future versions of CSD or ASA or are we going to continue to consider Android and Apple devices "secure" and not in need of an AV?
1. we upgraded our 5510 ASA firmware from 6.21 to 6.41
2. we also upgraded to the latest csd package (we have upgraded from 3.5.841 to 3.5.2008)
after 2 reloads, it seems that all my prelogin policies are gone ,i try enable / disable CSD and it just don't go back...i only have the default policy
I'm trying to block internet access to a range of IP addresses using the Access Control function of the DIR-655 router. Unfortunately, the router does not allow me to block a range of IPs. Instead, I can only create policies based upon individual IPs or MAC addresses. I have over 60 machines I want to block Internet access and I'd hate to have to type them in individually. How do I go about blocking all Internet access (HTTP/FTP/email/everything) for a range of IP addresses? They will have to be able to continue to use the internal LAN.
After updating the firmware of my WRVS4400N from V 2.0.1.3 to 2.0.2.1 all traffic was blocked for all machines, even some not included in the list of PCs. As the log was showing that all traffic was blocked by access policies, I disabled the only rule I had (blocking access to some sites to some MAC address list) and everything worked fine.I tried creating a new, simpler rule but after activation it blocked again all traffic for all the LAN.After many trials, I decided to roll back to the previous V2.0.1.3 which solved this problem.
Which transmit hash policies are supported by the SLM2008? I can't find this information in any of the documentation for this switch, all that is stated is that it supports Link Aggregation using IEEE 802.3ad LACP. I'm connecting to a Netgear ReadyNAS Pro that supports Layer 2 and Layer 3+4 transmit hash policies and I'm not sure which to choose (or whether it matters).
I have a fresh install of an ACS 5.4 virtual appliance. This ACS instance will only be used for TACACS+ AAA for network device administration. It is up and running on the network. I have time, timezone, NTP and DNS configured. ACS admin accounts and logging are configured. I created an internal user, a network device, a network device group, an internal identity group, a shell profile, and command set. It is joined to the Enterprise Active directory domain, and a couple of AD groups have been selected for use in policies.The default network device is enabled and configured with a TACACS secret. I have a lab router configured and pointed at ACS and I can SSH to it with the ACS internal user.The problem is: I can’t create any rules for any policies. If I try to add a rule (or edit a default rule) to the “Service Selection Rules” or “Default Device Admin” or Identity, group mapping or authorization, all I get is a popup with the message “Resource not found or Internal Server error”. If I click “customize” anywhere I just get empty selection/transfer boxes. If I try to change to a single result policy from compound rules I get a “System failure – your changes were not saved” message. I have installed this twice now with the same results.This is my first experience with ACS. I’ve gotten through most of the configuration guide but I don’t know ACS well enough to know if I’m missing something incredibly obvious, or whether it’s just broken.
I'm trying to set up a S2S VPN between two ASA5505 SP units running ASA Version 8.2(1). I've ordered additional ADSL2 lines to handle this traffic and I'm having troubles with the configuration for the additional PPPoE connection. Here is are extracts from my current config; First the interface vlans
The result being that I can ping the OUTSIDE interface, but get no reply from the VPN interface. I've checked ADSL lines, they are up. The two PPPoE sessions are logged in and active. I can even see the ICMP packets hit the VPN interface, but there is no reply.
I am having some troubles finding information about how to configure firewall policies (rules, chains, etc.) via telnet on a RV016. The reason for that is that i keep getting some log entries "connection refused - policy violation" and "blocked" even with my firewall wide open (only allow rules on all interfaces, SPI and block wan request disabled, multicast and https enabled, etc.... ). Also, with these exact same rules, i can only connect via PPTP with the firewall disabled. The minute i tick the enable option the tunnel never gets to authentication phase. I then started reading OpenRG manual and many things are quite similar, but some other entries are missing from that manual (maybe some changes made by cisco?). I am trying to figure out some service ids, chains (e.g. the rv016 has some rules redirecting to chains 10, 100, 200 but i can not find them anywhere), and so on. I have only one rv016 and about 60 connections to it so i can not experiment that much without having the whole company on my neck with internet problems.
We have an ASA 5525 running version 8.6(1)2 and a 10 MG pipe. I have execs that want to limit bandwidth on users for stuff like youtube, stream media, and downloads. I found the article on ‘Bandwidth Management(Rate Limit) Using QoS Policies’ so it appears our firewall can do what we want. I’m not a cisco person. My knowledge is limited when it comes to configuration – that’s why we have SmartNet.
Can bandwidth be limited on end users and/or can they limit the ‘bandwidth rate limit’ to just youtube, steaming media, and downloads? If so, what should the limit be? and I’m assume this would be for ‘incoming’ traffic only? we’re running into some bandwidth hogs – usually youtube and/or streaming media. We have a Barracuda web filter which we’ve used to block and monitor activity but I simply do not have time to babysit this all day. I should also mention we do have critical data running up and down the pipe; such as credit card processing, DB replication between in house DB and hosted website, TPCx and EDI, FTP, and such that we don’t want restricted.
I have a Cisco ASA 5505 that I've setup with an SSL VPN. This is for personal use, and I therefore don't have need for anything more than local authentication. [code]
I'd like to have one profile/policy where I only encrypt data going to my split-tunnel ACL, and I'd like to have one profile/policy where I encrypt all traffic.
The issue ive been fighting is - it doesn't seem like its possible to associate more than one group policy per user. If it IS possible - can you tell me how I associate both groups to my local account?
I have configured policies to shape the traffic on the interface of cisco 7206 router. Now my managemet wants to configure these policies on time based ie policy should be applicable during specified time period onle. Is it possible? if yes how to configure it?
I am trying to create a VPN between an SRP547W and a Cisco IOS router, in this case a UC540.I am running firmware 1.2.4 (003) Jan 11 2012. Now I can do this with an SRP527W and many other routers successfully. Including other IOS routers 1801, 1941 etc.
The issue I have is on the SRP547W I cannot create more than one IPSec Policy through a single IKE policy. I require this to route multiple v lans to our remote site. When I try to add an additional IPSec Policy I am give the error "IKE policy has been used by other IPSec policy"
This is possible to do on the SRP527W with latest firmware. I have tried rolling back to earlier firmware but instead I am given an error about overlap. Latest release note for this firmware suggest this issue was already resolved.
I am looking for a way to create different routing policies for vlans on a 3750 table.
My set up is
Clients----------- 3750 -------------- ASA ---------------Servers | | | Internet Routers
What i am trying to do is on the 3750 to route private networks to my ASA on different subintefaces and all internet to my internet routers . Each VLAN has a different GW for the internet. On some case i have the ASA as a default gateway. ASA default default route is 3750 where i need the internet traffic to be spllited on the proper Boarder router.
determine whether I have QoS properly setup on my router, and why the rules do not appear to be taking effect.ISSUE We have a couple of laptops, smartphones, and a Wii on our home network. One device, my roommate's laptop, is a real bandwidth hog. It's connected (via internet, not VPN) to a work server and is frequently downloading and syncing large datafiles and media files.Unfortunately, when that laptop is downloading the other devices either cannot connect to the internet without timing out, or is VERY slow, for example pulling up websites like google.com. When that laptop is offline, everything works fine. It seemed like enabling QoS would resolve our problem.\
SETUPLinksys E1000, latest firmware (v2.1.02), using WPA2-Personal security.
We first tried enabling QoS and setting the MAC address of the downloading laptop to "low" priority and all others to "medium". No luck - the downloading laptop still seems to be hoarding the bandwidth.We also tried adding the download application to the list and setting the port to "low". Still no luck.We added a new application called "web" and set port 80-81 to "high", but that didn't work.We then disabled WMM support. No dice. The other devices still can't connect while my roommatte's laptop is syncing.We've fiddled around with the settings a bit, but no matter what, it looks like the QoS rules are not being applied.And is it acceptable to have multiple categories (MAC and application) in the QoS rules?
We have ASA5500's deployed for remote access concentration.We use Cisco IPsec vpn client with a group policy the chacks for Network ICE BlackIce ersonal firewall.The powers-that-be wish to change to McAfee presonal Firewall ok..Now the Group Policy allows you to check for several pre- configured Firewalls, Cisco Integrated, Sygate, Zone Labs etc.So as McAfee are no listed then I am to assume we go for "Custom Firewall" and this is where I am struggling.To configure checking for a Custom Firewall I must have the Vendor ID and the Product ID.McAfee haven't the faintest idea what we're talking about when we ask them for these details.Or is there a way to extract them from the registry of a machine with the McAfee product installed?
