Cisco AAA/Identity/Nac :: ACS 5.1 - How To Configure Rules To Allow 802.1x And Device Access
Aug 21, 2011
I am new to ACS 5.1.I need to configure the ACS to act as the 802.1x authentication Server, as well as, act as the Radius Server for the authentication and authorization process when I access the switch.
I had created Two rules (under the Access policy) to cater for the two scenario, it will always "stuck" at the 1st rule. For e.g. Rule-1 is meant for the 802.1x, Rule 2 is meant for the AAA process. When I tested with 802.1x, it worked perfectly. But when I tested to login to the switch, it always failed. Based on the log, Rule1 is not able to fulfill my requirement (of course it can't). I thought the rules check process will proceed with Rule-2, but apparently it did not.
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Apr 14, 2011
I have ACS 5.2 running as a VM. I'm AD, then local authentication successfully for device access, but I want to define ACS user groups to restrict login. I don;t see any way to do this. If I use AD groups, they don;t show up as selection options on the policy screens, just the ACS locallyy defined groups.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 5, 2011
I'm looking for Cisco ISE v1.1 to use the following licensing feature. url...Endpoint is dynamically profiled by Cisco ISE and assigned dynamically or statically to an endpoint identity group. Cisco ISE authorization rules do not use this endpoint identity group.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 30, 2010
We are using ACS ver 4.2 and trying to setup users with limited access to our switchs and routers. Here is what we did:
1) Created a user in ACS
2) Create Shell command Autorization Set - ReadOnly
Unmatched Commands - Deny
Commands Added
show
exit
* this should limit the user to the show and exit command only (correct)?
3) Created a group - HelpDesk with the following TACACS+ Settings
Shell (exec) is checked
Priviledge level is check with 15 as the assigned level
Assign a Shell Command Authorization Set for any network device - selected
ReadOnly - shell command autorization set seleted
When the user logs on to the router/switch it appears that he has full access. He can enter the enable command, config terminal command, etc. All we want him to be able to do is to issue the show command.
View 13 Replies
View Related
Oct 15, 2012
I have a question reguarding the Cisco Secure ACS 5.2 and network access vs device admin access. We have our switches,routers,and firewall configured to use TACACS+. We also have configured our Wireless LAN Controller to use RADIUS for allowing for 802.1X authentication to the wireless network. We are using Active Directory for the backend user database and have assigned the users to different groups in AD. We have a Network Admins group to access the network devices and a Wireless Users to access the WLAN. The problem that we have is that everyone in the Wireless Users group can access the devices and run full commands on them. We want to limit the Wireless Users group from being able to do this. Is there a policy or config change that we will need to make for this?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2012
I have 2 types of network, DC & Office. I have 3 types of users NOC, Office & DC. Office network devices are in Office NDG, DC network devices are in DC NDG. Becasue of such config, Office network users can only access Office devices & DC network users can only access DC network devices....Now i have NOC users, who wants access to both Office & DC network devices. How can i achieve this?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 25, 2012
I am having trouble setting nat rules on device SRP527W-U with the latest firmware 1.2.4 (003). The latest firmware 1.2.4 has introduced the possibility to create specific nat rules via "ACL policy rules". I am trying to use this "new feature" not available in the older releases to get my network configuration done. The configuration I would like to do is to have two different vlan. In the vlan1 I would like to nat the PCs via the point_to_point interface and in the vlan2 I don't want use nat feature so each computer will be reachable via public ip address. I have configured two different PVCs on the device.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 21, 2012
I'm running an ISE 1.1.1 and i need to authenticate guest users.The goal is apply different Authorization profile to the same guest user based on the thevice he use to connect to the guest wlan.
I.E.:
if guest user "user1" connect to the guest WLAN using a windows laptop, than apply "Guest" authorization profile
if guest user "user1" connect to the guest WLAN using an Apple iPad, than apply "Mobile" authorization profile
I've tried to deployed the following 2 authorization policy:
1)if "Apple-Device" and "IdentityGroup:Name EQUALS Guest" then "Mobile"
2)if "Guest" then "Guest"
but the first rule never match and even if I use and iPad to access the guest network the "Guest" authorization Profile is matched
I've verified that the iPad is correctly recognized as an Apple-Device changing for test purposes the rule table in
1)if "Apple-Device" then "Mobile"
2)if "Guest" then "Guest"
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 6, 2011
I had insatalled the ACS 5.2 on Vmware . As per my requirement i need to configure a user to restricted privilege so that he should be able to execute only the below commands on the switch .
-Show ver
-Show interfaces
-Show ip Interface Brief
-Configure terminal
-Interface <interface name >
-Shutdown
-No shutdown
The users should not be authorized to execute any other commands than above listed one .After the configuration i was not able to restrict the config mode commands . Once the user is authoized for Configure terminal access he will have full access on the device. How to configure the command set only to allow interface access and he should be able to apply Shutdown and No shutdown command .
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 1, 2013
I'm trying to configure ACS 5.4 as radius server for network access (PPP connections).In monitoring and reports the users have green color , but the clients cannot send data. Auth method is CHAP/MD5.
Allowed protocols are set to CHAP and PAP only.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 26, 2012
I have an auditor wanting a screenshot of all users that have acces to configure our firewall, I am unfamiliar with 5.1. Is there a way of running such a report on a paticular device?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 21, 2013
I have an issue about ACS v5.3 Appliance.I have an ACS v 5.3 wo authenticate wireless users, together with a cisco wlc. One profile is to corporate users and the second profile is to guest.
The corporate users should authenticate with Active Directory and the guest with WLC. Guest users should authenticate with the ACS Local Database. I have configurate two service selection policy that match with protocol Radius. The first rule is to users of Active Directory and the second is to users in
the Local Database of ACS.When i try to authenticate users with active directory is OK, but when try to authenticate users with Local Database (Guest Portal) the ACS try to find the
the internal user in the Active Directory, because math the first rule, and the second profile can not authenticate.When I change the order, first the Rule of internal users and second the rule of users of Active Directory, the internal users can authenticate in to ACS, but
the users in the Active Directory can not authenticate.I think my ACS only authenticate the first rule of radius to Active Directory, no two rules of radius in the same time. Or maybe exists an issue in OS of the ACS.The authentication by separately is OK.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 25, 2012
This does seem correct. I had 2 rules and now they are gone.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 21, 2013
I have a fresh install of an ACS 5.4 virtual appliance. This ACS instance will only be used for TACACS+ AAA for network device administration. It is up and running on the network. I have time, timezone, NTP and DNS configured. ACS admin accounts and logging are configured. I created an internal user, a network device, a network device group, an internal identity group, a shell profile, and command set. It is joined to the Enterprise Active directory domain, and a couple of AD groups have been selected for use in policies.The default network device is enabled and configured with a TACACS secret. I have a lab router configured and pointed at ACS and I can SSH to it with the ACS internal user.The problem is: I can’t create any rules for any policies. If I try to add a rule (or edit a default rule) to the “Service Selection Rules” or “Default Device Admin” or Identity, group mapping or authorization, all I get is a popup with the message “Resource not found or Internal Server error”. If I click “customize” anywhere I just get empty selection/transfer boxes. If I try to change to a single result policy from compound rules I get a “System failure – your changes were not saved” message. I have installed this twice now with the same results.This is my first experience with ACS. I’ve gotten through most of the configuration guide but I don’t know ACS well enough to know if I’m missing something incredibly obvious, or whether it’s just broken.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 27, 2010
I am looking for a way how to set the password-rules for individually for for some users or identity-groups.I just can find the global settings,Background of the requirement: We want to use password-aging for most admin-users, for some we dont want that pw expires.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Aug 25, 2012
I'm working with an ACS 5.3 and ASA 8.2.5 and i've configured several access services for webvpn and ipsec remote access profiles but i haven't found which radius attribute can differentiate among them in the service selection rules.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 1, 2012
I am struggling in some areas to work out my firewall rules for a distributed deployment. The referenced documentation is not entirely clear in my opinion. In some instances it is easy to work out what ports need to be opened eg Admin node TCP 22,80,443 for management from administrator hosts/ranges. In other instances it difficult to work out eg TCP 1521 Database listener and AQ is this for ISE nodes only or for access devices aswell
My question is whether there is a better document that details these requirements. What rules are meant to be ISE node - ISE node communications and which rules are for access device - ISE, or ISE - access device. One of the rules I am pretty confused about is the PSN CoA ports. SHould the rule be WLC - PSN on 1700 and 3799 or is it the otherway round or unidirectional?
I am pretty sure that the ports are meant to be ISE-ISE in most instances barring the PSN for Radius and CoA.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2011
I try to configure in both Clean Access Manager and Switch 3560E-24Ps on SNMP Version 2 protocol but I can't make it working together (For CAM and Switch 3560G-48Ps I can do that). [code]
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 28, 2012
I am attempting to configure Radius authentication accross a site-to-site VPN for my ASA 5510-01 for remote access.
ASA5510-1 currently has a live site to site to ASA5510-2.
ASA 5510-1 - 10.192.0.253
ASA 5510-2 - 172.16.102.1
DC - 172.16.102.10
ASA5510-01 can ping the DC and vica versa but is unable to authticate when i perform a test. ASA5510-01 can authenticate to a DC on it;s own LAN but not on the remote LAN that DC sits on.
I have double checked the 'Server Secret Key' and ports as well as various users which all work locallly. ASA5510-02 authenticates to DC with no problems.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 5, 2011
I have a Pix 501 vs. 6.3(3). I have made changes to some Access Rules that made other rules disappear. When I try to recreate them I get an error that includes "Possible duplicate entry" statement.
The rule appears to be active, so how can I resurrect it in my Access Rule list?
View 16 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2012
I have 2 static IP addresses that I'd like to point to 2 corresponding servers in my LAN. I've followed the Access Rule and One-to-One NAT instructions as best I can (screenshots of each for one of the static IP scenarios attached), but no luck. The static IPs bring the outside/WAN user to the RV180's admin login screen.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 13, 2012
When i create a rule and enable icmp in ASA inside to outside direction to testing purpose, but I can't ping outside address ,
access-list ICMP extended permit icmp any any
access-group ICMP in interface inside
LOGG:::
ping 8.8.8.8
%ASA-3-106014: Deny inbound icmp src outside:122.255.3.1 dst inside:202.124.160.1 (type 0, code 0)
%ASA-3-106014: Deny inbound icmp src outside:122.255.3.1 dst inside:202.124.160.1 (type 0, code 0)
then I have permitted icmp for return path then it works, configs and logs are followed,
access-list ICMP extended permit icmp any any
access-group ICMP in interface outside
LOGG:::
ping 8.8.8.8
%ASA-6-302020: Built inbound ICMP connection for faddr 122.255.3.1/0 gaddr 202.124.160.1/14 laddr 192.168.1.1/14
%ASA-6-302021: Teardown ICMP connection for faddr 122.255.3.1/0 gaddr 202.124.160.1/14 laddr 192.168.1.1/14
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 10, 2012
I've setup a GroupVPN and connect to the RV042 with the Shrewsoft VPN client, works like a charm as opposed to QuickVPN ;-)The firewall is configured with an explicit deny rule for RDP access to an internal server, also an explicit allow rule is created for certain IP numbers as source. I noticed that I need to create an explicit allow rule for the subnet the Shrewsoft client is using for the virtual adapter or I will not be able to access the internal server via RDP through the GroupVPN tunnel. I would think that setting up a tunnel defies the rules created for direct access on the WAN port.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 26, 2012
I have a static IP block and need to route to various servers. I know I can use 1:1 NAT or Access Rules and have success with each. The problem is my mail server. When I use 1:1 NAT, the mail is sent from the correct IP - the address of my mail server - and there is no problem with reverse lookups. However, I cannot block any ports when I use 1:1 NAT. I have tried it every way I can think of and even some suggestions in the forums that did not work. No matter how I set access rules, all port stay open in 1:1 NAT.
If I delete the 1:1 NAT rule and use Access rules to open specific ports, the mail server sends out the mail from the WAN address. The reverse DNS does not match and mail server will bounce the mail.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Nov 2, 2011
We are moving from a different vendor to ASA 5520s. So far my "training" for Cisco consists of s Cisco press book, some white papers and guides, this website, and a bunch of mistakes. So, I have what is probably a pretty basic question for most folks.
What is the difference between Firewall Access Rules and ACL/ACE? And when to use which?
for example: on my ASA 5520s I've set up an Interface for my internal LAN: 172.16.x.x., a DMZ 192.168.2.0/24, and an interface for the Internet side. The 5520 is set up as a routing firewall betwen my internal lan, DMZ, and Internet.
If I want to allow my internal users Internet access for http and https would I use a Firewall Access rule?For most of my rules allowing outbound access from my 172 LAN and DMZ and inbound access to devices in my DMZ can I mostly utilize the Firewall Access Rules?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 3, 2012
I purchased a RV180 router, and would like set the Firewall Access Rules as below
- Action: Always Allow
- Service: HTTP
- Source IP: Any
- Send to Local Server (DNAT IP): private ip (192.168.1.xx)
- Use Other WAN IP Address: Enable
- WAN Destination IP: one of public ip (different of the router WAN ip address)
- Action: Always Allow
- Service: FTP
- Source IP: Any
- Send to Local Server (DNAT IP): private ip (192.168.1.xx)
- Use Other WAN IP Address: Enable
- WAN Destination IP: one of public ip (different of the router WAN ip address)
The firewall access rules no problem within 1 hour after setting. I can access the http / ftp services by the WAN ip address. After several hours, I can't access the services.
I can set the one-to-one NAT rather than use the firewall access rules, but I would like block all other ports, and one-to-one NAT will forward all ports to the private ip address. Administrator > Logging > Firewall Logs , when I enable the settings, where can I get the log of the firewall?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 2, 2012
I have configured the access rules for RWW, RDP, HTTPS and FTP and enabled them. Cannot access the server remotely. I have configured single port forwards for all the services and that does not work either. What am I missing? I installed this new unit in place of and old WRT400N that worked fine except for needing to be rebooted frequently.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 1, 2012
I setup ASA5540 for SSL-VPN (clientless) works fine. But I try to use Client (AnyConnect) to access internal resources, it is failed. It is stiil initiate sessions from remote client IP. I need to initiate session from client IP assigned by ASA5540 box (same with Cisco VPN client connect to Cat65 SVC module). How I setup it?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 22, 2012
I have found numerous posts discussing this but have yet to find a solution. I have an RV082 with firmware 2.0.0. 2.0.0.19-tm and I need a way to limit the incoming smtp traffic to just the spam filtering company.I have a port forwarding rule to forward WAN1 port 25 traffic to 192.168.1.10.I tried to add an access rule to deny all port 25 and then added one to allow WAN1 port 25 source <spam company> destination 192.168.1.10The RV082 log screen shows the traffic allowed but it does not work. If I uncheck the 'enable' box on the DENY port 25 rule email is still blocked. Only when I uncheck the 'enable' box on the ALLOW rule does email start flowing again.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Aug 2, 2011
Our company has recently upgraded our firewall from a Borderware Steelgate v7.1 platform to a Cisco ASA 5520 platform. Needless to say the interface on the Cisco platform is much more complex and I don't have much experience working with firewalls. Our other IT guy is out of town and this is the first time I have worked on this setup.
I need to create the following access rule
I need to open port 4**0 to be allowed through the firewall from external ip address 10.XXX.XX.XXX only. Then forward port 4**0 to 10.XX.XX.XX port 80 tcp
View 9 Replies
View Related
Apr 8, 2012
I wanna block the Lan IP address(eg:192.168.2.106) to visit wan web, and allow it to lan.How can i set it in access rules?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 4, 2012
This is just a general question... is there a good way to organize the ASA's access rule list to increase its efficiency? Maybe by service or hit count (Top 10). I am using the Cisco ASDM 6.2 to manage our ASA 5520.
Looking at it looks very unappealing and I'm in the process of adding names and descriptions to all the Network Objects.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2012
I'm having trouble setting up the correct rules on an ASA 5505 I'm using in my home office. I have a couple of IP Cams I need to access remotely.
I've tried setting up simple NAT(PAT) and/or Access Rules, but it hasn't worked. I have a single dynamic IP for the Outside interface. Call it 77.76.88.10 and I am using PAT. The CAM is setup to connect on port 80, but could be configured if necessary. I've tried setting up NAT Rules using ASDM as follows:
Match Criteria: Original Packet
Source Intf = outside
Dest Intf = inside
[Code]....
I'm afraid to use CLI only because I am not confident I'll know how to remove changes if I make a mistake.
View 9 Replies
View Related
