We will be upgrading from 4.x to 5.x and need to verify if any needed ports will have to be alllowed through the firewalls. Is there a list of required ports somewhere, I have searched but am coming up empty-handed.
View 2 Replies
We have an ASA 5505. 5505 comes with two default vlans 1&2 with each of them marked as inside & outside respectively.My query is , if i do not want to use vlans on 5505 and only want to use the Ethernet ports as pure physical layer 3 ports, is it possible?i.e. i want to assign a layer 3 ip address on eth0/0 and eth0/1 and make them as the inside & outside interfaces rather than vlans. is it possible to do away with vlans in 5505 & will it work otherwise?
View 3 Replies View RelatedIs there a way to associate spare firewall ports with another port that is being used..For example...int gi 0/2 is being used currently for my web dmz. Its ip is 192.168.10.1..Is there a way for me to associate gi 0/3 with the same layer 2 as gi 0/2 ?
In my webdmz I use 2 ACE 4710 proxys in FT mode. I used a layer 2 switch to connect firewall and proxys together.
I would like to eliminate this switch if possible..and connect both 4710's (layer 2) direct to firewall.If I could make gi0/2 - 4 part of the same vlan, then I would be good to go.
I am setting up six ISE 3355 appliances 3 in one datacenter 3 in another. They have just installed a new server farm infrastructure using Nexus 5596 and Nexus 2248TP top of rack switches.I have been looking for documentation on how to do NIC teaming on the 3355 or some way to connect Gig0 to FEX101 and Gig1 to FEX102. Or do I just setup a port channel using LaCP between the two different FEX groups?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am having difficulties implementing Mac-auth on selected ports between an HP ProCurve 2510 and Cisco ACS 5.3.The 802.1x works just fine, but for selected ports I need to implement port-access with MAC-based authentication instead of regular 802.1X (yeah, I know, but this line of ProCurve switches only support one auth-mechanism per port!).The switch successfully forwards interesting MAC-auth requests for authentication to the ACS with CHAP/MD5, but the ACS reports this:
Logged At:
April 16,2012 1:20:48.080 PM
RADIUS Status:
Authentication failed : 22056 Subject not found in the applicable identity store(s). NAS Failure:
Username:
002655886b3d MAC/IP Address:
00-26-55-88-6b-3d Network Device:
[code].....
The ACS is configured to use the Internal Hosts database, where the client computer is configured like this;MAC-address: 00-26-55-88-6B-3D
I have setup an Identity Firewall on a ASA version 5.6 on a DMZ interface.I have installed the ADAgent on a domain member Win2008 and configured as follows: [code]
where ashdew is a domain user and ACL 122(only one line) is applied on the dmz interface and NAT is properly configured.The ADagent has been properly tested and ASA can register to it.The ASA can connect to AD DC controller and query user database.I have placed a laptop ip 172.17.h.x on the DMZ and can ping the DMZ interface.
The laptop cannot authenticate on the domain and the asa does not seem to retrieve the user identity.Do I need to add extra rules in the access-list 122 to permit trafic to DC?Can I check on the AD Agent if it can retrieve the user to ip mapping ?
I am configuring TACACS Authentication on Cisco 3550 switch .It has Version 12.2(25)SEA IOS image. A strange thing is happening, whenver I am enabling AAA new-model on this switch, and then after enabling I see ruuning-config . It shows me this
tacacs-server host x.x.x.x
tacacs-server host x.x.x.x
no tacacs-server directed-request
tacacs-server key 7 xxxxxx
radius-server source-ports 1645-1646
* included here to hide the specific information I dint specified any RADIUS server , why it is showing me radius-server source-ports 1645-1646 after enabling AAA New-Model As soon as i give "no aaa new-model", this parameter also vanishes. I think this is the only reason I am not able to do tacacs authentication.
There is a PIX firewall and it has this configured on it.static (inside,outside) tcp interface 3389 192.168.1.250 3389 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0.This line of code works ok for port 3389 but I want all tcp ports to be translated. Not just 3389.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have setup new ip camera system and as per our vendor to access the camera from outside we need to open,TCP ports and in firewall and forward to our camera server.
Let say our public ip address is 207.114.111.22 and our local ip address for the camera is 11.11.1.30. We have cisco asa 5510.
I have a question with regard to setting up the ID firewall on the ASA 5585 in a single forest, multiple domain windows network.Currently I have a semi-operational IDF at the top level but can't find users on the lower other domains, here is the setup:I have 3 domains.
[URL]
Both domains have a two way parent-child trust and I can look for users in AD Users/Computer on both domains. I initially setup the ASA to look at domain1.test.com using an LDAP aaa-server per the IDF instructions, and then proceeded to configure the ad-agent. I installed the adagent on the domain1.test.com domain controller configured the settings on that system and had no problem adding users to the firewall and getting functionality within domain1. I looked to see if I could see domain 2 and domain 3 users and found none. I went ahead and added the domain2 system to the adagent on the DC and the system says that it is up, but when I search for users is not pulling them from domain2. Instead, it shows domain1 users as domain2user1. I also configured another adserver in the ASA to search ldap on domain 2 to no avail.The cisco documentation states the following:•Before you configure even a single domain controller machine using the adacfg dc create command, ensure that the AD Agent machine is first joined to a domain (for example, domain J) that has a trust relationship with each and every domain (for example, domain D[i]) that it will monitor for user authentications (through the domain controller machines that you will be configuring on the AD Agent machine). Single Forest, Multiple Domains—All the domains in a single forest already have an inherent two-way trust relationship with each other. Thus, the AD Agent must first be joined to one of the domains, J, in this forest, with this domain J not necessarily being identical to any of the domains D[i] corresponding to the domain controller machines. Because of the inherent trust relationship between domain J and each of the domains D[i], there is no need to explicitly configure any trust relationships.Reading that it sounds like it should just work. I had everything properly configured before I installed the adagent, but I'm guessing that there is a chance that you can't have the adagent on the top level DC and get to communicate with the lower level domains.
We are using the newest release of AD Agent (1.0.0.32.1, built 598). The ASA Firewalls 5520 are having the software release 8.4(3)8 installed.When somebody tries to connect thru the Identity based firewalls from a citrix published desktop environment (PDI) the connection is not possible. Checking the ip-of-user mapping on the firewalls (show user-identity ip-of-user USERNAME) mostly doesn't show the mapping of the USERNAME and the PDI the user is logged in. The user-of-ip mapping of the PDIs IP-address shows mostly other users, which then are used to authenticate the acces thru the firewalls.
What is interesting, that on the AD Agent using "adacfg.exe cache list | find /i "USERNAME"" i can't see the PDIs IP-address neither because it is mapped to another user.Is Citrix Published Desktop environment supported to connect thru Identity based Firewalls? How AD Agent, Domain Controllers and Firewalls are working together? On the firewalls with "show user-identity ad-agent we see, the following:
-Authentication Port: udp/1645
-Accounting Port: udp/1646
-ASA Listening Port: udp/3799
Why Cisco does use 1645 and 1646 and not 1812 and 1813?The Listening Port is used for what purpose? we tried the AD Agent modes full- download and on-demand with the same effect.
I have just configured identity firewall on our ASA 5510.I have 3 nodes that authenticates against Active Directory, using the Windows Server 2008 R2 builtin Network Policy Server: A laptop, a stationary PC, and a Android Phone. All 3 nodes are authenticated using the same user/password.
Now, in ASDM -> Monitoring -> Properties -> Identity -> Users, I can see two of the nodes with my user name attached to it, namely the laptop and the stationary PC.But not the Android phone.
Then it dawned on me. To set up the ADAgent properly, you have to apply 2 group policy entries. Unfortunately, those 2 entries are applied to the Computer Configuraton part of the Group Policy.This means that your COMPUTER has to be a member of your domain for USER IDENTITY to work.So my Android phone and other nodes not a member of the AD Machine Store will never be detected by identity rules, and can roam the network free.
We have a DVR here at work that has a web interface on port 100. From our internal network we just use http:192.168.100.40:100. What is the best way to set that up on cisco 5510 firewall. I have cisco asdm and set a access rule: enabled=checked ; source=any ; destination= 192.168.100.40 ; service= tcp 100 ; action=permit. It shows a couple of hits when I go to [URL]
View 7 Replies View RelatedOur cisco asa 5510 getting sometimes boot and sometimes not. sometimes LED on port comes back if boot and sometimes not. what are the parameter should be check to rectify problem.
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe have a client that is running a PC on a internet over satellite. To avoid any unessecery traffic over the satellite link (data traffic is quite expensive), we've suggested to use a 5505, as we had one handy already.
So basically what we wanted was to block everything outgoing and everything ingoing, except for example port 22 (ssh).
But I'm struggling a bit, since this is my first cisco router to be configured.
My interfaces are as follows.
Outside - DHCP
Inside (port 1) - 192.168.1.1
I'm only running ipv4.
in ASDM I made a static NAT rule for port 22, being forwarded to 192.168.1.5 (the computer)
in Access rules I made under outside (incomming rules) source=any destination=outside service=ssh action=permit
But when I try to add further rules to block everything else, it takes the SSH on port 22 with it. How should I do this the easiest way?
the hardware setup is pretty straight forward.
sat-terminal(with IP 192.168.0.1 running DHCP) -> 5505 (outside IP=DHCP - inside IP=192.168.1.1) -> computer (IP=192.168.1.5)
I wish to set up a ASA5505 with QoS, and to allow specific port numbers to have priority going through compared to rest of the traffic. Eg ports 21, 80, 443. So for example if im maxing out a torrent, it doesnt impact web traffic etc.The current link its connected to is 100mbit/2.5mbit connection..
View 1 Replies View RelatedI just finished implementing a VOIP install and I am trying to setup some softphones and in order to allow the softphones to work I need to open some specific ports for outbound. I am not a Cisco guy, I am a Windows Administrator that also has to maintain my Cisco infrastructure.
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe're trying to get a remote access setup for someone who needs to have access from offsite. To make things easy we set it up with a virtual machine running Windows 7 and RDP. Because the "other end" isn't our computer and we've had some difficulties with people using the Cisco VPN client successfully, we were just going to set up a machine as a RDP Gateway and forward the port through the firewall (WebVPN might be nice, but the plugins only do RDP through v5.x). I've tried this on 8.4-1 and after reinstalling the latest 8.2, and supposedly the NAT works and there is a firewall rule allowing access from the outside to the RD-GW server on HTTPS, but the ASA is still blocking those packets. I've looked at 4 howtos and followed them, trying from the console and from ADSM (and one trashed the whole setup, probably related to the reinstall of 8.2) - [code]
View 4 Replies View RelatedI've an ASA 5505 as my gateway for my internet at home. I've one public IP, so I use Port Address translatetion for my internal clients.
Now i wanna setup a FTP server, on a internal client. I will use Filezilla FTP server. I'm running the FTP server in passive mode, since the FTP server would be behind my ASA firewall/nat device.
I need 50 ports for the passive mode to be running.
I will use port range 50000-50050. I can easy make a firewall rule (access-list) that permit that port range.
But how do I PAT(NAT) a port-range on the ASA device? I can only figure out how to NAT one port at the time.
I have an ASA 5505 with ASA version 7.2(2) and ASDM version 5.2(2) and I am attempting to open ports 88 and 5445 and forward them to the IP address of my DVR. This is all new for me. I see several posts for other software version to do this same thing but my version appears to be older?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to forward both TCP and UDP ports 3074 but it looks like I can only have either TCP/3074 or UDP/3074 open one at a time. When I try to enter the UDP/3074 NAT statement, I get "ERROR: NAT unable to reserve ports". [code]
View 4 Replies View RelatedI need to forward some ports for remote desktop and remote outlook which I host on an internal server. I have looked all over the web and got close, but no hints on how to do it in the asa 8.2. there is an 8.3 guide, but it is just different enough to not work. I am new to this device and cli.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am trying to configure a new 5505 but I am having difficulties opening ports that allow traffic in from the outside. My setup is Comcast Business Modem (w/ single static IP) -> ASA (10.0.0.1) -> (dumb) Switch -> NAS (10.0.0.10). I am attemping to open port 5001 to the NAS. I am very new to IOS so I have mostly been working in ASDM. Not sure if I am overcomplicating this for myself or what but I am stuck.
My running config is -
ASA Version 8.2(5)
!
hostname ciscoasa
enable password 8Ry2YjIyt7RRXU24 encrypted
[Code].....
is it possible to convert the any two ports of asa5520 as L2 ports . If so kindly let me know how that should be done. We are planning to connect our hsrp switches to these switch ports instead of using a separate switch thats why.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to configure a recently purchased Barracuda Web Filter, After adding the IP address, DNS Server, Default Gateway and the new setings, I am now trying to configure my Corporate Firewall..I do not know what Coporate Firewall the manual is reffering too.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI would like to know how can we allow traffic on ports 3389 (rdp) and 8007 which comes from any to 192.168.2.10 but pretend to be a Phones interface 192.168.2.1? [code]
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have a network with multiple servers behind a PIX with 6.3 on it. I have one public IP address, and I'm using NAT. I'm currently trying to port my Exchange server to a cloud host, and the vendor is requiring I open up a wide range of ports for MAPI, basically ports 1024 on. What would be the command to forward all of the trafic cominto/from that broad range? if I could simply route all trafic to and from their two IP addresses to my email server, that would accomplish the same end goal.
View 3 Replies View Relatedwhat are default ports are open on asa 5520 from outside interface (Zero level Security ) to inside interface (Security level 100)
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have an ASA 5501 running latest code. Per the article at [URL], I need to open the below ports. I have 5 Xboxes (when people come over) and they all have a static IP. My network is 192.168.0.x and is a /24 network.Xbox LIVE requires the following ports to be open: Port 88 (UDP)Port 3074 (UDP and TCP)Port 53 (UDP and TCP)Port 80 (TCP)port 1863 (UDP and TCP) (Kinnect) I defined the various network ports as a service and then created 5 hosts called xbox1, 2, etc with a static IP. I dont have access from the command line (forgot telnet and ssh passwords) , so from the gui, what do I do next?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI'm working on setting up a PBX server in our office, and I'm having trouble getting a port opened for SIP on my ASA 5505.I created static NAT rule for SIP traffic from internal server to the outside IP address.I created access rules on outside interface to forward port 5060 to internal PBX server (192.168.1.8)I also disabled sip packet inspection on the ASA.I'm still receiving a message from the PBX that the firewall is configured incorrectly.
[code]....
How to create a mixed service ports on ASA 8.4(2)?I need to create a service group which has ICMP, TCP ports and also different UDP ports.Normally you would create different service group based on TCP/UDP/TCP-UDP/ICMP/Protocol and add then to new nested service group.But I want to create a new service group where you can define everything without the need to different service groups and nesting them into a new one.
View 1 Replies View RelatedTrying to get port forwarding going using ASDM 6.4 on a Cisco 5510
I want to forward port 25/Smtp to 192.168.1.10
I have added all the rules as outlined in the link below. [URL]
But when running an open port checker on [URL]
It says the port is closed, I have noticed that under Access Rules under the Hits columns it says 52 ?
I need to open some outbound ports in order for our CCTV company to receive alarms from our internal CCTV Machine.
The ip addresses of the company who access the CCTV are as follows:
213.130.134.56
81.130.198.97
The above are fixed IP addresses. The internal machine is on 192.168.204.170
The outbound ports that I need to open are the following:
TCP
21
23
80
5201
UDP
1025
2074
2075
I have access to the current config if needs be.
