I have 2 CSS 11501 providing load-balancing rules and SSL termination. When CSS is used for downloading through the rules of SSL, the rates I get are quite lower than those obtained when the download is done either directly on the machine or by using the rules of HTTP. Is it normal? Is there anything that canspeed up this process?
View 2 Repliesit's possible to clear stickies per VIP? The firmware is 08.20
View 2 Replies View Relatedi need to enable snmp on Cisco CSS 11501.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am load balancing Terminal Server Windows 2008 sessions with an CSS 11501. The code version is sg0750004 (07.50.0.04). I am trying to establish a Terminal Server session with Single Sign-On (SSO), but without success. Normal login with Username and Password on the TS are functionning, but never SSO session. The environment is: 10 Windows 2008 Terminal Servers (NTS1, NTS2,NTS3...). In DNS I have a host A named TS with IP for balanced CSS. The problem I see is that the client PC opens a TS session to "TS". then dont work SSO, but if client PC open a TS session to NTS1, NTS2...is working fine the SSO I am not sur if we can do something on the CSS.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have 2 CSS, 1 as primary and 2nd as standby. I configured the standby CSS as my old standby CSS box and now wanted to test the faliover. I am not aware of how to test it in. ny how i have cr for that.
View 1 Replies View Relatedsome misconfiguration (?) may be the reason for an undesired behaviour we are experiencing with our Cisco CSS 11501s. Balancing mechanisms work fine, however if a service transitions to the "down" state, the corresponding flows remain "alive" leading to a temporary outage of our service. Subsequent client requests are still being sent to the "down" frontend which is unresponsive.
View 4 Replies View RelatedWe have a pair of CSS 11501,Currently it is using source ip for load balancing and 5 servers as backend , however we have users loggin in using http and based on its source IP (ISP PROXY) , it is forwarded to SERVER A.However, we have a SSL page and when the client switches over to SSL , it is forwarded to SERVER B/C/D/E based on its source IP ( REAL CLIENT IP) .This will cause the user to be terminated as the 5 servers are independent and not running in a cluster.
Is there any way that we can use the X-Forwarded-For address to load balance so that when users loging , they are sent to SERVER A (Based on X-Forwarded-For Header IP which translate to REAL CLIENT IP).This way we are able to also send it back to the same server when it uses SSL.I believe that we should be able to load balance using X-Forwarded-For IP or to rewrite the X-Forwarded-For IP into client source IP.
implementation of the cisco CSS 11501 boxes available as spare on our site into production for an application evry thing worked as expected. i was able to telnet the active/master box and was able to console both master and backup box from the console port.however a week post the activity im faced with this weird problem where im not able to take console or the telnet access of my primary/active box.The boxes are working in BOX-to-BOX redundancy and now im not able to telnet or console my active/master box. The telnet and console window prompts me for username and password and after entering the credentials nothing happens. no prompt or no error message is displayed.
The telnet primary authentication is via tacacs and secondary is via local. however for console im not using any method for primay authentication and local for secondary authentication. however i can successfully console my backup box. below are my obsrvations 1. the left and right status LED on the active CSS box is OFF.- it means my CSS 11501 failed and has no power. 2. upon firing the rcmd command with show line command on backup box i see that the telnet sessions and console session is established with the master box3. the redundancy state of the active box says it is master and has not changed state since my last activity, no application issue reported, all the services are active on the active box and also i can ping the active box ip address from my backup box over which box to box redundancy is established. This confirms the active box is functioning well 4. i initially thought the telnet sessions are not getting cleared, however the show line cmd with the rcmd cmd on the backup box confirms this is not happening. now im stuck as the active box cannot be accessed at all via console or telnet. i was thinking of below steps to be carried out.1. to failover the boxes and make the backup as master2. then try to take the faulty box off the network and troubleshoot (are there any other commands that i should use to troubleshoot)3. if nothing works try rebooting the box and check
NOTE: the software running is version 7.20.30.3 with standard feature set. we are not using cvdm or the CSS GUI. we could access the css initially on CSS gui and that is also not working now.
we would like to setup FTP server over CSS where our member sever use non-std-port to open both control/data channel (i.e. 6370 as ctrl and 6369 as data this case.) but seems we only get Passive mode FTP mode work only but not for Active mode FTP case for data channel establishement for server back to client..
# sh ver
Version: sg0820501 (08.20.5.01)
Flash (Locked): 08.10.1.06
Flash (Operational): 08.20.5.01
Type: PRIMARY
Licensed Cmd Set(s): Standard Feature Set
[code]....
I generated a wildcard certificate for my company type *. [URL] in a CSS 11501. For the site [URL] worked fine, for the site [URL] didn't worked. I read on the web that should generate a wildcard certificate with subject alternative names. Is it possible in CSS? how can I do it?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI've got an issue with a CSS 11501 where, if *any* change is made to a global keepalive (active), the device reboots. The code is 08.10.2.05. I'm unable to search the TAC archive or I would've gone there first.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have 2 pair of 11501 switches and 1 pair of 11503 switches on 3 sites(LA, China, Taiwan).Each site has a pair of 1105x switch running as redundancy between them and is a standalone which will not interact with others.Recently a series of interfaces(ports) down happened to every active 1150x switches without any reason and log.Especially today, it happened to active switches at 5:39 AM meanwhile on 3 sites.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am trying to get a sample command output of "show chassis inventory" for:
CSS 11501
CSS 11503
CSS 11506
I could not able to download a 1.5 GB of file size.Its getting interrupted while 30 mb or so ...I have tried in wireless connectivity & even wired internet connectivity as well.I dont understand wether the problem with IE or with internet connection provider or my IT administrators restricted the download functionalities for my user name ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have Ace 4710 version A4.1.1 and I am experiencing interesting problem with GUI and SSH reachability. I am unable to connect to management vlan3000. Interesting is that I can ping from ACE to network but unable to ping or SSH or HTTPS to ACE. Everything seems good. ARP is ok, switch is OK, line is up, protocol is up. Management is enabled for icmp, https, ssh to any.
When I do show interface I noticed line Config download failures : 9.
Hardware type is VLAN MAC address is 00:1e:68:1e:bc:db Virtual MAC address is 00:0b:fc:fe:1b:01 Mode : routed IP address is 10.168.0.18 netmask is 255.255.255.128 FT status is active Description:Management VLAN MTU: 1500 bytes Last cleared: never Last Changed: Mon Jan 21 16:48:54 2013 No of transitions: 5 Alias IP address not set Peer IP address is 10.168.0.19 Peer IP netmask is 255.255.255.128 Assigned on the physical port, up on the
[Code] ....
I have Verizon DSL. Since I've gotten it turned on in my new apartment it's been randomly DCing, I had a tech come out and tell me it was because I'm too far from the central office(thought I'm only a mile from the office?) and I needed to call and get my mbps reduced from 10, to 5. So, I called and did that and I was still having the same issue. Today another tech came out, told me the same thing, but I needed to be reduced to 3, and left. I called and got it reduced again. They said it should be 3-5 and I was at 5-7. So, now my download speed is actually higher than it was when I was 5-7(it was at 3 mbps usually, now it's 5), but my ping has doubled. Pages are taking longer to load, and when I play any games online there's a noticeable delay. I have been DCing less often, but it's still happening.
View 14 Replies View RelatedI buy new Cisco Modem X2000.I face several problem:
1- When i enter to any website for example (Facebook), When i check remember me, It's not working if i exit and enter again ( No Cookies).
2- I can't download application in iPhone and Android phones.
I have a Mac and a PC in my home wireless network. ATT Uverse provides me with 16 MB/s internet access. I use the ATT wireless modem/router.With the Mac my download speed is almost 16 MB/s so everything seems working well.With my PC (WIN XP) the download speed is limited to less than 6 MB/s. I know that there is a way to allow my PC to speed up but I do not know how.
View 3 Replies View Relateddownloading of youtube hindi songs is very slow,and taking too much of time to hear one song
View 1 Replies View RelatedMy Download Speed was about 10mbps and i be came around 1-5kbps.Is there any software for internet connections like just choose your download and upload speed then restart your computer and your download and upload will be very fast then anything
View 2 Replies View RelatedI recently purchased a new HP ENVY dv6 laptop which runs on Windows 8. I've noticed a significant drop in wireless speed on my network compared to my previous laptop, a Sony VAIO, which runs on Windows Vista. I don't believe that it is my network's problem; when I ran Speedtests on my two laptops, side-by-side, the VAIO had a greater download speed. Both computers are also fully updated, including the drivers; the VAIO laptop is four years old, and the HP ENVY dv6 just came out of the factory two weeks ago.
View 19 Replies View RelatedAfter every attempt and changing of radios still download and upload was very slow.
View 1 Replies View RelatedMy net speed is very slow in few days i have check my cables are fine
View 1 Replies View RelatedI just bought this router. Unfortunately I'm losing close to 3mpbs !
When I was connected directly to the modem i had a little over 12.5 Mbps
Now I'm stuck at 9.5mbps and it won't go higher!
I read a bit over the forum. I tried turning off the QOS but it didn't change a thing.
Here a little extra information;
My internet provider is Cogeco
MY computer is wired
I tried 2 internet tester, both give me the exact same result
I'm paying to get Download Speeds of 25Mbps from my cable provider.
If I plug my computer directly into my cable modem, I get 24.98 Mbps every time.
Using the same speed test, if I go through the DIR-655 I get rates from 2.92 to 10 Mbps.
I'm on Firmware 1.32NA. I'm ready to go out and buy a different brand Router.
has full Download/Upload speed while I only have a max. of 5kb/s download speed. The ping is perfect (20ms) and the upload rate is around 150 kb/s. I tried it out with my laptop on Windows 7 and Ubuntu and also with my Android Smartphone. I don't know why it's not working.
View 7 Replies View RelatedWhen connected to my router on my main desktop, I get download speeds of about .3-.85 mbps, I have comcast and a linksys N router, as well as a N wireless adapter in my desktop. If I use my laptop, I get around 10 mbps download speed, (Speeds are as of [URL]) but they still remain at .3 mbps on my desktop. I have tried two different wireless adapters in my computer. One is the Linksys AE2500 Dual Band N adapter, and the other is an ASUS N13 N Adapter. I have gotten the latest drivers of both adapters, but speeds stayed very low. When I connected the computer via ethernet cable, it ran at 16mbps. So I think that something must be wrong with some wireless settings, since I've tried 2 different adapters and was getting the same result, unless both were faulty I suppose. I also don't think it's my router's issue, because the wireless is working great on other wireless devices. I am using windows 7 on the desktop.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI did a search and came across this board because I too am having the same issues with wireless connection. I went as far as buying a new router, which like the original post stated, worked well for a few and then stopped. It's frustrating because I need the wireless connection for many items I use at home.
View 2 Replies View RelatedThe last couple of weeks my internet download speed has become really slow.First of all, I cleaned out my cache and everything on Chrome (The browser I am using) so don't tell me to do such a basic thing. [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedI usually get a solid speed of 2.3MBss yet today I am getting only 500kb/s I have reset my router 3 times, and my computer twice. Why is it happening?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm having really slow speeds surfing the internet, watching videos on sites like youtube, and downloading files. So i went to [URL] and found that my download speeds are only 1.3 mbps!! my upload is fine, around 5 mbps.I am wirelessly connected to the router, but the signal strength is fine.
View 2 Replies View RelatedEarlier today Comcast came to our house and upgraded our internet from 12 MB/s to 22 mb/s speed.We have a larger house using wifi internet with 3 laptops (2 XP, 1 Win7).Our wifi has always slowed down speeds on the computers.Our laptops were generally getting 3-6 download speed via speedtest.net.Then when we plugged in directly we got full 12 mb/s.So we figured, hey lets upgrade our internet to get faster speeds around the house!Today we are doing speed tests with the new 22mb/s and only my dad's win-7 laptop is getting 21mb/s via wifi. Even when right next to the router the other 2 laptops only max out at 6mb/s and can not go any higher. When directly connected they get the full 22mb/s.
why is it that one computer gets full speed via wifi when the 2 XP computers do not? It really seems like the speed has a cap at 6.35mb/s download, never goes higher on the speed test.Currently using a Linksys WRT160N Router.When I check the DHCP Client Table it shows that all computers are connected via Wireless-G so it's not a connection type.Is there a specific setting on the XP computers that are capping speed?
i have a laptop that i connect through our wireless router with, and for the past couple months my download speed have been terrible. my browsing speed is just as fast as it always was when i am connected to our router, just incredibly slow if i try to download or stream something.however, my downstairs neighbor also has a wireless router set up that i can access which gives me incredible download speeds but my cant even browse the internet because i the browser connection times out.i have tried plugging directly into my router to on the thought that perhaps the 2 routers' wireless was somehow interfering with each other, but my download speeds are still *** even then.
View 1 Replies View Related