Cisco :: CiscoWorks LMS 3.2 With TACACS Role Authentication?
Jan 4, 2011
I'm trying to get user authentication backed off to ACS 5.1, I've got it working but not the way I'd like. This is using the TACACS settings not ACS mode.I've created a local user in CW and assigned it to the correct roles, then created a user in ACS with the same name and a different password and this works fine.My question is can I set the roles on the TACACS server using a shell profile/custom attributes. All the documentation I can find is for ACS v4?
View 15 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Oct 24, 2012
I am trying to get CiscoWorks LMS 4.0 to connect to my routers in order to back up configurations, but I am getting SSH authentication failures reported in the router logs (and archiving fails).
The credentials LMS is using is a username and password with priviledge 15: the account is established in TACACS+. I can log into the devices directly with this user account.However, I cannot TFTP from the routers to the LMS either (I get a permission denied message in the router).
LMS did manage to fetch some configs, but 90% of my devices are having this issue.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 4, 2012
I have a Cisco ASA (8.2) setup with remote access for my users using Cisco VPN client. The authentication is passed off to my ACS 5.3 which then checks with AD. What I've done so far is create Access Policy rule where I define specifically the Location and NDG where the ASA is and then a DenyAllCommands command set. This should pass authentications just fine but this also gives those users the ability to remote connect directly into the ASA and login successfully. Even though there is a Deny Commands there I still would prefer they get Access Denied as a message. If I do a Deny Access on the ShellProfile then this stops the login authentication altogether.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 25, 2011
How to be able to locate a sample, working configuration of tacacs+ authentication on the ASA5510?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 13, 2011
I tried to configure TACACS+ authentication / authorization for NCS via ACS 4.2. For that I followed the configuration guide:
1. Configured the service for NCS with HTTP (see attachment)
2. Added the tasks to the user (see attachment)
When I try to login on the NCS it fails, in the logs on the NCS I see the following lines:
09/14/11 16:53:03.333 TRACE [system] [http-443-7] [TACACS+ AAAModule] Creating authorization socket - To Server: 192.168.49.14 - For User: netadmin
09/14/11 16:53:03.335 TRACE [system] [http-443-7] [TACACS+ AAAModule] Sending authorization request packet - To Server: 192.168.49.14 - For User: netadmin
09/14/11 16:53:03.336 TRACE [system] [http-443-7] [TACACS+ AAAModule] Receiving authorization response packet - From Server: 192.168.49.14 - For User: netadmin
[code].....
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 1, 2013
I want to setup two factor authentication via ACS 5.2 TACACS+ without having to use a token (such as that by RSA). Is there a way to do it?
More info:
Users from unconnected AD domains will be connecting to the routers and switches.There is a certificate server available to generate certificates.SSHv2 is the current login protocol.
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2013
I am trying to access an ASA 5545 using TACACS+. I have the ASA configured as follows:
aaa-server tacacs+ protocol tacacs+
aaa-server tacacs+ (inside) host 10.x.x.x
[code]....
I have added the ASA in ACS with the correct IP and the correct key. When I try to test the authentication via test aaa-server authentication tacacs+ host 10.x.x.x username Cisco password Cisco, I get:
ERROR: Authentication Server not responding: No error.
View 20 Replies
View Related
Aug 6, 2012
I have ACS 5.2 and JUNOS 10.6.x I setup 2 classes eng-class and ops-class with read/write and read-only permission here is my configuration on JUNOS
set system login class eng-class idle-timeout 15
set system login class eng-class permissions all
set system login user engineer full-name “Regional-Engineering”
set system login user engineer uid 2001
set system login user engineer class eng-class
set system login user engineer authentication plain-text-password xxxxxxx
[code]....
I have 2 separate Authorization policies for engineer and operator group.Result,
1. engineering group is working fine.
2. the operator group its not working im unable to login to device under this group "authentication failed" but on the ACS logs its successfully authenticated.
3. Web authentication is not also working for bot group.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jun 27, 2012
we have a ACS server V4 installed on W2003 server ,when we make a telnet to an equipement on the wan the authentication pass on the first connexion ,but when we telent to a switch on the lan the first connxion fails and we need to retry to login .when i check the field attempt log on the ACS i dont find the field attempt.i find this issue in ALL switch on the LAN ,from the switch i can ping the the ACS server .this problem appear frequently?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 20, 2009
Having an issue with authenticating Juniper J Series and SRX devices with ACS 5.1 The devices can authenticate using TACACS to ACS 5.1 via the CLI (telnet / ssh connections) but cannot using the JWEB management page.Doing packet captures between the Juniper devices and the ACS 5.1 box shows the Authenticate phase passing, but it does not progress onto the Authorisation phase. There is nothing of interest in the ACS Logs (Even with the debugging levels turned right up) The same Access service is in use for both the CLI and GUI (JWEB).Using ACS 4.1, both CLI and JWEB authentication works.[URL]I'm thinking the issue is with ACS 5.0 / 5.1 and it maybe not liking the response from the Juniper (even though it should be the same mechanism)
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 2, 2013
I am trying to configure ACS 5.2 to do all authentication against Microsoft AD, but use local identity groups to determine TACACS+ authorization.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 18, 2011
how do i configure user authentication via TACACS on UCS 1.4 with ACS 5.2? My TACACs connection works, and my user authentication is successful, but i can only get read-only rights. I have tried several versions of "cisco-av-pair= role=admin" both as mandatory attributes named role and as cisco-av-pair=role , with "admin" as the value, and i still get read-only.
When i attempt to find any documentation, it only describes ACS 4.2, which is another problem i have with most documentation for new cisco products (i have this exact issue with my NAMs, nothing i do to change the attributes results in successfully logging into the NAM, and all config guides are written in 4.2 speak).
is there any possiblity cisco is going to release some documentation on how to convert 4.2 speak to 5.2 speak?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Feb 17, 2012
All ip's and any identifying numbers have been change to protect.
I have a 6500 series switch that for some reason will not authenticate to the tacacs server. When you try, you get a password authentication failure. However, it will let you use the configured username and secret to log in thru ssh. And the enable secret to get into privileged mode. Tacacs key is correct, btw.we will call the server vlan 300 and the admin vlan 400.the tacacs source interface is in vlan 400 and the tacacs server is in vlan 300.
I can ping the tacacs server via the switch, but when i use the source cmd with the ip address of the admin interface vlan, ping will not work. I changed the tactics source interface to vlan 300 (the server vlan) and authentication with the tacacs server works fine. ip routing is turned on. There are entries for both the server vlan subnet and the ad-min vlan subnet in the routing table. There are only standard access-lists, and none of them are blocking packets from getting to the tacacs server via the admin vlan.
I could just leave the source interface on the int vlan for the servers, but I would like to find out why this isn't working. I have 1 other 6500 switch on a different network that is configured exactly the same (except for ip's, keys, and vlans) and am not having any issues with that LAN. I also have 6 other 3700 switches on the network that Im having an issue with, and none of them are having issues with authentication.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 12, 2012
I want to configure managment-access authentication to the WCS via tacacs+. The AAA Server is Cisco ACS 5.2.I made it and it works, but only with PAP Authentication Type. Chap doesn't work 4 me.The Access Service is configured with allowed protocols PAP and CHAP.The ACS Monitor just display an error with these steps:Received TACACS+ Authentication START Request
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 22, 2009
We added AAA client in the Cisco ACS 5.0 for WLC 4402 (TACACS+ Authentication) and configured WLC 4402 to use TACACS+ authentication for the management access. We can't get this work for some reasons.
Other Cisco routers and switches all worked fine with TACACS+ authentication. This is a TACACS debug output from the WLC;
Sun Aug 23 16:19:06 2009: tplus response: type=1 seq_no=2 session_id=f59bbf0b length=15 encrypted=0
Sun Aug 23 16:19:06 2009: TPLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_GETPASS
[Code].....
View 24 Replies
View Related
Dec 27, 2012
We are using Cisco ACS server Version : 5.3.0.40.6. Our tacacs appliances are crashing on AD authentication on a fairly regular basis. I have been searching Cisco.com to see whether we are on the latest version or not however I couldn't find anything lattest than what we are currently using. Are we on the latest version?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 5, 2012
ACS 5.1 is failing to authenticate tacacs authentication to the ASA firewall, getting
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2010
I've been configured my device 6506-9 with TACACS+ server authentication: [code]
but when I tried to access the device only uses authentication local but not uses TACACs (with username/password defined) it can be an error in configuration? in the other devices of network this works properly, only it's wrong in Cat6506-E
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2011
Is there a decent guide on how to configure ACS5.2 for TACACS management authentication of WCS?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 26, 2010
My switches are able to successfully authenticate user access against ACS 5.1 via SSH with TACACS+, but I am not able to authenticate via HTTPS with TACACS+. I don't even get a log in ACS when attempting to authenticate via HTTPS.
Here is my AAA config, followed by a debug:
aaa new-modelaaa authentication login ACCESS group tacacs+ localaaa authorization consoleaaa authorization config-commandsaaa authorization exec ACCESS group tacacs+ aaa authorization commands 1 Priv1 group tacacs+ none
[Code]......
View 8 Replies
View Related
Oct 13, 2011
I am trying configure tacacs authentication for http in Cisco 2960 with IOS 15.0.1.SE. [code] But the device is not authenticating. It ask the credentials (user and pass) but not authenticates.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jun 6, 2011
I am experiencing an issue where NX-OS on our 5010s is allowing both Local AND TACACS authentication concurrently. If I don't configure any aaa authorization commands, the locally logged in user has unmitigated access to the device. Once I enable aaa authroization, all commands issued by the locally logged in user are denied by ACS, but they can still log in to the device. When I comb through the logs on the ACS server, I see successful logins when TACACS credentials are used, and also the failed attempts when the locally configured credentials are used. On the switch, however, I receive "%TACACS-3-TACACS_ERROR_MESSAGE: All servers failed to respond" when using locally configured credentials on the switch itself. We are running ACS v4.2.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 25, 2011
We have a Catalyst 3750 switch that failed over to local login after the Tacacs authentication stopped working. I went through the configuration settings and everything appears to be identical to another switch in this same building.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 5, 2012
I successfully authenticate through ACS to my Identity Store, but only get dropped into a non-enable prompt: ciscoasa> How can I get an Authenticated user directly into enable mode?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 14, 2011
Does vpn connection need ISP support. If it does, in which step does ISP give service?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 20, 2011
I am having a problem trying to get to my root view. I am trying to set up some views to allow restricted access to one of our routers.I am running C2800NM-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M Version 12.4(20)T as the IOS and have the following AAA entries in my config
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 3, 2011
Is there any way to link the Role-based CLI views created in the AAA client to the user created in the ACS 5.2 server? I know that you could do that in ACS 4.2 by using the “cli-view-name” attribute.What I have in mind is to login with some user and that the ACS 5.2 server links this user with a view previously created in the AAA client:This is what I would like to achieve:view configured in the AAA client:parser view DiData secret 5 $1$jPNA$gr9o8gGNmWh9sk8Axbfx91 commands exec include copy running-config ftp commands exec include copy running-config commands exec include copy startup-config ftp commands exec include copy startup-config commands exec include copy commands exec include all show Login to the device using a user created on ACS 5.2 and linked to the above DiData view:
telnet xx.xx.xx.xx
username: cenetacspassword:
Router#?Exec commands: <1-99> Session number to resume copy Copy from one file to another enable Turn on privileged commands exit Exit from the EXEC show Show running system information
Router#
Typing the command "enable view something" is not an option for us.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 7, 2011
I am using ACS 5.2 and attempting to authorize users through TACACS to Nexus 5.1 code. I seem to have ACS setup correctly based on documentation I received through here. The problem is that the NX/OS doesnt seem to be operating as expected.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 19, 2012
How does the Internet play a role in data sharing?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 16, 2012
I've not found much detail regarding election of a root port other than "The root port is the switch port with the lowest path cost to the root bridge" they also expand on this a bit more for the case below, (italics)." When there are two switch ports that have the same path cost to the root bridge and both are the lowest path costs on the switch, the switch needs to determine which switch port is the root port. The switch uses the customizable port priority value, or the lowest port ID if both port priority values are the same".They explain that on S2, F0/1 is root port because it's lower than F0/2 but don't go beyond this.My understanding is that the following order is true with regards to priority of criteria (in this case), am I right?:
1. Lowest cumulative path cost back to the root bridge
2. In case of tie, the device with lowest Bridge ID
3. In case of tie, the port with the lowest received priority #
4. In case of tie, the port with the lowest local ID #
So, shouldn't this demonstration factor in the BIDs of S3 and S4 before the port priority and IDs of S2 ? For instance, if the BID of S3 was lower than that of S4, wouldn't F0/2 on S2 become the root port? I'm hoping I'm correct in this? Also I've not actually seen these four bullets in any of my official material for STP which I thought was a bit odd. I wondering if anyone else who has seen this before, considered the bridge ID aspect.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Nov 23, 2010
I've got a UCS210 with about 8 VMs running on it (SBS2008, and a bunch of other 2003/2008 servers).Currently its hooked up to a unmanaged 3com gigabit switch and I'm only using a single Gb ethernet interface.I'm implementing a whole small business pro infrastructure internally here, and this will probably the the first a several hopefully easy questions.
What smartport role do I need to assign to the port that I'm hooking this box up to? Also, is there any type of trunking/load balancing I could do with the dual NICs built into the UCS to the ESW? Any general best practices info for integrating VMs into a cisco SB pro networ.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2012
we are using single cisco 3845 gateway as Ingress as well as vxml gateway . Can you provide any documentation regarding the call volume capacity this gateway can handle. We have deployed this gateway in a UCCE parent- child model.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 8, 2012
I want to give limited access to our first level support so that they can execute certain basic commands like, port vlan change, access port shut/no-shut on Cisco 6509 and 3750E switches IOS based. I want to restrict them to only few options so they can not make changes to uplink (TenGig) ports and can not issue reload command etc. We do not have TACACS. What is the best way to achieve this?
View 2 Replies
View Related
