Cisco AAA/Identity/Nac :: ACS 5.2 And Role-base CLI Views?
May 3, 2011
Is there any way to link the Role-based CLI views created in the AAA client to the user created in the ACS 5.2 server? I know that you could do that in ACS 4.2 by using the “cli-view-name” attribute.What I have in mind is to login with some user and that the ACS 5.2 server links this user with a view previously created in the AAA client:This is what I would like to achieve:view configured in the AAA client:parser view DiData secret 5 $1$jPNA$gr9o8gGNmWh9sk8Axbfx91 commands exec include copy running-config ftp commands exec include copy running-config commands exec include copy startup-config ftp commands exec include copy startup-config commands exec include copy commands exec include all show Login to the device using a user created on ACS 5.2 and linked to the above DiData view:
telnet xx.xx.xx.xx
username: cenetacspassword:
Router#?Exec commands: <1-99> Session number to resume copy Copy from one file to another enable Turn on privileged commands exit Exit from the EXEC show Show running system information
Router#
Typing the command "enable view something" is not an option for us.
Login to N5k is managed centrally from a cisco ACS server ver 5.2
Goal: Role base access for (1) Network Admin and (2) Storage admin in such a way that network guy and storage guy has controll on their seperate domain.
I am using ACS 5.2 and attempting to authorize users through TACACS to Nexus 5.1 code. I seem to have ACS setup correctly based on documentation I received through here. The problem is that the NX/OS doesnt seem to be operating as expected.
my customer has FreeRadius, and I'm trying to get the server to assign a network admin role to a 5K running 5.0.3 code.This is based on the example given in this document: url...The server authenticates the user name, but will only put the user into the network operator role. This is confirmed by checking the output of show user-account and debug security user-db.The Radius test using the same credentials passes the authentication test. I'm sure the problem is that the N5K dosent understand the VSA format of the attribute, and that this is a simple syntax problem.
I need a specify users to allow access to particular devices and give privilege only for show command or show run. Here is how I tried to configured.
1. Configured two seperate Shell Profile and Command set with privilege level 4-5 and allowing only show run command
2. create seperate service selection rule with adding the require NDG and protocol TACACS and maching service "RestrictAccess"
3. In the RestrictAccess Service I have following configured; Identity: internal users, Group Mapping to a particular group where the user exists, authorization: matching the above created identity group, NDG, shell profile, command sets
All the steps are attached in the .doc file. However when I tried with the particular user he is able to access everything and he is not hitting the correct access rule.
Our DDM admin would like to pull device information from LMS. I've enabled DB Views (ODBC) access and tested from my desktop that I can query the data successfully. The DDM admin is telling me DDM requires access to several master tables - sysservers, sysdatabases, syslogins, etc..before he can query the RME/ANI device data. Does these master system tables are available, exposed or even exist in LMS? I can't find them.
one of my customer has CSACS & has bought CSACS-5-BASE-LIC, at the time of registration i ,had put the end customer as my company, how to change the end customer details on the license.
Had sent a mail to licenseing@cisco.com, they changed the end user details at there end, but the same is not reflecting on the physical box at the customer site.
I had a problem about authentication use AD group member. Below webiside is the way I config on ACS.
[URL]
I'm using ACS 5.1.0.44 and this version has a bug , ACS cannot read AD group. I have to add it manually . After I change the access policy from Internal user to AD1. I can use anyone AD ID to pass authenticaiton. I finished all config from the website had same result.
I checked the access polices -- default device admin -- authorization , the new rules I created had no hit count. How can I make sure that I make a right config ?
We want to buy a ISE-3315-K9 for 500 end-devices.In the price-list I found the ISE-3315-K9 but cannot find the base license: L-ISE-BSE-500=. (I think I need this license)Will the shipment of the ISE-3315-K9 includes a 3000 end-points base license (maximum support of the ISE-3315) or do I need to order the base 500 license seperately?
I've had a 2Wire gateway that I got from AT&T for about 5 years. Although I've seen terrible reviews for 2Wire, I've had pretty good luck with this one. Now the Power light is a steady red and only light on. Tech support says that it's most likely the power adapter.As I understand, most what are called modems or routers today are a combination of these two, is that right? I see them in stores ranging from $30 to $200 or more, and they all say they do the same thing - almost identical wording. If it turns out that my adapter is good, what should I be looking for?
Getting the following alarm from my ISE:Cause:Base License Enforcement Details: Base concurrent users exceed license allowable count.Currently only using 1656 out of 2000 base licenses so I'm not sure what the issue is. Running 1.1.2.145 patch 3.
I have a WS-C3750X-12S-S (IP Services) that I THINK I'd like to downgrade to LAN Base so I can stack it with a WS-C3750X-48T-L that is already LAN Base..
I am having a problem trying to get to my root view. I am trying to set up some views to allow restricted access to one of our routers.I am running C2800NM-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M Version 12.4(20)T as the IOS and have the following AAA entries in my config
I'm trying to get user authentication backed off to ACS 5.1, I've got it working but not the way I'd like. This is using the TACACS settings not ACS mode.I've created a local user in CW and assigned it to the correct roles, then created a user in ACS with the same name and a different password and this works fine.My question is can I set the roles on the TACACS server using a shell profile/custom attributes. All the documentation I can find is for ACS v4?
I've not found much detail regarding election of a root port other than "The root port is the switch port with the lowest path cost to the root bridge" they also expand on this a bit more for the case below, (italics)." When there are two switch ports that have the same path cost to the root bridge and both are the lowest path costs on the switch, the switch needs to determine which switch port is the root port. The switch uses the customizable port priority value, or the lowest port ID if both port priority values are the same".They explain that on S2, F0/1 is root port because it's lower than F0/2 but don't go beyond this.My understanding is that the following order is true with regards to priority of criteria (in this case), am I right?:
1. Lowest cumulative path cost back to the root bridge 2. In case of tie, the device with lowest Bridge ID 3. In case of tie, the port with the lowest received priority # 4. In case of tie, the port with the lowest local ID #
So, shouldn't this demonstration factor in the BIDs of S3 and S4 before the port priority and IDs of S2 ? For instance, if the BID of S3 was lower than that of S4, wouldn't F0/2 on S2 become the root port? I'm hoping I'm correct in this? Also I've not actually seen these four bullets in any of my official material for STP which I thought was a bit odd. I wondering if anyone else who has seen this before, considered the bridge ID aspect.
I've got a UCS210 with about 8 VMs running on it (SBS2008, and a bunch of other 2003/2008 servers).Currently its hooked up to a unmanaged 3com gigabit switch and I'm only using a single Gb ethernet interface.I'm implementing a whole small business pro infrastructure internally here, and this will probably the the first a several hopefully easy questions.
What smartport role do I need to assign to the port that I'm hooking this box up to? Also, is there any type of trunking/load balancing I could do with the dual NICs built into the UCS to the ESW? Any general best practices info for integrating VMs into a cisco SB pro networ.
we are using single cisco 3845 gateway as Ingress as well as vxml gateway . Can you provide any documentation regarding the call volume capacity this gateway can handle. We have deployed this gateway in a UCCE parent- child model.
I want to give limited access to our first level support so that they can execute certain basic commands like, port vlan change, access port shut/no-shut on Cisco 6509 and 3750E switches IOS based. I want to restrict them to only few options so they can not make changes to uplink (TenGig) ports and can not issue reload command etc. We do not have TACACS. What is the best way to achieve this?
I know that in small networks, one of the computers is elected the Master Browser role, and elections are held every now and then. In domain networks that implement Active Directory, is there still a Master Browser role, or do the domain controllers take over this role?
I'm planning to use 2 3560X (access switch) on two different locations connected over two 2921 routers in small ring. 3560Xs are directly connected via fiber. Each 3560X is conected to its own 2921, and 2921s are connected together with GRE over IPSec. So they are creating ring.I'm planning to use small area 0 in this scenario. There are less then 200 routes in the network. Will 12.2(55) IP Base on 3560X support this scenario or I will need IP Services image? "OSPF for routed access" is still little vague to me, there are only tipical case study scenarios.
We are trying to migrate WCS base license to NCS 1.1 .We have procured the migration license .In the licensing guide , it is mentioned as "L-WCS-NCS1-M-K9 License first, before adding the licenses migrated from your WCS installation"
1)Whether we need to add this migration license in WCS before genrating XML file or
2)Before adding XML file in NCS we need to add this in NCS ..
I currently purchased, Cisco 1941/K9 with 2 onboard GE, 2 EHWIC slots, 1 ISM slot, 256MB CF default, 512MB DRAM default, IP Base.
Questions
1. With IP Base License, will I be able to run Frame Relay? I really need reference on what works and what doesn't between these different technology package licenses ? Actually frame relay is running on it right now, hope it doesn't suddenly stop after 60 days...
2. As I understand in order to run MPLS, I will need to upgrade to Data License "SL-19-DATA-K9". Since, I already have a Cisco 1941 to upgrade it, I need to order a spare license / paper PAK?
3. Does the IP Base License support site to site IPSEC VPN or do I need to purchase a security license "SL-19-SEC-K9"
4. Can I have both security and data license activated on the same device ?
5. If I do activate security or data license will I be able to use the IP Base features at the same time?
6. If I purchase a new Cisco 1941 with Data or Security License do I need to purchase the IP Base License then upgrade the license?
7. Is the 1941 suited for voice application routing ?
Just bought this switch it has the IP base IOS and I need to use BGP and VRF-lite. My question is can I configure and use these two things without having to upgrade to the IP Services IOS?
Can I connect 2 or more wireless repeaters to the same wireless base station signal to extend wireless coverage? I.e. The base station is located in the centre of the building and the signal covers the middle but not the extreme end of the building. I would like to add a repeater on each opposite sides of the signal's reach so it covers the complete building. I can't use LAN cable and the building has different electricity supply to the 3 different part of the building so can't use the mains to carry the signal. Is this possible using wirless repeaters or do I have to use wireless bridge units to connect to the base station and then output with wireless access points attached to the bridge unit to extend the wirless signal?
I'm having a problem when configuring this cisco router 1921 with an ip base software. Accordingly with the Cisco software adviser this software allows to configure the l2tp Client Initiated Tunneling. But configuring the router the commands are not recognized:
