I recently upgraded the ios image and the asdm on a cisco 5520 firewall. I use a policy on a cisco security manager to push policys out to this firewall. But it cant push to them now because the image has changed on the device.Is their anyway to re - assign the policy without having to do a new discovery.
View 2 Replies
we're evaulating the Cisco SM 4.2. After adding my ASA 5520 the Policies are discovered from the device except the RA VPN Policies.I tried to trigger the discovery process manually and i got this errormessage Please verify the device "IP address", "hostname", "domain name" and "port number" are correct, there is network connectivity between the CS Manager server and the device, and the device is configured to accept https connections, the device is running, and then retry this operation.which i don't understand because the other policies were retrieved just fine.
View 0 Replies View RelatedI was trying to assing statefull link as same as LAN failover link on ASA5520 with VPN Plus license. But i am getting the below error. Is there any restriction in the license itself.
View 1 Replies View Relatedwe have a nat exemption rule for 10.0.0.0/8 to w.x.y.z followed by some static nat rules and then dynamic policy nat rule for 10.0.0.0/8 to w.x.y.z natting to IP a.b.c.d.When I do a packet trace from 10.10.10.10 to w.x.y.z, it shows the packet first matching against the nat exemption rule, and then immediately afterwards it matches the dynamic policy NAT rule. The static nat rules are being successfully bypassed (which is what I want), but why does the dynamic policy nat rule apply if an exempt rule has been hit already? An actual test between the IPs above reflects the result of the packet tracer as well (IP a.b.c.d is seen on server w.x.y.z).We are running the following software on an ASA5520.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have configured the primary firewall every thing seem to be fine, And we have configured fail over device while config is getting replicated to the fail over device we are getting below error.
ERROR: Cannot add policy to rule engine
ERROR: Unable to assign access-list LAN_out to interface inside
IOS and Model are same.But all the config got replicated from primary to secondary but except the one access group command.
access-group LAN_out in interface inside.
ASA 5520 can handle 2 ISP? not to load balance or not standby/active but to use the 2 ISP at the same time and separately. for example, ISP_A who has 10m will be dedicated to the customer A/VLAN A, then ISP_B who has 4m will be for the rest of the customer's traffic. Can the ASA 5520 do traffic shaping or policy map just like in a normal router?
View 5 Replies View Relatedi have removed the icmp inspection from my default policy-map in my ASA 5520,now i could not able to ping to 4.2.2.2 from my LAN even though i have configured an ICMP Access-list in my asa like ,but I can't ping 4.2.2.2 for testing the Internet connectivity,what shall i do to allow only my self as admin to ping outside?
-icmp permit host 192.168.60.60 echo
-icmp permit host 192.168.60.60 echo-reply
is there a way to assigen a QoS service policy via Radius to an Caltalyst 4500/3750 Switchport?
in detail, we would like to assign this policy
policy-map SET_EF class class-default set dscp ef
to an interface. All traffic should be marked with a defined DSCP value.
This works find when doing it statically with
interface FastEthernet2/1 service-policy input SET_EF
but we would need to assign such a policy via Radius during the 802.1x Authentication. different users should get differnt policies. We use Cisco ACS 5.2 as Radius Server and there actually is a field for that in the Authorization Profile Common Tasks Configuration. in detail, this uses the cisco-av-pair "sub-policy-In=<policy name>" attribute to assign a service policy to an NAS.
we found also two other attributes "sub-qos-policy-in" and "ip:sub-qos-polcy-in" for that. CCO says that "ip:sub-qos-polcy-in" works with Catalyst 65k [URL]
unfortunately this seems to not work on Catalyst 45k and 37k.
In the ACS Logs we can see that these attributes are attached to the Radius Reply, but unfortunately they are ignored by the switch.
it is interesing that when entering "show aaa attributes" on the Catalyst 45k, these attributes are displayd - so for my understanding the switch should understand these attibutes (?)
4503-E#sh aaa attributes AAA ATTRIBUTE LIST: Type=1 Name=disc-cause-ext Format=Enum Type=2 Name=Acct-Status-Type Format=Enum
[Code]......
I am using the "File exist"-check in my Dynamic Access Policies to be sure that VPN-computers are corporate. I would like to place the file in each users %APPDATA%-directory, but it seem that the ASA cannot use variables when specifying the path? Is there a way to do this or do I have to use a absolute path in the check?I am running a ASA 5520 with sw 8.4(1).
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am new to v5.3, and I am not good at VPN.I just have my consultant to configure this correctly just today. Currently, there is only one rule for the access policy (Single Result Selection). That rule is to use Active Directory as the source for the authentication. And by default will deny any other access which is not found in the rule.Now... I just got an order that I need to setup a new user who will need to access to our network by using Cisco IPSec VPN (the software one). But that user is not setup in our Active Directory, and we do not want him to access our domain anyway. He only needs to access non-domain resourse...such as airconditioning controller by IP. So I am thinking to setup his account by using "internal identtity". If I do this way, what do I need to do to setup another access policy? May you give me some steps with little more details? OR... if it is not the way I should do...what else can I do to achieve this goal? Also, he said he could provide his static IP trying to access from. I have a ASA 5520.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI've tried to set up IPSec over TCP with a VPN-Client V5.0.07.0440 on Win 7 64b to my ASA 5520 (Version 8.2(2)16) regarding to
[URL]
IPSec over TCP activated at the ASA
crypto isakmp ipsec-over-tcp port 10000
and in the transport tap of the VPN connection 'enable transport tunneling' with IPSec over TCP an port 10000 instead of 'IPSec over UDP' The connect timed out with error code 412 And this is my log from the ASA:
%ASA-7-710005: TCP request discarded from 178.x.x.x/53225 to INTERNET:212.x.x.x/10000
%ASA-3-713042: IKE Initiator unable to find policy: Intf INTERNET, Src: 212.x.x.x, Dst: 178.x.x.x
%ASA-7-710005: TCP request discarded from 178.x.x.x/53225 to INTERNET:212.x.x.x/10000
%ASA-3-713042: IKE Initiator unable to find policy: Intf INTERNET, Src: 212.x.x.x, Dst: 178.x.x.x
I don't have a clue what's here missing.I have static crypto maps for the L2L tunnels and the default dynamic crypto map for the VPN clients which come over NAT-T
crypto map INTERNET_map 65535 ipsec-isakmp dynamic SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP
crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 match address INTERNET_cryptomap_65535.65535
crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 set pfs
crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 set transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA ESP-AES-256-MD5 ESP-3DES-SHA ESP-3DES-MD5
crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 set reverse-route
My ASA 5505 has stopped giving out DHCP address to my machines.Everything was working fine and nothing has changed in the network. I've reloaded the firewall and clear all DHCP on the firewall I've even re-entered the cmd on the ASA.
I'm able to staticlly assigned address to the clients and all is way. When I do a DHCP debug on the ASA I don't see any events relating to the DHCP service apart from checking for lease expiry.
I've also tried to plug a machine straight into the ASA and no result. I finally did a packet capture and I am seeing the client machine sending out a DHCP discover packet and nothing else is responding.
My ASA config is:
dhcpd address 192.168.3.10-192.168.3.33 inside
dhcpd dns 8.8.4.4 interface inside
dhcpd option 3 ip 192.168.3.1 interface inside
dhcpd enable inside
I have two 1811's connected in a lab using a ipsec vpn tunnel (using a switch to simulate an internet connection between them).I am trying to configure one of the routers as a ZBPF just to allow a remote windows login (DC on the firewalled side, workstations on the other side).I'm trying to verify that the zbpf is working, but it doesn't seem to stop anything. I had match icmp added to the class-map, but took it out to test if icmp would fail. It didn't. Basically, I don't think the firewall is working at all. Any thoughts on how I can configure this so that the policies will work between zone-pairs?
Here's an quick drawing:
Here are the configurations:
Local router:
hostname sdc-1811-LocalLab
!
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
!
no aaa new-model
!
resource policy
[code]....
I've been given 4 more public static ip's and would like to use one of them static ip's to point to my sharepoint box, for example i want to be able to access my sharepoint boxweb site externally:
212.xxx.xxx.01 - my public pix ip
212.xxx.xxx.02 - is my owa for email (https://xxxxxxx.net/owa)
212.xxx.xxx.03 - my sharepoint box (https://xxxxxx.net/sharepoint)
212.xxx.xxx.04 - not assigned
What command do I have to input on the Cisco Pix 515 to make that work?
ASA 5520 to get it to authenticate VPN users against and Active Directory environment plus allow management access as well. I created a Dynamic Access Policy on the ASA stating that if you are a member of the Active Directory group "Managment" the continue. I chagned the DefaultAccessPolicy to "Terminate". So with that, VPN users cannot connect because they are not a member of that group, but the access to manage the ASA is allowed because of that policy.Is there a way through using Dynamic Access Policies that I can allow management access (SSH, ASDM, etc) by matching to a group membership and will allow normal users to VPN in successfully but not allow them access to managing the ASA?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am configuring ASA 5510.
My ISP given /28 pool of public IP's. So i had total 14 available IP addresses.
I configured one IP to the my firewall outside interface. I want assign remaining IP's to the my Servers, which are located inside to the firewall.
How to assign NAT IP to server from Firewall
View 2 Replies View RelatedCan we assign Secondary ISP-2 Pool IP to DMZ Server, network design attached for reference.
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs there any way to always assign the same IP address to an AnyConnect VPN client logged into an ASA 5505 running v8.4?2
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm currently replacing my ASA 5505 with a 5510. I have a range of public IP addresses, one has been assigned to the outside interface by the setup wizard (e.g. 123.123.123.124 ) and another I would like to NAT to an internal server (e.g 192.168.0.3 > 123.123.123.125). On my asa 5505 this seemed fairly straigh forward, i.e. create an incoming access rule that allowed SMTP to 123.123.123.125 and then create a static nat to translate 192.168.0.3 to 123.123.123.125. Since I've tried to do the same on the 5510 traffic is not passing through so I'm assuming that the use of additional public IP addresses is not handled in the same way as the 5505? I also see that by default on the 5505, 2 VLANs are created, one for the inside and one for the outside, where as this is not the case on the 5510. Is the problem that VLANs or sub-interfaces need to be created first? I'm doing the config via ASDM.
Everything else seems to OK i.e. access to ASDM via 123.123.123.124, outbound PAT and the site-to-site VPN.
I have ASA 5505 with base license. I created 3rd vlan on it.it was created. but i am unable to assign IP to it. i assign ip address it takes it. But when i do sh int ip brief it does not show any ip.
Code...
How do i tell my firewall to start listen also on another outside ipadress assigned by my ISP? I have it used on other firewall right now. So my steps would be shutting down ip address assignment off old firewall interface. Assign that ip address to ASA5510 outside interface and configure NAT.
View 13 Replies View RelatedI have a PIX 515E that I want to use to as a border between my internet connection and my Cisco AIR1131AG. I have configured the PIX to have the outside interface as a dhcp client which gets its dynamic IP address from the cable modem. the AP is connected to the E1 inside interface. Now I could see the E1 interface from the arp table from the AP but I cannot ping it. From the firewall I don't see the ARP table from the firewall. and i cannot ping the AP. what is wrong with the configuration? side note, i am able to connect to the AIR1131AG from my laptop I was not able to retrieve an IP address.
FW1 - CONFIGURATION
interface Ethernet0 description uplink towards the techsavvy modem speed 100 nameif outside security-level 0 ip address dhcp setroute !interface Ethernet1 description >>> WIFI LAN ACCESS <<< nameif inside security-level 100 ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
[Code].....
i am doind a policy NAT on the folowing scenarion.
acess-list policy_nat extended permit ip host 10.0.0.1 host 192.168.1.1
static (inside,outempresa) 170.66.53.1 access-list policy_nat
I understand that when host A 10.0.0.1 wants to connect to host B192.168.1.1 its going to be translated to 170.66.53.1 when host 192.168.1.1 wants to connect to10.0.0.1 the same entry will change the destination when the packet hits the asa from 170.66.53.1 to 10.0.0.1, is that correct ?
How can I configure police-based nat to allow ICMP-only traffic on asaos 8.4.1 or 8.3?On 8.3 it was very simple:global (outside) 1 interface ,access-list outside_nat_outbound extended permit icmp any any,nat (outside) 1 access-list outside_nat_outbound.
View 10 Replies View RelatedI have devices on Inside interface of ASA that need to get to Internet to get ntp. Hence I want to set up dynamic pat (interface overload) which 8.3 style would be
-object network obj_NTP-DEV
-host 192.168.1.250
-nat (INSIDE,INTERNET) dynamic interface
But I need to limit nat to only Internet destined traffic on ntp port not all ports for traffic from 192.168.1.250.I'm not using this nat set up to control outbound access - I also have incoming RA VPN tunnels to the box and traffic from these sources need to be able to get to 192.168.1.250 and the above simple set up would break that access as all traffic involving 192.168.1.250 would get nat'd
Reading the doco I've sent myself round in a loops trying to figure how you are meant to do such a " Dynamic Policy NAT (overload)" call it what you will config in 8.3
I´m triing to setup a QoS policy on ASA 5515, i read several pages, but my questions are, how setup the real BW?, or is not necessary to do this?
View 7 Replies View Relatedhow can I configure policy NAT on ASA5510. I would like to do the following;
9.1.1.9 NAT to 10.1.1.9
If source IP = 1.1.1.1
then NAT to = 10.2.2.9
the rest NAT to = 10.1.1.9
The issue is I want 1.1.1.1 NAT to 10.2.2.9 when access www.example.com. The rest NAT to current NAT.
We were using ASA-5520-K9 with ASA-SSM-AIP-20-K9 but recently found some hardware problem in our running ASA. Now cisco want to replace with ASA-5520-K8.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow to configure our ASA to nat our to internetconnections, at the moment the first work fine,
ISP1 NAT
ASA5510 LAN
ISP2 NAT
On FWSM (running version 4.1 in my case) the default global policy uses the following class map:class-map inspection_default match default-inspection-traffic
What "default-inspection-traffic" includes? Is it all traffic? If so, do I really want all my traffic to go through the inspection engine? I would imagine this would have a performance impact on traffic that is not part of the protocols being inspected.
I have a server in a network DMZ (IP 192.168.40.43) need to do discovery of other IP address to update the IPAM tool. It should not be done source NAT so I´m trying to use the configuration below with Policy NAT but isn´t working:
nameif ethernet1 inside security100
nameif ethernet5 dmz8 security55
!
ip address inside 10.56.12.93 255.255.252.0
[Code]....
It´s following message appears "% PIX-3-305005: No translation group found for icmp dmz8 srv: 192.168.40.43 dst inside: 10.38.36.50 (type 13, code 0)".
I understand from the Cisco documentation that a service-policy applied to an interface on an ASA 5500 series firewall, will override the default global service-policy. However, I am not clear on whether it will override the entire global service-policy, or only the parts where they overlap. In other words, would the resulting service-policy on the interface in question be just what was applied in the service-policy on the interface, completely replacing the global service-policy? Or, would it be a combination of the global and interface service-policies, with the interface one taking precedence where they overlap?
if I wanted an interface to have the same service-policy as the global service-policy plus on other item, can I just add the one item in a service-policy that I apply to the interface, or do I have to replicate all the items from the global policy, plus the one additional item, and apply that to the interface.
