how can I configure policy NAT on ASA5510. I would like to do the following;
9.1.1.9 NAT to 10.1.1.9
If source IP = 1.1.1.1
then NAT to = 10.2.2.9
the rest NAT to = 10.1.1.9
The issue is I want 1.1.1.1 NAT to 10.2.2.9 when access www.example.com. The rest NAT to current NAT.
How to configure our ASA to nat our to internetconnections, at the moment the first work fine,
ISP1 NAT
ASA5510 LAN
ISP2 NAT
We have a problem with some websites being blocked every now and then. Everyone inside can access this external website for weeks, and then suddenly it's not available for a few hours, and then it comes back. All without me making any changes to the firewall, ASA5510. The external website that has nothing to do with us can be accessed from anywhere outside our network, example on my iphone through Verizon.
We have not set up any rules about blocking websites, all I found was the Default Service Policy. After backing up and then deleting the rule we are able to access all sites.
configure the firewall Cisco ASA5510 in HA Mode.Enclosed Network diagram.
View 14 Replies View RelatedI am using a fiber optic connection. I want to connect it directly to ASA5510. A WLC2504 will be connected to ASA and one Aironet AP will be deployed at first. (At this moment I am not using any Windows server but in near future I will need to deploy Windows Server 2003 in my corporate network) My questions are:
Can I configure ASA as DHCP server for my LAN?
Can I configure WLC as DHCP server for my LAN?
If we can configure both then what is the best practice from above two options? (I am new to Cisco stuff and first time user)
My customer had a spare ASA5510 bought a few years before with 5 x FE and security plus license with HA. Now they would like to buy a new ASA5510 to configure HA with the spare one, but now the ASA5510 comes with 2GE+3FE. Can the two FW work in HA?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a asa 5510 with 8.x software and I want to reserve (i mean RESERVE not PRIORITIZE) traffic based on protocol, like if I have a 10Mbit I want to :
- give 3 Mb for smtp
- give 5 Mb to http/s whatever
- 2 Mb for other stuff.
Of course QOS won't do that, can you do that with ASA?
How to limit maximum SSL VPN sessions per group-policy on ASA5510?
There are 2 group-policy: in one maximum of 10 connections, in the second - 15 (In total licenses for SSL VPN 25 connections).
I can make some "local policy" with client of SSL VPN AnyConnect and block access to internet?
The user would only have access to the internet if he was connected to the VPN (by internal proxy).
ASA 5510 have two model Bun-K9 and Sec-Bun-K9 from the datasheet find out difference Port related and Redundancy. My questions is : Have any major difference for Security service between two model ?
View 3 Replies View Relatedconfiguring policy based route for my cisco router?Basically, I have a 2811 cisco router with 2 ADSL ports. 1 port is for iiNet line and another port is for Telstra line.I want to configure a policy based route on the router so that:Any traffic coming from 1 internal IP (i.e. 172.16.x.1) will go through iinet line (i.e. Dialer 0) interface.Any traffic from rest of the office will go through the Telstra line (i.e. Dialer 1) interface. Is there any easy way to configure this policy based route?
View 8 Replies View RelatedIm having problem configuring policies for limiting traffic on subinterfaces on cisco Router 7606-S. I have configured:
[code]...
So for egressQOS , i want to configure with police, not shape (for the memory reason).
I am not able to configure Service policy output command in Cisco 2921 router.While configuring I am getting below error.Same config is working fine in Cisco 3845 router.I am suspectting the problem with license in IOS.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI currently have an ASA5510 with 2 interfaces (outside and Inside) running remote VPN for clients and L2L VPN for a couple of sites. I have traffic entering the inside interface, matching interesting traffic, being wrapped up in IKE / IPSEC and sent out via the outside interface. All straightforward so far.Now I have a new VPN which is required to go over another interface and not the outside. The traffic comes in to the inside interface as normal and should be matched via ACL, encrypted and sent out th e new interface however the traffic is simply sent out of the outside interface and doesn't get any IKE headers. If I reconfigure the interface to be be the outside it does at least match the ACL, wrap it up nicely in IKE and try to get to get to the remote peer.My questions are why does this behaviour occur and why isnt the traffic marked interesting and sent out the new interface.I don't have any issues creating a new VPN if I want it to go external, I just add the required information to the outside_map but i need the traffic to be encrypted and sent over another interface. I not a huge fan of the GUI for this but I've tried both CLI and GUI with the same results.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have two 1811's connected in a lab using a ipsec vpn tunnel (using a switch to simulate an internet connection between them).I am trying to configure one of the routers as a ZBPF just to allow a remote windows login (DC on the firewalled side, workstations on the other side).I'm trying to verify that the zbpf is working, but it doesn't seem to stop anything. I had match icmp added to the class-map, but took it out to test if icmp would fail. It didn't. Basically, I don't think the firewall is working at all. Any thoughts on how I can configure this so that the policies will work between zone-pairs?
Here's an quick drawing:
Here are the configurations:
Local router:
hostname sdc-1811-LocalLab
!
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
!
no aaa new-model
!
resource policy
[code]....
We have a main office and 4 remote offices (only showing 1 remote office in the diagram). We are using GRE over IPSec VPNs to the remote offices which terminate on the 2811 router in the main office. We are using the 2811 as it is the only device that we have that can terminate GRE. The 2811 router is connected to the outside switch and is configured with a public IP address. We also have a ASA5510 in the main office which is connected in the same manner and is used for Web, e-mail traffic etc.Both the main office and remote offices have a 10Mbps Internet connection.
We have an issue with voice quality between sites as we are finding it difficult to control bandwidth utilization in the main office. When users in the main office download web content it can saturate the 10Mbps Internet connection causing voice quality issues. We have configured outbound shaping on the branch routers to make sure that aggregate inbound traffic from all branches to the main office does not saturate the link but we cannot control traffic from the Internet.I understand that controlling inbound traffic from the Internet is difficult without controlling QoS on the ISPs side. Is there any way that can reserve inbound bandwidth to ensure that web traffic does not impact voice? Also in this design, which is the best place to configure outbound QoS from the main office?
In our datacenter we have a 3750 stack with IP base image. I have enabled PBR and reloaded the switch. Show sdm prefer says i am using default template. The reason i want to use PBR is that we have 2 firewalls on the same work and want to be able to have granular control over which gateway out of the network they use but still be able to access all internal resouces accross wan and locally.
Created access list to identify traffic:
access-list 10 permit 10.2.3.59 (test workstation on vlan 3)
Created policy:
route-map TestASA permit 10
match ip address 10
set ip next-hop 10.2.0.3
Assigned policy to the user vlan3:
ip policy route-map TestASA
Results:It changed the default gateway to the above gateway but i could not access any resources on any other vlan, could not access resouces accross wan.
I am able to ping from Switch to firewall inside ip and user desktop ip but unable to ping from user desktop to FW Inside ip.. config is below for both switch and FW Cisco ASA5510....
TechCore-SW#ping 172.22.15.10
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.22.15.10, timeout is 2 seconds:
[Code].....
i am doind a policy NAT on the folowing scenarion.
acess-list policy_nat extended permit ip host 10.0.0.1 host 192.168.1.1
static (inside,outempresa) 170.66.53.1 access-list policy_nat
I understand that when host A 10.0.0.1 wants to connect to host B192.168.1.1 its going to be translated to 170.66.53.1 when host 192.168.1.1 wants to connect to10.0.0.1 the same entry will change the destination when the packet hits the asa from 170.66.53.1 to 10.0.0.1, is that correct ?
How can I configure police-based nat to allow ICMP-only traffic on asaos 8.4.1 or 8.3?On 8.3 it was very simple:global (outside) 1 interface ,access-list outside_nat_outbound extended permit icmp any any,nat (outside) 1 access-list outside_nat_outbound.
View 10 Replies View RelatedI have devices on Inside interface of ASA that need to get to Internet to get ntp. Hence I want to set up dynamic pat (interface overload) which 8.3 style would be
-object network obj_NTP-DEV
-host 192.168.1.250
-nat (INSIDE,INTERNET) dynamic interface
But I need to limit nat to only Internet destined traffic on ntp port not all ports for traffic from 192.168.1.250.I'm not using this nat set up to control outbound access - I also have incoming RA VPN tunnels to the box and traffic from these sources need to be able to get to 192.168.1.250 and the above simple set up would break that access as all traffic involving 192.168.1.250 would get nat'd
Reading the doco I've sent myself round in a loops trying to figure how you are meant to do such a " Dynamic Policy NAT (overload)" call it what you will config in 8.3
I have two ASA5510's set up in failover, and the secondary keeps crashing after doing the interface checks when bringing failover up. This only happens if I try to upgrade the image on the secondary to anything newer than 8.4.1 (I've tried with 8.4.1-11 and 8.4.2). The primary one run just fine with new images.
I don't have the exact error right now, as I need to do a screen capture from console. It's just a huge crash dump.Are there anything I might have missed during the upgrade? Should I cold-boot both the firewalls in the correct order?
I´m triing to setup a QoS policy on ASA 5515, i read several pages, but my questions are, how setup the real BW?, or is not necessary to do this?
View 7 Replies View Relatedi have a ASA5510 in the office, that already configured 3 context, namely, admin, user, server.in the server context, the last running config was not saved, and there was a power trip last friday night. 1 of the sub interface was affected, and i need to recreate that interface.I am getting the below error, it only allow me to do changes those pre-defined interface.how to I create extra sub interface?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a ASA5510 and I have a question about the speed the ports can handle, here is one port:
-interface Ethernet0/2
- speed 100
-shutdown
- no nameif
-no security-level
-no ip address
it's ethernet and not fastethernet so I figure it will only go to 10Mbps, but at the same time I can hard code the speed to 100.
i have cisco ASA 5510 Firewall using in my network, i have planning to upgrade the Flash memory from 256 mb to 512 mb and the RAM from 256 mb to 1GB.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI recently upgraded the ios image and the asdm on a cisco 5520 firewall. I use a policy on a cisco security manager to push policys out to this firewall. But it cant push to them now because the image has changed on the device.Is their anyway to re - assign the policy without having to do a new discovery.
View 2 Replies View RelatedOn FWSM (running version 4.1 in my case) the default global policy uses the following class map:class-map inspection_default match default-inspection-traffic
What "default-inspection-traffic" includes? Is it all traffic? If so, do I really want all my traffic to go through the inspection engine? I would imagine this would have a performance impact on traffic that is not part of the protocols being inspected.
I have a server in a network DMZ (IP 192.168.40.43) need to do discovery of other IP address to update the IPAM tool. It should not be done source NAT so I´m trying to use the configuration below with Policy NAT but isn´t working:
nameif ethernet1 inside security100
nameif ethernet5 dmz8 security55
!
ip address inside 10.56.12.93 255.255.252.0
[Code]....
It´s following message appears "% PIX-3-305005: No translation group found for icmp dmz8 srv: 192.168.40.43 dst inside: 10.38.36.50 (type 13, code 0)".
I understand from the Cisco documentation that a service-policy applied to an interface on an ASA 5500 series firewall, will override the default global service-policy. However, I am not clear on whether it will override the entire global service-policy, or only the parts where they overlap. In other words, would the resulting service-policy on the interface in question be just what was applied in the service-policy on the interface, completely replacing the global service-policy? Or, would it be a combination of the global and interface service-policies, with the interface one taking precedence where they overlap?
if I wanted an interface to have the same service-policy as the global service-policy plus on other item, can I just add the one item in a service-policy that I apply to the interface, or do I have to replicate all the items from the global policy, plus the one additional item, and apply that to the interface.
From what I can find the ASA does not support policy routing.
I have two VLANS that need to go to the same destination but different routes. Anyway to accomplish this on the ASA?
I Have a Firewall ASA 5505 with asa 8.4(2) asdm 6.4(5) I have only one Public IP services and need to publish on the Internet
External User (Internet) -> Calls connection on port 22 Internal server 192.168.1.124
External User (Internet) -> Calls connection on port 80 of the Internal 192.168.1.124 server or other server the same inside.
In the first moment I'm just testing the access port 22.I had it working in version 8.2 but after I updated to 8.4 does not work, I've tested several different configurations.
Configuration (see asa5505_config.txt file)
object network remoto_ssh
host 189.120.190.229
object network linux_ssh
host 192.168.1.124
nat (inside,outside) static remoto_ssh
access-list outside_access_in line 1 extended permit tcp any object linux_ssh eq ssh
ERROR: Address 189.120.190.229 overlaps with outside interface address.
ERROR: NAT Policy is not downloaded
I have a cisco asa 5510 with security plus license in Live enviroment . I need to add a secondary firewall . I was planning to do in active /standby mode for failover .But i have a doubt , when i do "show version " on live asa output says Active /active failover , does this means that i can only configure failover in active/active mode not in active/standby (which i want to do )?
Maximum Physical Interfaces : 8
VLANs : 20, DMZ Unrestricted
Inside Hosts : Unlimited
Failover : Active/Active
VPN-DES : Enabled
VPN-3DES-AES : Enabled
VPN Peers : 25
WebVPN Peers : 2
Dual ISPs : Enabled
VLAN Trunk Ports : 8
AnyConnect for Mobile : Disabled
AnyConnect for Linksys phone : Disabled
Advanced Endpoint Assessment : Disabled
UC Proxy Sessions : 2
This platform has an ASA 5505 Security Plus license...