Cisco Firewall :: CSM 4.3 Compatibility With Asa Version 9.1
Jan 12, 2013
I would like to know whether CSM 4.3 is compatible with ASA version 9.1(1). Any appropriate url that contains information about these two version's compatibility?
I would like to ask if a cisco 2811 running on an ios c2800nm-adventerprisek9-mz.124-25a.bin should be able to make an HWIC-1FE card work? I am also not detecting the card on any show commands. Plus i am seeing that all the LEDs (FDX/COL,100 and LINK/ACT) are lit steadily even though there is no cable attached to it, is it safe to say that the card could be defective?
I am confused about some things regarding the different IOS versions and their compatibility with certain switch hardware. I understand the differences between the IPBASE and IPSERVICES ios but am not quite clear as to how you can tell which ios images will work on which Cisco switch model platforms, other than the fact that some switches are designed only to run the IPBASE images and others have advanced hardware to run the advanced images. For instance, if I have a 3750-24TS-E with an IPBASE ios on it, can I load an IPSERVICES ios that came from say a 3750G-24TS-E1U? whether the ios on one platform can be transferred to another?
I need to understand if ASA 5550 ver 8.2(1) is comptible with IPv6, if not what is the upgrade path to make it IPv6 compatible. The requirement is dual stack of IPv4 and IPv6 should run in the same HA cluster and later will shift IPv6 completely.
The existing infrastructure is equipped with ASA with HA Active/Active mode. The command output for required details are attached here in txt mode.
We have a pair of 6500s with Sup720 running 12.2(33)SXI3. Each has an ACE-20 (s/w A2(2.0)) and FWSM (s/w v3.2(15)). We have reached a limit on the number of rules we can configure on the FWSM, and have determined that we shall upgrade to 4.1(5), with ASDM to 6.2(2)F. A question has been raised regarding the s/w on the ACE-20 modules. Do we need to upgrade them as well?
I have two ASA 5510, The one which I just got shows the CPU speed to be 1599MHz While the previous device (which is also 5510) reads the CPU as 1600 MHz.According to Cisco, for Failover redundant configuration, both devices must have same hardware configuration. Technically, this slight difference should not be an issue but I need to confirm that thess devices will work fine with failover configuration.
McAffee scan of acs 1113 appliance running the 4.2 build 124 patch 12 version reports that a medium vulnerability exists because the system has SSH version 1. Any way to specify only version 2 or turn off SSH?
I am currently migrating a netscreen firewall to a asa 5515 version 8.6 The issue is setting up the management connectivity.
basically the management IP of the cisco asa is not advertised. But, we want to route a management IP through the management interface to interface Gi0/2.
so IP of management interface is say - 216.10.100.10. and the IP of the inside interface is say - 198.1.1.10/24 on our router we have a static route sending 198.1.1.0/24 to next hop of 216.10.100.10 (management interface of cisco asa).
On the Cisco ASA can I send the traffic to the inside interface and manage the firewall via ssh that way?
I'm trying to install an ASA 5510 transparent firewall using ASA version 8.4(3)9 but I don't understand how traffic will ever pass through my firewall if both interfaces are on the same sub net(V lan) as the host and it's default gateway? The reason I'm doing this is were installing UAG (or Direct Access) and the UAG appliance need to have public IP's but still be behind a firewall (see attached diagram).
Looking at the documentation (which all seems to be for 5505's running 8.2) it almost seems like i need to have the transparent firewall 'in-line' to the ISP router?, but this router services another IP address range on another v lan for other (routed) firewalls (not shown on diagram) so putting it 'in-line' is not possible. Surely this can't be the case can it? If not how is it supposed to be cabled up and configured so packets go through the firewall?
I try to convert a CISCO ASA 8.2 version to 8.4 BUT, I have a small or "little" problem :On Cisco ASA 8.2.x, i have a possibility to create multi-line global with different subnet.Example :
global (outside) 2 217.1.x.65-217.x.x.66 netmask 255.255.255.240 global (outside) 1 interface <-- Ip interface is other subnet : 217.3.x.3 global (outside) 2 217.1.x.67 netmask 255.255.255.240 nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 nat (dmz2) 2 192.168.4.0 255.255.255.0
What is the method or solution to translate multi-global in 8.4 ? with static translation in 8.4 : i try to use different server in inside's zone, but not in same network on outside. In 8.2 Firmware, it's very easy to use that, but in 8.3-8.4 version, i don't have some idea to manipulate ...
interface Vlan1 description Lien vers reseau Interne Client nameif inside security-level 100 ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
We want to make an upgrade of one of our customers' ASA 5520 (with failover). They have version 8.2 now and we want to get the more stable newest one. Can we get an 8.6 version? or we need an ASA 5500X for that one?
%ASA-3-305005: No translation group found for tcp src inside:211.155.169.186/1433 dst outside:42.121.87.89/6000, I found this error ,but the IP 211.155.169.186 is public address. I check the configuration but didn't find any information about this address.I don't understand why src is inside? How can I solve this error?
We have 2 firewalls on PIX facing the Internet and connected to interface e1 (behind it) an ASA version 8.3 Both the PIX (Firewall facing) and the ASA are on the same subnet.
By using Routing statements and statics I have been able to reroute specific traffic to the ASA5520 version 8.3 Now I need to inverse the 2 devices. The ASA5520 will be facing the Internet and the PIX will be behind it.Unfortunately the ASA5520 is refusing to route the traffic to the PIX. The access-lists are open accordingly and a NAT on the ASA has been created.
I try to setting up a PIX firewall to server as firewall end point for a small network for Internet access. I had include PIX configuration setup, I had replaced IP address information by sentence which describe them since IP Address is sensitive information in our network.
For some reason NAT process doesn't work in log I always receiving this kind of messages :
I need to fullfill the below configuration which is working fine on my actual D-Link Netdefend firewall.
We have a range of IP assign by our ISP : 194.250.47.128/29 194.250.47.129 is the firewall IP and 134 the isp gateway.
We have 4 interfaces - The local user interface: lan =192.168.170.1/24 - The servers interface : dmz =192.168.171.1/24 - The database interface : oracle=192.168.169.1/24 [Code]...
I have to test new Cisco ASA's IOS version 8.4 in my GNS3 LAB . do provide the link for downloading the same.I dont have direct download access from cisco.com.
What anyconnect version do I need on a 5505 so i can have people connect via iOS devices? Right now I have "anyconnect-macosx-i386-2.5.1025-k9.pkg" on there, will that work for iOS devices?
I have a PIX506E that was resently reset and it has version PIX Version 7.1(2) . It either uses some different commands or I am not using them correctly. [code]
I was wondering if I picked up a used (End of Life) pix-515e, would would I need to do to be able to upgrade it to that latest version of IOS made for that product? Is it still possible to even get access to that version? Will cisco allow downloads for that devices IOS?
I just need to upgrade existing FWSM of 6509.FWSM Firewall Version 2.3(1)is it possible to upgrade to the version of 4.X .If not to which version is safe?And also I need to steps of doing FWSM upgrade.
I believe this setup does the following. The inside interface and interfaces 4,5,6,and 7 will translate using this line....
global (outside) 1 209.165.200.235-209.165.200.254 netmask 255.255.255.224
and if the addresses run out is will start using the ouside interface IP address to translate, so traffic is not disrupted and is based on the line of configuration.....
global (outside) 1 interface
My question, does it do this because of the order of the configuration..
global (outside) 1 209.165.200.235-209.165.200.254 netmask 255.255.255.224global (outside) 1 interface
or would it do it that way even if it was like this?
global (outside) 1 interfaceglobal (outside) 1 209.165.200.235-209.165.200.254 netmask 255.255.255.224
and if so why?Now let's convert the above configuration to ASA 5505 Version 8.3 or newer.
My question is how does it know to use the outside interface as a backup when the OUTSIDE-NAT-POOL is depleted?Also why do I need to define the INTERNAL-SEGMENTS ? Doesn't the "any" in the (any,outside) take care of that?Also wouldn't the "any" in (any,outside) cover interface 3 or DMZ which could be an issue?
im changing the firewall 5510 to 5515, with ASA5510 the incoming and outgoing calls work perfectly, but when i active the 5515 the outgoing calls doesnt work, only the incoming calls work.
As you see on the topology,the flow of calls happens this way:
In the outgoing calls the phone forward the call to the PABX(172.17.3.4), and the PABX forward the call through the ISP LINK to SIP SERVER (10.140.131.208). The incoming calls occur in the reverse path.
ASA 5510 config: ASA Version 7.0(8) name 172.17.3.4 PABX dns-guard ! ! interface Ethernet0/1 [Code]...
Im changing the firewall 5510 to 5515, with ASA5510 the incoming and outgoing calls work perfectly, but when i active the 5515 the outgoing calls doesnt work, only the incoming calls work.
As you see on the topology,the flow of calls happens this way: In the outgoing calls the phone forward the call to the PABX(172.17.3.4), and the PABX forward the call through the ISP LINK to SIP SERVER (10.140.131.208). The incoming calls occur in the reverse path.
ASA 5510 config:
ASA Version 7.0(8) name 172.17.3.4 PABX dns-guard ! ! interface Ethernet0/1 description ***ISP SIP Network*** [Code]....