I'm planning connect VPN concentrator in our company to PIX515 DMZ interface.At the moment , VPN concentrator(used for remote access VPN for laptop users) is connected directly to core switch so as PIx515. Having VPN Concentrator connected directly to LAN is security risk .SO i want to connect VPN concentrator to DMZ of the Firewall(pix515).
We don't have any test environment and we are not allowed to have downtime of more than 10 minutes in production network ,I want to make sure my design and commands would work without problem .I've attached doigram of our curernt setup and new setup I'm planning to work on as well as commands . Does this design will work .Nat , routing everything .
I am unable to ping my computer (attached via crossover). I can ping from the PC, but not from the PIX515. I'm using ethernet 1, and I have its IP set at 192.168.1.2/24, but for what ever reason I am unable to contact the computer. I tried messing with the access list a little bit but nothing so far.
PIX515(config)# show run : Saved : PIX Version 6.3(5) interface ethernet0 auto shutdown interface ethernet1 auto nameif ethernet0 outside security0
We're migrating as mentioned in the subject and this new format is quite a departure from previous iOS versions so I thought I'd post the configs of the PIX and the ASA and ask if someone is willing to compare them and verify that it is correct and should be basically plug and play. The xxx.xxx.xxx are outside IP addresses and the yyy.yyy.yyy are inside addresses. .
Existing PIX config PIX Version 6.3(4) interface ethernet0 100full
I have one outside interface with global IP address 22.214.171.124 and two inside.Both inside interfaces restrict and non_restrict have private IP addresses.I tried to filter some URLs on PIX515 IOS 7.2, only on restrict interface but my filter does not work.I can access prohibited URL from restrict interface. What's wrong in my URL filtering?
I am using a Pix 515 with IOS 8.0(3).I have in my access list on the outside interface.......access-list outside_access_in extended permit icmp any 126.96.36.199 255.255.255.0 echo access-list outside_access_in extended permit icmp any 188.8.131.52 255.255.255.0 echo-reply.......in order to allow ping requests and ping replies into my inside network. This certainly works since I can ping the inside from outside and vice versa, but in the ASDM display of access rules, the hit count for these two lines is always zero. If I run 'show access-list', the hit count for these lines is non-zero.
Why doesn't the hit count show up in the ASDM gui display?Also, I have read that the PIX does not treat ICMP in the same way as TCP or UDP and there is no stateful behaviour towards ICMP. However, if I set up a continuous ping from outside to inside and then disable the above access list rule allowing echo requests towards the inside, the ping continues whereas I would expect it to stop.
In the config there is 'timeout icmp 00:00:02' if there is no stateful connection for ICMP, why is there a timeout value for it?
I am having a spot of bother with a Cisco PIX515, I have posted the current running config below, now I am no cisco expert by any means although I can do basic stuff with them, now I am having trouble with traffic sent from the outside to address: 10.75.32.25 it just doesn't appear to be going anywhere.
Now this firewall is deep inside a private network, with an upstream firewall that we don't manage. I have spoken to the people that look after that firewall and they say they they have traffic routing to 10.75.32.21 and 10.75.32.25 and thats it (although there is a website that runs from the server 172.16.102.5 which (if my understanding is correct) gets traffic via 10.75.32.23. [code]
We are setting up an old office building as an offsite data center. The network cosists on a PIX 501 firewall and a 2811 router. I am attempting to setup a GRE tunnel over IPsec back to the main office. The main office consists of a PIX515, a 2821 router, and a 2921 router.
There is also an ASA5510 in our main office that is used as our primary connection for all of our external services and as a GRE endpoint for our other offices. The PIX515 is used to connect our main office clients to the internet and we would like traffic between it and our offsite data center to go across it as well. The default route is to use the ASA. We used policy based routing on the 2821 and 2921 routers to direct the appropriate traffic to the PIX515. Right now I am not able to get the tunnel setup. It appears that the offsite datacenter is sending packets but is not receiving any when I issue the “show crypto ipsec sa” commands on both firewalls. I will show the output of that command below.
Main Office The external address 184.108.40.206. The loopback address 10.254.10.6 The tunnel address 10.2.60.1 Offsite Datacenter The external address 220.127.116.11 The loopback address 10.254.60.6 The tunnel address 10.2.60.2
The main office PIX515 Config :
PIX Version 7.2(2) ! interface Ethernet0 mac-address 5475.d0ba.5012 nameif outside security-level 0 ip address 18.104.22.168 255.255.255.240
We have got site to site VPN configured between local site with PIX515 6.3(5) and remote site with ASA 5505 7.2(4) . Because of very unreliable internet connection in remote site , we have added new ISP link which we want to use as redundant link .i understand ASA 5505 can be configured with two ISP link with SLA monitor method for redundancy as per this document ,[URL]
my question is how do i set up this pix 515 to have redundant VPN tunnel with remote site (when primiary ISP link fails in remote site and secondary ISP links takes over ) . I was thinking of using PIX 515 with 2 peers in same crypto map used for that sepcific site to site vpn tunnel,not sure that is the right way or not though.But how would i configure ASA 5505 to use backup interface(where secondar isp router conects ) to particitae in Site to site Tunnel .
I need to confirm that the 4510R+E switch with the SUB7-E/2 running version 15 IOS will not support NAT. I am 99% convinced that it does not but i am looking for confirmation, as i am a bit surprised by the lack of NAT support on this platform.
We are running ACS 4.0 so understandably so we are looking to upgrading to a Cisco supportable version of ACS. The limitation of our current version of ACS does not support nested AD groups. The latest version of ACS (I think it is 5.4) will?
I´m Trying to synchronize the clock with NTP server external, these ntp server only support NTP version 3.Can I change the NTP version in the ACE4710 Appliance to support the ntp server external?If is possible, How I can change it ?
This is the version:
Cisco Application Control Software (ACSW) TAC support: [URL] Copyright (c) 1985-2011 by Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. The copyrights to certain works contained herein are owned by other third parties and are used and distributed under license.
I Have a requirement to migrate from ipv4 to ipv6, I have checked the scalability of all the devices for this migration except ACS 1113 Solution Engine, Version 4.2. I couldnt reach the proper documentation to check its support for ipv6.
I cant find the WUSB600n ver.2 drivers on your support page: url...When I click "Version 1.0" it shows me the Win7 driver but by clicking "Version 2.0" it just says: "Guides and Information" but theres no drivers. I suppose it's a bug.I have a new Laptop so I need the Win7 64bit driver for ver.2.
McAffee scan of acs 1113 appliance running the 4.2 build 124 patch 12 version reports that a medium vulnerability exists because the system has SSH version 1. Any way to specify only version 2 or turn off SSH?
I am currently migrating a netscreen firewall to a asa 5515 version 8.6 The issue is setting up the management connectivity.
basically the management IP of the cisco asa is not advertised. But, we want to route a management IP through the management interface to interface Gi0/2.
so IP of management interface is say - 22.214.171.124. and the IP of the inside interface is say - 126.96.36.199/24 on our router we have a static route sending 188.8.131.52/24 to next hop of 184.108.40.206 (management interface of cisco asa).
On the Cisco ASA can I send the traffic to the inside interface and manage the firewall via ssh that way?
I'm trying to install an ASA 5510 transparent firewall using ASA version 8.4(3)9 but I don't understand how traffic will ever pass through my firewall if both interfaces are on the same sub net(V lan) as the host and it's default gateway? The reason I'm doing this is were installing UAG (or Direct Access) and the UAG appliance need to have public IP's but still be behind a firewall (see attached diagram).
Looking at the documentation (which all seems to be for 5505's running 8.2) it almost seems like i need to have the transparent firewall 'in-line' to the ISP router?, but this router services another IP address range on another v lan for other (routed) firewalls (not shown on diagram) so putting it 'in-line' is not possible. Surely this can't be the case can it? If not how is it supposed to be cabled up and configured so packets go through the firewall?
Can any ASA 5500 in particular the ASA5510 firewall support jumbo frames (i.e. greater than the default standard 1500 Bytes frames)?. I plan to use the ASAs to setup a point-to-point IPSec tunnel and need an Application frame of 4Kbytes intact and not segment it.I have done little checking on the Cisco Website and see it mention of Jumbo frames on the 5580 on 10Gig interface but didn't see mention 5510. 5580s are way over-kill and expensive for what I need is to run a mission critical one IPSec point-to-point with maximum of no more than 100Kbps so 5510 is perfect for me but not sure if it can carry the jumbo frame?
On the routers and switches it's the MTU settings and they are configurable per interface and I am OK and the circuit is T1 which the Telcos said it's OK since it's physical layer so the only unkown is the firewall.