Port forwarding done to a DMZ located server on the cisco ASA 5520. Now this host cannot browse but allowed outside to inside access is possible Is there anyway i can give this system to browse internet? may be through the natted IP ( 94.20.*.*)
View 2 Repliesi allowed one of internal ip using static nat and public ip is 203.18.137.22 and i want to check which IP are hit this public ip ?Is there is any command to check which ip is hitting 203.18.137.22? I have the cisco 5520 asa firewall.
View 6 Replies View RelatedCan threat detection provoke frequent disconnections on allowed traffic?We are using asa 5520 with 8.3.1 IOS For instance in ASDM we see SYN attack messages .The source ip address correspond to external an external host (in the outside interface) wich is allowed to connect to internal servers(in the internal interfaces).
Our threat conf is as follow:
threat-detection rate dos-drop rate-interval 600 average-rate 100 burst-rate 400
threat-detection rate dos-drop rate-interval 3600 average-rate 80 burst-rate 320
threat-detection rate bad-packet-drop rate-interval 600 average-rate 100 burst-rate 400
threat-detection rate bad-packet-drop rate-interval 3600 average-rate 80 burst-rate 320
threat-detection rate acl-drop rate-interval 600 average-rate 400 burst-rate 800
threat-detection rate acl-drop rate-interval 3600 average-rate 320 burst-rate 640
[code]....
I am not very familiar with ASA 5520 yet.I have been able to allow the OUTSIDE world to connect via SSH to the intermal host 172.17.2.50 on my DMZ network. I've created a NAT rule and an ACL as written on the configuration below.
Now I need the INTERNAL network to ssh 172.17.2.50 but ASA stops me with the following error: [code]
I am trying to create host objects that I'll then add to network-object groups for use in ACL/ACEs.When I try to create a host I am having trouble adding the IP address.I then get an error saying the host name must start and end with letters or numbers and only contain letters or numbers. What do I need to do to create hosts from CLI?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have ASA 5520. I cannot ping the host(192.168.1.20) which is inside firewall from outside hosts. Inside host (192.168.1.20) is translated into (198.24.210.226) using static NAT.From outside host, I used "PING 198.24.210.226". Is it because I used dynamic PAT for inside hosts?
interface GigabitEthernet0/0nameif outsidesecurity-level 0ip address 198.24.210.230 255.255.255.248!interface GigabitEthernet0/1nameif insidesecurity-level 100ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
[Code].....
How can we host 300+ secure (https) websites using a couple of public IP's on an ASA5520 with AIP SSM-20 and with as few certificates as possible?
Summary of set-up:
We currently host a number of websites using an ASA5520 and use host headers, so have 6 servers with around 40 hosted URL's. The number of websites is due to double very soon and we will need to use more of our public IP's. We can see that we will will run out of public IP's very soon especially as there is a project in the pipeline that has a likely requirement to host an additional 200+ websites.
Each of these websites are required to use https and therefore each must have a certificate which will be very expensive. PCI DSS (payment card industry data security standard) is causing us issues because we had hoped to post the certificates on the firewall (one for each physical server) and then run the data UN-encrypted from the firewall to the relevant web servers, so that we could use one certificate for lots of websites and therefore reduce our certificate costs, however is not best practice to do this due to the data being unencrypted within the firewall and on the DMZ network and therefore potentially open to compromise. I doubt that we could install 200+ certificates on a 5520 and then re-encrypt the data to the web servers especially seeing as we also have an IPS card that is already running at around 70-80% util due to the performance overhead.
BTW - We also have an in-line Breach WAF which will be required to inspect the packets (certificates to be installed on the WAF to allow this).
I have a 5520 in production at a customer's site between an outside 802.11 network and an inside server. The server can get to outside hosts OK, and the traffic is being NATed properly, and sockets initiated by the server on the inside can pass data both ways, but I need to allow outside hosts the ability to send 'announcement' UDP packets to the inside server. I thought this might be an outside-NAT-required issue to get the traffic routed, but I need the inside server to see the actual outside host source IP in the UDP packet, so I basically set the outside host up similar to the inside host, just without the NAT table on the firewall -- it's subnet is outside the destination (inside server) subnet, and its gateway is the outside interface of the ASA, the same way the inside server is able to get to hosts outside. The firewall should just route the packet with a destination of the inside subnet once it sees that it hits a 'permit' ACL.
I have the appropriate ACL's set up, and when I do 'show access-list' I see policy hits for the 'permit' statements where the outside host is generating the announcement and it's hitting the ACL. I even duplicated the ACL into list 101 and 102, and applied 101 for inbound traffic on the outside int, and applied 102 for outbound traffic on the inside int, and I'm seeing policy hits on both permit statements outside and inside, so it looks like the traffic is being passed on to the inside interface and permitted, but the server isn't seeing the packets.
I can ping the outside interface from the outside, but cannot ping the inside interface or any inside hosts from the outside, even though I have 'permit icmp any any' enabled on the ACL on both ints. When I remove the firewall and put the outside clients on the same subnet, the server sees the packets just fine.
I set up the same scenario in my lab with an ASA 5505, with the same results. Below is the running config from the 5505 in the lab. The production firewall is running a slightly older version of ASA, so I made the configuration as basic as possible on the 5505 to match the config in the field:
: Saved
:
ASA Version 8.3(1)
!
hostname ciscoasa
enable password Guh9Xxhb9mcC8lV1 encrypted
passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
names
!
interface Vlan2
description Outside WAN Interface
nameif outside
security-level 0
ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan3
description Inside LAN Interface
nameif inside(code)
We have set of PC's who will be connecting either RA IPsec or SSL VPN to another location. On our site, our perimeter device is an ASA 5520 8.2(3). The interfaces on this ASA doesn't have Access Lists applied, so from what I understand, there is a default policy applied globally (class-default). Now my question is: If we set up vpn clients on our pc, are the ports used by the clients to the VPN server allowed by default or do we need to tweak the class-default?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI am using an ASA5550 for a complex secure network that has at least six "outside" networks. Each "outside" network is assigned to a specific port each set at level "0". I also have a DMZ, set to level "50". I am having difficulty with passing traffic from a host in the DMZ to all but one of the "outside" networks. Is there a limit to the number of "outside" interfaces? I will provide a redacted config file as soon as possible.
View 3 Replies View RelatedA user needs to be allowed through the Cisco ASA 5505 firewall to make a VPN connection to 83.1.**.** address on port 1723.
View 13 Replies View RelatedI was reviewing my ASA config and noticed that port 1025 was being allowed in and statically NAT'd to connect to my email server:
access-list outside_in extended permit tcp any host X.X.X.X eq 1025
static (inside,outside) tcp interface 1025 Y.Y.Y.Y 1025 netmask 255.255.255.255.
i have reviewed this configuration a couple of times and I am not seeing my error. I have two internal subnets, in different VLANs with the ASA being the default router. The internal zone works fine, but the zone called wireless on VLAN 13 doesn't. The firewall blocks all communications and the rules look correct to me. I want all traffic on this wireless subnet to be allowed to cross over the firewall and NAT to the outside interface, just as the inside zone does.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI would like to setup an cisco ASA 5505 to only allow certain IP's on port 3389, but i can't get it to work. Maybe some of you experts know why?
Here is my config:
ASA Version 8.4(3)!hostname cisco-asaenable password ** encryptedpasswd ** encryptednames!interface Ethernet0/0switchport access vlan 2!interface Ethernet0/1!interface Ethernet0/2!interface Ethernet0/3!interface Ethernet0/4!interface Ethernet0/5!interface Ethernet0/6!interface Ethernet0/7!interface Vlan1nameif insidesecurity-level 100ip address 192.168.1.253 255.255.255.0!interface Vlan2nameif outsidesecurity-level 0ip address 95.*.*.* 255.255.255.248!ftp mode passiveobject network obj_anysubnet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0object network rdpuser-1host 46.*.*.*object network rdpuser-2host 48.*.*.*object network rdp-host-pchost 192.168.1.20object
[code].....
The allowed IP's are setup on user level (rdpuser-1 and rdpuser-2) .Still do, I can't connect to the server from any of these IP's...
We have a Cisco ASA 5580 and the outside interface has a public IP address and we noticed we can ping this address from the Internet. I did a packet capture on the outside interface and confirmed the pings and the IP address sending the pings. The 5580 does not have an access list allowing icmp so I'm not sure what is allowing the pings to this interface.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI want to mark company owned laptops with a registry setting and have our ASA 5520 identify these systems when connecting via SSL and IPSEC remotely, and allow broader access to the internal network than the telecommuter that use their personal PCs. For the users that connect with their personal PCs, I want to only allow RDP access to their company PCs on the internal network.
Can I accomplish this with the current VPN Plus license and Anyconnect Essentials feature enabled? If not, what license/features do I need installed/ enabled to accomplish these objectives?
If I am using an ASA5505, and I have a configuration similar to below, I see that the untrusted interface is only allowed to ftp to 192.168.1.5. Since the trusted interface is not limited to ftp only can it basically run any protocol it wants to 10.20.30.2, or does it get limited to only ftp by the other ACL on returning packets.Also, is the ACL applied to the interface because the ACL's name is the name of the interface?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have ASA 5520 acting as the VPN Server and Cisco 1941 router as EZVPN client. Since last few days client is not able to establish vpn connection. 1941 router is continuously generating the below log messages
001569: Jul 22 12:19:05.883 ABC: %CRYPTO-4-EZVPN_SA_LIMIT: EZVPN(VPNGROUP) Split tunnel attributes(51) greater than max allowed split attributes(50)
001574: Jul 22 12:19:07.835 ABC: %CRYPTO-6-EZVPN_CONNECTION_DOWN: (Client) User=vpn_user Group=VPNGROUP Client_public_addr=<client public ip> Server_public_addr=<server public ip>
004943: Jul 22 11:32:42.247 ABC: %IP_VFR-4-FRAG_TABLE_OVERFLOW: Dialer1: the fragment table has reached its maximum threshold 16
I have recently setup Splunk to receive my syslog messages from my ASA 5510. In the past I used kiwi without observing this issue, but I needed more features than kiwi had available. Anyway, anytime I stop the splunk service my asa does not allow any outbound connections to be established.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have installed ASA 5510 to limit sessions of Users to 170. But as soon as i put it infront of network before router, Internet goes down and i cannot browse or something.
The network is simple, Cisco three layer model with users on Wired LAN/Wireless LAN using WLC. Approx 2500-3000 users.
[code]...
I just got a PIX 506e from a friend that was not longer using it. I'm trying to get started with the configuration page. I've reset it to factory defaults, rebooted and connected up ethernet. I can ping the device at 192.168.1.1 and access it via console. I browse the site https://192.168.1.1/startup.html, get the invalid ssl certification, get a login prompt (user/pass) and as the document says I leave it blank. As soon as I hit ok it goes to the 404 error Page Not found.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI just installed a new ASA 5505 for an office with three internal subnets. The three networks can each get online fine and ping eachother, but cannot browse to shares on the two internal networks other than their own. How do I configure the ASA to allow all traffic between these three inside networks?
192.168.152.0
192.168.152.0
192.168.154.0
[code]....
From home I would like to browse my intranet at work where I have a Linux box, which I will call "W", i.e. url...My router at home closes port 22 but maps port 2222 to port 22 on my server "S" which resolves to mydomain.org.
My main machine at home, "M", is where I do my work from home. I thought this might work: [code] On M I tell firefox that S:6666 is the proxy for all sites like url...
So far my browser on M cannot find the intranet web sites with this scheme.How do I make this work? What can I use to debug this
I recently deployed this module on Cisco ASA 5520 (v8.2.5) at a client's place. I'm having problems. Even if there's 1 user, browsing Internet is super slow. If I were to bypass the CSC SSM (for 10 users) module by removing the "service-policy TEST interface inside" command, browsing Internet is very fast. Based on my troubleshooting, if I were to disable Web Filtering, Web Reputation and URL Blocking & Filtering, and leave all other services enabled, then the browsing is fast. how come I enable the 3 services stated above and browsing the Internet is slow, even for 1 LAN user. I don't have any thing configured under these 3 services. Just by enabling the services alone, it's already slow. It doesn't make sense for Cisco to sell such an expensive product and it can't even handle 1 user with no settings but services enabled.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a host that can successfully connect to a PIX 515E (7.x OS) via VPN Client; however, I have no IP routing to the LAN from the remote host.The VPN IP pool works finem,The LAN default gateway is the inside interface on the PIX; the network is flat L2 behind it.The default route on the PIX points out; no other routes are defined,The VPN remote host can be pinged from LAN hosts, but the VPN remote host cannot ping any LAN host, not even the PIX inside interface.
View 2 Replies View RelatedASA 5510
Ver 8.2(5)
I have been looking all over the place for the answer of how to allow clients on an IPSEC VPN to ping from host to host.
I have 2 web servers that replicate between them (two different internal ip). My idea is that if one of them will not work, the other to do the relay.I have a Cisco ASA 5505 I can do a nat for each machine. How should I set ?
View 3 Replies View RelatedBased on the configuration pasted below, we believe the host (10.0.2.200 / 255.255.255.0 GW: 10.0.2.1 with external DNS servers configured) should have access to the web. However, it cannot resolve any names nor can it connect outside.
[code]....
We were using ASA-5520-K9 with ASA-SSM-AIP-20-K9 but recently found some hardware problem in our running ASA. Now cisco want to replace with ASA-5520-K8.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe just changed ISPs and now have a /29 routed subnet to be used on our ASA 5510 (8.4) instead of the one public ip we had before.There are a couple of PAT translations that were previously setup on the "interface" address which i now want to assign to a different ip address further in my subnet.
So i just changed this:
object network BMMM
nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp smtp smtp
to:
object network BMMM
nat (inside,outside) static other.external.ip.in.subnet service tcp smtp smtp
And assumed that this would work,y it does not, and this leaves me unable to contact that machine from the outside.And shoud i also change my access-list?The relevant access-list rule is:access-list outside_in extended permit tcp any object BMMM eq smtp
I have a ASA 5505 Sec Plus. I would like to allow outside hosts to our mail server and also our FTP server. So i would like to allow only SMTP, HTTP (for Outlook Web Access) and FTP.
View 10 Replies View RelatedI updated an ASA 5505 to 50 users, but I still can only connect 10 hosts. In Licensing it show 50 insides hosts. I also tried to update to ASA 8.4.5 but that did not work.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm just wondering if its possible to ping an IPv4 host using the IPv6 host assuming that the NAT64 has already been implemented?
[code]...