We are in the process of adding second isp for webhosting purposes .Is there any issue if we are making outside 2 interface on the pix .i need to host some websites through this new link ie isp2 .
PIX Version 7.0(7)
Whether it is possible to have same vlan on multiple interface on ASA 5510 and higher models ?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have been working on a configuration for single IP address (on outside ) of ASA5505.I am trying to utilize the outside address 192.168.0.249 to PAT/NAPT to 10 inside machines [code]
What I am not sure of (actually that could be considered all encompassing) is the mapped services/real services.Any constructive comments assistance?
Is it possible to assign a single ssid to multiple interface groups by assigning the ssid to multiple AP groups?
I have buildings geographically dispersed that are configured with multiple vlans in interface groups so that I can maintain an addressing scheme of dhcp assigned addresses per building. Each building is also further grouped as AP groups. I'd like to know if by assigning the same wlan ssid to each of the AP groups, will I maintain addressing integrity for each building? I'm thinking it will work.
Do the buildings have to be outside AP range of each other to avoid problems?
5508 controller
7.2.110.0 code
6 buildings
6 interface groups
1 ssid
We have Cisco ASA 5505 box.We have a /29 subnet available.At this moment one of IP addresses in this rage is assigned to VLAN2 used for outside interface all outgoing traffic from VLAN10 (for employees) will go out using one IP, xxx.xxx.xxx.1all outgoing traffic from VLAN20 (for visitors) will go out using second IP, xxx.xxx.xxx.2all outgoing traffic from VLAN10 host yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy (mail server, webmail, ...) will go out using third IP, xxx.xxx.xxx.3all specified incomming traffic to xxx.xxx.xxx.3 will be NATted to internal host yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy in VLAN10 .The main purpose is to have specific public IP address for mail server only not to get to any black list,and to give visitors different outgoing IP address than for our internal users.
View 3 Replies View Relatedsome of the servers are not pinging from one switch but they are pingable from other redundant distribution switch. So I took the IP addresses from the redundant switch, with that I found MAC addresses from the access switch.But when I tried to see to which ports these MAC are addresses are connected to, multiple MAC addresses are resolving to the same switchport. like 5 MAC's are showing to 1 port and other 3 MAC's are showing to other port, like this there are many. All these MAC's belong to virtual servers.
View 11 Replies View RelatedI am Implementing Cisco IP Routing (CCNP ROUTE FLG) book and right now I am reviewing IPv6 chapter. This part of OSPFv3 multiple instances over a single physical interface caught my attention
View 6 Replies View Relatedconfigure a secondary ip address (over the same address range) in a vlan interface on the SGE2000?For example, I want Interface Vlan 10 on mw switch has 172.16.10.1/24 and 172.16.10.2/24. Is that possible? If I try I get an error message with a duplicate IP address error. On Catalyst switches it can be done, but on Small Business?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe are having Cisco ASA 5540 having Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 8.0(5)23 at certain time of moment daily wer are facing latency and packetdrop wherin when I checked for ASA Interface which gives me " Input Errors" on outside interface ,so can any one tell me what are the causes to get input errors on cisco asa outisde interface.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI know this is not a the preferred way to do it, but this just an interim network configuration until the Remote Site gets re-located and reconfigured. I'm trying to bridge and route traffic and hoping the community can offer a review of the sample configuration and/or some ideas to make this a reality.
Existing network is bridged across site-to-site private line (p-2-p) so 192.168.100.0/24 devices exist at both locations. In order to reduce bandwidth consumption across the p-2-p, the 172.20.100.0/24 devices (end user PCs and new to the environemnt) will be routed out a local Internet connection which in turn reduces the p-2-p traffic to just private network traffic for the two networks. That same network requires routing through the 192.168.100.0/24 network in order to access the private WAN connected to the 3900 router with IP 192.168.100.1.
I have Pix 501 firewall and I'm just configuring the device for "Email Server" to allowing POP/SMTP.
Inside Interface Address: 132.147.162.14/255.255.0.0
Outside Interface Address: ISP provided IP address
My question is can my traffic goes from inside interface to outside interface? (because the inside interface address not from 10.0/172./192.168 private address)Also I'm allowing internet from this email server (132.147.162.14) so what my access list to be configured? and what my subnet mask shoud be there?
Pix(config)#access-list outbound permit tcp 132.147.162.14 255.255.0.0 any eq 80
Pix(config)#access-list outbound permit udp 132.147.162.14 255.255.0.0 any eq 53
Pix(config)#access-group outbound in interface inside
I've got a ASA 5550 firewall interface failover issue. (File attached).
when I shut down the inside interface Gi 1/1 of the left firewall(Active firewall), It failed to failover. but when I shut down the Gi 1/12 of the Core 1 switch, The firewall failover very well.
I followed this guide but I was not able to failover. [URL]
how can I configure so that when the Gi 1/1 or Gi 1/0 interface goes down, it can failover ? Code...
I have verizon fios business line with 5 static IP addresses and am configured for ethernet wan. I can use EA6500 as the router instead of using Verizon's own router, however I can't figure out how to assign all 5 static IP addresses on internet interface. I have already assigned first IP to internet interface but don't see a way to add more IPs either in internet interface or from NAT section where I can create static NAT.
Is this even possible with EA6500? If so, how?
I need to create a firewalled segment that not only separates hosts from general population, but also from each other. The solitary confinement of firewalled segments.I know that I could create a bunch of sub-interfaces, one for each host or group that needs to be isolated, but I'd really rather not have to do that if possible. 1) It could become a management nightmare between ACLs and sub-interfaces and 2) it's a waste of IP addresses.s there any way that I can create a bunch of separate VLANs behind the firewall and have them all terminate at the firewall, using a single firewall IP address for the gateway?
VLAN 1 - hosts 1.1.1.5 and 1.1.1.6VLAN 2 - hosts 1.1.1.7
Firewall DMZ Interface - 1.1.1.1VLAN 3 - hosts 1.1.1.8 and 1.1.1.9
This way, the hosts are isolated and can't talk to each other unless they're on the same VLAN.I'm working with an ASA 5510 running 8.2.4(4).
I have a Cisco ASA 5505 in our office. We are currently using Interface 0 for outside and 1 for inside. We only have 1 Vlan in our environment. We have two three switches behind the firewall. Today the uplink to Interface 1, to the firewall, on the switch went bad. I want to setup a second inside interface on the firewall and configure it as failover incase this happens again. I want to attach it to the other switch. Can I do this? If so, what do I need to do? would it only be a passive/standby interface?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have an asa 5520. How would I configure my dedicated management interface to be able to route off subnet while the firewall is in transparent mode?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am getting ready to deploy a 3945 ISR to serve as an internet and core router for and remote site. I will be terminating a site-to-site VPN tunnel on it and also configuring a zone based firewall config between my "outside" (internet link) and "inside" (all internal nets). My question is about how to approach securing the WAN interface with the Zone based FW in place?what kind of ACL do I need beyond those allowing and restricting remote access to the outside ip?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI've recently upgraded my old firewall from a PIX to an ASA5505 and have been trying to match up the configuration settings to no avail. I have is that I can't ping the new firewall on it's inside interface, despite having "icmp permit any inside" in the running config. Secondly, the server I have on there ("Sar") can't connect out to the internet.I've included the ASA's running config incase anybody can see if something stands out. I have a feeling it's either not letting anything onto the inside interface, or there is no nat going on. Lastly (and possibly relevant), the firewall is actually going at the end of a vlan, which is different to the firewall's inside vlan number. I don't know if this is actually the problem because the server can't connect out even if connected directly into the firewall.
View 32 Replies View RelatedI have been working with ASA 5510,20,40,80 but not with 5505 this vlan and its interfaces are quite confusing.Just want to know how it works and its connectivity to Cisco Switch.Do i have to put the interface of the switch in the same vlan as i am creating the interface vlan in firewall ?Now the switch port connecting to this Eth1 interface should also be in the same vlan ? i.e vlan3 ?? or it will be in trunk ? The default configuration shows the eth0 with no access vlan and interface eth1 with access vlan 2... does it mean the eth0 is in vlan1 ? (Nativ Vlan ) ???
View 4 Replies View Relatedtwo 6509 chassis with VSS configuration.One of those chassis have one FWSM installed and the configuration is like this:
Switch: firewall multiple-vlan-interfacesfirewall switch 1 module 3 vlan-group 1firewall vlan-group 1 3-5,7,8,10,200 interface Vlan200 ip address 10.50.50.1 255.255.255.252end
I am not receiving icmp replays from the fswm interfaces if i try to ping 172.20.80.1 from 10.50.50.2.I do not see any debuging info in the logsI successfully ping 10.50.50.2 from the inside networks int the cat6500, but int the network 172.20.80.0, can not ping 10.50.50.2.
I have a ASA5510 and I have a question about the speed the ports can handle, here is one port:
-interface Ethernet0/2
- speed 100
-shutdown
- no nameif
-no security-level
-no ip address
it's ethernet and not fastethernet so I figure it will only go to 10Mbps, but at the same time I can hard code the speed to 100.
I am unable to see 4th interface on my firewall i.e fastether0/3 on my firewall ASA 5510.
Below is the output.
ciscoasa# sh int ip br Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol Ethernet0/0 x.x.x.x YES CONFIG up up Ethernet0/1 x.x.x.x YES CONFIG up up Ethernet0/2 unassigned YES unset administratively down down Internal-Control0/0 127.0.1.1 YES unset up up Internal-Data0/0 unassigned YES unset up up Management0/0 192.168.1.1 YES CONFIG up up
We are trying to utilize a 5 ip block of addresses provided by our ISP. What we have assigned from them is like this: 10.10.10.46 - 10.10.10.50 is our ip range. 10.10.10.45 is the gateway. Subnet is 255.255.255.248. If we assign 10.10.10.46 to the outside interface how do we accept inbound traffic from the other addresses?
View 6 Replies View RelatedHaving upgraded to 8.3 from 8.2 I and read much about the differences , it seems that 8.3 deals with NAT in a much more managed method.However I am confused on how one would NAT a network object to multiple interfaces? i.e I know you can specficy a NAT adddress within the network object howeveer this only allows you to specific a single IP address.What if I want to talk accross multiple interfaces how would I specify this?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI would like to config "when host X on v lan X goes to a network that is across an ip sec tunnel, for which v lan X network is not in the encryption domains, translate host X address to that of the asa in a network that is part of the crypto domain".
Interface vlan544 (172.16.80.0/24) is the local encryption domain, and 10.1.0.0/29 holds some monitoring servers that should not be part of the encryption domain, but rather get it's source address translated to that of the firewall in 172.16.80.0/24. Here's how I did:
# Vlan522 for 10.1.0.0/29, need to somehow have a specific nat here I guess that falls between the no nat and the generic "nat the rest to the global)
[code]...
This obviously didn't work, the second (number 2) rule is never hit. What am I doing wrong?
We have an ASA 5510 firewall. There are 4 ports on it configured as 2 outside, one inside, and one DMZ. We have two cable modems attached to the outside ports. Our plan is to have the "inside" port directed to one outside port/cable modem, and the DMZ port directed to the other outside port/cable modem.
We have been able to get the "inside-to-outside" setup to work but not the "DMZ-to-outside" setup (at least at the same time).First off, is this possible? If so, what are we likely missing - some way to have a second default route for the DMZ?(My manager is the "Cisco person" here, not me, so I may not have enough info.
I have an ASA5510 that is connected to outside for WAN, inside for LAN (10.22.254.0/24), and a iSCSI switch plugged into Ethernet 0/3 (10.22.244.0/24). I can ping the Eth0/3 interface (10.22.244.1) but I can't ping across that interface from WAN or LAN side.
START CONFIGURATION
ASA Version 9.1(1)
!
hostname ASA5510
[Code].....
NAT command on 8.4? I am trying to PAT multipule Inside subnets to an IP address. With the example I found I can only PAT one subnet. If I do it the way I have below, it will end up with the last subnet (3.3.3.0) stay in the config. What is the best way of doing it? I have about 20 inside subnets I need to PAT.
object network obj-Inside-sub1
subnet 1.1.1.0 255.255.255.0subnet 2.2.2.0 255.255.0.0subnet 3.3.3.0 255.255.0.0nat (inside,outside) dynamic 199.246.5.2
Does the pix-501 support multiple SNMP communities? Im trying to add a second one, but the original community string gets removed when I add the new one. If we can have multiple SNMP hosts, then I woud imagine you could have multiple strings. I thought it was like most switches and routers, which can have the following:
snmp-server community STRING1
snmp-server community STRING2
The Pix-501 is currently running on version 6.3(5).
I have ASA 5520 with Ver 8.2.Outside interface is directly connected to ISP's router(TelePacific) and is assigned one of public IP:198.24.210.226.There are two servers inside the network with the private IP's:192.168.1.20 for DB Server, and 192.168.1.91 for Web Server.I did Static NAT 198.24.210.226 to 192.168.1.20 and 198.24.210.227 to 192.168.1.91.When I access DB Server(198.24.210.226) it's working OK but when I access Web Server(198.24.210.227) there is no response at all.I checked the inside traffic, it even did not get into the firewall.Is this the problem with ISP's router? How can we route all of our public IP's to the outside interface(198.24.210.226)?
interface GigabitEthernet0/1nameif insideip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0security-level 100no shutdown
interface GigabitEthernet0/0nameif outsideip address 198.24.210.226
[Code].....
I have an ASA 5505 that I log into and currently only need a password to log onto the device. How do I set it up so a username is required as well?Another user needs to access the device. How would I set that up so they have to user their own credentials? I tried username apssword priv command and it does not work.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have three public IP:s from /24 network like 83.x.x.10, 83.x.x.25 and 83.x.x.41 all using netmask 255.255.255.0.
I'm using 83.x.x.10 on ASA outside interface and trying to do static nat for inside servers with those other IP:s, but not yet solved it.
Using Cisco ASA 5505 software v9.02
Config:
object network obj_guest
nat (guest,outside) dynamic interface
object network obj_any
nat (inside,outside) dynamic interface
object network w2008
host 192.168.1.10
[code]....
This works other networks that are like whole network with /29 mask and have router in front of ASA using bridge. But in my case i just have DSL modem bridged in front of ASA. This static nat works like should if i use like Zywall USG series fw and this same configuration works in my customers, but they have those scenarios i said having mask /29 and router in front...
It seems that the problem is in ASA, like i won't show those public IP:s to public router from my operator. Because if i roll those other public IP:s on my ASA:s outside interface: i will use 83.x.x.25 and 83.x.x.41 on outside interface and after that put back my original 83.x.x.10 then my static nat is working just fine, atleast few hours, but not in next morning because ISP router flushes ARP cache.
Looking to replace an "all-in-one" type firewall (UTM/Firewall, SSL VPN) with a cisco product - the issue i'm running into is that we have multiple ISPs plus WAN and DMZ - overall more than 5 ports on mid-range ASA devices - and from what i read, adding 4-port module precludes me from adding CSC module.
Is there an solution to that other than going for 5585-x model? (kind of over our budget, granted we need 2 for failover)
