Cisco Firewall :: Add New Vlan In Existing Firewall Group In 6500?
Jan 19, 2013I want to add new vlan in existing firewall group in 6500. I am confused if it will add new vlan or overwrite.. I am using ASASM module with 6500.
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Cisco Firewall :: Cat6500 To Add Vlan Group For Fwsm
May 22, 2012i have fwsm in cat6500, i have one firewall vlan group which is in firewall module 1 vlan group 10. I need tocreate another vlan group and add to firewall module 1 vlan group 10, 20. i need to have zero downtime.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: 6500 FWSM Vlan Interface
Jan 29, 2012Is it possible for me to create 2 vlan interfaces on the 6500 and have them both in the same subnet?
For a specific customer requirement I would like to have a vlan interface on the 6500 as default gateway, sat in it's own vrf, and then route all traffic inbound and outbound to this vlan through the FWSM interface, preferably in the same subnet. I don't think this will be possible so just looking for confirmation either way.
As I will be running EIGRP between a pair of central 6500's and 2 remote offices it will make things much easier for me advertise the connected FWSM interfaces in to EIGRP for access in/out of all my VRF'd subnets. If I need another subnet for each VRF FWSM next hop then I'll have to reditribute a list of statics which I don't really want to do.
The reason I am not just using the FWSM as gateway is because I need to run HSRP across 3 different devices (another 6500 in a second suite), and failover FWSM will only give me 1 level of redundancy for those gateways.
Cisco Firewall :: ASA-SM Failover Pair In 6500 - Same Mgmt VLAN In All Context
Jun 19, 2012I have ASA-SM failover pair in two Catalyst 6500 switches. I send from switch to ASA-SM management VLAN 1234 to admin context for management purposes. I have another 3 contexts on ASA-SM. Can I have same managemenet VLAN1234 on each ASA-SM context? Can it work?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: Number Assigned For Firewall-group On 6509 Significant
Nov 17, 2011Is there any significance to the parameter "firewall-group" in the command
firewall vlan-group <firewall-group> <vlan-id>…<vlan-id>?
In other words is the series of commands
firewall switch 1 module 3 vlan-group 1,2
firewall vlan-group 1 100,101,102
firewall vlan-group 2 200,201,202
exactly equivalent to
firewall switch 1 module 3 vlan-group 3
firewall vlan-group 3 100,101,102,200,201,202
or
firewall switch 1 module 3 vlan-group 1,2,3
firewall vlan-group 1 100,200
firewall vlan-group 2 101,201
firewall vlan-group 3 102,202
All three of these options associate the same set of vlans to the FWSM but using different groupings. As far as I can tell, these groupings have no functional significance either on the switch side or the FWSM side. These are simply three different ways of specifying exactly the same thing? Am I correct?
Cisco Firewall :: 6500 - FWSM - Not Passing Traffic Through Firewall
May 3, 2011We have 2 FWSM modules in each 6500 switches. 1st module is having 04 firewall vlan groups with 18 vlan interfaces in a single context firewall. All are working fine with no issues. Recently we create one more vlan on MFSC and add into the same firewall module. However newly created vlan inside the FW is not able to communicate with outside and also outside users not able to reach newly created subnet. But within the firewall zones (other interfaces) it can communicate. Once we did packet capture we noticed that its hitting firewall outside interface only and when we ping we got TTL expired error. we have default routes to outside and there's no any route inside as new segment is within the firewall (no any hop).
I guess there's no limitation on number of vlans that we can assign on one firewall eventhough there is a limitation for number of vlan-group which is 16 max (but we are within that limit).
Cisco Firewall :: 6500 Cannot Ping The Servers Behind The Firewall
Feb 18, 2013I have 2 modules of FWSM in 6500 switch (failover).I need 5 context.When I use in routed mode (like in the picture) , I cannot ping the servers behind the firewall. (I have ping to FW context),In transparent mode, it is not happening.what is the problem with routed mode?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: Firewall Vlans On Catalyst 6500 By Using ASA
Aug 9, 2012How to secure vlans on Catalyst 6500 by using Cisco ASA Firewalls?There are no free modules on Catalyst 6500 to install a FWSM module.What is the best configuration to secure vlans (~80 vlans) by using cisco ASA firewalls (context, hairpining...)?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: ASA 5505 Creating Interface Vlan In Firewall
May 3, 2011I have been working with ASA 5510,20,40,80 but not with 5505 this vlan and its interfaces are quite confusing.Just want to know how it works and its connectivity to Cisco Switch.Do i have to put the interface of the switch in the same vlan as i am creating the interface vlan in firewall ?Now the switch port connecting to this Eth1 interface should also be in the same vlan ? i.e vlan3 ?? or it will be in trunk ? The default configuration shows the eth0 with no access vlan and interface eth1 with access vlan 2... does it mean the eth0 is in vlan1 ? (Nativ Vlan ) ???
View 4 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: 5510 Get Files From Existing Flash Onto New
Jun 5, 2013In order to do a flash upgrade on a 5510, is there any way to get the files from the existing flash onto the new flash before you replace existing flash? Is there an online procedure?
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: 5520 Unable To Add Another Line To An Existing NAT ACL
Mar 26, 2013As part of our PCI compliance, we were required to add a line to all of our ACLs in our ASA 5520 running version 8.2(3). Though there is an implicit deny all, we had to add a line to deny from any source to any destination.We had no problems in adding the additional deny all statements except for our NAT access-list. This NAT access list is used for our internet connection.Currently, the NAT ACL has 4 entries to permit from a specified source to destination any. This ACL is then called on our NAT statement.nat (inside) 1 access-list NAT,Also, note that NAT control is in place and we also have NAT zero statements for our VPN connections.So to fulfill our requirements, we just had to add another line to our ACL entries. But we encountered an issue with our NAT acl.
View 10 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: Setting Up New ASA 5505 Into Existing Network?
Mar 21, 2013I am having a problem trying to figure out how to add a new ASA 5505 to an existing network. My current network is:Cable Modem > Linksys > 48 port switch With multiple hosts residing on the 192.168.0.x network.Now i know that the ASA comes default with 192.168.1.1 on the inside interface and i want to change that to 192.168.0.1. I have tried to do this thru ASDM using the wizard and manually. Once i hit ok for it to write the config, it gives me an error that it didnt take. I then lose connection to the ASA and have to hard boot it to get it back.I am trying to do this without my external connection connected and i have a laptop connected to the ASA on port 0/2 with an IP address of 192.168.1.75.Do i need to connect my internet connection to it first and then run the wizard? I was hoping to get it configured for my existing network before i plugged in the internet connection to limit my downtime.This ASA came with 6.4.1 ASDM and 8.2 OS installed. i was able to upgrade the ASDM to 7.X but when i go to update the OS to 9.1, i get an error that i am not registered to use cryptographic software. Dont know where i need to register to get it?
View 4 Replies View RelatedCisco Routers :: VLAN To VLAN Firewall Rules Support Missing On RV180?
Jan 12, 2013How do I submit an RFE (Request For Enhancement) to the Cisco SBR team to encourage them to implement the missing support for VLAN to VLAN firewall rules that was available in the RVS4000 (See [URL]) and that was supposedly added to a beta release of the RV220W firmware (See [URL])?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: 6509 / FWSM VLAN Configuration Mismatch And Some VLAN Deleted
Aug 12, 2012We have 6509 VSS with FWSM Module and we have created two context on it, one is INTERNALL CONTEXT othe is EXTERNALL Context? We have spanned various VLANS in switches and FWSM context level. All VLAN Gateways are configured in context level.
Activity description : We had planned migration of these devices into a new Datacenter, it was a planned activity. During migration of devices from one Dc to a new DC we broke the VSS and kept the primary running and removed the secondary switch and migrated this secondary to new DC and powered this device ON in the new DC and checked all the config was very much fine but this device was OFF network as secondary was brought to new DC just to limit the downtime during the primary switch movement.
During the activity ( Primary switch movement )We powered off the Primary switch and mean time before shifting into new Data center We had brought up secondary switch which was already existing in the DC was put live in the network and it was working fine without any issues.
Later we had moved Primary into new data center and tried to put into VSS with the secondary , during this period the secondary device into went into RECOVERY MODE and primary device was not responding and devices went off network and immediatly we removed the VSL link and brought up primary into production network without secondary online in the network ( Without VSS just stand alone switch ) network started working, but bringing up the primary we found that some of the VLANS in the FWSM was deleted and some VLAN had misconfiguration ( example : say original VLAN ip 10.200.112.1 has become 10.300.13.1 ) also some of the access list as well as SVI was deleted making configuration mismatch.
Wanted to know while syncronization b/n primary and secondary switch in VSS if we pull out VSL link would create this type of issues.
Cisco Firewall :: SSH Key Exchange DH Group 14?
May 29, 2013I am trying to issue command "ssh key-exchange group dhgroup14" on several of my ASA firewalls. The key-exchange command is failing on 3 of 4 ASA firewalls. According to Cisco documentation, this command was introducted in 8.4. My ASA's are running version 8.6.1.10, 9.1.1.8, 9.1.1.10 and 9.1.2. The command is available only with 9.1.2.
Example from one my ASA.
lbjinetfw# show version | in Version
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 8.6(1)10
Device Manager Version 7.1(2)
Baseboard Management Controller (revision 0x1) Firmware Version: 2.4
lbjinetfw# config t
lbjinetfw(config)# ssh
[code]....
Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5520 Access Rule Duplicating Existing One
Jul 3, 2011After upgrading to 8.4(2) and ASDM 6.4(5) I seem to have an extra access rule duplicating an existing rule, this is only visable through the ASDM. When using the CLI you can't see this duplicate rule.
I therfore get the following warning everytime I make a config change using the ASDM [code] If I delete this rule it returns everytime I launch the ASDM!
I also have extra config under Firewall>Configuration>Public Servers that I didn't have before. If I delete it, again it returns.
Cisco Firewall :: ASA5520 Configured NAT / ACL With Real IP In Existing Configuration After Upgrade
Mar 7, 2011I am forced to upgrade my ASA 5520 software from 7.1 - 8.2 or higher, as I am not familiar with ASA I need expert opinions.I have following concerns regarding the upgrade.
1-Do I need to worry about the software licensing when I download 8.2
2-I read about the few difference in commands (ACL and NAT) in 8.2 what exactly I have to do here should I change the configured NAT and ACL with real IP in the existing configuration after the upgrade ?
Cisco Firewall :: With ACL And Access Group With 1811w
Apr 25, 2013I have some problem to get working ACLs. The main purpose of this ACLs is to control what is going out from vlan to internet. (For example, i want that only my proxy can access to the web.) So, i use Cisco Packet Tracer and test new rules in lab without any problem.
interface Vlan1
ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x
ip flow ingress
ip flow egress
ip nat inside
[Code]...
But it doesn't work on my Cisco 1811w and i dont uderstand why and i'm not sure to have sufficient knowledge to aolve my problem by my own.
Cisco Firewall :: ASA5505 NAT For Group Of Objects
Oct 4, 2010My ASA5505 has an external address of x.x.x.13. We have got another 2 spare ip addresses: x.x.x.10 and x.x.x.11.We also have 2 internal hosts, which we need to provide with internet access using NAT. y.y.y.146 and y.y.y.70.
We recently updated our ASA to software version 8.3(1). I was thinking that I could do it using network objects and groups, but didn't understand quite good how this should be done.
The goal is to set up ASA in the way, that if either of the abovementioned 2 hosts will connect to the internet, it needs take one of 2 external addresses. All other hosts should use PAT through x.x.x.13.
Cisco Firewall :: DNS Server Group On ASA 5510
Apr 5, 2011I can not have "dns server-group" on my asa 5510, could you tell me how to get this command in my ASA 5510.
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: ASA5505 How To Convert 3 Group Mac Address To 6
Apr 16, 2013Recently i bought asa 5505 to practice for my exams and i failed to connect to internet since my internet provider binds IP and mac for every users and supports only 6 group mac address (xx-xx-xx-xx-xx-xx) format. because asa 5505 has 3 groups (xxx-xxx-xxx) mac address they are unable to provide me the connection.So my question is how can i assign 6 group mac address to asa5505.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: PIX515E - No Translation Group Found For TCP
Mar 17, 2012i wounder why i'm getting such log message whenever i'm trying to reach my remote site: No translation group found for tcp src outside XXXX dst dmz ZZZZ, i have a Cisco PIX515E firewall and that message is captured there, the traffic is going through a VPN tunnel (the VPN are up on both ends)
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: Group Failover Happening Automatically On ASA 8.0.5 23
Nov 6, 2012We are having ASA 5550 running on 8.0(5)23 IOS. We are having 2 failover groups group1 & group2. currently all contexts are on group1 & its active & Group2 is in BulkSync mode but from last 2 days the failover for group 2 is happning, i am not able to find anything in logs. Its happing daily from 2 days.
View 4 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: Error 305005 - No Translation Group Found?
Jun 26, 2011Error message
305005: No translation group found for udp src c_dmz:10.0.176.120/51910 dst inside:195.244.192.16/53
305005: No translation group found for udp src c_dmz:10.0.176.120/51910 dst inside:195.244.192.166/53
[Code]....
I thought it needed a nat (c_dmz) command but I got the following error message
PIX(config)# nat (c_dmz) 0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 nat 0 0.0.0.0 will be identity translated for outbound WARNING: Binding inside nat statement to outermost interface. WARNING: Keyword "outside" is probably missing.
Cisco Firewall :: ASA5520 Split-TunnelAcl Set Group Is Not Working
Oct 21, 2012I have an ASA5520 with mobile VPN Ipsec.The "splitTunnelAcl" set the group is not working.
View 7 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: 5505 - PPPOE Client Vpdn Group
Mar 3, 2013I need to use a Cisco ASA 5505 on a BT Openreach connection, The configs that I have ben using are below -
interface vlan2
nameif outside
security-level 0
[Code]....
Cisco Firewall :: ASDM Access Through S2s Tunnel Group On ASA5510
Feb 7, 2012For years now we've had an ASA5510 running an old version of ASA/ASDM (7.0/5.0) and couldn't access ASDM through a modern system with a recent JRE, so we didn't bother with this.
However, we've recently upgraded ASA/ASDM for purposes of adding failover and want to be able to access ASDM through our site to site tunnel. The site to site tunnel gives us access to the VLAN that the firewall is the gateway for, but not access to the firewall itself.
This side of the network is the 10.1.55.0 subnet, and that side of the network is the 192.168.1.0 subnet. I can ping devices on the 192.168.1.0 subnet, but not the firewall, (not that I really need to) and devices can ping me back. I can access ASDM through RDP or ssh into a server on the 192.168.1.0 subnet, but not directly from the 10.1.55.0 subnet.
This is the current config relative to the 10.1.55.0 subnet:
access-list trust_nat0_outbound extended permit ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.1.55.0 255.255.255.0
access-list untrust_cryptomap_600 extended permit ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0
[Code]....
As far as I'm aware, the tunnel comes into the firewall through the untrust (public) interface, because that is the destination of the tunnel on the 10.1.55.0 subnet side.
What am I missing here that would allow asdm access through the untrust interface for the 10.1.55.0 subnet?
Cisco Firewall :: 5510 No Translation Group Found Error
May 31, 2011I have a 5510 with just a inside and outside interface, everything works on the lan inc internet access and exchange hosting to the net, but I have another exchange server on the wan and I can't get to that because I'm not natting inbound traffic and the default route sends traffic elsewhere.
If I put a nat any statement on the inside interface inbound it works, however all LAN internet traffic fails with a No translation group found error.I've removed the static nat commands as they are all named anyway, but below is what I have before I do a nat any inside inbound command global (outside) 1 interfaceglobal (inside) 2 interfacenat (inside) 0 access-list inside_nat0_outboundnat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.
Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 - Multiple Pools / Group Authentication?
Apr 8, 2011can i have on asa 5510 multiple pools and multiple group authentication for various departments along with restricted access if any
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: Object Group Network Limit With Asa 5510
Oct 29, 2012We have Cisco ASA 5510, I am about to add another 2 Objectgroup network groups on the firewall to our already growing list. Under this Object-group Network xxxx , we are planning to add about about 500 network-object host xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx . This objectgroup will then be applied to an ACL. Just wanted to know if thats possible - meaning addnig 500 hosts? If it is whats the limit?
Also are there any other things to keep in mind before i go-ahead with this huge object group?
Cisco Firewall :: 5510 - No Translation Group Found For UDP Src Inside
Jan 10, 2013I have seen many of these errors lately. We have just moved to a new office and I have basically only assigned a new IP to the outside interface.
[code]....
Cisco Firewall :: 5585 - Two Different Subnets Assigned To Single Bridge Group
Apr 9, 2013We are deploying two Cisco 5585 in transparent mode and multiple contexts. they are running Active-Active fail over.
There are a lot of V LANs need to be added in the contexts, we are trying to use least contexts to fulfill.
ASA supports 8 bridge groups for each contexts, and maximum 4 interfaces for each bridge group.
We have assigned four interfaces in different V LANs , set two of them as a pair with one IP sub net and the other two interfaces are in another IP sub net.
For example :
Bridge group 1:
inside1 and outside1 -------> 192.168.1.0/24
inside2 and outside2 -------> 192.168.2.0/24
However, we can only make one sub net(V LAN pairs ) work when the BVI is set to that IP sub net. If the BVI set to 192.168.1.0/24, the inside1 and outside1, the other pair not work. If the BVI set 192.168.2.0/24, then only inside2 and outside2 work.
Since the BVI can only be assigned to either of the sub net, Is it possible to make both vlan pairs work ? Or we only can have one sub net in one bridge group ?
Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5585 Cannot Connect To Context Active In Failover Group 2
Nov 7, 2011I am setting up a new pair of ASA 5585's in a multi-context, active/active failover design. I cannot create management SSH connection to the contexts that are assigned to failover group 2. With all the security contexts that are assigned to failover group 1 I can SSH to the inside interface IP and login without a problem. When I try to do that to the group 2 contexts there is no response from the firewall at all, PuTTY just times out.
My firewalls are running version 8.2(4). The contexts seem to be functioning normally in all other respects.