i wounder why i'm getting such log message whenever i'm trying to reach my remote site: No translation group found for tcp src outside XXXX dst dmz ZZZZ, i have a Cisco PIX515E firewall and that message is captured there, the traffic is going through a VPN tunnel (the VPN are up on both ends)
View 2 Replies
Error message
305005: No translation group found for udp src c_dmz:10.0.176.120/51910 dst inside:195.244.192.16/53
305005: No translation group found for udp src c_dmz:10.0.176.120/51910 dst inside:195.244.192.166/53
[Code]....
I thought it needed a nat (c_dmz) command but I got the following error message
PIX(config)# nat (c_dmz) 0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 nat 0 0.0.0.0 will be identity translated for outbound WARNING: Binding inside nat statement to outermost interface. WARNING: Keyword "outside" is probably missing.
I have a 5510 with just a inside and outside interface, everything works on the lan inc internet access and exchange hosting to the net, but I have another exchange server on the wan and I can't get to that because I'm not natting inbound traffic and the default route sends traffic elsewhere.
If I put a nat any statement on the inside interface inbound it works, however all LAN internet traffic fails with a No translation group found error.I've removed the static nat commands as they are all named anyway, but below is what I have before I do a nat any inside inbound command global (outside) 1 interfaceglobal (inside) 2 interfacenat (inside) 0 access-list inside_nat0_outboundnat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.
I have seen many of these errors lately. We have just moved to a new office and I have basically only assigned a new IP to the outside interface.
[code]....
My remote VPN clients aren't able to do anything network wise once they have connected to the VPN. The ASA keeps coming up with "no translation group found" in the log.
Result of the command: "show running"
: Saved:ASA Version 7.2(2) !hostname ciscoasadomain-name office.propertyfinder.comenable password ######## encryptednamesdns-guard!interface GigabitEthernet0/0 description Office Network Interface nameif Office-LAN security-level 100 ip address 10.121.10.4 255.255.255.0 ospf cost 10!interface GigabitEthernet0/1 description 4Mbps BTNet Internet Connection nameif Internet-Primary security-level 0 ip address 213.121.253.33 255.255.255.248 ospf cost 10!interface GigabitEthernet0/2 shutdown no nameif no security-level no ip address!interface GigabitEthernet0/3 description Office Wireless Interface nameif Office-Wireless security-level 10 ip address 172.16.0.1 255.255.255.0 ospf cost 10!interface Management0/0 nameif management security-level 100 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 ospf cost 10 management-only!passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encryptedboot system disk0:/asa722-k8.binftp mode passivedns domain-lookup Office-LANdns server-group DefaultDNS name-server 10.121.10.20 name-server 10.121.10.21 domain-name
[code]....
I'm seeing plenty of these errors on my ASA5510. The ip's in question are IP's that my ASA is assigning VPN connection from my General IP pool.
Here are some examples:
<179>%ASA-3-305005: No translation group found for udp src External:172.16.50.112/29239 dst External:172.16.50.140/10009
<179>%ASA-3-305005: No translation group found for udp src External:172.16.50.113/20066 dst External:172.16.50.140/10009
<179>%ASA-3-305005: No translation group found for tcp src External:172.16.50.140/51228 dst External:172.16.50.111/29395
I have seen a few of these 305005 threads and they're usually related to NAT and resolved quickly. I have poked around a little, but can't seem to get it right. I'm using the Real-Time Log Viewer in my ASA 5510 and see lots of these 305005 errors between VPN clients and a server. Packet Tracer says it's being stopped at the PAT_POOL dynamic traslation to pool 1. I'm not solidly sure of what to change. [code]
View 9 Replies View RelatedI just configure VPN for end users in PIX515e with IOS 8 and get stuck with "Tunnel Rejected: User (msveden) not member of group (VPN-shared), group-lock check failed.". tell me how I add user to my VPN group?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a PIX 515E UR which I would like to activate the VPN-3DES-AES license. I did find a link to register the license, but after following the link and logging into my old CCO account i found that as I didn't have access to anything, so couldn't complete the procedure.Is there any way that I can get the license activated? I bought the unit from a Cisco partner quite some time ago, but never needed the 3DES license. Now I do.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI need configuring a newly reinstated PIX515E with IOS 6.3 to test the configuration of a load balancer.I would like to setup with two Inside interfaces (or simply two interfaces) for testing. I just need it to pass traffic (basically HTTP and HTTPS) between these two interfaces without using NAT.The older IOS is causing me some problems. I don't have an outside interface configured for Internet access,but trying to connect via IP address does't work either. I may be able to configure a second DNS server for the 192.168.12.X network for testing purposes if needed. I even tried to set the default route to the Interface of the production ASA's inside interface (3.1), but that did not work either.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI just added a PIX515E to my lab (since this is a lab, if I need to change IP address, that is not a problem)....I thought I configured it right, but I am not able to ping any of my other routers/PCs.I have EIGRP on the other three routers, but not sure if I configured it right on the PIX.The diagram below shows my current network topology....(right now the PIX is connected vai Ethernet 1 to the switch, not the router itself) [code]
View 13 Replies View RelatedI just bought a used PIX515e. It is running version 8.0(3) and ASDM 6.1.5 Because I do not know the history of the unit, how can I tell if the image used came from cisco and not some download site? I guess I should've thought about this before buying it but hindsight is...you know. Worse case is that the person who had it before me dl the software that was infected with a backdoor or something else. I don't have a service contract so I'm kinda stuck.
Can I download the image from the firewall flash and compare a MD5SUM?
We are planning to upgrade the PIX515e (128 MB, 16 MB flash) adaptive software from 7.2(4) to 8.0.3(ED). In our environment the two PIXes are working in active-standby mode and experiencing high memory utilization.
1) What are the bug fixes(like memory leak fix) and new configuration options in the 8.0.3(ED)?
2) Is there any issues to upgrade 7.2 to 8.0.3(ED)?
3) Is the upgrade to new version software fix the memory utilization issue?
why the ethernet 3,4,5 is not licensed here ?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe have two PIX515E ( 6.3), one is Primary( Active) and second one is Standby. after configuration of Secondary Firewall as Standby. getting problem.
1. Configuration part everything is fine
2.we have done failover text also .
Aster Some time , we are not able see Standby Firewall its going down .
Quick question. I have a site - site tunnel that is up and running between a Pix 515E and a 3050 appliance.Tunnel is up and running but on the pix side I dont see traffic from a couple of subnets behind the inside interface.On the vpnallow access list there are no hits So I setup a capture on the inside interface to see if the packets is making it to the inside interface and nothing. There is some traffic making it thru the tunnel that would have to hit the inside int first and even that doesnt showup in the capture.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a PIX515E. I need to create a vpn to my clients office. PIX is alerady having two VPN, among two one is a dynamic VPN to a dynamic IP of netgear router.
It has two gateway(public IP). Configuration in MH2001 is pretty simple. and i have completed it.I have also completed configuration in PIX using ASDM. But the VPN is not up till now.
[code]...
I am trying to veiw my PIX515e via the ASDM, but I am unable to...Can you review my config and make sure I have everything setup the way it is supposed to?
PIX Version 8.0(4)32
!
hostname pixfirewall
domain-name jkkcc.com
enable password DQucN59Njn0OjpJL encrypted
passwd DQucN59Njn0OjpJL encrypted(code)
I am trying to veiw my PIX515e via the ASDM, but I am unable to...Can you review my config and make sure I have everything setup the way it is supposed to?
PIX Version 8.0(4)32
!
hostname pixfirewall
[Code].....
The infrastructure has PIX515E as the Firewall and few Web Servers and Database Servers inside. Is it possible to retreieve information regarding the bandwidth available at the outside interface of PIX (Internet link utilization ) utilized by each of the nodes seperately? I could use SNMP to get the overall data transfer at the Outside interface of PIX but isit possible to get utilization details of individual nodes ? Is Netflow an option ?
View 10 Replies View Relatedi just installed a pix515e ( ios ver 6.2) in my network. and the vpn users can connect to it from the internet successfully but they aren't able to connect to any of the internal resources. some other informaion: i configured nating between the internal network (10.0.0.0/24) and the internet and another static nat policy between an internal resource through another public ip address on outside interface. but right now i need to let the vpn clients to connect to my internal resources.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am in the process of migrating my config from my PIX running 8.0(4) to my ASA5520 running 8.2(1). I have converted the config so that it is ready for the ASA. I noticed the "boot system flash:" and "asdm image flash:" command references the old PIX files. Do I need to update these or will they be updated when the ASA reboots with the new config?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am going with ASA 5520, know how many NAT translation is possible.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to migrate from olda PIX to newest ASA 8.4.1. Everything seems to be good except the static NAT. [code]
The inside interface uses implicit rule. ( permit any less secure network )
Although te above config the ASA logs the following.
TCP access denied by ACL from 94.94.94.94/2003 to outside:86.101.228.221/80
The 86.101.228.221 our public Internet IP whic are used as outside IP also.
I have some issues with Twin PAT on ASA (8.4.2), there is sth I dont udnerstand FTP server is on the inside and client is in outside.
I did sth like this
object network NATED-11
host 20.20.20.11
object network REAL-2
host 10.200.200.2
object service SRV-FTP
service tcp destination eq ftp
nat (outside,inside) source static any any destination static NATED-11 REAL-2 service SRV-FTP SRV-FTP so teoretically there should be a problem in NAT cause there is a second channel for data etc. BUT according to docs "For applications that require application inspection for secondary channels (for example, FTP and VoIP),the ASA automatically translates the secondary ports."
The problem is that it doesn't work at all and got the syslogs
Debug on ASA shows
ASA5510(config)# nat: untranslation - outside:20.20.20.11/21 to inside:10.200.200.2/21
nat: untranslation - outside:20.20.20.11/21 to inside:10.200.200.2/21
nat: untranslation - outside:20.20.20.11/21 to inside:10.200.200.2/21
nat: translation - outside:20.20.20.252/37924 failed - port is not found in xlate(0-0)
[code]....
To make it work I need to modify the nat rule to sth like this (translate source of client to inside inteface of ASA) nat (outside,inside) 1 source static any interface destination static NATED-11 REAL-2 service SRV-FTP SRV-FTP / why its not working in the first place? aaa I forgot to mention that both modes of FTP were tested (passive and active)
I have a server in a DMZ of my 8.4 ASA with nat:
object network FTP-SERVER
host 192.168.1.102
nat (dmz,outside) static interface tcp ftp ftp
And that's working well. However, I now need to translate the source address of connections from the outside to the FTP server as well. The aim is that the source address of packets when they reach the FTP server is an address on the DMZ subnet (as the default route for the FTP server now needs to be something else, not the ASA) as well as this outside-dmz NAT. I thought overloading the DMZ interface of the ASA? Or another IP in that range?
Trying to translate telnet for switches to the outside ip address at some random ports.
172.16.200.2:23 -> 10.199.199.2:2300
172.16.200.3:23 -> 10.199.199.2:2301
172.16.200.4:23 -> 10.199.199.2:2302
etc....
ASA 5510 running 8.4(3):
interface Ethernet0/0
nameif outside
security-level 0
ip address 10.199.199.2 255.255.255.248
interface Ethernet0/1.200
vlan 200
nameif inside
security-level 100
ip address 172.16.200.254 255.255.255.0
[code]....
I can not access the switch at 10.199.199.2:2301 . What am I doing wrong? Or should cleaning toilets be something I really should look at! Now if i run this NAT statment:
object network Switch_TN
nat (inside,outside) static 10.199.199.3 service tcp telnet 2301
I am able to access the switch at 10.199.199.3:2301
I have a server on the inside of my network (with a internet Routable IP). It has been requested to me that people from the internet access port 80, and that is translated at the firewall to port 7080. I have set up a temp Access rule to allow access to 7080 from the outside and it is accessable. I am not sure what I am doing wrong, but I am tion from 80 not able to get the translato 7080 to work.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have ASA 5510 and public FTP server from my local network to external IP address, with static nat translation. All works, but I need request to ftp come from internal ASA interface (need use gateway different ASA). How configured ASA for forwarding request?
View 4 Replies View RelatedRecently upgraded to an Asa 5512x from a pix 515e. I have an Ipswitch secure MoveIT server on the dmz1 interface that needs to be accessed from both the inside and outside interfaces. I have setup a static nat from the outside to the dmz1 and it works, I can also connect from the inside interface. Now I need the MoveIT server to access the DNS server and email server on the inside interface so it can send notifications. On the pix I just created a static from the inside to the dmz1 using its own IP address - static (inside,dmz1) 192.168.1.7 192.168.1.7 net mask 255.255.255.255. I would then add the access-list to allow. How would I set this up with the Asa 8.6 commands?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am having an issue with a specific server that is not reachable from other sub nets. Every other device on the same sub net as the server is reachable via the other sub nets. This server is special because it's NAT'd to an external IP address and has several site-to-site VPN's set up. The firewall is a Cisco ASA 5510.
This is the error I see on the ASA syslog when I try to ping the server from another sub net: 3 Dec 05 2012 10:58:49 10.0.15.101 regular translation creation failed for icmp src inside:10.0.20.8 dst inside:10.0.15.101 (type 0, code 0)
The problem server is on sub net 10.0.20.0/24 and the server IP address is 10.0.20.8. Every device on the 10.0.20.0/24 sub net can hit the server, but devices on other sub nets cannot. For instance, a device on 10.0.15.0/24 cannot reach 10.0.20.8, but can reach other devices on 10.0.20.0/24.
I am trying to correctly configure our ASA 5520 and our Mitel Border Gateway in our DMZ. In the documentation for the Mitel border gateway it wants me to set up 2 external IP's on my ASA one to allow 443 traffice into the MBG, and another for 443 traffic that needs to be forwarded to port 4443 for the MGB in the DMZ. My problem is I don't know how to do this. the MBG only has one IP, and I need to have 2 different URL's mapped to two different external IP's both externally using port 443, and one of them forwarding to 4443 on the DMZ interface.
View 10 Replies View RelatedAfter adding a NAT rule on Friday morning, I'm now getting a bunch of "portmap translation creation failed" messages from my ASA5520. (It's currently running 8.4(3).) The failure errors appear to have nothing to do with the change that was made. [code] I have very similar rules in place for other vendors to access other machines. The only difference between this new one and those old ones is the use of the objects in the rule instead of the direct IP addresses. This is also the first one that invovles a range instead of a specific address or network. [code]
View 4 Replies View Related
