Cisco Firewall :: Static 1 To 1 NAT Not Working On ASA 5505
Jan 28, 2013
i have 2 internal server sitting in inside interface
inside network vlan 1 ip address 192.168.0.20, and 192.168.0.22
i going to map 192.168.0.20 to public ip routable address 203.117.124.180 and 192.168.0.22 to public ip routable address 203.117.124.181
the purpose is to make those 2 server 192.168.0.20, and .22 to be able to access remotely using public routable ip address,
however, after done the configuration i still not able to ping or access the public IP Address mention above. my both server are turn on and can access internally.both server are also able to access internet. See below partial configuration retrieve from Show Run.
nat-control
global (outside) 1 interface
nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
nat (Antlab) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
[Code].....
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 26, 2011
I just replaced a PIX 501 with a new ASA5505. I had a very weird problem and would like to know what caused it incase I run into it again. The setup is a DSL connection, with an old-ish speedstream DSL modem. Static IP, no PPPoE. I had a PIX 501, then two servers with static NAT entries on secondary WAN IPs. Everything was working fine on the PIX, I just duplicated the config over to the ASA. I swapped out the PIX for the ASA, and rebooted the DSL modem to clear out it's cache. After installation, NAT was working fine for the the global pool, but the systems with static NAT could not get online. I tried lots of different things to fix them, and they never worked. Finally I rememberd running into an issue like this a long time ago, in that the static NAT IP's wouldn't work without giving them a bump-start on the network. So I assigned the ASA each of my WAN IPs, one at a time, and tested them all. After that I went back to the original WAN IP, configured the static NATs, and they fired right up. why did my static NAT entries not work until I first assigned them to the ASA, then swapped back? I did reset the DSL modem when I swapped the firewalls, so I don't believe it was an ARP issue (unless it was an ARP issue at the far end?) I would like to know if there is something I can do differently with the devices or with the config to not have this issue again in the future.
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 25, 2011
Currently a customer has all theLAN devices using a router as the Default Gateway. The router also do the Dynamic NAT to the internet access and has NAT/PAT rules to publish some services like HTTP and FTP. As I know the router will permit all the incoming traffic in all its interfaces without restrictions at less there is an ACLs that restrict the incoming traffic on an specific interface.Now the customer has bought a brand new ASA and wants to use it as the default gateway for the entiery LAN. This means, the ASA will have the internet connection and will be the responsible for the NAT/PAT process.
I have configured the NAT/PAT rules already following the current router configuration, but I need to know if I have to configure ACLs allowing the incoming traffic on th Outside interface for the services I NATed.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 12, 2012
I have a Cisco ASA5505 running 8.2(1) and I am using ASDM to manage the firewall. I have a Linux VPN server on the inside with and IP address of YYY.YYY.YYY.39 with a static NAT to the outside with an address of XXX.XXX.XXX.171 . I have a site to site VPN tunnel which terminates on the outside of the ASA on the outside interface XXX.XXX.XXX.190 .Traffic from the YYY.YYY.YYY.0/24 network can't transverse the site to site VPN as there is a conflict of IP address's on the far side so it is natted via a dynamic policy to host address ZZZ.ZZZ.ZZZ.100, Users remote into the inside(YYY.YYY.YYY.0/24) for support via the Linux VPN server (.39) and then need to communicate down the site to site VPN. The problem is that the static NAT for the incomming connections takes preference and bypasses the site to site VPN tunnel for outbound traffic. I tried to create a policy Static nat but it tries to modify the static nat that handels the incomming traffic to the Linux server.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 30, 2011
I have a 5505 for a small business that has one web server. The web server has a static NAT entry to an IP address and not an interface. There is an access rule allowing any HTTP traffic to the outside IP of the web server. From the web server I can't access the Internet.
All other computers on the network can access the Internet using a dynamic nat rule that uses the outside interface. The web server is accessible from a computer behind the firewall.
If I delete the static NAT entry for the web server I can get on the Internet.
I have turned debugging on and see that an outbound connection is built and then 30 seconds later the connection is torn down with the bytes 0 SYN Timeout message.
I am running 8.0(5).
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 31, 2012
I have an ASA 5505 behind my internet router. i have got only one public ip configured on the router outside interface.192.168.20.0/24 subnet is configured between ASA and router and inside network is 192.168.10.0/24 (Refer the attached diagram).
I have exposed my mail server and ftp server to public through static PAT in router and ASA with the same public on router outside interface. Iam facing issue some of the machines inside my network internet is not working(actually DNS is not resolving) some of the PC's internet is working fine some of the PC's randomly working. i have attached the diagram and ASA config , after this issue is sorted out i need to configure a L2L VPN to my head office.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2012
I'm trying to configure a second server on my network but whenever I add the static NAT rule, the internet stops working on that computer.
Here's my Cisco ASA configuration:
ASA Version 7.2(3)
!
hostname domain
[Code].....
View 16 Replies
View Related
Feb 9, 2013
I have configured the ASA in a very similar manner to how the PIX was set up but I'm having trouble with some hosts on the inside accessing the Internet. Any inside hosts which use DHCP work fine. Any inside hosts with a static IP (and configured on the ASA with a "static" rule) cannot access the Internet. For example, in the config below the server daviker-dialler cannot access the Internet. I've spent a few days working on this now and have started from scratch several times but I'm not getting anywhere. Apologies for all the X's everywhere, didn't like to post anything sensitive on the Internet.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 3, 2013
I am mapping static ip address to the local ip address.We have a bsnl broadband connection, and bsnl has provided us with one static ip address.We are using broadband modem.Now I would liket to map this static ip address to one of the private ip address which is 192.168.1.2(database server).i want to do nat above ips if i do so then i dont have no ip to assign to my outside interface.I would like to access this device over internet, by typing my public (Static ip ) given by the BSNL.security device i have is cisco ASA 5505.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 10, 2011
I am setting up a Cisco ASA 5505 first time for My organisation, I usually setup Cisco Router, I have 10 Static IP, & Have 6 Server (S-1, S-2, S-3, S-4, S-5, S-6), Traffic Should be pass through the ASA and is distributed to the destination server that is specified in the packet. LAN servers can be separated into discrete networks for security. For example, a private LAN for internal traffic accessed only via remote dial-in VPN sessions and Want to Configure DMZ for Server (S-4, S-5, S-6) that allows public web traffic.
I have Attached My Network Diagram I have some question,
1:- Can we Configure Multiple Static IP On ASA 5505 ?
2:- If Diagram is wrong what change need to be done ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 3, 2013
I have ASA 5505 with basic licence, v9.1, ASDM 7.1. I want to create the DMZ for a web server.
The interface 0 is for the outside network The interface 6 is for the DMZ All other interfaces are for the inside network
My ISP provided me with one public static IP address, one gateway address and a subnet mask 255.255.255.252
1/ I would like to ask which interface I should assign the public static IP address to. Should it be assigned to the outside interface 0, or should it be assigned to the DMZ interface 6, while outside interface would be configured to use DHCP?
I tried to assign the static IP address to the outside interface first, but then when I used ASDM the “Public Servers” feature to configure NAT, I get error message that the outside interface and the public address cannot have the same IP address.
2/ For the sake of peace of mind, I am thinking about using the second firewall, which would be used only for the inside network. Can I connect this second firewall to one of the inside interfaces of the 1st firewall,
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 22, 2012
I have created a simple static ip address by using this command:
interface Vlan1
nameif inside
security-level 100
[Code].....
But, no matter what, the I can't ping the static address or access the computer 10.2.1.2 from outside of the asa 5505. I have attempted to ping from inside of the asa 5505 or from another computer. I just does not work.
I also have created several rules that allows icmp traffic.
icmp unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
icmp permit any echo-reply inside
icmp permit 10.2.1.0 255.255.255.0 inside
icmp permit any echo-reply outside
icmp permit any outside
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 20, 2012
I just upgraded my firewall to ASA 5505. Now, my original static ip address cofiguration is gone. Apperantly, Cisco went away from static ip address to something like nat (inside,outside) dynamic interface. how to create a static ip address under version 8.4? By the way, I am sharing what my configuration used to look before upgrading.
!
hostname cisco-asa
domain-name default.domain.invalid
names
!
interface Vlan1
nameif inside
security-level 100
[code].....
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2013
I was checking out the config on my ASA and noticed a bunch of static routes configured when I did a show route. With the exception of two that I expect to be there, the remainder point traffic destined for specific internal hosts to the outside interface, i.e.
S private_ip 255.255.255.255 [1/0] via public_ip, outside
I verified that I cannot ping those hosts from the firewall. I logged in to the ASDM. When I check the Configuration>Device Setup>Routing>Static Routes it only shows two static routes, the ones I expect to see. If I look under Monitoring>Routing>Routes, I see the same output as I did on the CLI. I looked around to see if I was missing a key location for this information, and I was able to see the same static routes output in Monitoring>Routing>Routes. Since this is under monitoring though there's no way to delete these routes, and I still don't know where they were configured originally. Then I happened to check under Monitoring>VPN>VPN Statistics>Sessions, and I see several of the private IPs used in the static routes being used by VPN users, including my own! I know I didn't assign myself a static IP for VPN use or anything like that. So, what are these static IP routes? Why do I see them in the CLI and not under the Configuration tab? I mean, I know I can delete them from the CLI but I'm trying to figure out why the info is not synced. Am I seeing dynamically created content based on the VPN connections?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 17, 2012
working config with least amount of code for:
IOS post 8.3
Subnet: 192.168.1.0 /24
Static NAT (from any source) to server 192.168.1.100 and allow the same incoming connections on outside interface
Ports:
TCP 20,21
TCP 80
UDP 50000-50020
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 19, 2011
I've got an ASA 5510 that has been working like a charm for some time now. Until now we've not had to nat any resources to the outside. I created network objects for an internal host and an external host. The internal host has to respond to requests on tcp/2001.
The internal host has no problem accessing the internet, but when I attempt to access the internal host from the outside, I get the following:
4 Sep 20 2011 16:20:33 fw_outside_ip 62678 outside_host 2001 Deny tcp src outside:outside_host_ip/62678 dst inside_host:inside_host_ip/2001 by access-group "outside_access_in" [0x0, 0x0]
When I try to use the packet tracer to simulate the outside traffic, I get the following
5 Sep 20 2011 16:17:41 inside_host 2001 Asymmetric NAT rules matched for forward and reverse flows; Connection for tcp src outside:outside_host/1065 dst inside_int:inside_host/2001 denied due to NAT reverse path failure
I've got over my NAT statement and access rule and can't find anything wrong with either.
Here are the pertinent NAT and access rule...
static (inside_int,outside) tcp interface 2001 inside_host 2001 netmask 255.255.255.255
access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp host outside_host host inside_host eq 2001
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 20, 2012
I have been using static NAT to map between a single server behind an ASA 5505 and a single public IP address. In other words, I've been doing this:
object network NAT_ME
nat (inside,outside) static interface
Now I would like to start using the clientless VPN feature of the ASA, so I of course don't want that particular port forwarded to the server. Is there a way to define such an exclusion? I've tried several things, including setting up a separate NAT rule to direct that port back to the ASA's interface, without luck.
If that is not possible, what configuration would I need to move to in order to get the behavior that I want? It is important that all (non-VPN) traffic is passed exactly as it arrives at the firewall (whether it is coming from internal or external), with the exception of changing the IP address (i.e., I need static port mappings for some of my services).
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 30, 2011
We have several pairs of ASA5510s in failover A/P mode, some running 8.3(2) and others running 8.4(1).
e0/0 = outside
e0/1 = inside
m0/0 = management
The problem we're having is we can't get anything to route out of the management interface unless we put in a static route at least to the subnet level. For example, we want syslog traffic to exit out m0/0 to our syslog server 10.71.211.79. Our 'gateway of last resort' points to the next hop out e0/0, and a second static route with a higher metric and a more distinct network space is for m0/0 as in:
route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.49.129 1route management 10.72.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.72.232.94 10
This doesn't work, and ASDM loggin gives this error: ".....Routing failed to locate next hop for udp from NP Identity Ifc:10.72.232.89/514 to management:10.72.211.79/514"
If I put in a more granular subnet route, or a host route of the syslog server it works, such as:
route management 10.72.211.0 255.255.255.0 10.72.232.94 10 <------------- this works
route management 10.72.211.79 255.255.255.255 10.72.232.94 10 <------------- this works too
Why won't a static route for 10.71.0.0 255.255.0.0 work in this case?
We are going to have numerous hosts access and be sent messages though the management interface of these ASAs, and it would be very burdonsome to have to add a host, or even a subnet, route for every one. I've removed all static routes and tried to rely on EIGRP, but that doesn't work. I also had to put 'passive-interface management' under the EIGRP for this to work.
Here is the pertinant ASA config concerning syslog, routing, and interfaces:
interface Ethernet0/0 nameif outside security-level 0 ip address 192.168.49.140 255.255.255.128 standby 192.168.49.141 !interface Ethernet0/1 nameif inside security-level 100 ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.128 standby
[Code].....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 2, 2012
I recently acquired a used ASA 5505 and have encountered issues with getting the PoE output on Ports 6 & 7 working. Theese two PoE ports are behaving like all the other ports (100mbit, Vlan 1). Per the best I could Google, I made sure the all relevant ports are set to "auto" for duplex and link speed. Again, the ports do work for data - just not PoE. The LEDs light up ok.
I've tested four different working devices that can be powered off PoE with it, and all failed to power up using a straight-thru Ethernet cable connected to ports 6 & 7.
Ubiquiti PicoStation M2
MikroTik OmniTik
MikroTik RB450G
MikroTik RB433
What should I do to get PoE working? Is it a defective unit?
: Saved
: Written by enable_15 at 18:56:43.926 CDT Sun Jun 3 2012
!
ASA Version 8.4(4)
[Code].....
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 20, 2013
i'm trying to setup my 5505 for SSH but it seem doesn't work. console and HTTPS/ASDM are working.
my teraterm is just stuck with the user/password screen. also tried using putty but still failed.
ciscoasa# exit
Logoff
Username: admin
[Code].....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 2, 2012
When i install my ASA5505 i get the following message? "This platform has a Base license.
Encryption hardware device : Cisco ASA-5505 on-board accelerator (revision 0x0)
Boot microcode : CNlite-MC-Boot-Cisco-1.2
SSL/IKE microcode: CNlite-MC-IPSEC-Admin-3.03
IPSec microcode : CNlite-MC-IPSECm-MAIN-2.05
i2c_write_byte_w_suspend() error, slot = 0x0, device = 0x40, address = 26 byte
count = 1. Reason: I2C_UNPOPULATED_ERROR"
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 16, 2011
I'm trying to get a new 5505 installed in our network to replace the 1841 that died over the past few days (memory issues). One of the big pieces of functionality that the old router gave us was the ability to open certain ports to the outside world to let clients see web sites we were working on for them or let employees RDP in to their work machines. I'm having trouble getting that working properly with the new device.
After a lot of trial and error, I finally got some ports working, but only for some IP addresses. In theory, Comcast (our ISP) is routing 13 IP addresses to our device (a.b.c.177 through 189). For historical reasons, the external IP of the device is .178. Only those NAT entries for .177, .178 and .179 are currently working. I've attached the configuration of the ASA, as well as the configuration of the old 1841. As far as I know, Comcast's equipment is doing its job, so I don't have a lot of reason to question that end of it. And it was working with the 1841 in place before its untimely demise.
One note - I am also having trouble getting the VPNs working, so they are a work in progress. That will account for some of the differences in the configs.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 16, 2013
there is an issue with tracroute from ASA 5505 with 9.0(2) - here is the running configuration [code] with this running configuration - from the LAN tracerouet to public IP, it is working fine. but once I traceroute from the LAN 192.168.225.x to the corporate networks via the IPSec l2l tunnel - it does not show any hop at all - even the inside interface of the ASA does not show in the traceroute.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2013
I am trying to set up a SLA statement on an ASA 5505 version 8.2(5). When I enter the command "sla monitor schedule 1 life forever start-time now" I get a message stating "%Entry not configured."
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2012
I have an ASA 5505 running 8.4(3) at home and I'm banging my head against the wall trying to get the PCTV working from my local ISP.Basically I open a web page for the service and I can stream all the basic TV channels to my PC screen.
I just simply cant get this working through the ASA.. I know absolutely nothing about voice/video in networking.
My setup regarding ASA configurations are as follows
interface Vlan1
description LAN
nameif LAN
security-level 100
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
igmp forward interface WAN
[code....
I can get the PCTV working if i bypass the ASA. I can for example get the PCTV working on PC2 if I simply change the port Ethernet0/2 to access vlan 10. So theres just simply something that I havent configured on the ASA or the ASA doesnt support something?I took a capture from my PC2 just as I opened the browser and connected to the PCTV url (opens our local channe 1 right away)Only thing I can see in the capture at that point is:
- V2 Membership report / Join group 232.1.3.1
- Right after a remote host from the ISP networks starts sending the stream with the destination port udp/2000 with the destination address of 232.1.3.1
what I could check in my configuration? Or is there something that I have simply configured wrong already on the partial configuration shown above?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 15, 2012
I am having difficulty following the logic of the port-translation. Here is the configuration on a 5505 with 8.3,So I would have thought the outside access-list should reference the 'mapped' port but even with 3398 open I cannot remote desktop to the host. If I open 3389 then I can connect successfully.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Mar 29, 2012
I have a base 5505 and would like to get AnyConnect working. To do that, would I have to first purchase either an essentials or premium license and then purchase the AnyConnect Mobile license?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 2, 2013
I've having a problem with our company ASA5505 router.
We recently moved to a new adress, so everything had to be set up again. I have a static IP, submask and gateway from our new ISP. The router have been factory reset before moving. We have betweeen 10-20 employees on our LAN in the office. In an attempt to make things easier I have changed the internal IP (and IP range) to 10.0.200.1 with a range from 10.0.200.5 - 10.0.200.100 as our NAS/printer/plotter have IPs within this range.
I can ping machines on the internal IPs and in ASDM the Outside interface is show as "up" with a green arrow. But there still isn't any internet connection. The only thing I haven't tried (because people need the current network to be online) is changing "route inside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 62.242.X.X 1" to "route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 62.242.X.X 1"
I have recieved a primary and secondary DNS adress as well, but I'm in doubt as to were I'm supposed to enter these (Using ASDM Version 6.3). I would like everything "Behind" the router to be run by DHCP.
Here is the running config:
ASA Version 8.2(2)
!
hostname ciscoasa
[Code].....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 22, 2011
Trying to connect a 5505 with a dynamic address on 8.3(2) to a static IP'd asa (5510 on 8.2(1) with a DefaultL2LGroup and dynamic maps already created.
Inside networks:
Local (5505) 192.168.100.0 /24
Remote (5510) 10.100.1.0 /24
Configuration on 5505
isakmp policy 20 authentication pre-share isakmp policy 20 encryption 3des isakmp policy 20 hash md5 isakmp policy 20 group 2 isakmp policy 20 lifetime 3600 isakmp enable outside access-list 100 extended permit ip 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0 10.100.1.0 255.255.255.0nat (inside,any) 0 access-list 100tunnel-group DefaultL2LGroup ipsec-attributes pre-shared-key *****crypto ipsec transform-set myset esp-3des esp-md5-hmac crypto dynamic-map cisco 1 set transform-set myset crypto map dyn-map 20 ipsec-isakmp dynamic cisco crypto map dyn-map interface outside
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 13, 2013
We have a customer, who has the following setup:
ISP router with ip range: x.x.202.1/ 28
That is connected to a Cisco 2960 switch, that doesn't do much but:
Vlan5: x.x.202.14 /28
Port 1-12 is switchport mode access to vlan 5 There are 3 firewall's connected to the 2960
1: D-Link DSR-1000N with ip x.x.202.2 /28
gw: x.x.202.1
2: Uknown
3: Cisco ASA 5505 with ip: x.x202.7 /28
static route: x.x.202.1
Each FW have a LAN behind it. The D-Link and the unknown device are both working perfectly and clients on each subnet can connect to the internet?However when I connect the ASA 5505 to the 2960 SW with a configued static route: Route Outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.202.1 1 is says it has no route to host?
Sanitized Config for the ASA 5505 is:
hostname ciscoasa
domain-name network.local
names
!
interface Ethernet0/0
switchport access vlan 2
[code]....
If I connect the ASA5505 to the LAN of D-Link DSR-1000N and give it a static address and a static route match the D-Link LAN network, it works perfectly, however not when I connect it the the Cisco 2960 Switch
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 1, 2011
I have an ASA 5505 with a dynamic IP address from the ISP.What I need to accomplish is the following:
- Either setup that ASA (Dynamic IP)VPN with an IOS router (Static IP)
- Or setup that ASA (Dynamic IP) with another ASA (Static IP)
View 8 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2011
I'm having some issues configuring NAT statements on my ASA5505 which has recently been upgraded to 8.41.
I have a single dynamic IP on the outside interface of the ASA and would like all internal hosts to NAT/PAT to it. In addition, I would like to have several ports 'forwarded' to internal hosts, one of which is TCP/4343. With the current configuration all hosts are NATing to the external interface properly but the service running on TCP/4343 is not accessible from the outside. See command output below:
"sh run object" output:
object network DrJones host 10.81.220.90object network LAN-10.81.220.0 subnet 10.81.220.0 255.255.255.0
"sh run nat" output:
object network DrJones nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp 4343 4343object network LAN-10.81.220.0 nat (inside,outside) dynamic interface
"sh run access-list" output:
access-list inside_access_in extended permit ip 10.81.220.0 255.255.255.0 anyaccess-list outside_access_in extended permit icmp any any echo-replyaccess-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp any interface outside eq 4343
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 30, 2012
We have two sites: 192.168.100.x and 192.168.101.x currently connected via IPsec VPN. On each end we have a Cisco ASA 5505. However, each site also has an MPLS VPN with intentions to move all traffic to this link. Will this work on the ASA? We need to make sure traffic can hit the ASA @ site A on the inside interface and trafiic will forward to the MPLS VPN router which then handles the traffic. Too, will it cause any problems in bi-directional flow between the two sites?
View 3 Replies
View Related
