Based on the stace trace, how do I determine what object is being polled??? (what is causing the high cpu for SNMP ENGINE)
From the “show stack 295” output (SNMP ENGINE)
router>show stack 295
Process 295: SNMP ENGINE
Stack segment 0x68226DC0 - 0x68229CA0
FP: 0x68229BD0, RA: 0x62A0D95C
FP: 0x68229BF8, RA: 0x628276A8
FP: 0x68229C68, RA: 0x629FBE08
FP: 0x68229C80, RA: 0x629FBDEC
I have a Catalyst Switch 6000. Inoticed that after the execution of the job inventory in LMS, and after the snmp queries reached the equipement, the cpu value reached 98-99 % due to the process : PDU DISPATCHER (what’s it ?)
I have also a script running in the switch to observe the differents logs. For exemple, when high cpu is obtained, the message bellow appear :
« %SNMP-3-INPUT_QFULL_ERR: Packet dropped due to input
« %SNMP-3-INPUT_QFULL_ERR: Packet dropped due to input
« %SNMP-3-INPUT_QFULL_ERR: Packet dropped due to input
....
I've connected my c3560G which I use as Core-switch in my company to Prime Infrastructure 1.3.And sometimes I see a CPU overload over 50% only by SNMP ENGINE process. Total CPU load at this time - up to 100% Possibly, It's happened after IOS update from 12.2(25r)SEE4 to 15.0(2)SE2 C3560-IPSERVICESK9-M.
I've exclude some OIDs from snmp view, but problem is still exists:
PRIMEview internet - excluded nonvolatile active
PRIMEview mib-2 - excluded nonvolatile active
PRIMEview system - included nonvolatile active
PRIMEview interfaces - included nonvolatile active
PRIMEview at - excluded nonvolatile active
[code]....
I am having a lab switch. Recently I am getting "%SCHED-3-SEMLOCKED: SNMP ENGINE attempted to lock a semaphore, already locked by itself" message and the switch has started to hang a little bit. I just want to know what this log means and how to trouble shoot.
I'm using C3750, version 12.2(25)SEE3
We have a Cisco 886 configured with two WAN's (ATM0 connected to a DSL line and Fa3 connected to a CMTS modem).We're running DMVPN over the Cable network and GetVPN over the DSL line. When the DSL line is down we see a lot of CPU peaks up to 90%.The CPU peaks are caused by the process "DSL state machine". As soon as the DSL line has sync and the ATM0 interface goes UP the CPU peaks disappear. What we'd like to know is if this constant extra CPU load will have an impact on other resources like normal routing & switching or more specific IPSEC handling. Is it for example possible that establishing an IPSEC tunnel will fail because of the CPU peaks?
View 11 Replies View RelatedI have in my router 2801, one link with 20 MB WAN Connection, and it is presenting high cpu utilization with 97% Interrupt Errors when start one download.
I exchanged it to another router the 2811 and it presented the same results. I read the cisco document about Router Performance.
And it speaks about the 2801 supports 46 Mbps using CEF/Fast Switching and 1.5Mbps using only Process Switching, and 2811 supports 61.44 CEF and 1.5Mbps Process Switching.
I need to know if the NAT Process is process switching or CEF Switching. Because if it was process switching the router is working in the max capacity and i will need to exchange the hardware to a better hardware.
I have a problem with a 9 3750 switch stack. If you take a look at the show proc cpu history command , the following is seen:
1291999691191111911110111991117911119111191111911119111931
8994899595719876945570744993236132549385494445924169433963
100 * *** * * * ** * * * * *
90 * *** * * * * ** * * * * * *
[Code].....
Is it maybe a normal background proccess that runs in all the switches but , for some kind of reason, is not working properly?
I have an issue with 7600 router where CPU goes up to 60-70% and memory is also high. Both due to BGP Router process. URL We are seeing this issue since ISP has upgraded their router 20 days ago. Router also seen following error.I have not reset the BGP session with ISP yet. Is there any way I can supress BGP updates coming from ISP and see if CPU and memory USAGE reduces. IOS version 12.2(33)SRD and RSP720 with PFC 3cXL
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have an issue with 7600 router where CPU goes up to 60-70% and memory is also high. Both due to BGP Router process. [URL] According to our baseline it should not be more than 40% at any given time. We see high CPU uptp 70% consistently.
CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%/0%; one minute: 57%; five minutes: 55%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
442 66173704 90234125 733 96.86% 46.09% 46.30% 0 BGP Router
7 509291060 26330202 19342 1.17% 3.90% 2.99% 0 Check heaps
Router has 1 eBGP session with ISP from where it downloads whole IPv4 internet routing table and two IBGP session with other two rotuer. When I look at BGP summary table I see many updates received from ISP and sent out to IBGP neighbors. Also did debug BGP updates to confirm it.
We are seeing this issue since ISP has upgraded their router 20 days ago. Router also seen following error.
%BGP-6-BIGCHUNK: Big chunk pool request 628 for community. Replenishing with malloc
I have not reset the BGP session with ISP yet. Is there any way I can supress BGP updates coming from ISP and see if CPU and memory USAGE reduces. IOS version 12.2(33)SRD and RSP720 with PFC 3cXL
I have a process whick take all the CPU on two differents Stack of WS-C3750G in version 12.2.53(SE2):
XFRPALSN02R#sh proc cpu sorted CPU utilization for five seconds: 97%/3%; one minute: 95%; five minutes: 95% PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process 307 5450059 4167397 1307 86.74% 83.63% 83.35% 0 hulc nrgyz PD di XFRPALSN02R#sh proc cpu sorted CPU utilization for five seconds: 96%/3%; one minute: 96%; five minutes: 96% PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process 307 7779608 5947379 1308 86.26% 85.75% 85.30% 0 hulc nrgyz PD di
i try newest ios 15.1(3)S0a and 12.2(33)SRE
in both case some times i obtain lowing traffic on interface and highest cpu - to 100%
after clear cef linicard i obtain growing traffic and cpu 0%
#sh proc cpu s
CPU utilization for five seconds: 87%/83%; one minute: 91%; five minutes: 96%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
7 1711512 87883 19474 4.06% 0.84% 0.89% 0 Check heaps
[Code].....
Each time I enter show run on my router 2821, it takes ages to display and I have a cpu peak from the ssh process ( I am connected through SSH)
RTR-2821-01#sh proc cpu sorted
CPU utilization for five seconds: 96%/21%; one minute: 34%; five minutes: 22%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
55 26948 814 33105 74.96% 16.92% 5.87% 323 SSH Process
Our switch is very high cpu in process arp
Am debug ip arp track command the result as below
-- on this switch have interface vlan 201 ip subnet is 10.11.201.1/24
Jun 5 15:30:40.732 GMT+7: IP ARP: rcvd req src 10.11.201.217 0001.6c6b.8ab9, dst 172.27.116.73 Vlan201
Jun 5 15:30:42.150 GMT+7: IP ARP: rcvd rep src 10.11.201.217 0001.6c6b.8ab9, dst 172.27.116.4 Vlan201
Jun 5 15:30:42.150 GMT+7: IPARP_TRACK: ARP tableid(0) 10.11.201.217 Vlan201 mode(1) modified.
Jun 5 15:30:42.150 GMT+7: IP ARP: rcvd req src 10.11.201.217 0001.6c6b.8ab9, dst 172.27.116
and then am try to shutdown vlan database 201 after that the cpu process has to normal state.
How to check the root cacus?
I have a router 3845 with c3845-advsecurityk9-mz.124-24.T6.bin software . Frequently we are facing problem in logging to the device .Inorder to resolve we need to reboot the router . Yesterday fortunately i have got the console access for some time so i came to know that TPLUS process is consuming 99.9% percentage cpu.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe suddenly noticed high CPU utilization on one of our 7600 routers. I output of show process CPU showed high utlization for the FM core process. I looked it up but did not find information on what this process does. [code]
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a problem with cpu high.tell me if normal have this process?
CPU utilization for five seconds: 29%/0%; one minute: 29%; five minutes: 30%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
29 198216576 402619350 492 15.83% 15.87% 15.68% 0 Cat4k Mgmt HiPri
30 175197296 96703435 1811 10.23% 10.10% 10.64% 0 Cat4k Mgmt LoPri
Cisco IOS Software, Catalyst 4000 L3 Switch Software (cat4000-I9S-M), Version 12.2(25)EWA14, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)Technical Support: [URL] Copyright (c) 1986-2008 by Cisco Systems, Inc.Compiled Tue 20-May-08 18:49 by chendahImage text-base: 0x10000000, data-base: 0x114BE208
ROM: 12.2(31r)SG2Dagobah Revision 226, Swamp Revision 34
System returned to ROM by reloadSystem restarted at 00:36:52 UTC Sat Dec 10 2011System image file is "bootflash:cat4000-i9s-mz.122-25.EWA14.bin" cisco WS-C4506 (MPC8245) processor (revision 10) with 262144K bytes of memory.MPC8245 CPU at 266Mhz, Supervisor II+Last reset from Reload1 Virtual Ethernet interface144 FastEthernet interfaces2 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces511K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.Configuration register is 0x2102
We are experiencing with high CPU input due to ARP input between 20:30 and 22:30 every day At this time we have a lot of backup operations. When I look the netflow report, I can't see anything anormal.
We are changing our backup server's NIC card from 1gig to 10Gig. The backup operation's traffic is high (approx 2Gbps level) but 6509 has to be handle this size of traffic.
We are using two 6509E in VSS mode and our image version is s72033-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.122-33.SXJ.bin
20:00
show ip arp summary
--------------
2588 IP ARP entries, with 166 of them incomplete
[Code].....
I'm facing high CPU utilization issue due to a ssh process on 3750 switch. What is the use of SSH proces in the switch? Can I disable it for troubleshooting?
will there be any impact if I disable it?
#sh processes cpu sorted 5min
CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%/0%; one minute: 66%; five minutes: 46%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
159 1896078 589986 3213 3.96% 10.76% 14.00% 0 Hulc LED Process
165 32871 591 55619 77.42% 33.40% 8.85% 3 SSH Process
which process is consuming high memory with my c6509 switch.
View 17 Replies View Relatedwe are using Cisco 6509-E VSS mode [12.2(33)SXI] ipbase image and facing high cpu utilization. In show process cpu output it is showing some "ios-base" process consuming cpu. I attached show cpu output
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe are running a stack of 2 WS-C3750X-24S-E's with IOS version 12.2(58)SE2 and we are seeing continuous high processor utilization involving the hl3mm process. The stack is configured for PIM Sparse mode, with 2 upstream Nexus 5596'es acting as both RP candidates and as BSRs. The hl3mm process generally runs at about 19% but can spike up into the 60% range.Symptoms on the 3750X are spiking latency and sluggish CLI perfformance. I thought at first that we might be running into SDM limits, but the "show platform tcam utilization" show that we are far under the limits of the default SDM template. Performing the "show ip pim (vrf name) bsr-router" command freezes the system and takes 20-30 seconds to return results. Similiarly configured WS-C3750G-12S running 12.2(55)SE3 does not exhibit these same issues.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am building a few 3750 stacks, I want to be able to poll/monitor each individual switch in the stack but as it only has 1 ip associated with the stack how can I do this. I am polling the uplink interfaces but as I only have uplinks on the top and bottom switch I am blind to a switch going down in the middle of the stack.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a problem with SNMP. I using Cisco 3845 in distribution layer. >600 subinterfaces. When my managment system send response - the cpu Utilization on cisco3845 near 100%. I want to prohibited my Cisco answer on response about interface status.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have a stack setup with 2 C3750x-12s and 5 C3750x-48p switches. We have two of these stacks. One is working and responding with snmp just fine. Our second one is showing the errors in the logThe only difference i see between the two stacks right now are the sw versions.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have been seeing high CPU on a 3750 stack we use for our phone system. I followed the documentation here:
[URL]
This documentation pointed out that the interrupt was very high and so I started looking at the CPU queues to debug. The icmp queue was dropping TONS of traffic.
The debug was full of these:
ICMP-Q:Dropped Not a candidate: Remote Port Blocked L3If:Vlan248 L2If:GigabitEthernet1/0/17 DI:0xB4, LT:7, Vlan:248 SrcGPN:17, SrcGID:17, ACLLogIdx:0x0, MacDA:001a.a1c4.1cd2, MacSA: 0013.192c.bb80 IP_SA:5.1.1.10
[Code].....
Seeing very high CPU on one of our 3750X stacks. Usally its around 30% but recently its 70, 80, 90 or maxed at 100% during the main day.IOS version c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE1.bin.Has a ten gig uplink connected to a nexus 7k and another ten gig connected to another 7k. Running Layer 3 and EIGRP on the 3750X.Is this normal for the CPU?
#sh processes cpu history
5555555554444455555555555555588888666669999888885555577777
8888000001111111111222227777755555666662222222229999977777
100
90 ***** ****
80 ***** ********* *****
[code]....
I have a customer with a stack of two switches C2960S-24TS-L that are running 12.2(58)SE2 universal K9, we see that the CPU load increase over time, to 95% and stays there reload solves the problem.the process that akes a lot of CPU is also the SNMP ENGINE, I see that it is running 30 minutes on 95% and then 10 minutes on 35%, this is the only stack were we see this problem. Is there also a SNMP bug in this version ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe recently configured a stack of four 48 port 3750-x switches . We are noticing high CPU usage. "Hulc LED process" seems pretty high. This has coincided with VMware servers getting slow and non-responsive at times, perhaps a coincidence, not sure. Below I provided some outputs about how to diagnose it.
View 13 Replies View RelatedWe added Site02 for redundancy and DR. Also added new SAN and ESX hosts. The CPU on device Site01Server01 is not very happy when files are being transferred between the sites. Since the setup is the same at both sites, why is the problem only at site01?
Site02 is newer and we have two 3750X-24 with IOS 12.2(55)SE3 on ipservices, for site02server01; no problem.
Site01server01 is a stack of two 3750G-24PS with IOS 12.2(58)SE on ipservices.
[Code]....
i am seeing very high utilization on a random basis on the stack. and the logs indicate me that there is a pattern where there is a stack power cable shows inserted (which was never unplugged) followed by sudden spike in the utilization.
001018: *Mar 6 16:21:22.138: %PLATFORM_STACKPOWER-6-CABLE_EVENT: Switch 4 stack power cable 1 inserted
001019: *Mar 6 18:18:37.982: %SYS-1-CPURISINGTHRESHOLD: Threshold: Total CPU
[Code]......
We are having 3750 Stack switch as our edge switch. Here we are having some issues as low memory & itermediate High CPU utilization.For memory when we checked its shwoing maximum memory is allocated to DHCPD receive & ARP Input as follows
Processor Pool Total: 70829380 Used: 56809532 Free: 14019848
I/O Pool Total: 12582912 Used: 8554920 Free: 4027992
Driver te Pool Total: 1048576 Used: 40 Free: 1048536
[code].....
i want to understand why this 2 proceses (DHCPD & ARP input) taking more memory?High CPU: We also facing intermediate high CPU utilization (above 95%). When CPU is high there were 2 processes consuming more CPU are 'Spanning Tree' (about 20%) & ARP Input (about 66%). we also checked the ARP entries, there were 1500 ARP entries & 2 incomplete ARP (out of 6000 ARP supported)
I have a new cisco 3750 stack comprised of 8 members (6 x 3750G-48PS and 2 x 3750V2-48PS) running 'c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-58.SE2.bin'. I am seeing high memory utilisation, it seems to sit fairly stable and I do not see an increase but this has only been running a few days. No errors or performance issues. Should this be a cause for concern?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe have a 3750 stack with a mix of 3750G and 3750X switches. The current active template on the switch is desktop default and we are running EIGRP on the switch with large routing table so we get the TCAM error that a specific prefix cannot be programmed in TCAM memory so it will be software forwarded.%PLATFORM_UCAST-4-PREFIX: One or more, more specific prefixes could not be programmed into TCAM and are being covered by a less specific prefix, and the packets may be software forwarded
This error is quite frequent on a daily basis. My question is that will this error create a high CPU situation and affect traffic processing on the stack causing ESX Hosts to become unresponsive?
