Cisco Routers :: RSV4000 With No WAN Connectivity?
Oct 31, 2011
I purchased a RSV4000 for my home network and I was setting it up when I ran into a bit of an issue. My WAN is set for DHCP so it received an IP and DNS information from the cable modem. From the router I am able to ping my providers DNS servers as well as tracert to google.com. From inside my network I can log in to my admin page and see my other devices so internal DNS is working fine as well as DHCP. I can ping my router internally and I can also ping the WAN IP address of my router internally but that is as far as I can get.
From a PC on my network I cannot access any web content beyond my router WAN port, which I have verified has connectivity. I have power cycled both my modem and my router numerous times to no avail. I plug my old router back in and it works with no problem. I plug my computer into my modem and it works as well.
I turned off all firewall settings, set it so that it is in router mode and edited the DHCP and LAN IP information on it but that is all. All of the other settings should be default.
I even went so far as to plug the RSV4000 into my old router which was plugged into my modem since I know my old router worked. It did the exact same thing. It received an IP from the old router, was able to ping externally and I was able to ping the WAN port but then after that bupkiss.
I'm trying to set up VPN with RSV4000. I'm trying to connect from Snow Leopard through it's inbuilt Cisco IPSec. So when I try to connect from a machine within the network I get something like this:
Nov 21 17:03:06 - [VPN Log]: packet from 192.168.10.52:500: received Vendor ID payload [RFC 3947] method set to=109
I got a RSV4000 router here with the latest firmware 1.3.3.5, trying to get the quick VPN client to connect.As far configurations go I have under WAN set the IP, subnetmask, DNS1, DNS2 and gateway. And under VPN I have created a client account with a password, created and then exported the Cert to my client PC.But when I attempt to connect, the QuickVPN software hangs for a few moments at "Connecting" and then fails; when the general error.I'm running this on Windows 7 x64.
I have a customer that has an RSV4000 Router. The customer has also purchased a block of 5 usable public IP addresses. I need to be able to assign these public IP addresses to printers either by configuring a static IP on each printer directly or thru IP mapping or some other method. Does the RSV4000 support using multiple public IP addresses and if so what configuration is needed in the router for the printers to be seen by the outside world.
I have RV 120W Wireless-N VPN Firewall and having issues with connectivity and communication between PCs within the same LAN. I tried the following to check connections:
1. Finding the computers within the workgroup using wondows network or (finding the computer) without avail. 2. Pinging the IP address of the PCs within the LAN. Request Timeout is given. 3. Pinter Network is working fine.
I recently replaced RV016 with a new one. Now I'm having connectivity issues with my server. One particular software I'm running on workstations will no longer connect. Everything is set up the same as with the old RV016. Internet connection is fine.
Based on the tech support from the software company, they are saying - "The clients contact the server using the HTTP protocol and the server IP address or host name. You should begin troubleshooting by pinging the server from the workstations to see if they have any connectivity to the server and move forward based on the result of that ping." Pinging the server from the workstations results in timing out.
After upgrading an RV042 from 1.3.12.19 to 1.3.13.02, it loses connectivity after several hours. RV042 WAN1 is connected to cable modem (WAN2/DMZ is unused), configured to obtain IP Address.
Cold booting all devices, RV042, AP & Cable modem, re-established connectivity. Only to lose connectivity again several hours later.
Reset RV042 to factory default via reset switch and cleared log. Minimal configuration applied (domain name, hostname, ntp, WAN1 bw=8000).
Checked early this morning and no connectivity. Summary screen showed the same IP on WAN1 port. All appeared normal. Clicked renew, and connectivity was re-established. Same IP as before.
The RV042, when running 1.3.12.19, would run for many months without a hiccup.
This is the log entry when I clicked 'renew':
Aug 18 04:12:40 2011 System Log DHCP lease info: ip[68.202.x.x] mask[255.255.240.0] gw[68.202.x.x]
[Code].....
Clicking 'renew' did re-establish connectivity, but I'm not sure if it's a dhcp issue or not. If I read the log entry correctly, the router has the IP lease for an hour, which means it renews several times successfully. Connectivity is down in the morning after several hours go by without use. I'm not sure if that has anything to do with it. Again, nothing changed but the code and the RV042 ran without problems for months with the 1.3.12.19 code.
We have an office with about 10 PCs, and several other network devices (smartphones, printers, etc). Some PCs and printers are wired, some are not. About two weeks ago, some (6) of the wireless devices lost connectivity. Since then, some (4) of the devices have also recovered normal connectivity.
As of right now, there are two computers, a laptop and a desktop, that cannot use the wireless network. They see the wireless network, connect to it, receive an IP via DHCP properly, have correct DNS servers listed in ipconfig, but they can't ping the router, use the intranet, or internet.
I manage the I.T. department for an ambulance service. We have 12 ambulances all equipped with Verizon 4G LTE Samsung hotspot cards. [code] There are laptops in each of the ambulances that connect to the wireless cards in the ambulance via DHCP. I get frequent problems when the vehicle get close to each other of them jumping from one card to another... which is not a huge problem, except when it happens the computer will have a "limited connectivity" to the internet. This sometimes will resolve after 3-5 minutes on its own, or if i disconnect from the wireless card and reconnect it will resolve, or sometimes by rebooting the wireless card it will resolve.We also need the ability to move the laptops from one ambulance to another as well so we need to have this flexibility.would I be better off establishing the same IP address to each of the wireless cards, still keeping different SSID's and different channel #'s and then hard code the IP address into the laptop instead of using DHCP to connect? My goal is to eliminate the limited connectivity issue.
I just spent a number of hours getting a site-to-site VPN tunnel and Cisco Quick Connect client running on my WRVS4400N and RVS400. Turns out the problem was the routers don't route IPv6 properly and it takes precedence over IPv4
RV220W worked good with QuickVPN, but suddenly lost such ability and doesn't allow connection from any Windows machine (Xp,Win7 32/64 bit)
QuickVPN is ver. 1.4.2.1 Cisco RV220W firmware is ver. 1.0.4.17
Client error on Windows XP in Log.txt :
[STATUS]OS Version: Windows XP [STATUS]Windows Firewall is OFF [STATUS]One network interface detected with IP address 10.1.1.165 [STATUS]Connecting... [DEBUG]Input VPN Server Address = x.x.x.x
I have a Catalyst 3750 that was already configured with a minimal setup and integrated into one of our labs. The 3750 works fine and does everything we need it to for our internal wired network for that specific lab. The owners of the lab are trying to integrate an RV220W into the lab. So i am trying to set up this RV220W as just an access point as was requested. I've disabled all of the extra features on the device so it is being used as a WAP/Router. We have separated the 2 networks into separate VLAN's. VLAN 2 is used for the wireless, VLAN1 is used for the wired. The wired works great. I can connect to all devices on the cisco switch through the RV220W and vice versa.
We have tried disabling the RV220W's dhcp and using the rv220 as a dhcp relay from a server in the lab but it has the same results, so we've disabled dhcp from the lab and are using it on the rv exclusively since everything else is static.
Cisco3750 <----> RV220W <---- wireless/wired devices. 192.168.10.x for the wired network. 192.168.2.x for the wireless.
I can ping both sides of the VLAN's(If i have .10 IP, I can ping 192.168.2.1(interface for wireless VLAN on the router) when wired into the RV or plugged directly into the switch... Here it comes...
as soon as i connect the RV220w into the Catalyst switch the wireless gets EXTREMELY intermittent. The network shows up then doesn't show up in available networks. When i try to connect to it, it will time out and connect back to other available networks. As soon as i unplug the device from the switch the wireless is stable and there are no problems connecting to it.
We tried using a Dell switch instead of the Cisco to test, the wireless is stable. Wireless assign's a .2 subnet IP as it should and i can connect to everything on the Dell switch(.10 subnet) and vice versa. Also connected this device into a couple different 3750's and had the same issue. They are not heavily configured so many default settings may still be enabled.
Also tested 2 other devices on the Cisco switch, a linksys WAP and a Netgear Router. Both acted the same. I don't think it is the RV220W. I'm sure i'm missing something on the Cisco switch.
I've downloaded the file "RV0XX-v4.1.0.02-tm.bin" from Cisco's web site. The current firmware in the RV016 router is V3. I log into the router with IE9 (or even firefox), navigate to the system management section, upgrade firmware tab. Browse to the file above and click the button to upgrade. Nothing happens for a few seconds, then the browser displays cant load this page. (Same results if I use the file "RV0XX-v4.1.1.01-sp.bin" as well.)
I have an RV220W running firmware 1.0.4.17. I have a couple of wireless laptop users that connect to the wireless without problems, but frequently cannot access the Internet. They can always access local network resources, but for some reason when laptops are first powered up or are idle for a prolonged period of time, Internet access is lost. Wired clients never experience this problem and always maintain local network and Internet connectivity.
To get the laptops to access the Internet over wireless, we have to run a TRACERT command from the command prompt to a public IP address, and then all Internet access is restored.
I purchased a new N600 dual band router (2.4 and 5.0 GHz). I set up security to use WPA/WPA2 PSK (AES) on both bands. The devices that can see the 5.0 band could connect without issue, however those devices that can only see the 2.4 band (older devices like the Nintendo Wii, my desktop computer with wireless, and iPhone 4's could not connect). In troubleshooting, I finally disabled security on the 2.4 band and everything connected without issue, but I cant figure out how to successfully enable security on both bands at the same time.
Looking for a SOHO device that could accomplish not only to connect people from home to Internet, but also to let me remotely access my work stuff (from my home office), RV180W sounded great and really cost effective. I could connect to Internet, FROM Internet, separate home, work and guest VLANs, all in just one device... sounded just GREAT! Bought one but (unfortunately) I have to say I'm quite disappointed with its performance, outnumbered errors (how many!) and continuous lost of Internet connectivity (can't stay a full day without one).I've searched a lot (not only here) and tried many things, listing some:
- Upgrading firmware (now v1.0.2.6): done several times, once with nothing connected to the router besides a local wired laptop, to ensure integrity - Resetting to factory defaults and performing a "clean configuration", from scratch (done several times) - Disabling Firewall functions (once all of them) - Checking the real need of every option and making sure I had just the ones I needed configured
I have (in a very "consistent" way) the following problems:
- Poor performance (it's clearly much better when I directly connect to the cable modem's WiFi OR to another router connected to this cable modem). I could say that it seems to have 50% of the performance I had with my CISCO/Linksys E4200 and Netgear "elder" routers.
- Persistent disconnections / resets: Sometimes it happens only with wireless, sometimes it looses the "Internet forwarding capability", retaining the local wireless connection (to other devices), sometimes it seems to make a full reboot (including a new DHCP request to cable modem). In a day this happens several times, I'd say from 3 to 15 times, depending on the day (couldn't figure out why).
CPU utilization is always shown as being 100%, what sounds amazing, because:
- There are usually just 4 wired connections (3 storage devices + 1 Desktop) and at most 5 wireless connections (including my laptop connected to the main VLAN and 3 Android devices and 1 "guest" laptop connected to GUEST VLAN) - The utilization % remains when I have jut one laptop performing Internet browsing and nothing more - VPN wasn't enabled yet (and it will be, as I want to remotely connect to my home office) [code] ......
We relocated several servers to our DMZ and, without a domain controller in the DMZ (we plan to put a RODC in the DMZ later when we mvoe to Windows Server 2008), i punch through the standard recommended TCP ports. ports 88,135, 389, 53, etc.) to the internal network located DC. I am double hopping to the DC (I hope thast doesn't matter) as the DMZ located web server communicates to another IP address in the same DMZ network and then I NAT that address to the internal IP address of the DC. Everything seems to be working for the servers we moved to the DMZ but i think i don't have all the necessary TCP/UDP ports punched through because we have found that logging into the DMZ servers is taking an extended amount of time, sitting on the “applying settings” screen. For 2-34 minutes. Also, we noticed that our applciations fols have to now add the fully qualified domain names when making calls to servers that just needed the domain name. When i open the access-list up completely without opening specific TCP/UDP ports, the issue is resolved.
I am currently configuring an ISR 892 without wifi. I got the start-up config working and am now stuck with zone-based firewalling. I configured four zones: private, dmz and internet-static and internet-dial. The private zone is configured for Vlan1 witch covers one ethernet switch port connected to the LAN. The dmz zone is currently not configured. The internet-static zone is configured for GigabitEthernet0 which connects us to our ISP providing a static IP. Internet-dial is configured for FastEthernet8 and connects to another ISP using a dial-up ADSL line, which is currently not connected. So, in short: I try to connect the private zone to internet-static and get traffic flowing, but can't get this working. The private zone can talk to the router and the router can talk to the internet. I suppose I forgot some basic configuration for the router itself because the zone configuration was done with this config guide: [URL]
This is my current running config:
Current configuration : 6076 bytes !! Last configuration change at 08:26:03 UTC Thu Feb 3 2011 by admin!version 15.1service timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime
I have created a management vlan on my network of 2950 and 3750 switches. One 3750 has a trunk to each of the 2950 switches which includes the management VLAN. On that 3750 the vlan and line protocol are both up even though there is no specific port assigned to the vlan; I believe the trunk connections allow the vlan line protocol to come up. On another 3750 stack I have my VLAN defined with no ports designated or trunks; the VLAN is up however the line protocol is down.
Physical devices are a Cisco 2901 (CISCO2901/K9) with GE0/0 configured as 192.168.1.1 Connected through a D-Link DGS-1210-24 configured as 192.168.1.202 Running on a domain with an HP domain server as 192.168.1.2
The 2901 was an EHWIC (VA-DSL-A oPoTS) on EHWIC 0/0/0 GE 0/0 on the 2901 is physically connected to the DGS-1210 which is physically connected to the server. VDSL 0/0/0 is physically connected to the DSL jack.
So far the configuration reports all is connected, and I can ping the gateway of our ISP (using CLI or Cisco CP); however the server reports no internet connection and no workstations can access the 'net.
Once connected; I'd also like to allow ports through for use on the network (25, 80, 110, 443, 987, 1723) - but not sure on how to do that just yet!
Our IP is 202.27.19x.19x Our Gateway is 202.27.217.5
i found that cisco small business SF302 PoE managed switch connect with the end device (RFID component) would causing packet drop issue.how should i isolate the issue and proper troubleshooting? would it cause by the PoE issue, or the 10/100 base etc.
We have a fixed IP address 3G data SIM which we intend to use as backup for our ADSL connectivity using a CISCO887VAG+7-K9 router. (We have previously implemented similar using the older CISCO887G-K9 router without any issues)
The problem is, we don't seem to be able to establish 3G connectivity with this new router. Our service provider assures us that the SIM card is active (although they have seen no connection attempts from us on their RADIUS server)
The router is running IOS version 15.1(4)M4 and the following is the relevant config we have used:
I have a 2921 series router w 15.1M series IOS. The platform has HWIC-2SHDSL module installed, which is used for point-to-point G.SHDSL connectivity. When I apply a service-policy on atm pvc, after 10 to 20 minutes I lose IP connectivity on ATM interface and tunnel interface also goes to down state. If I remove the service policy on ATM PVC IP connectivty returns back.
Interestingly I use exactly the same config on 2821 platform (w. WIC-1SHDSL installed) and I do not live such an issue on that platform.I tried to carry the Qos config on to Tunnel interface with shaping enabled and "no qos-preclassify" command issued, but the result is the same.
policy-map MetroDSL-llq class sna-dsl bandwidth percent 10 class netbios-dsl bandwidth percent 10
I'm trying to configure ACS 5.2 so that should it loose connectivity to Active Directory it chooses the local authentication, however I can't seem to make this work.Within ACS 5.2, Access-Policies, Access Services, Default Device Admin, Identity,
I have a single rule configured for any device that matches tacacs to use the identity source of Active Directory, If authentication failed: Reject If user not found: Reject If process failed: Drop
The ACS can not access Active Directory, when I debug TACACS authentication on any 65k or 2921 device I get "Received Authen status error".
I am writing to be given some support related to a issue that I am having. The fact is that I am trying to give connectivity between two companies that are connected to mine through the same Cisco VPN 3030 device (I know that it would be better that they access directly between them and not through my Concentrator, but due to some security reasons it is not possible).
The problem that I found is how to route the destination network through one specific L2L, because the static routes can only be configured to IP addresses or Interfaces (in my case just Internal-LAN and External-Internet).
WAN Interface gig0/0 interface ip add 62.x.x.x 255.255.255.252 duplex full speed auto LAN interface gig0/1 ip add 10.x.x.x 255.255.255.0 duplex full speed 100 ( i am keeping the speed 100 because it is connected in switch port f0/48,made the switch port as speed 100)
but after some time my connection to the internet goes off and i just shut and no shut the WAN interface and it comes back.
I have an ASA 5505 and i recently for some reason cannot connect to the VPN using anyconnect.Usually users would connect using the Anyconnect URL with the configured port number: https://publicipaddress:8443
Right now we are getting "page cannot be displayed" since it doesn't connect to the Anyconnect URL page.
I haven't done any recent configuration for this to have failed. I have checked the and both ports 443, and 8443 are allowed in the firewall. NAT is also allowing an exemption for the VPN Pool.
I have been having some gripes with the above problem for the past few days, connecting several PCs in my office into a network. To cut a long story short, it's a bunch of XP SP2 and SP3 machines with only some of them having these issues. The network consists of two switches and one router with integrated modem and wireless. Internet access is established over that router/ ADSL modem.I have drawn out all the cabling and made all the connections myself, I don't doubt network related hardware one bit. Basically, I had the problem on two PCs, I tested connectivity on that cable with a laptop which didn't have any problems connecting to the network. All the cables are brand new, "straight" connectedC
i did this and the sign of unable to connect went away, restarted back to it, did it again and it goes away but still no connection. TCP/IP stack repair options for use with Windows XP with SP2.
my internet is not working on my PC (XP) however the wifi in my house is still on (i can use laptop with functioning internet). The internet status say's "limited or no connectivity" and shows a yellow triangle with an exclamation point in the middle.
I manage a small office network IP's are generated via a rooter. I need to add a new pc to the network and here is where the problem starts.I have a cable from a HUB in that office which has a splitter 1 way goes to a PC the other is empty. At first i tried connecting the other PC from that splitter but i get the Limited or no Connectivity message on both PCs. If i connect only one of them to the splitter the connection works fine.Now i tried with a HUB, made a Crossover cable from the splitter to the HUB in the WAN port, same deal both PCs get Limited ot no Connectivity. THe strange thing is that if i connect only one via the HUB the same thing happens.I am really out of ideas, my only option left is to connect the PC from the main HUB which means allot of cable posing.
