Cisco Routers :: RV016 - Connecting To VPN Internal Server Not Working?
Jan 6, 2013
We have 3 internet links from different providers connected to configured WAN 1,2,3 in RV016. A remote client needs to connect to a internal VPN Server behind RV016, so we use one-to-one NAT to publish the internal server ip to a Valid IP from WAN3 and setup protocol binding in Multi wan to all trafic (TCP and UDP) from the internal VPN address exits with WAN3.
So, the remote client tries to connect to VPN using this ip Address from WAN3 and sometimes work and sometimes not. It's clear to us that the problem lies in the response from RV016 not coming always from WAN3, because if we disconnect the two other links (WAN1 and 2) Its works flawless.
just purchase this RV016 and the firmware has been updated to 3.0.2.01-tm.
Almost every download I try through the router leads to a curruption somehow, even though the download manager gets it all. If I go straight from the cable modem I have no problems. I use a cat5 lead from the front ports on the router to my PC. A few small downloads under 512kb work.
I haven't change much from the default setup apart from the IP address to 192.168.12.10
It's a 4mbps upload and 0.8 downlink from what speedtest shows. I have tried diff DL managers, and get the same result on different connected PC's when through the router. The great thing about the RV016 is it speeds up the connection on this cable modem.
Problem: IPsec VPN setup seems ok (Client to gateway) but is not responding from client requests. However, remote manage works, PPTP works.
My environment:
Hardware: RV016 10/100 16-Port VPN Router Firmware: v4.2.1.02 (Jan 18 2012 14:10:55) Clients: Mac OS X 10.8 (integrated VPN client) , Windows 7 (build in VPN client) OR both with NCP-E VPN client.
None of the above works with IPsec. I have tried all kinds of combinations. I don't think the problem is wether I use Group1 or Group2 or DES or AES...It must be something else... Neither of the built-in VPN (IPsec) clients in Mac OS X or Windows can be configured in an easy way. BUT the NCP-E client can. I have tried to set it up to exactly meet the settings on the server but no progress...How do I setup an IPsec VPN group so that I can use any of my VPN clients to work?
PS. I have also tried the client that comes delivered. 1- It does not work and 2- it's only available for Windows.
So if the PPTP server is enabled, and "Block MAC address not on the list" is enabled under the DHCP settings, will the PPTP client get an IP address?Similarly, if the PPTP server is enabled and the range of IP addresses configured on the PPTP server screen is outside the IP range of the router due to a subnet mask (like 255.255.225.248 for example), will the IP still be assigned to the PPTP client? If assigned, will that IP have any connectivity to the LAN?
I was just wondering if it's possible with an ASA 5510 to connect to the external IP address of an internal server from inside the network. I have already set up dns doctoring for dns lookups, and everything is working fine there. We have an application inside the network that tries to connect straight to the external Ip of another internal server. where to look in the ASDM 6.4?
setup a DHCP server on a WLC 2504. I'll try to resume my configuration:
I have 2 networks: inside users (vlan 1) and external users (vlan)
My controller uses the port 1 to connect to the switch, which has a trunk with WLC.
I have two routers, one using vlan 1 (192.168.3.0/24) and one using vlan 10 (200.X.X.X). All ports to these routers are access ports on their respective vlans.
I have 2 SSID, one for inside, other to outside. Inside is working very well.
To the outside I created a DHCP escope and already set the IP of the management interface 192.168.3.119.
The RV082 is a great unit, however when VPN clients connect the QuickVPN Client has a setting to use the Remote DNS settings of the RV082. The RV082 has no way of linking or using a user-defined DNS. I have an internal DNS Server that I would like the VPN Clients to query on internal name lookups (kindof the point of having client vpn, so they can access internal network shares etc. On the diagnostic page the ping and name resolution can only check external DNS and internal IP's. Wouldn't it make sense to at least make the RV082 aware of internal DNS Servers? Then the Ping and DNS lookup would be able to test both zones? Is this something that can be looked at by Linksys Developers for this product? The WRV210 (a cheaper and lower level model) has this functionality.
We have setup a new internal web server so now we have two internal web server and both or hosting sites on port 80. Currently we have port 80 forwarding to one of the web servers and users are able to hit it from the outside.
Is there any way to configure the RV042 to route web traffic to the correct web server by using the site name or dns? If a user puts in the address{URL}, be routed to one web server but if they put in {URL}, be routed to our second web server. I've checked with our vendors and the both web servers applications need to run on port 80. If we have forwarding setup on the RV042 to forward port 80 to web1 then users can't access web2 from the outside?
We use the RV082 at some our sites. One particular site will not connect to the DNS server but all others will. I've checked every setting I can think of with no joy.
I have two AC1200 routers? how do i connect one ac1200 to another ac1200. Only one should act as a DHCP server and broadcast wireless; the other should be simply just a hub (vs. me having to buy a separate hub). What are the correct settings and connections?
I possess a RV220W (firmware 1.0.3.5) but I can't seem to work with the PPTP server on one VLAN only.
My default VLAN is in 192.168.1.1/24. I created a VLAN ID 10 in 192.168.50.1/24 inter-vlan routing : disabled and Device Management : disabled. (Menu Networking > LAN > VLAN Membership and Multiple VLAN Subnets).
Then I configured a PPTP server on the IP range 192.168.50.200 to 192.168.50.210.
To finish I created my user. (Menu VPN > IPSEC > VPN Users).
The PPTP tunnel is working, but on all my local network and not only the VLAN ID 10.
just purchase this RV016 and the firmware has been updated to 3.0.2.01-tm.Every download I try through the router leads to a curruption somehow, even though the download manager gets it all. If I go straight from the cable modem I have no problems.It's a 4mbps upload and 0.8 downlink from what speedtest shows. I have tried diff DL managers, and get the same result on different connected PC's. The great thing about the RV016 is it speeds up the connection on this cable modem.What can I change to get downloads working?
I am using a RV016 (192.168.1.2) as a router and DHCP. It automatically assigns its own IP which is 192.168.1.2. I can not set my RV016 to assign a Default Gateway IP of the server. The workstations will connect to internet via this server (192.168.1.1)
I would like to ask if what is the replacement for RV016? Is there any on the ISR G2 that can be set as a mulit-WAN router? Meaning can handle for more than two WAN connections.
I have a rv016 that's been in 24x7 operation since I bought it a few years back. It is out of warranty. It is connected to three cable modems on WANs 1-3. Behind it are a bunch of PCs getting IPs via DHCP. There is a gateway to gateway vpn tunnel setup on wan3 to a rv082 at another site. There is a forwarding entry for http to an internal http server. Everything else is pretty much default.
The router is primarily used to aggregate bandwidth for uploading large numbers of photos. The systems behind the router initiate the uploads and the router automatically load balances the outgoing bandwidth.
This was all working fine until just recently. The ISP is Knology who is upgrading each of the 8m/768k cable modems to 25m/5m. They are also moving from DOCSIS 1 to DOCSIS 3. They are currently in the middle of this upgrade and have upgraded the modems to DOCSIS 3 as well as the speeds to 12m/2m. The problem is that the rv016 Network Service Detection, which is set to "Default Gateway" indicates that the modems fail randomly. Usually only one will be failed, but up to two will fail the Network Service Detection simultaneously.
Knology insists that there is nothing wrong with their modems. I have removed a modem from the rv016 when Network Service Detection indicates it is in a failed state and connected it directly to a computer. It will work, but it has a different IP address and default gateway. As soon as I connect it back to the rv016, it works there too, but on the original IP address and gateway. I've only tried this test this twice so far, so it is a bit inconclusive.
Speed tests behind the rv016 are the same as directly connected to one of the cable modems. The router works normally as it has for years. Nothing else is acting funny.
So my question is, is the rv016 failing or is the ISP having problems?
Problems on RV016 the firmware, Firmware Version : v4.2.1.02 (Jan 18 2012 14:10:55) on port PPPoE mode. It makes the dial, but not Web browsing correctly. The solution was to return the old version of firmware.
I am trying to upgrade my RV016 from 3.0.2.01-tm to 4.0.4.02. I have not received any messages and the log has nothing. I have left the computer and switch for 2 hours and it never seems to end. (serial no. DF0006200812).
WAN1: VOIP traffic (either by port or IP) + failover for WAN 2 WAN2: all other traffic + failover for WAN1 WAN3: failover for WAN1 & WAN2 with connection on demand
I have hardware version 2 and firmware 3.0.2.01 (latest firmware available for this hardware version I believe) and I cannot get it to email me logs. I have entered my outlook address and our SMTP server.The log says that it's failing each time it attempts. I have scoured the internet and I cannot find a solution that will work for me. I have found some talk of adjusting an MTU setting which is supposed to be located under the firewall / general tab.
this router (RV016v3, Firmware: v4.1.1.01-sp (Dec 6 2011 20:03:18)) in regards to it not properly directing UDP packets out of the right WAN, as per the settings stored in Protocol Binding section of [System Management, Multi-WAN].I use the section to direct all traffic from desktop computers (192.168.5.100 ~ 192.168.5.199) through WAN4, and all VoIP related traffic (192.168.5.200 ~ 192.168.5.239) through WAN2(PPPoE).Everything seems to be working well except for some of the UDP traffic from 192.168.5.200 which is seen in the log going out of WAN4 instead of WAN2.I have even created a new entry for [UDP/5060~5060]->192.168.5.200~192.168.5.200(0.0.0.0~255.255.255.255)WAN2, and placed it at the very top of the list.Here are a few lines that I've observed in the log: (Refreshed the registration of two SIP Trunks configured in our PBX)
Feb 23 18:11:47 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 192.168.5.200:5060->184.72.227.214:5060 on eth4 Feb 23 18:11:46 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 192.168.5.200:5060->50.56.59.168:5060 on ppp2 Feb 23 18:11:46 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 192.168.5.200:5060->184.72.227.214:5060 on eth4 Feb 23 18:11:46 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 192.168.5.200:5060->50.56.59.168:5060 on ppp2
There are no static routes configured, so i'm baffled by what could cause some of the UDP packets to go through the wrong WAN.All TCP Traffic from 192.168.5.200 is seen going though WAN2 as it should.
Would one of the 'Cisco RV016' work with a switch? I'm planning on running our work network using this device to load balance between 3 WAN connections and would like to keep the upstairs and downstairs computer users separated via a switch.Will the switch affect the load balancing or will the router still be able to detect each individual user and balance the load as seen necessary?
We are deploying a new batch of RV016 with the latest firmware (4.0.4.02). We are using 3 WAN ports for internet access (WAN1, WAN2, WAN3)The WAN ports connects to Cicso 800 series adsl modem with DHCP.The RV016 WAN1 port setting regularly resets to 0.0.0.0 despite that the modem dhcp is still up and running. A cold boot, resets all the configuration and WAN1 port start working againg a new ip.
All three WAN ports are set to automatically obtain ip from the modems.We have tried several modems, and even swap WAN ports, but the error is persistant to WAN1 only.
WAN2 and WAN3 are up and running without any errors. This error is persistant with WAN1 only.We have also configured a manual ip on WAN1, and after a few hours of operation on all 3 ports, traffic on WAN1 comes to a halt.We have the same error on 3 units we received last week.All there modem are configure on different subnets.It does not seems to be a configuration error with the modem as they work perfectly well with the WAN2, WAN3 ports.We also tested a RV016 out of the box using the wizard setup, without any extra setting/configuration, and we got the same error after a few hours of operation.
I am trying to upgrade my RV016 hardware version 1, Firmware version 1.3.2 to firmware version 2.0.0. but can't find the file. Locating RV016_2.0.0? I am trying to upgrade to version 3.0.0.1
I know this is a small business appliance I got my ccna certification with the hope of practice my CLI skills with a cisco device however I read in cisco docs the small business routers doesn´t support talnet neiter ssh I mean CLI, is thta true ?
I have two LANs 192.168.0.* and 192.168.1.* (main)
I'd like to facilitate port forwarding on the sub-LAN - is there a way to configure the device to do so? The "main" LANs fowarding works just fine, however I have specific ports that need to go to the sub-LAN.
I have a RV016 with an internal address of 192.168.1.1. Also on the 192.168.1.0 network is a gateway server that the rest of my clients sit behind. The clients are on a 172.16.3.0/24 network. All of the gateway server does is forward the packets. It does not NAT. There is a static route to 172.16.3.0 on the RV016.
So my question is how do I get traffic from 172.16.3.0 to route through the RV016? Computers on the sub net can ping the RV016 and get a reply so I know the gateway server is forwarding the packets between the two sub nets just fine and that the static route on the RV016 works. Any traffic that tries to go beyond the RV016 never makes it. It just disappears at the RV016. I have checked all of the ACLs and they should let all internal traffic through.
I have 11 available IPs at a data center and have 5 servers I want configure - each with its own LAN, not to be networked together (used for web, ftp, sql and other webs services). Is it possible to configure the RV016 with 5 WANS, each attached to a specific port with its own LAN?
Am this even the right considerations for this router as I would just have normally purchased 5 routers and attached them individually to each server with their own specific WAN and LAN?
I just purchased a RV016 router, upgrading from an older Linksys router only to find out that there was no support for TZO DDNS. I have used TZO for years now and don't really want to change to another service. Any way to request this from Cisco engineers for future firmware upgrades?
I recently replaced RV016 with a new one. Now I'm having connectivity issues with my server. One particular software I'm running on workstations will no longer connect. Everything is set up the same as with the old RV016. Internet connection is fine.
Based on the tech support from the software company, they are saying - "The clients contact the server using the HTTP protocol and the server IP address or host name. You should begin troubleshooting by pinging the server from the workstations to see if they have any connectivity to the server and move forward based on the result of that ping." Pinging the server from the workstations results in timing out.
I've looked over all the spec sheets and hunted around, can't seem to figure out if the RV016 or RV082 support PoE. what Cisco product would be best to inject PoE on a small business network. I have 1 RV016, and I'm looking to deploy a RV082 and WAP4410N, with the 4410 being the only device on my network that would need PoE, I'd rather not have to buy a dedicated PoE Switch or Hub just for that one device.
