I have hardware version 2 and firmware 3.0.2.01 (latest firmware available for this hardware version I believe) and I cannot get it to email me logs. I have entered my outlook address and our SMTP server.The log says that it's failing each time it attempts. I have scoured the internet and I cannot find a solution that will work for me. I have found some talk of adjusting an MTU setting which is supposed to be located under the firewall / general tab.
Just installed a RV042 with dual wan connections. Would like to make the WAN 2 (new cable modem as well) the primary connection over WAN1 (DSL), however whenever I switch from WAN1 to WAN2 in Smark Link set up, our email server will not send mail out, even though nothing is blocking the connection.
I've used many Cisco RV042/082 and have just purchased a couple previously used RV016 units.The first think I do is hold down the "reset" switch until the units reset to factory and then proceed programming them - EXCEPT this last unit doesn't seem to be resetting the administrative password.The unit has reset so that it is 192.168.1.1 and is handing out IP assignments via DHCP in that range.
When I point my browser (IE9) to the web page http://192.168.1.1 I am prompted to log on. I enter 'admin' for user name and attempt to enter the same for the password. The browser returns me to the logon prompt and after a few apparently failed attempts it displays a 401 error Unauthorized page.
and simply admin with a blank password.Isn't the admin password supposed to reset with everything else?If not - how can I - if it is, then what would be preventing the admin password from resetting - is there an internal jumper or something I could try? I don't care about preserving any setting obviously I just want access to the admin interface.
I can connect to my mom's wireless network but now all of a sudden I can't get any pages to load. All I get is this page cannot be displayed screen. My computer shows I'm connected with an excellent signal but I can't get any pages to load, I can't even send and receive my e-mail.
Configured ASA 5510 with CSC module and working fine.Here i likes to configure, Whenever any users from outside accessing my firewall (like VPN users) that logging information i need to send one particular mail ID.Simply, i likes to enable my fireawall to send logging information to one particular mail id.
I have hardware version 2 and firmware 3.0.2.01 (latest firmware available for this hardware version I believe) and I cannot get it to email me logs. I have entered my outlook address and our SMTP server.
Motion detection is setup - and I can see in the log and on the Live Video "Motion Trigger Indicator" that this part is working. I can also send test-emails, so the smtp is set up correct. In the Event Setup I have a valid server and a motion triggered event with the status ON. But no emails are sent . In the log there is also no indication of the server trying. Am I missing something - or is this not working for anybody?
And - there is no firmware beyond 1.0 for this model as far as I can see.
P.S. I am using a Gmail account for smtp, port 587 and using startTLS to send with,
Currently it seems as our 3550's doesn't send traps when bpdu-guard sets a port in err-disable state. Or DFM doesnt recognize it.Is there a way to get a DFM alert when a 3550-port gets into err-disable state?
I have a rv016 that's been in 24x7 operation since I bought it a few years back. It is out of warranty. It is connected to three cable modems on WANs 1-3. Behind it are a bunch of PCs getting IPs via DHCP. There is a gateway to gateway vpn tunnel setup on wan3 to a rv082 at another site. There is a forwarding entry for http to an internal http server. Everything else is pretty much default.
The router is primarily used to aggregate bandwidth for uploading large numbers of photos. The systems behind the router initiate the uploads and the router automatically load balances the outgoing bandwidth.
This was all working fine until just recently. The ISP is Knology who is upgrading each of the 8m/768k cable modems to 25m/5m. They are also moving from DOCSIS 1 to DOCSIS 3. They are currently in the middle of this upgrade and have upgraded the modems to DOCSIS 3 as well as the speeds to 12m/2m. The problem is that the rv016 Network Service Detection, which is set to "Default Gateway" indicates that the modems fail randomly. Usually only one will be failed, but up to two will fail the Network Service Detection simultaneously.
Knology insists that there is nothing wrong with their modems. I have removed a modem from the rv016 when Network Service Detection indicates it is in a failed state and connected it directly to a computer. It will work, but it has a different IP address and default gateway. As soon as I connect it back to the rv016, it works there too, but on the original IP address and gateway. I've only tried this test this twice so far, so it is a bit inconclusive.
Speed tests behind the rv016 are the same as directly connected to one of the cable modems. The router works normally as it has for years. Nothing else is acting funny.
So my question is, is the rv016 failing or is the ISP having problems?
Problems on RV016 the firmware, Firmware Version : v4.2.1.02 (Jan 18 2012 14:10:55) on port PPPoE mode. It makes the dial, but not Web browsing correctly. The solution was to return the old version of firmware.
I am trying to upgrade my RV016 from 3.0.2.01-tm to 4.0.4.02. I have not received any messages and the log has nothing. I have left the computer and switch for 2 hours and it never seems to end. (serial no. DF0006200812).
I'm having an issue where our RV042 router is blocking some of our customers from sending us e-mails.I noticed thatCISCO has produced a newer version of the RVO42 V3.0 and has firmware version 4.x. can you upgrade the Linksys RV042 Hardware V 1.2 to the 4.x firmware? I have found a few articles and forums online about otherpeople having the same issue with the RV042 v1 randomly blocking, e-mail but no one ever has a solution to correct the issue.Some people have recommend to roll back to factory default and reconfigure the router as the config may by corrupt.
this router (RV016v3, Firmware: v4.1.1.01-sp (Dec 6 2011 20:03:18)) in regards to it not properly directing UDP packets out of the right WAN, as per the settings stored in Protocol Binding section of [System Management, Multi-WAN].I use the section to direct all traffic from desktop computers (192.168.5.100 ~ 192.168.5.199) through WAN4, and all VoIP related traffic (192.168.5.200 ~ 192.168.5.239) through WAN2(PPPoE).Everything seems to be working well except for some of the UDP traffic from 192.168.5.200 which is seen in the log going out of WAN4 instead of WAN2.I have even created a new entry for [UDP/5060~5060]->192.168.5.200~192.168.5.200(0.0.0.0~255.255.255.255)WAN2, and placed it at the very top of the list.Here are a few lines that I've observed in the log: (Refreshed the registration of two SIP Trunks configured in our PBX)
Feb 23 18:11:47 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 192.168.5.200:5060->188.8.131.52:5060 on eth4 Feb 23 18:11:46 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 192.168.5.200:5060->184.108.40.206:5060 on ppp2 Feb 23 18:11:46 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 192.168.5.200:5060->220.127.116.11:5060 on eth4 Feb 23 18:11:46 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 192.168.5.200:5060->18.104.22.168:5060 on ppp2
There are no static routes configured, so i'm baffled by what could cause some of the UDP packets to go through the wrong WAN.All TCP Traffic from 192.168.5.200 is seen going though WAN2 as it should.
Would one of the 'Cisco RV016' work with a switch? I'm planning on running our work network using this device to load balance between 3 WAN connections and would like to keep the upstairs and downstairs computer users separated via a switch.Will the switch affect the load balancing or will the router still be able to detect each individual user and balance the load as seen necessary?
We are deploying a new batch of RV016 with the latest firmware (4.0.4.02). We are using 3 WAN ports for internet access (WAN1, WAN2, WAN3)The WAN ports connects to Cicso 800 series adsl modem with DHCP.The RV016 WAN1 port setting regularly resets to 0.0.0.0 despite that the modem dhcp is still up and running. A cold boot, resets all the configuration and WAN1 port start working againg a new ip.
All three WAN ports are set to automatically obtain ip from the modems.We have tried several modems, and even swap WAN ports, but the error is persistant to WAN1 only.
WAN2 and WAN3 are up and running without any errors. This error is persistant with WAN1 only.We have also configured a manual ip on WAN1, and after a few hours of operation on all 3 ports, traffic on WAN1 comes to a halt.We have the same error on 3 units we received last week.All there modem are configure on different subnets.It does not seems to be a configuration error with the modem as they work perfectly well with the WAN2, WAN3 ports.We also tested a RV016 out of the box using the wizard setup, without any extra setting/configuration, and we got the same error after a few hours of operation.
I know this is a small business appliance I got my ccna certification with the hope of practice my CLI skills with a cisco device however I read in cisco docs the small business routers doesn´t support talnet neiter ssh I mean CLI, is thta true ?
I have two LANs 192.168.0.* and 192.168.1.* (main)
I'd like to facilitate port forwarding on the sub-LAN - is there a way to configure the device to do so? The "main" LANs fowarding works just fine, however I have specific ports that need to go to the sub-LAN.
I have a RV016 with an internal address of 192.168.1.1. Also on the 192.168.1.0 network is a gateway server that the rest of my clients sit behind. The clients are on a 172.16.3.0/24 network. All of the gateway server does is forward the packets. It does not NAT. There is a static route to 172.16.3.0 on the RV016.
So my question is how do I get traffic from 172.16.3.0 to route through the RV016? Computers on the sub net can ping the RV016 and get a reply so I know the gateway server is forwarding the packets between the two sub nets just fine and that the static route on the RV016 works. Any traffic that tries to go beyond the RV016 never makes it. It just disappears at the RV016. I have checked all of the ACLs and they should let all internal traffic through.
I have 11 available IPs at a data center and have 5 servers I want configure - each with its own LAN, not to be networked together (used for web, ftp, sql and other webs services). Is it possible to configure the RV016 with 5 WANS, each attached to a specific port with its own LAN?
Am this even the right considerations for this router as I would just have normally purchased 5 routers and attached them individually to each server with their own specific WAN and LAN?
I just purchased a RV016 router, upgrading from an older Linksys router only to find out that there was no support for TZO DDNS. I have used TZO for years now and don't really want to change to another service. Any way to request this from Cisco engineers for future firmware upgrades?