I have a RV180W and a EnGenius EAP350 Access Point. The EnGenius supports multiple SSID's and VLAN tags them. If port 1 on the RV180W has VLAN 1 untagged and VLAN2 tagged, any connection to the EnGenius always gets an IP from the VLAN 1, even though they are connected to the SSID which is tagged with VLAN2.
View 3 RepliesI just recently switched from the WRVS4400N to the RV180W. I have 4 VLANs, and I want VLANs 1, 2, 3 to communciate freely, but I DONT want VLAN 4 to communicate with anybody, just Internet access. On the WRVS4400N, I was able to do this using the Firewall > IP Based ACL. I notcied that the RV180W, does not have such an option. I am sure there is something I am missing, I just cant find out how to isolate VLAN 4.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have the followint setup:
VLAN1 = 10.1.10.1
VLAN2 = 10.1.11.1
Inter WLAN routing is enabled on both VLANS
I have VPN PPTP set to 10.1.10.50-60
When I connect the VPN I get an IP address of 10.1.10.55 I can ping the 10.1.10.x network i cannot ping anything in the 10.1.11.x network.
I need to be able to see (ping/access by IP) both VLANs from a VPN PPTP connection.
it is possible to route netbios broadcasts between VLANs using a RV180W. Presently i have the network configured with two vlans (one for each building). The RV180 operates as a DHCP server and internet gateway for VLAN 1 and a linksys product operates as the DHCP server and internet gateway for VLAN 2.With the addition of a static route between, we can ping freely between the VLANs, transfer files, etc. However, members of VLAN 2 must be addressed by IP in windows explorer by members of VLAN 1 and vice versa. I understand this is because Netbios broadcasts are not routed between the two vlans, precluding addressing computers by name. While this is not a critical problem, it would be "nice" if i could configure the RV180 to route only Netbios between the two (still hold other broadcasts such as DHCP). I understand this ispossible on higher-end cisco products through the use of IP-Helper addresses, but I cannot find any information on doing such on the RV180.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am setting up a customer site. One side is RV180W and the other side is Checkpoint 500W.
RV180W side
LAN - 192.168.100.0/24
Checkpoint side
LAN - 172.26.1.0/24
VOIP - 172.26.2.0/24
Need to setup an ipsec tunnel between the site. However, from the RV180W side, I can only ping the VOIP network, but not LAN. I have heard that RV180W only can talk to one remote network via ipsec, correct? workaround this other than changing out the RV180W?
I have setup 15 x RV180W's so far for a particular client.They have requested that we add a Corporate Wireless VLAN for their laptop users (not guests) and add a Special Use WiFi VLAN for a particular mobile platform that is being deployed (in this case we need 2 separate WiFi VLANs to ensure compliance).Also, none of the VLANs can talk to eachother and they have their own subnets.I have the Wireless and VLANs setup, no problem... but I am having an issue wiht the VPN settings.I have the wired network's subnet working fine. But I do not know how to add the subnets for both Wireless VLANs to the traffic selection.The IP schemes will not allow me to just select a large subnet... here are some examples:
Wired VLAN: 10.10.x.y
Corporate WiFi VLAN: 10.15.x.y
Special WiFi VLAN: 10.18.x.y
x is the octet that defines the physical unit location (unit 1 = .23, unit 2 = .24, etc...) y is the octet the host.Since they are not in a contiguous block, I cannot just use a larger subnet mask.I can add multiple traffic selection rules to the ASA5515 at HQ, so that side of the tunnel is perfect... I just don't know how to add the three VLANs to the RV180. Is it as simple as using commas or semicolons?
I have the following configurations in cisco CISCO7606 (R7000). Its meaningful to have the below configuration, wherein , we are allowing multiple vlans on the access port?
interface FastEthernet4/45
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 124-127,423,478,493,578,699,751,787,895,987,1981
switchport mode access
end
interface FastEthernet4/46switchportswitchport trunk allowed vlan 124-127,423,478,493,578,699,751,787,895,987,1981switchport mode accessend
Some days ago I bought a new RV180W router with firmware 1.0.1.9. The router is configured with PPPoE and I need to forward some port (a basic operation for a router!!!). I try in every way but it doesn't work. My old router works well. [URL]
View 1 Replies View RelatedI bought a new RV180W router with firmware 1.0.1.9.The router is configured with PPPoE and I need to forward some port (a basic operation for a router!!!). I try in every way but it doesn't work. My old router works well.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI would like to configure a 3750 switch port to be able to use two vlans. I know you can do this with a voice and data vlan, but what about two data vlans ? Say I have two devices, one on a 10 subnet and the other on a 172 subnet, but i only have one wall jack for both devices to plug into. So I use a mini switch to connect both devices and connect the switch to the wall jack; and of course this all leads back to one switch port. When I go to enter the switchport access vlan 172 cmd, how would I also make it so the device on the 10 subnet could route out ?
View 9 Replies View RelatedUntil now i used a D-Link router with a DDNS account on dyndns.com. I used the ddns account for accesing the surveillance camera when i wasen't at home. The ports for the cameras are 80 and 83.I have a static ip and when i tiped the IP on broswer i was able to acces the camera with port 80 and when i tiped ip:83 i was able to acces the camera with port 83.Today i got a RV180W router made de configuration (ddns, port forwarding) but now when i type the ip address i can't see the camera, instead the router interface is loading and when i tipe ip:83 i get the message "The connection has timed out".I've tryed diferent things but i can acces the camera only by internal ip (192.168.1.x) but using the DDns address i can't acces the camera.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI got : RV180W router updated with the last firmware.Static IP for the DMZ host (Synology Server 212+) My problem is that I had try all combinaison since 10 days to get IP source in synology interface (to block IP's of bad connections...) but, I only see the RV180W adress....So impossible to block bad connections IP.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI was assigned a task to configure an SG300-28P to have 3 different vlans.Now on VLAN1 their will be only one device configured with static IP 192.168.0.230,On the other 2 VLANS there will be a separate router connected on each one of them and will also act as a DHCP server.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI would like to ask if what is the difference between RV180W-E-K9-G5 and RV180W-A-K9-NA specifically the -E and the -A. As far as I know -A is the compliance code for Philippines. Am I right? If yes, what about -E? There is a documentation for wireless complaince on Aeronet devices but what about these SB products?
View 9 Replies View Relatedhow i can configure a second ssid for guest access in our environment. this is our network setup prior to this request: Internet----Firewall (not ASA)---ce520---C1131AG and CME router is also connecting to the ce520 switch. we only have two vlans: one for voice and two for data.
Presently, there is no vlan configured on the AP because it on broadcasting ont ssid and wireless users gets IP from a windows DHCP server on the LAN. the configuration on the ce520 switch port for the AP and other switches say access vlan is the DATA vlan which automatically becomes the native vlan for all trunk port connecting the AP and other Stiches to the network.
Now with this new requirement, i have made my research and i have configured the AP to broadcast both the production and the guest Vlans. The two vlans are 20-DATA and 60-Guest. I made the DATA vlan on the AP the native vlan since the poe switch is using the DATA vlan as native on the trunk ports. I configured the firewall to serve as DHCP server for the guest ssid and i have added the ip helper-address on the guest vlan interface on all switches while the windows server remains the dhcp server for the production DATA Vlan. I have confirmed that the AP, switches can ping the default gateway of the guest dhcp server which is another interface on the firewall. I can now see and connect to all broadcasted ssids but the problem is I am not getting IP addresses from both the production dhcp server and guest dhcp server when i connected to the ssid one at a time. My AP config is attached below.
Do i need to redesign the whole network to have a native vlan other nthan the data vlan? Does the access point need to be aware of the voice vlan? Do the native Vlan on the AP need to be in Bridge-group 1 or can i leave it in bridge-group 20?
My question is if I can configure 3 ssid, for 3 different VLAN and add the DHCP address from a WAP4410N AP, when you upgrade to the latest version of IOS I can have this functionality?
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to have multiple dhcp pools for multiple VLANs? The switch is a 6509 and/or 4506 catalyst. I don't want to use server-based products.
View 5 Replies View RelatedFrom an older manual it describes how to configure this. I installed the oldest firmware available for download and this feature is there. Was this just simply moved somewhere else in the newer firmware?
Configuring Port VLANs
You can associate VLANS on the Cisco RV220W to the LAN ports on the device.
By default, all 4 ports belong to VLAN1. You can edit these ports to associate them
[Code].....
I am trying to access home security camera from outslide my house.I have an AT&T internet coming into the house. They have a router that comes into the house and that splits off to another router in my house which carriers CAT5 all over the house. One of the wires go to another router that I use for my wireless devices.One of those wireless devices is an security camera.Here is my question. I want to view the camera from the internet outside the house. I have followed the instructions given by the manufacture for port forwarding. I have port forwarded the wireless router since the camera is connected to it. Is that wrong since the DSL is coming in one router and then going to another and then to the wireless
View 2 Replies View Relatedsetup multiple wireless routers to one Internet connection. We have one cable modem (with built in wireless router) for Internet connection. Over a wide area (500 feet over two floors) I would like to connect to the Internet throughout this area wirelessly. The computers sharing the connection do not need to share with each other and do not need to see each other. Security is not a major factor. The building material is cinder brick walls (which weakens the wireless signal quickly).I have several older (2008 or 2009) wireless routers. I was thinking of putting these routers at various locations in the building with a wired connection back to the WAN modem. Each wireless router could the service a smaller area in the building.My plan is to turn off the DHCP on each wireless router. Do I need to run a wired cable (lan port to Lan port) back to the cable modem or can I use the wireless routers to connect to the wireless cable modem?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI've got an RV180W for my office, and so far it has been great. I have two users that use a certain application that crashes all the time. For some reason, they don't crash when put into the DMZ. Is there any way i can put both of them in the DMZ? I can only figure out how to have one host in the DMZ at a time.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe've run into some difficulty trying to take advantage of multiple WAN IPs in conjunction with the SRP547
What we're trying to acheive is the ability to port forward from our distinct public IPs to different internal servers. Looking at the options under Port Forwarding it looks like we can only configure forwards at the "WAN interface" level, but our problem is that we can't work out how to set up separate interfaces for each of our Public IPs...
Our ISP provides us with a fully managed NTU/router with a single "Internet" ethernet port, which we can use by statically configuring IPs on our end. For this configuration this port has been directly patched to the WAN ethernet port on the SRP547W.
We have been allocated a 255.255.255.248 (/29) subnet, giving us 5 usable IPs after the ISP's gateway address is taken into account, like so:
a.b.c.208 Network Address (/29 subnet)
a.b.c.209 ISP Gateway
a.b.c.210 IP1
[Code].....
I should mention at this point that we're running on firmware version 1.02.01 (023).
Is there a CLI or other method of configuration that might work if the web interface won't?
How to configure DHCP server if i have 2 vlans. I know how to configure rest of the network, just i don't know server.I use packet tracer and i attached file with my network. PC1 is on VLAN1 and PC2 is on VLAN2.I want ip addresses in vlan1 to be from 192.168.1.2 and in vlan2 from 192.168.2.2. I would like to do it just like in the designed network, without router.
View 5 Replies View RelatedThe network topology is like this. Router with DHCP_Server on it.
VLAN 10
VLAN 20
VLAN 30
My question is how to configure the router so that all devices on all 3 VLANS can obtain IP from the router. I've tried to enable proxy arp on all interfaces and create sub interfaces and trunk them to their appropriate vlans, but I can't specify the gateway on all trunked sub interfaces because I get a warning that addresses overlap. Then I tried to set access-group on all sub-interfaces and still doesn't work.
I have 2 SG300-10 switches, and I need two VLANs, one for internal network and one for WiFi APs.I need ports 1->4 on both switches to be part of 1st VLAN and ports 5->8 on 2nd VLAN; and port 10 uplink to 2nd switch.How I set up the VLANs and interface VLAN mode?
[code]...
I'm trying to setup a VPN connection for the two PC's in the graphic below. I have the link between the two locations setup and secured, now I just working with the routing elements.what I need to add to the firewall config in order to get this to work? Here is what I have:
SITE A------access-list mpls_vpn_sitea extended permit ip host 172.168.199.1 host 172.168.199.2 access-list mpls_vpn_sitea extended permit ip TEST-LOCAL 255.255.255.0 TEST-REMOTE 255.255.255.0crypto map mpls_vpn 1 match address mpls_vpn_siteacrypto map mpls_vpn 1 set peer 172.168.199.2 crypto map mpls_vpn 1 set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHAcrypto map mpls_vpn interface MPLScrypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
SITE B------access-list mpls_vpn_siteb extended permit ip host 172.168.199.2 host 172.168.199.1 access-list mpls_vpn_siteb extended permit ip TEST-LOCAL 255.255.255.0 TEST-REMOTE 255.255.255.0crypto map mpls_vpn 1 match address mpls_vpn_sitebcrypto map mpls_vpn 1 set peer 172.168.199.1 crypto map mpls_vpn 1 set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHAcrypto map mpls_vpn interface MPLScrypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
do I need to specify a route between the two networks? What do I need to have for NAT statements?
I recently set up a Cisco 881 to cover a small business network. The router is currently set up and working as expected. We recently decided to move to VoIP phones and here is where I'm running into some issues.
First an overview: We run a network with a cable internet WAN connection, this connection is DHCP, however we have a static IP through our ISP. We also have a block of 30 additional IP addresses for one to one mapping as we need them. The new VoIP system is being run over T1 lines throughout the township (we are a municipal organization) and the VoIP system is being run to about 5 buildings in the township.
This brings me to the topic of VLANs. As the phone engineer explained it to me, there is a network set up over the T1 that allows the VoIP equipment to talk to one another and operates all of the VoIP phones on one network. The equipment that is being installed at our building connects to the network over the T1 and "talks" to the other equipment on the network. The engineer wants to create a VLAN and run it on ports fa1 and fa2, with the fa2 port being connected to the actual "MPLS" (their term) that connects to the T1 and into the cloud, and the fa1 port connected to the internal phone switch.
TLDR; The problem is this: When we attempt to set up the VLAN on ports fa1 and fa2, we have no connectivity with the other units in the external VoIP cloud. Pinging while directly connected to the "MPLS" yields successful pings, while pinging from the router with the "MPLS" connected to fa2 yields failures. I'm going to post the running config below, I feel like what we're doing should be working. I asked around about subinterfacing, but others seemed to think this was not necessary.
ROUTER CONFIG
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 4909 bytes
!
! No configuration change since last restart
version 15.1
[Code].....
I am having problems accomplishing these tasks with my new SG 200-18.
I have a LinkSys WRT54G2 connected to port 1. I would like ports 2-8 to be in one VLAN with access to the Internet and to be able to share their printers, hard drives, etc. with other computers on ports 2-8. I would like each of ports 9-16 to be on a separate VLAN with access only to the Internet and no other ports on the switch. I would like to be able to manage the switch from any of the ports 2-8.
After I create the VLAN 1009 (see screenshot below), port 9 can browse the Internet and cannot see the other ports on the switch which is correct. However, ports 2-8 can no longer access the switch at 192.168.1.20 in order to manage the switch.
I'm just setting up a Cisco rv180w router to replace our aging Belkin. I need to allow a range of ports through the firewall to a particular PC on our internal network that runs our VOIP/SIP Trunk phone system.
The Cisco's Port Forwarding looks like it can only forward one port at a time, but for our phones I need to allow a full range of ports (in this case ports 49152-64512) to one machine at 192.168.x.xx.
On the Belkin I used something called 'Virtual Servers' which allows you to enter ranges of ports. Anybody know what the equivalent might be for the Cisco router?
I have two Cisco 1300's acting as bridges only. I have created an infrastructure ssid on VLAN 2 and assigned this to the radio. I am carrying multiple VLANs between the bridges (using subinterfaces on the fastethernet and radio ports).I have enabled WPA-PSK, but how do I check that this is being used between the bridges? Also - I have a switch connected at each end of the bridge. When I make VTP changes, the remote switch does not pick these up - is this because VTP goes over VLAN1 regardless of the Native VLAN (2 in my case)? Do I have to carry VLAN1 over the bridge to get VTP working, or is there an alternative solution?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have SGE2010 switches and I want to implement Multiple VLANs. Im a newbie and starting to study VLANS's.
I want to implement 5 VLAN's on my test lab network and here as follows:
192.168.1.x default
192.168.2.x
192.168.3.x
192.168.20.x
192.168.100.x
The .1 is exclusively for my test-lab servers.
The .2 is general test-lab Win-XP workstations.
The .3 is general test-lab Win7 worstations
The .20 is general test-lab production worstations
The .100 is for test-lab IP PHONES.
I have to configure multiple vlans served with a unique DCHP server . As first step, I just will The DHCP server to serve 2 vlans. The following is the hardware and configuration that I implemented :
[code]...
But If I connect the DHCP server on a trunked switch port and adapt the DHCP server gateway 172.16.0.1 to 172.16.0.254, hosts receive ip address properly.I have to connect the DHCP server directly to the router. How can I do that, what is wrong in the configuration?
I installed the RV180W yesterday and decided to play with it a bit today. I got stuck on the firmware update. Tried different browsers on different PC's. Tried going to 1.0.1.9 first. I have the "reset all configurations" button checked. After looking through the posts here I'm not sure this firmware will even fix my next few problems(port forwarding etc). Is there a trick with this device?
View 4 Replies View Related