Cisco Routers :: RVS4000 Cannot Download Files From Web
Oct 31, 2010
I am having problems with the RVS4000 ver 1. I cannot download files from the web. Firmware is up to date. As an example, if I try to download from pdf995's site, I get a "page cannot be displayed error. If I try to download current files for my flight planning software (like charts, etc.), the download hangs and never completes. I have bypassed the RVS4000 and connected directly to the broadband router and there are no problems. We have a 15MB cable connection.Follow-up - It appears the issue is file size. At pdf995's site, downloading a 2.5MB file works, but the 9 MB file does not. The file sizes for the flight planning software are rather large - 100-200 MB, and they hang as well. Connecting directly to the cable router does not cause this problem. The RVS4000 is set for Gateway mode.
I have an RVS4000, and have been unable to update my iPad with the new iOS verison because the download of the update file keeps timing out. The file actually gets to the end of the download, but then times out before completion.
My RVS4000 is being used in gateway mode and is connected to another cable modem. When I connect my computer directly to the cable modem, the download completes without issue.
I've turned the IPS off.My patience is running out, as I've tried just about everything (firmware update, reboot, signature update, etc.). When I contact support, they want me to pay $79 to open a ticket. The router costs $120.
I have used adsl internet in network system(domain) at my work place, i can't download any pdf files.of course, computer server has limited connecting to internet for some operators.so we install a special program in server for limiting and now we cant download any pdf files.
I have a client who has the Asus NAS on their network with a 2TB hard drive in it. And what i would like to to as a backup solutikn for them, is log on to the ftp server on the NAS and then download all of their files on a daily basis.
Browsers will not download certain files. They often get stuck at 300-400 kb, but some other files are ok. Eg. I can never download Java 64 from filehippo, whereas CCleaner is good to go from filehippo.WirelessTried with no firewall, no antivirusprogram.My other computer wireless downloads.Tried different drivers to network adapter.
Every time I try to download files from the internet, a pop-up appears from Internet Explorer saying I am prevented from downloading files for my own security
Whenever i try to download an exe file from the internet, its just get stuck at 99%. It doesn't happen with .rar or any other file. Not to mention, I was able to download net fremwork 4.0 exe installer though. I tried these things: Used different browsers. Used different download managers. Disabled firewall and AV.
I have 2 internet connections in my office one via Verizon Fios and another one via the local cable company. On the fios connection I have an RV042 VPN router and on the Cable company connection I have an rvs4000 router, I would like to know if there is a way I can connect the 2 so I can share a printer I have on one of the 2 networks from the other network without using the VPN feature, like via an ethernet cable connected between the 2 and some kind of static route maybe?
Ive set up a rvs4000 with two vlans, one as a bussiness network and the other as a guest network. Everything works fine and the networks can not see each other. I would like to add wifi and I would like to do so with keeping both networks separate. I have a used 1130AG access point and was wondering if I could use this single AP for both networks. If so, how would I go about doing so? Is there a better suited AP for my needs?
I have an RVS4000 running V2.0.2.7 firmware that gives me an "Invalid Character(s) Found" error message when I try to edit an existing ACL.
I'm trying to deploy 57 of these routers and would like to be able to use a pre-built config dropped onto each router.
I initially planned on editing the exported config with a find&replace for my local LAN addresses. Since that didn't work the next reasonable solution would be to edit the ACL list (much more tedious, but still better than hand-entering every ACL on all 57 devices).
when this bug will be addressed? Alternatively, if there is an offline configuration editing tool I would be one happy camper to have it!
I have an RVS4000, not installed. How can I tell from the unit or the packaging that it is a v1 or a v2, without installing and switching it on (which I don't want to do now) ? Are v1 branded Linsys and v2 Cisco ? Can you tell from the date on the package (mine says copyright 2011) ?
I don't know if my vendor mislead me, but I need to do this: There is a public subnet in my office, not a 192.168.x.x, but a real Public IP.The reason is that we do VOIP and those are only servers. I installed a RVS 4000 in that location, and assigned a PUBLIC Ip to BOTH the WAN and LAN, since when I connect from outside, using either QickVPN or another identical router, I need to be assigned one of the PUBLIC Ip's on the remote LAN. That is the whole idea of the project, to locate servers remotely and make them use our set of PUBLIC IP's. Well, so far I cannot connect either with the Quick VPN client, or using the VPN Wizard. It goes and creates the tunnel, without error, but when I click test, it fails.
We have backup and other traffic over our vpn which is affecting our ip phone service between two sites. Our consultant suggested implementing QOS over the VPN to give the phone traffic priority. Is this possible with the rvs4000. Is there any good source saying how to do it. Is the setup of the QOS on this router similar to another router where this has been discussed.
I am getting ready to setup an RVS4000 so we can use the VPN functionality of it, but I am not quite sure of the correct way to integrate it into our network though. I do not need site to site, just the client portion of it for a few salesmen/off site people to use. I have never used or setup a VPN before, so I'm learning everything as I go along.
We are in the middle of switching our ISP and I am waiting to set this up until the new service is live so I can test it prior to moving the rest of the company to the new ISP.
We are switching to Comcast, and will have 5 static IP's available to use. Currently, the firewall does all our NAT and is the forward facing device on our network. I would like to leave the firewall in place (although I am setting up a new firewall for the new internet connection) and have th RVS 4000 sit behind it and receive VPN traffic from a WAN to LAN rule We currently have a 192.168.100.0/24 network.
Do I need to setup another /24 network for the VPN to function behind (and still have access to the 100.X network), or is there a way to allow everyone who connects to receive a 100.X ip address from our DHCP server. I'm not sure how to set everything up with the WAN/LAN connections on the RVS4000 to acheive this.
We are running a domain on a 2008R2 server. The clients will be using laptops that are already part of the domain, if that will make a difference.
I'm trying to setup a VPN tunnel between a Cisco RVS4000 on our side and a Cisco ASA5520, to connect a machine on our local network to a test server on the target side.
We have all the settings setup correctly and the tunnel is up and running, however, our local machine can't connect/ping to their server. I've tried a trace route both from the machine and from the RVS4000 itself, and they both get stuck after getting past 192.168.1.1. Is there any routing or NAT-ing that I need to do on our router? Or is there a problem somewhere else?
I'm having an issue with a Linksys RVS4000 which doesn't appear to be behaving as I think it should.I need to forward a port (Single Port Forwarding) through to an internal NAT host. However, I only want that host/port to be accessible from one host on the internet, for security reasons.
I have created the port forwarding entry and this works fine. I then created two rules in IP Based ACL - one to block all access to that port from the WAN interface and one to allow access from a single host.
However, it appears that when a port forwarding entry is added, it will completely bypass the ACL and allow all traffic for that port/host by default.Is this the correct behaviour?
I'm currently dealing with a weird problem on a Cisco RVS4000. I'm trying to connect to a IPSEC VPN Gateway (NETASQ) located on the LAN side of the RVS4000. I'm using Green bow vpn client on the WAN side of the RVS4000. Basically I'm trying to get through the RVS.My VPN config is OK because i tested it on the LAN side of the RVS.
The RVS is configured like this: NO VPN configured. Block WAN Request :OFF FIREWALL,IPS,DDOS are OFF
NAT forwarding on for UDP 500 and 4500 directed from the wan to the ip of the VPN gateway. Seems right because iv managed to do this with other routers (different brands) on another site.I've wire sharked my vpn client and i keep getting ICMP destination unreachable (PORT UNREACHABLE) after my ISAKMP launching packet.Can the RVS nat these ports ?
I've been trying to disect this problem for a few months to no avail. The router allows me to connect to outside FTP only when IPS is enabled. The moment I disable the IPS functoin, the connection hangs and does not connect to a server. Reason I'd like to keep IPS disabled it is because it's eating up half of bandwith when enabled.RVS4000
I have a Cisco RVS4000 with Port 1 as a trunk connection to a Cisco SF300 switch. Port 1 on the router is configured 1untag,2tag,3tag,4ag. When connected directly to the router I can connect to the switches management IP. I would like to reach the switch remotely. I have set up DDNS and can access the router and I have have set a specific port to forward to port 80 on the switches management IP but this does not work. Should I not be able to Port Forward to the switch across VLAN 1?
I have an RVS4000 with FTP download issues. I have the latest v1.3.3.5 software and the latest ISP (1.5). Regardless of any settings changes, my FTP downloads always timeout. I have tried a new basic router and had no issues, so it is not the PC, FTP software, or the ISP. I have even put my PC into the DMZ and still no resolution.
Few months back I had purchased this Router. But I did not use it till last week. Since the time I have installed it, it does freeze often (between 5 to 30 hours).
I can connect to devices within the subnet, but not elswhere. I have to remove the power and plug it back for it to respond. I have updated the firmware to the latest one that was on the Cisco site.
I have firmware version 2.0.2.7. I've down loaded the firmware upgrade utility ver 1.3, and do not see a read me or help file. I've disconnected the cables as directed, but recive a 'broadcast error' and a 'browse device error'
I am trying to configure my RVS4000 to create my church's small network. I want to connect my internet DSL router on the WAN port and also segment my network with VLANs on the 4 LAN ports. I have port 4 connected to a wireless access point which is in VLAN1 for an open wireless network for any church member to access the internet through. I have a church server, printer and second access point on ports 1-3 in VLAN 34. All ports are untagged. I want the devices on VLAN34 which need confidentiality to be secure from the devices connecting to the internet from VLAN1 for open access but both VLANs need access to the internet..
My open wireless AP in VLAN1 has access to the internet on the WAN port.
None of my devices in VLAN34 have access to the internet. I have tried using inter-VLAN routing but that made operation worse so I disabled it.
I work for a company that recently upgraded to a Cisco RVS4000 router in place of a failing D-Link router. I configured the RVS4000 to utilize the same address space as the D-Link previously did (192.168.0.0 Network Address, 255.255.255.0 Subnet Mask, RVS4000 in Gateway Mode with IP Address 192.168.0.1, DHCP Scope from 192.168.0.101 - 200 managed by the RVS4000) before installing it on the network. I powered down the D-Link as well as the cable modem, then all of the workstations in the office. Then, I installed the RVS4000, powered up the cable modem, and once it was ready, powered on the RVS4000.
When devices connect, the RVS4000 is assigning them an IP address in the 192.168.1.0/24 subnet, instead of the 192.168.0.0/24 subnet. I have verified that the RVS4000's GUI is showing the correct settings, but connected devices are not picking up addresses from the correct address pool. In troubleshooting, I went to each workstation, released and renewed their IP addresses, and they picked up addresses in the correct subnet. I thought everything was solved, but the next day, the same problem resurfaced.
I left the DHCP lease time at the defaul value "0", which according to the unit's documentation should correspond to a 24-hour lease period. I suspect this is why I had to renew the clients' IP addresses the next day (today), but I still don't get why the RVS4000 wants to give out addresses in the 192.168.1.0/24 scope. Could this be a holdover from the factory settings?
Additional Information: I did not set up any VLANs on the network and the office only requires one subnet as there are not a lot of devices connected, nor do we need the traffic segragated. The VPN functions of the RVS4000 work fine. Using the QuickVPN utility, I can access the network and resources on the network remotely without issue.
My new RVS4000 (2.0.2.7) connects the WAN via PPoE with dynamic IP which is held at DynDNS and normally I see the RVS4000 via a router-to-router-VPN. That works fine so far, but every "some" days the router looses WAN connection (and with ist VPN). When this happens, last DynDNS-update is hours ago, so it didn`t reconnect. Looking on the routers site, the LAN is fully functional for clients that have got their DHCP-Information. New clients don`t get DHCP-Info (IP-address, DNS), both do not have internet access. The router`s WAN-summary shows, that it thinks to be "CONNECTED" but with empty WAN-IP and DNS entries. Klicking "DISCONNECT" and then "CONNECT" again solves the problem so far. The loss of connection is not the periodic break from the IPC, which is correctly identified and reconnected as configured. I wanted to trace the problem with the log, but there is also a bug. It stops logging at some time completely - neither email-log nor local log, so I never happend to be lucky to hit the point of loss of connection. Also the local log provides a first and next pages, but the next pages are always empty - not really useful.
The local router is behind a fiber firewall/router; the rvs4000's ext ip is thus 192.168.1.2, not visible from the net. The firewall/router is a dyn ip, with a dyn dns name mapping to it. The remote (some NetGear thing) is also dyn dns, but it is not behind a firewall.
I want to cook a vpn from the local lan subnet to the remote lan subnet.
It worked fine when both ends were NetGear.
I think it would be ok if somehow I could thell the rvs4000 that the local Security Gateway Type be just FQDN; it can't be IP+FQDN because the remote end doesn't know anything about that kind of thing; it can do IP or FQDN or a couple other confusing things.
We are an A/V integrator and AMX shop and provide our clients with support through the use of VPN tunnels from our RV042 router to their mostly RVS4000 routers.Support is provided through access of remote site equipment using VNC, Telnet, FTP, etc. from multiple PC's at our main office.Netbios is not turned on, but the remote sites have the ability to access equipment on our local LAN should they know our private IP address range.Is there any way to limit the acces from the remote sites back to our LAN while maintaining our access to the equipment on their LAN?I know that one can limt the IP address range on on end of the VPN, but I would like to limit the ability of remote sites to gain "any" access to our LAN. If there's any way to just prevent all traffic from an IP address range on the remote site, that would also do.
So, I'm trying to set up a VPN tunnel between two sites. Site A has a RVS4000 as the router to the internet. Site B has a Adtran NetVanta 3200 to convert a frame relay to ethernet, so I can't replace the Adtran. How do I set this up so I can create a tunnel between the two Cisco routers? I have static Internet IP addresses for the Cisco at Site A, the Adtran and Cisco at site B. I have configured the two Ciscos to set up their tunnel and I've been able to establish the tunnel between my house (where I put Cisco B in place of my home router as a test) and the Cisco at Site A. So, I know my tunnel settings are ok (with the exception of IP address changes).
1.) put the Adtran in bridge mode and use the Cisco as the firewall, DHCP, etc. No clue how to do that. 2.) put the Cisco in a DMZ set up on the Adtran. If I do that, it wouldn't really give me access through the VPN to the network, right? 3.) set up static routes between the Adtran and the Cisco? static using the internal IPs or the external ones?
I'm not concerned about Site A since I know the internet works there and the VPN tunnel settings are easy enough to change once I actually get the internet working with the two router combo at site B. [code] I don't care which one does the firewall, NAT, etc. To me it would seem easier to have the Adtran send all traffic to the Cisco, then let the Cisco do the rest (VPN, firewall, DHCP, DNS, etc.).
At the small church I attend, and where I'm the IT guy, we have an RVS4000 router which has worked well for us including the VPN capability. Our internet connection is through AT&T (not my choice) and last week we had to switch from DSL to U-Verse because AT&T is doing away with the former.
Unfortunately as part of this switch, the old modem was discarded and an NVG510 installed. The NVG510 is a combo modem/router. But since it doesn't have VPN capability and is not as good a router all around as the RVS4000 (even though the 4000 is an aging device), I am trying to run both.
I finally figured out how to set up IP Passthrough on the NVG510 so now VPN is again working to the RVS4000 so that's not an issue. We do have a couple of PCs that are in a room where no wired connections are possible so they are using wireless. But they are not very close to the wireless antennas so they don't have the greatest throughput. The NVG510 does have wireless capability and is physically located to where it would provide a much better signal. However, the NVG510 will only use a 192.168.x.x subnet and our LAN is setup for 10.x.x.x. I'm not about to change the LAN as it runs a Windows domain with enough equipment that I don't want the exercise of changing subnets.Can the RVS4000 be setup so that it will route domain traffic between the 2 subnets? As it is now, connecting a PC to the 192.168.x.x subnet on the NVG510 allows it to have internet access but it can't access domain resources on the 10.x.x subnet. I don't understand networking well enough to know why this won't work. I know it can because when I worked for a large corporation, they had different subnets that were routed so that PCs on one subnet could be on the same Windows domain as PCs on another subnet and all access resources on both subnets.
The RVS4000 may be capable of doing this but my limited knowledge of networking (I know servers, not switches, etc) means I'm not sure of what I see on the router to know if it can do it or not.I'd be appreciative to know first off if the RVS4000 can do it, and secondly if it can, then how to set it up. I've worked with the RVS4000 since we got it 3+ years ago so I'm fairly familiar with it, I just don't know the rest.
