Cisco Routers :: RVS4000 WOL Rule Not Working From WAN (Internet)?
Oct 17, 2012
I picked up an RVS4000 V2 and configured a rule to forward a Magic Packet to an internal system to wake it from a sleep state. Everything was working fine until I update the firmware to v2.0.3.2. I know it's not the the computer as I can wake it from Sleep internally without any problems. One thing I noticed is that the static IP for the computer in Sleep state gets lost in the ARP/RARP Table though the NIC is configured to respond to ARP requests in Sleep.
Has anything changed in v2.0.3.2 that requires a different configuration to get Wake on Lan working externally?
My Setup is
Computer
P8Z68 Deluxe/Gen3 onboard Intel 82579V NIC
Wake on Magic Packet: ON
Respond to ARP/NS requests without waking system: ON
RVS4000 V2 (v2.0.3.2)
Mode: Gateway
I have read through the manual. My question is what is the proper format to input into the ACL rule "Range"? Would as an example work- 192.168.0.1 - 192.169.255.254? Will the range effectively work? Or does it have to be 192.168.0.0 - 192.169.255.255?
i have a Cisco Rv082 with Firmware v4.0.4.02-tm (Jul 4 2011 13:30:56)I have configure WAN1 with a public IP and netmask 255.255.255.252. (Only one public IP in use) Internally the LAN is a 192.168.169.0/255.255.255.0.I need to add some rules like
Service: HTTP Interface: WAN1 From: ANY To: 192.168.169.2
But after rule configured the connection still not working, it only works when I add a port forwarding.For HTTP maybe port forwarding is OK, but other services I need to grant access to a specific public IP address, not to everyone. So I need the Firewall rule, but is not working, it always block the request. [code]
We have two RVS4000 at both ends of a VPN tunnel. The tunnel is up and runs fine. I can ping the two servers at the main office end of the tunnel, and cconnect to the resources of both servers. However, one of the servers, the terminal server, is unreachable via RDP. The other server can be reached via RDP for administrative purposes just fine, but the terminal server cannot be reached. There is only one difference that I can think of. The terminal server is reachable from the outside world via a redirected forwarded port on the RVS4000 at the main office.
The current firmware version is V2.0.0.3 at both ends. Is this a known anomaly for this revision of firmware?
I have a RVS4000 hardware v2 with firmware 2.0.2.7. I have a DSL modem in bridge mode and have the router set to PPPoE. Everything works fine except I want to use QOS which doesn't work fine. I have some vonage boxes set up on a switch set to port 1 trust mode is set to port and level 4 for highest priority. Port 2 I have on another switch set to priority 3. I tried turning bandwidth mangement on which doesn't seem to work at all so I don't even know if they QOS is even working. I set the max down stream and upstream provided after running a number of speed tests and setting it a little lower than my worst speed results. Once I did that I set up a rule for all traffic for rate control and set them just below the min and max I put in for isp bandwidth. I set the ip range from 192.168.1.100-190 this will cover anything that dhcp hands out and I also have a few statics set up on 192.168.1.180 and 181. However after enabling it I ran some speed tests and I still get full speed and the rules seem to be getting ignored.
Ports 1 through 3 are configured for VLAN1 and right now I have one PC connected directly to port 1 and nothing connected to ports 2 or 3. Port 4 is configured for VLAN10 with a managed switch (also configured on VLAN10) connected to it. There are 4 wireless access points connected to the switch.
On the Setup->Advanced Routing page of the RVS4000 I have the Inter-VLAN Routing option set to Disabled. Yet when I connect to one of the wireless access points and receive a 192.168.10.x address, I can ping the PC connected to port 1 which has a 192.168.1.x address.
Also, I would like VLAN10 to not have access to the Management GUI on the RVS4000.
I have 2 internet connections in my office one via Verizon Fios and another one via the local cable company. On the fios connection I have an RV042 VPN router and on the Cable company connection I have an rvs4000 router, I would like to know if there is a way I can connect the 2 so I can share a printer I have on one of the 2 networks from the other network without using the VPN feature, like via an ethernet cable connected between the 2 and some kind of static route maybe?
I am a novice with networks but do have a fair understanding of networks. I have a small business network, utilizing a RVS4000 router (Firmware V2.0.27)I am attempting to set up firewall rules to block certain web sites at certain times.I have successfully set up rules using source and destination ranges, to deny service 24 hours a day everyday.
However and here is the problem when I attempt to edit any of the rules (I want to change the time to certain hours of the day) it allows me to edit the rule but when I attempt to save I get an error message up saying there are invalid characters and it will not save the changes?create the whole thing with the changes I want it works fine, is this a known bug?
I am trying to configure my RVS4000 to create my church's small network. I want to connect my internet DSL router on the WAN port and also segment my network with VLANs on the 4 LAN ports. I have port 4 connected to a wireless access point which is in VLAN1 for an open wireless network for any church member to access the internet through. I have a church server, printer and second access point on ports 1-3 in VLAN 34. All ports are untagged. I want the devices on VLAN34 which need confidentiality to be secure from the devices connecting to the internet from VLAN1 for open access but both VLANs need access to the internet..
My open wireless AP in VLAN1 has access to the internet on the WAN port.
None of my devices in VLAN34 have access to the internet. I have tried using inter-VLAN routing but that made operation worse so I disabled it.
I am able to connect to the RVS4000 remotely using QuickVPN, and can stay connected, however, once connected I cannot use the internet or see any of the remote computers via the network.
Just recently purchased an RVS4000 to take the place of an old NetGear FVS336, which supported multiple NAT translations. It appears that the RVS4000 does not support this, any other models in the small business line support this? I only need this for a backup Internet connection?
Would there be some reason why I cannot change the Access Restriction to Allow? I also can't add anything into the Website Blocking by URL Address or the Website Blocking by Keyword. I can't type anything in the fields. I've tried rebooting, other browsers and even other computers but nothing seems to work.
I recently bought an RVS4000, and unfortunately forget the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" rule, and flashed it to the latest firmware (2.0.2.7). Subsequent to doing that, it has been inconveniently dropping the connection to my ISP and completely locking itself up to a point where a manual reboot is required, usually about 4 hours after any outgoing activity (which usually means 11pm!).
Goggling my way round seems to suggest that this could be a firmware problem. The accepted wisdom is that I need to use the RVS4000 Upgrade Utility to get back to a lower version, so I have downloaded and installed V1.3 from the RVS4000 support area. However, though I think I followed the instructions (including trying setting the host PC to a fixed IP address, which was not supposed to be necessary), but I am consistently getting a "Broadcast Error" message, which I am guessing means that the utility and the RVS4000 aren't talking.
I have recently purchased a RVS4000 router and am experiencing major downtime.Almost everyday the RVS4000 router losing internet connectivity. I noticed that when this happens I cannot login into the router from my pc which is connected to the RVS4000 network.The only way to restore connectivity is to restart the RVS4000 by disconnecting power and powering back up.The router's WAN is connected to my Cable modem.The RVS400 has two PC connected to it. (port 3 & 4) I have a Cisco 8-port switch connect to the RVS4000 with 3 additional PCs/devices on it.
we have a RV082 and have the DMZ option enable for a range of IPs within the same subnet of WAN IP and this works great. I have another range of Public IPs from our ISP that is not in the same subnet of the WAN IP and do not see a way on the RV082 to include this 2nd bank of Public IPs in the DMZ. Our ISP internet feed plugs into the RV082 WAN port and we have a switch pulgged into the DMZ port of the RV082 that is used to connect the public devices in the current DMZ. Both banks of Public IPs from our ISP come over via the ISP internet feed plugged into the WAN Port. My question is, if I cannot configure a DMZ rule to allow this 2nd range of Public IPs to "travel" to the RV082 DMZ port.
I have a DSL line at work that we use to test external services provided to external users on our primary Internet circuit (Citrix, web applications, etc). Because this DSL line is for testing only, we want to lock it down so the only destinations allowed through the firewall are our own IP spaces.
I purchased a WRVS4400N for this purpose, thinking I could use the IP based ACL list to create these restrictions. However, every time I try to create an ACL, the internet slows to a crawl, and many sites don't come up at all. This occurs even if the ACL rule I add is a simple "allow any any" rule similar to the default rules.
Is this a known issue, or am I configuring something incorrectly? Here's an example of a rule I'm using (IP not real):
Action Service Source Interface Source Destination Time Day Allow All Protocol LAN ANY 1.2.3.0/255.255.255.240* Any Time Every Day
I also get the problem with a simple allow from a single IP (mine) to any destination, without any other rules enabled.
implementation of the ACL ruleset on these routers?
I need to add some rules to block some attacks. I can add them fine but they get added to the end of the list. I try to re-order the rules to put them at the top and can not. I am using Internet Exploder 8 and I put a checkmark on the rule I want to move then click the reorder button. It takes me to a screen that shows 0 rules. I click the Back button and am back at the list of rules on that page. I am running the latest firmware which is from a year ago.
We have a setup where our e-mail server is hosted in-house.Our network is connected through a RV042 gateway. Port 25 is forwarded to our internal e-mail server.Our smtp service should be limited to receiving incomming connections only from 4 specific ip ranges which I set up in the firewall rules.The reason is that all smtp is managed and protected by an external anti-spam/vires provider.
However it looks like any computer is able to connect to our port 25 and be forwarded to our e-mail server.Does portforwarding overrule firewall rules - ie. you can not limit access with the firewall if you decide to port forward?Is this a "fixable" situation - or is the RV042 not built for handling this setup?
I accidentally setup two schedule rules both with the name of "Log". When I highlight either rule, and try to delete either, I get error "The rule is being used by another rule and cannot be deleted" How do I delete?
1. I could not make an inbound access rule work for RDP. It is configured as follows WAN -> LAN for RDP (TCP 3389) , it didn't work even when I chose "All Traffic".
2. Single Port Forwarding seems to be working though.
3. Destination IP and QoS settings seem to be grayed out, I would like to know why.
I have RVS4000 v02 and created 3 VLANs - 192.168.70.0/24, 192.168.80.0/24, and 192.168.90.0/24 . I tired to created IP based access list to deny network 192.168.80.0/24 and 192.168.90.0/24 to have access to 192.168.70.0/24; and deny 192.168.90.0/24 to access 192.168.80.0/24.
MY ACCESS LIST from RVS4000 Deny All Protocol LAN 192.168.80.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.70.0/255.255.255.0 Any Time Every Day Deny All Protocol LAN 192.168.90.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.70.0/255.255.255.0 Any Time Every Day Deny All Protocol LAN 192.168.90.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.80.0/255.255.255.0 Any Time Every Day Allow All Service LAN ANY ANY Any Time Every Day Allow All Service WAN ANY ANY Any Time Every Day
* all access list is enabled.Both 192.168.80.0 and 192.168.90.0 network can still reach 192.168.70.0 network.
Ive set up a rvs4000 with two vlans, one as a bussiness network and the other as a guest network. Everything works fine and the networks can not see each other. I would like to add wifi and I would like to do so with keeping both networks separate. I have a used 1130AG access point and was wondering if I could use this single AP for both networks. If so, how would I go about doing so? Is there a better suited AP for my needs?
I have an RVS4000 running V2.0.2.7 firmware that gives me an "Invalid Character(s) Found" error message when I try to edit an existing ACL.
I'm trying to deploy 57 of these routers and would like to be able to use a pre-built config dropped onto each router.
I initially planned on editing the exported config with a find&replace for my local LAN addresses. Since that didn't work the next reasonable solution would be to edit the ACL list (much more tedious, but still better than hand-entering every ACL on all 57 devices).
when this bug will be addressed? Alternatively, if there is an offline configuration editing tool I would be one happy camper to have it!
I have an RVS4000, not installed. How can I tell from the unit or the packaging that it is a v1 or a v2, without installing and switching it on (which I don't want to do now) ? Are v1 branded Linsys and v2 Cisco ? Can you tell from the date on the package (mine says copyright 2011) ?
I don't know if my vendor mislead me, but I need to do this: There is a public subnet in my office, not a 192.168.x.x, but a real Public IP.The reason is that we do VOIP and those are only servers. I installed a RVS 4000 in that location, and assigned a PUBLIC Ip to BOTH the WAN and LAN, since when I connect from outside, using either QickVPN or another identical router, I need to be assigned one of the PUBLIC Ip's on the remote LAN. That is the whole idea of the project, to locate servers remotely and make them use our set of PUBLIC IP's. Well, so far I cannot connect either with the Quick VPN client, or using the VPN Wizard. It goes and creates the tunnel, without error, but when I click test, it fails.
We have backup and other traffic over our vpn which is affecting our ip phone service between two sites. Our consultant suggested implementing QOS over the VPN to give the phone traffic priority. Is this possible with the rvs4000. Is there any good source saying how to do it. Is the setup of the QOS on this router similar to another router where this has been discussed.
I am getting ready to setup an RVS4000 so we can use the VPN functionality of it, but I am not quite sure of the correct way to integrate it into our network though. I do not need site to site, just the client portion of it for a few salesmen/off site people to use. I have never used or setup a VPN before, so I'm learning everything as I go along.
We are in the middle of switching our ISP and I am waiting to set this up until the new service is live so I can test it prior to moving the rest of the company to the new ISP.
We are switching to Comcast, and will have 5 static IP's available to use. Currently, the firewall does all our NAT and is the forward facing device on our network. I would like to leave the firewall in place (although I am setting up a new firewall for the new internet connection) and have th RVS 4000 sit behind it and receive VPN traffic from a WAN to LAN rule We currently have a 192.168.100.0/24 network.
Do I need to setup another /24 network for the VPN to function behind (and still have access to the 100.X network), or is there a way to allow everyone who connects to receive a 100.X ip address from our DHCP server. I'm not sure how to set everything up with the WAN/LAN connections on the RVS4000 to acheive this.
We are running a domain on a 2008R2 server. The clients will be using laptops that are already part of the domain, if that will make a difference.
I'm trying to setup a VPN tunnel between a Cisco RVS4000 on our side and a Cisco ASA5520, to connect a machine on our local network to a test server on the target side.
We have all the settings setup correctly and the tunnel is up and running, however, our local machine can't connect/ping to their server. I've tried a trace route both from the machine and from the RVS4000 itself, and they both get stuck after getting past 192.168.1.1. Is there any routing or NAT-ing that I need to do on our router? Or is there a problem somewhere else?
I'm having an issue with a Linksys RVS4000 which doesn't appear to be behaving as I think it should.I need to forward a port (Single Port Forwarding) through to an internal NAT host. However, I only want that host/port to be accessible from one host on the internet, for security reasons.
I have created the port forwarding entry and this works fine. I then created two rules in IP Based ACL - one to block all access to that port from the WAN interface and one to allow access from a single host.
However, it appears that when a port forwarding entry is added, it will completely bypass the ACL and allow all traffic for that port/host by default.Is this the correct behaviour?
I'm currently dealing with a weird problem on a Cisco RVS4000. I'm trying to connect to a IPSEC VPN Gateway (NETASQ) located on the LAN side of the RVS4000. I'm using Green bow vpn client on the WAN side of the RVS4000. Basically I'm trying to get through the RVS.My VPN config is OK because i tested it on the LAN side of the RVS.
The RVS is configured like this: NO VPN configured. Block WAN Request :OFF FIREWALL,IPS,DDOS are OFF
NAT forwarding on for UDP 500 and 4500 directed from the wan to the ip of the VPN gateway. Seems right because iv managed to do this with other routers (different brands) on another site.I've wire sharked my vpn client and i keep getting ICMP destination unreachable (PORT UNREACHABLE) after my ISAKMP launching packet.Can the RVS nat these ports ?
