Cisco Routers :: SRP 540 Series Supports Ipv6 Features Or Remote Vpn
Feb 1, 2012
The products from SRP 540 series line (541w etc) will ever support IPv6 features or remote VPN (eg SSL VPN or Cisco QuickVPN)? If yes, is there a time horizon?
Is there a new software version that supports full ipv6 for wan and lan? What may be the replacement for rv016 that supports full ipv6 and may have a density of 8-16 10/1000 ports?
We are using the Cisco ACS 5.2 for AAA to manage our network devices. We plan to migrate all our edge's devices to IPv6 soon. Can or when the Cisco ACS 5 support IPv6 address?
some of the features of 6500 are enabled by default and woudn't appear in the "Show run". See the command below and how do I make sure whether these featues are enabled by default or not. Would it appear in the config if enabled?
ip verify unicast source reachable-via rx ip verify unicast source reachable-via any
storm-control broadcast level 70
what are the difference between the commands below and can they be enabled together.
spanning-tree guard root vs spanning-tree loopguard default vs spanning-tree guard loop
I tried looking in ASA documentations but unable to find out that how many IPSec Tunnels can be terminated to an ASA cluster. I have 5545 running only two IPSec Tunnels so far but need to terminate 18 sites all up and would like to confirm how many tunnels we could terminate? Is there a limitaion to it?
we are using 3750 and 2950 switches both of them do not support vlan up to 4000 .we need vlan about 3000 .Whic cisco series switch do support vlan up to 4000.
2950 S-SW1.3(config-vlan)#exi
Proposed configuration has too many VLANs for this platform. Reduce the number of VLANs proposed.
S-SW1.3(config)#end 3750 SW1(config-vlan)#exi
proposed configuration exceeds the limit of 1005 VLANs that can be supported on this platform. Reduce the number of VLANs proposed to be within this limit.
I was slightly dissapointed with the performance of the "pre-sales" phone number of Cisco in the Netherlands so I am asking it here instead.We decided on using 2 Cisco 2921 routers with 2.5GB ram to use for a MultiHomed connection using BGP. We already have our v4 and v6 space assigned as well as our AS number. The connections should turn up soon.What I could not find out with proper certainty on the Cisco Feature Navigator is if the IP BASE on the Cisco 2921 supports both IPv4 and IPv6 routing combined with BGP. This model uses the Universal IOS licensing which I found slightly confusing. I could not find a simple matrix with the supported commands either.
I just purchased a SA 520 and I am trying out the IPS feature before I buy. During my tests I get around 85 Mbps off a 100 Mbps connection (which is relatively normal), however as soon as I enable IPS with very few options (Trojan/virus, HTTP, etc), it drops down to 18 or so. Anyway to improve this?
I am doing a security assessment of an organization that uses 871/881 routers with the firewall features enabled. I see the following commands defining packet inspection done by the firewall software.
-ip inspect name inet-users tcp -ip inspect name inet-users udp -ip inspect name inet-users icmp
What I am trying to define is the inspect name "inet-users". It is obviously a constant defined by IOS as it is not defined anywhere in the configuration file like any other "variable" and does not generate an error.What does "inet-users" define? I'm assuming it is all users using the interface(s) where the inspect commands are used, but is that correct? The Cisco IOS manuals do not contain a reference to "inet-users" hence why I'm here asking.
After configuring the router and enabling a load of functions to secure our LAN, the download speed halved! Even disabling AcitveX "eats" 10Mbs! I understand that enabling IPsec will drag the speed down to 25Mbps, but I have disabled this.
Even setting the QoS to speeds equal or higher then the ISP's promissises drags the speed down!
My Draytek 2710 just dies after 2 years so I was looking for something a little more reliable and noticed the spec of the SRP527W-U.I take it with only one antenna and reading a couple of past discussions, the wireless will only manage n-lite as some people call it i.e. 150Mbps, and not the full 300? Oh, and are the ports still only 100M and not Gig?I know the 547 would tick both these boxes but we are talking twice the price. How does the quality and logevity of the SRP500 series compare to the RV series (which would need an adsl modem) or the Linksys boxes?
I currently have ipV4 as the setting on my DIR-825. Other posts seem to want ipV6 which is more secure but is not possible with a DIR-825 Rev A1. I have two routers, a primary router (DIR-825 Rev B1) capable of ipV6 and a secondary router (DIR-825 Rev A1). If I implement ipV6 on the Rev B1 router but keep ipV4 on the secondary router, will this improve the security, or will it just mess things up so nothing works?Certain devices (cell phones and most Tablets) don't deal with ipV6 very well at all. The ones I have tested flat don't connect to the wireless network if the router is set at ipV6. Is ipV4 adequate for a Home/Small Business Network when trying to implement Remote Access and VPN?
I'm looking for a device which will allow me to forward all internet bound traffic through a L2L IPSec tunnel from branches to a central hub and internet connection.
I've recently purchased a RV120W(as a test branch device) which i've tried to get working with the ASA5505 at the central site. I can get the VPN to come up but can't manage to get the internet bound traffic through it. Reading up on the issue, it looks like full tunneling or IPsec wildcard forwarding isn't supported on the RV120W and RV220W devices [URL] The source mentions that the RV0xx series supports this feature, however one of my requirements is wireless on the device.
Any device which supports this rather than just the standard split tunneling, alternatively a workaround which will allow me to use RV120Ws at branch sites? Would an SRP521 support what i'm trying to achieve?
I have an out of the box configured RV220W and was wondering if it supports local DNS resoltuion for DHCP addresses it issues. I have a few reservations and a custon search domain configured ('local') but it will not resolve a name fromt the terminal using the search domain (see below):
It resolves freenas but not freenas.local. macbookair:~ brantwinter$ dig freenas ; <<>> DiG 9.8.1-P1 <<>> freenas ;; global options: +cmd [Code]...
I am running "PLEX Media server" on a PC and have a "Roku" client working perfectly on my home network
I am trying to use the "My PLEX" feature of "PLEX" to stream my content to the internet and access it on a Nook or iPod from any internet hot spot. This requires that the router supports DLNA. I am not sure what this is and am not successful at this so far.
Although it may sound like I know what I'm talking about I am at my limit and do not know how to determine if my router will support DLNA.
Is it time to get a new router or is there something I need to do to the router so it supports DLNA?
I've been looking into posibilities for extending a DMVPN (already implemented) with very small (1-2 user) remote locations over a single ISP link.I would like to use what is basically the smallest Cisco router that supports DMVPN and EIGRP (stub) - here's a sample configuration:I know that the 881 can accomplish the above without issues (if it has Adv IP Services as licensing).I would like to know if I can use the smaller routers (physically smaller, that is) for a similar configuration. Can the Cisco 819 router.URL provide the same functionality? What about the Cisco 866VAE router URl.
My ISP provides IPv6 connectivity in the form of dual stack IPv4/IPv6 with DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation. Using a Cisco IOS-based router I managed to make such a connection by using as a template the Cisco IOS configuration file that my ISP has posted as an example in the following link:
[URL]
The main point on this configuration is a PPPoE connection with:
I enabled dual stack on my rv042g router but its not recieving ipv6 information from my isp. My isp is Time Warner in Milwaukee. They assure me that they are ipv6 ready and assume the problem is on my end. All they want to do is have me connect one computer up to my modem. What good is that when I have a network that needs service. The router needs to be working not just one pc. My ipv4 is working perfectly. It is obtaining all information automaticly.
I have several RV082 routers in production, most of them on IPv4-only access. I want to roll out IPv6 on all these networks and have set up a test environment for this.I did start with a factory-defaulted router with a fixed public IPv4 address. IPv4 network access does work as expected.With the 6to4 option disabled, the RV082's IPv6 routing table contains several entries for local addresses, but not public ones, as expected. When enabling the 6to4 transition function as described in SBKB article #567, three new entries are created: [code]
With the router's diagnostic ping function I can ping the next 6to4 relay on IPv4 (192.88.99.1) and IPv6 (2002:c058:6301::). But I cannot ping that next hop address given as default route (::c058:6301).The RV does advertise routes with the correct 6to4 prefix on the LAN side, and the clients connected to it configure themselves with appropriate addresses. However I was unable to ping any IPv6 both in the 2002::/16 as well as in the 2000::/15 range from any system on the RV's LAN side. When trying to add a static route which routes the 2000:: prefix with prefix length 15 to next hop 2002:c058:6301:: with metric 1, I keep getting the message "Please input IPv6 Address with correct format!"could there something wrong with this default route? How can it be changed? And what is the problem with the route I am trying to add?
When I attempt to save IPv6 Router Advertisement settings, it fails and displays this cryptic message: Addtionally many of the settings in this dialog are not in the PDF manual. Seems odd - like this portion of the Router Configuration is broken.
Question 1. I have no idea how to route IPv6. My provider has provided me with a subnet. This subnet is for example 1:1:1::/48
The router of the provider is located at 1:1:1::1 and my router should get 1:1:1::2(Cisco router). Every subnet I want to create must be routed by 1:1:1::2, for example if I want to create 1:1:1:1111::/64 it needs to be routerd by 1:1:1::2
How do I configure this on the RV220w?
Question 2. I have the possibility to create vlans on the RV220W. I can configure IPv4 addressen per vlan. Only for IPv6 this is not possible.How do I configure this or when will new software be released to configure this?Or do I have to edit the configuration file?
What are the IPv6 anycast addresses using for?, are they some kind of broadcast? I have a router 2811 I'm configuring ipv6, do I need to use these addresses?
I noticed that the recently released firmware version 1.2.0.9 for the RV110W router mentions in the release notes that DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation is now supported.
Does that mean that this feature will also be implemented in some future firmware release (if we ever see one) for the RV220W router? This is the method used by most if not all ISPs around the world (e.g. Comcast) for IPv6 and the only one RV220W does not currently support. P.S. As of beta version 1.0.4.13 there is no support for IPv6 Prefix Delegation.