Routers / Switches :: What Is Protocol 41 With Ipv6

Aug 26, 2011

Protocol 41 with ipv6

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Routers / Switches :: How To Format IPv6

Feb 6, 2011

want to know how to format IPv6

View 1 Replies View Related

Routers / Switches :: How To Implement Ipv6 On Windows 7

Feb 10, 2011

How to implement ipv6 on windows 7

View 1 Replies View Related

Routers / Switches :: IPV6 Implementation In IPV4 Network

Jul 1, 2012

our company backbone is hp 5406, and desktop switches are hp 2510 currently we are working with ipv4.if we want to start use IPV6 for test environment, what’s things we need to enable in our backbone/regular switches.i mean for example if we want to set static IPV6 address for 2 servers and send ping between them, or even make new vlan with IVP6 subnet, and use it like regular vlan but with static ip's(until we got ipv6 dhcp).i have hp 5406 manual for IPV6 but i can't understand what i really need to do for start using IPV6.

View 5 Replies View Related

Spanning Tree Protocol For Extreme Switches?

Feb 28, 2011

download speed is getting slower in lan, file and print sharing also take long time.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: Does Sge 2010 Support Routing Information Protocol (RIP)

Dec 27, 2011

if the sge2010 switch support Routing Information Protocol (RIP) and if so how do I enable it. I have a small wireless router that support it and would like client connected on it te bo visible from the wan side and that worked when I had another device doing the routing with RIP support the wireless router was picking up that information and the routing for the wireless client was working.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - Do All Switches In LAN Need To Use Same Protocol

Dec 1, 2012

On our backbone (Cisco 6509)  we have the following config.
 
spanning-tree mode rapid-pvst
spanning-tree extend system-id
spanning-tree vlan 1-200 priority 24576
 
1. is rapid-pvst the best spanning tree protocol to use? on some switches we have pvst (not rapid)
 2. do all switches in the LAN  need to use the same protocol?
 3. does line 3 :priority 24576 mean that someone set tis switch as root manually? how can one further enforce the backbone as root (so noone adds a old switch with lower root id)

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: SOHO97 / 800 - Unable To Support IPv6

Dec 7, 2010

I've got older SOHO97 which I want to use as a backup for Cisco 800  but I can not find any information if it actually supports IPv6. Neither the data sheet [URL] nor the Cisco Feature Navigator [URL] suggest it has any IPv6 support at all.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 3500 - How To Check Switches Support IPV6 In LAN

Feb 6, 2013

i want ti migrade lan from ipv4 to ipv6.. how can i check my switch support ipv6?
 
i am having cisco 3500 and d-link managed and unmanaged switchs.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Protocol Binding For SIP And RTP (VoIP)

Jun 26, 2012

I have a RV042 with a DSL (WAN1) and cable (WAN2) internet connection in Load Balance Mode. The DSL provider also provides internet telephony when registered via his line. When I disable the WAN2 port, my IP phone successully registers with the registration server of the DSL provider. I also defined protocol bindings for SIP (port 5060) and RTP (ports 5004 to 5020) to be bound to WAN1. My IP phone is set up to listen on only these ports. [code] With these protocol bindings in place when I re-enable WAN2, then after some time the phone reports "registration failed".Do I need to set something else apart from protocol binding to force the VoIP traffic to go via WAN1?

View 23 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: Server Access Through RV042G With SMB Protocol On MAC 10.6.8

Sep 4, 2012

Our lab recently purchased a RV042G to setup a subnet (I don't know if this is the correct term) within our company's network. Eventually we like to put a dozen computers on this subnet along with a 24TB NAS drive for data storage. We like the computers in the subnet to be able to access the company's numerous servers.
 
To test the router setup before going all out, I have a WinXP SP3 computer and a MAC OSX 10.6.8 computer hooked up to it. Both computers can access the Internet just fine. The WinXP computer can access company servers thru the RUN command ("\servernameshare"), but the MAC is having issues with the SMB protocol ("smb://servername/share"). The same MAC if plugged directly to the network has no issues connecting to the company server.
 
Is this not working because the RV042G doesn't support SMB? or did I do something wrong with setting up the router? By the way, firewall is turned off, since the company already has its own firewall.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Protocol Binding Multiple LAN Subnets?

Aug 16, 2011

We have Point to point T1 environment where 3 additional WAN sites get internet access through our RV042. When we setup load balancing we have problems with https traffic, so we setup protocol binding for https and everything worked great from the local LAN. When trying to access https content from the remote LAN across the WAN the sites failed and I see no option to add additional subnets to the protocol binding. Is there a command line feature that supports adding additional subnets for protocol binding or is the local LAN the only option?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: ICMP (ping) Protocol Binding With The RV042?

Aug 7, 2011

Is it possible to use protocol binding to route pings only over the WAN1 connection, even if WAN1 fails? It seems like the protocol binding feature of the Linksys RV042 is ignored once WAN1 fails.  I would like to use a ping from the LAN to an external IP to verify if the WAN1 connection is down, or is up and then use that information to power up, or power down a secondary communications system (WAN2).  However, if the protocol binding is ignored when WAN1 fails, then I will not be able to use the ping to establish the state of WAN1 connection. Addtionally, is it possible to use protocol binding to only route pings and allow all other traffic to use either WAN connection? I have seen these feautures on a different brand of router that failsover to a cell connection, but it is not a true dual WAN router. It would be nice if the RV042 would allow this kind of control. Are there any other dual WAN routers out there that have this kind of protocol binding feature?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042G - Protocol Binding And VPN With Load Balancing

Oct 6, 2012

I have dual WAN connections on rv042G in "office 1". LAN is 192.168.10.x
 
A gateway to gateway VPN is made with another "office 2" on rv042G too.
 
The goal is to reach the LAN of the other "office 2" : 192.168.5.x
 
Working good. Now I need to use protocol binding : One LAN ip need to use WAN 2 : All traffic :192.168.10.77~77(0.0.0.0~0.0.0.0)WAN2 -> Working
 
The rest of LAN should use WAN 1 (same as the VPN) When I create this rules, I can't reach the "office 2" LAN : All traffic : 192.168.10.100~150(0.0.0.0~0.0.0.0)WAN1

What should I do to make it works ?

View 13 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: Dual WAN Router And Protocol Binding RV042/G

Jan 7, 2013

I'm in the process of finding a dual WAN router with VPN support, that allow me to redirect some traffic to one specific WAN port and do load balancing of that specific traffic in case of that WAN failing (this last requirement is preferably but isn't fully needed).
 
Does the RV042/G could work with that? In that case, does it allow protocol redirect only? What about ip/ports redirecting? Or some kind of packet filtering to redirect to specific WAN ports?

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042G Difference Between Bandwidth Protocol Binding For WAN

Oct 15, 2012

What the differences are between bandwidth management on WAN ports and protocol bindings?

If you can specify in each section which protocol should go where why having two places to configure this?Or are there some things to remind when using one of them?                  

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042G V3 Protocol Bind All HTTPS Traffic To Wan1

Jun 12, 2013

If you are using load balancing how do you bind i.e. all HTTPS traffic to i.e. wan1. RV042G V2 you can inter 0.0.0.0~0.0.0.0 as Source IP to forward from all IPs, how do you do that with a V3?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV120W - Error / EndChantRecv / Protocol PNAC Returned / Ok

May 13, 2012

what does this log message mean? (RV120W fw 1.0.3.10)
 
2012-05-14    19:59:26    warning    HERMES    kern    KERNEL    [Kernel] ERROR:endChantRecv: protocol PNAC returned !OK
2012-05-14    19:59:26    warning    HERMES    kern    KERNEL    [Kernel] ERROR:endChantRecv: protocol PNAC returned !OK
2012-05-14    19:59:26    warning    HERMES    kern    KERNEL    [Kernel] ERROR:endChantRecv: protocol PNAC returned !OK
2012-05-14    19:59:26    warning    HERMES    kern    KERNEL    [Kernel] ERROR:endChantRecv: protocol PNAC returned !OK
2012-05-14    19:18:46    warning    HERMES    kern    KERNEL    [Kernel] ERROR:endChantRecv: protocol PNAC returned !OK
2012-05-14    19:18:46    warning    HERMES    kern    KERNEL    [Kernel] ERROR:endChantRecv: protocol PNAC returned !OK
2012-05-14    19:13:36    warning    HERMES    kern    KERNEL    [Kernel] ERROR:endChantRecv: protocol PNAC returned !OK

[code]....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: What About Ipv6 On Srp500 Series

Jun 4, 2012

Tomorrow 2012-06-06 is ipv6 launch day, what about ipv6 on srp500 series ? On product specification cisco wrote : IPv6 (RFC 6204) ready.

View 10 Replies View Related

Belkin Routers :: Does F5D7234-4 Work With IPv6

Jan 13, 2013

I am replacing my modem, and intend on getting one that supports IPv6. Does the Belkin model F5D7234-4 support IPv6, and does it need to?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: Getting IPv6 Support For RV082

Jan 27, 2010

Is there any IPv6 support planned or in the works for RV082?

View 3 Replies View Related

Belkin Routers :: Does F5d8636-4v1 Support Ipv6

Feb 3, 2013

was told to allow Ipv6. Does my modem support this?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Load Balance Protocol Binding Not Failing Back

Mar 6, 2013

I am trying to make this router prefer Wan1 for outbound while listening to both WAN ports for Inbound. I set it to Load Balance mode and added in a rule for Protocol binding:
 
All Traffic( TCP & UDP/1-65535)>192.168.1.1~192.168.1.254(0.0.0.0~0.0.0.0)WAN1 ENABLED
 
This says bind all Outbound traffic  to anybody to WAN1
 
My Wan 2 connection is over satellite so it is easy to tell if a ping is going over Wan2 because the latency is >600mS
 
If I start a continuous ping to outside site - eg Yahoo.com then if I Fail WAN1 I see the ping latency Jump from 30mS to 700mS  as it starts to use Wan2. If I restore the Connection to Wan 1 then the pings stay on WAN2 - seemingly forever. If I stop pinging for 30 mins then a restart of pinging does use Wan1 - so it fails back eventually If I restore Wan1 and then remove Wan2, it fails back right away
 
My problem is with our VOIP which uses a connection keepalive  so there is no real downtime for the router to release the path to WAN2 should it fail over how I can force the router to fail back to Wan1 without removing Wan2?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV082 V3 Load Balancing (Protocol Binding) With IPsec Tunnel?

Mar 14, 2013

We have tried a variety of options in an attempt to use Load Balancing (Protocol Binding) with an RV082 that has a site to site IPsec tunnel with another RV082. Both are v3.
 
Here is the issue. We have dual ISPs, one has great bandwidth, but we incur overages. The other has mediocre bandwidth, but has unlimited usage.
 
GROUP1 - We want most PCs to use the "unlimited" ISP for general surfing, email, etc. (Bound all ports for range of internal IPs to ANY dest to WAN1)
 
GROUP2 - We want to use the "faster" ISP for our VPN tunnel (mostly RDP and SIP traffic). (Bound all ports for range of internal IPs to ANY dest to WAN2)
 
So far everything works. The router will route traffic appropriately and GROUP 1 uses WAN1 and GROUP 2 uses WAN2.
 
Unfortunately, sometimes GROUP1 users need access to resources over the VPN (WAN2).
 
There is something not right with the routing. For example GROUP1 can ping and receive responses from devices on the other side of the tunnel, but GROUP1 can't access intranet sites on the other side of the tunnel. They also can't RDP to PCs on the other side of the tunnel.
 
Why does the router correctly route ICMP, but not RDP?
 
We've tried adding additional protocol binding rules for specific ports(80, 3389, etc) and ip ranges (both local and remote) to see if we could force GROUP1 traffic destined via VPN through WAN2, but it doesn't work.
 
Shouldn't VPN tunnels created and configured in the RVs not adhere to protocol binding? It just seems logical to me, but maybe I am missing something.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W - Setup An IPv6 Connection

Jan 25, 2012

My ISP provides IPv6 connectivity in the form of dual stack IPv4/IPv6 with DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation. Using a Cisco IOS-based router I managed to make such a connection by using as a template the Cisco IOS configuration file that my ISP has posted as an example in the following link:
 
[URL]
 
The main point on this configuration is a PPPoE connection with:
 
interface Dialer46
ipv6 address autoconfig default
ipv6 enable

[Code].....
 
configure this router according the Cisco IOS configuration file I linked on the top in order to have a working IPv6 connection?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: How To Add IPv6 Support Via TunnelBroker To A RV016

Jun 21, 2012

how to add IPv6 support via HE's TunnelBroker to an RV016.

View 0 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV016 Software That Supports Ipv6

Nov 10, 2010

Is there a new software version that supports full ipv6 for wan and lan?  What may be the replacement for rv016 that supports full ipv6 and may have a density of 8-16 10/1000 ports?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042G Not Communicating With Isp For Ipv6 Info?

Jun 27, 2012

I enabled dual stack on my rv042g router but its not recieving ipv6 information from my isp.  My isp is Time Warner in Milwaukee.  They assure me that they are ipv6 ready and assume the problem is on my end.  All they want to do is have me connect one computer up to my modem.  What good is that when I have a network that needs service.  The router needs to be working not just one pc.  My ipv4 is working perfectly.  It is obtaining all information automaticly.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV082 IPv6 Tunneling With 6to4

Apr 28, 2013

I have several RV082 routers in production, most of them on IPv4-only access. I want to roll out IPv6 on all these networks and have set up a test environment for this.I did start with a factory-defaulted router with a fixed public IPv4 address. IPv4 network access does work as expected.With the 6to4 option disabled, the RV082's IPv6 routing table contains several entries for local addresses, but not public ones, as expected. When enabling the 6to4 transition function as described in SBKB article #567, three new entries are created: [code]
 
With the router's diagnostic ping function I can ping the next 6to4 relay on IPv4 (192.88.99.1) and IPv6 (2002:c058:6301::). But I cannot ping that next hop address given as default route (::c058:6301).The RV does advertise routes with the correct 6to4 prefix on the LAN side, and the clients connected to it configure themselves with appropriate addresses. However I was unable to ping any IPv6 both in the 2002::/16 as well as in the 2000::/15 range from any system on the RV's LAN side. When trying to add a static route which routes the 2000:: prefix with prefix length 15 to next hop 2002:c058:6301:: with metric 1, I keep getting the message "Please input IPv6 Address with correct format!"could there something wrong with this default route? How can it be changed? And what is the problem with the route I am trying to add?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV180 IPv6 Error - I18nHTMLMissing

Jun 1, 2013

When I attempt to save IPv6 Router Advertisement settings, it fails and displays this cryptic message:

Addtionally many of the settings in this dialog are not in the PDF manual.  Seems odd - like this portion of the Router Configuration is broken.
 
Steve CICSO RV180 FW:1.0.2.6       

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W - Routing IPv6 Subnet

Feb 27, 2013

I have a few questions regarding IPv6.

Question 1.
I have no idea how to route IPv6. My provider has provided me with a subnet. This subnet is for example 1:1:1::/48

The router of the provider is located at 1:1:1::1 and my router should get 1:1:1::2(Cisco router). Every subnet I want to create must be routed by 1:1:1::2, for example if I want to create 1:1:1:1111::/64 it needs to be routerd by 1:1:1::2

How do I configure this on the RV220w?
 
Question 2.
I have the possibility to create vlans on the RV220W. I can configure IPv4 addressen per vlan. Only for IPv6 this is not possible.How do I configure this or when will new software be released to configure this?Or do I have to edit the configuration file?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: 2811 - IPv6 Anycast Addresses

Oct 18, 2012

What are the IPv6 anycast addresses using for?, are they  some kind of broadcast? I have a  router 2811  I'm configuring ipv6, do I need to use these addresses?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W And IPv6 Prefix Delegation

Aug 6, 2012

I noticed that the recently released firmware version 1.2.0.9 for the RV110W router mentions in the release notes that DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation is now supported.

Does that mean that this feature will also be implemented in some future firmware release (if we ever see one) for the RV220W router? This is the method used by most if not all ISPs around the world (e.g. Comcast) for IPv6 and the only one RV220W does not currently support. P.S. As of beta version 1.0.4.13 there is no support for IPv6 Prefix Delegation.

View 4 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved