Cisco Switching/Routing :: Does WS-C3750-48TS-S Supports Private Vlans And IPV6

Nov 3, 2012

Need to confirm if  WS-C3750-48TS-S supports Private vlans and IPV6?
 
Also need to know which stack cable like part number i can use for stacking them .

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: To Add WS-C3750-48TS-E To WS-C3750E-48td Stack

Feb 13, 2012

Is that possible add WS-C3750-48TS-E to ws-c3750e-48td stack?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Which Ios Will Support IPv6 Feature In WS-C3560G-48TS Switch

Feb 18, 2013

I am having WS-C3560G-48TS switch with ios(c3560-ipbasek9-mz.122-58.E2.bin) and I am trying to use IPv6 feature in this switch model. More over I've upgraded this switch with many ios but none of them not supporting IPv6 feature. ios which supports IPv6 feature?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: C3750 - How To Configure 2 DHCP Servers For Two User Vlans

May 1, 2012

I can't seem to find any info on how to configure 2 DHCP server pools on a C3750, to use with 2 user vlans. The purpose is that users in vlan 1 should get an IP address from DHCP server1, and users in vlan 2 should get an IP address from DHCP server2. Both DHCP servers are configured in a stack of C3750 switches, which acts a a L2 switch.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750x And Private VLANs

Sep 5, 2012

Is this supported on a 3750X ?? A router has two VRFs and its lan interface is a trunk with 2 VLAN IDs, let say VLAN 10 and VLAN 20. The ip address subnet of these two vlans is the same (therefore , they are in different VRFs)

fa0/1
VLAN 10 = 10.15.4.9 (VRF A)
VLAN 20 = 10.15.4.10 (VRF B)
 
This router is connected on a 3750X switch. There is a firewall connected to this switch also, which is default gateway for several VLANs including VLAN 10 (10.15.4.1)

The goal is that VRF B ip can talk to 10.15.4.1 and VRF A can talk to 10.15.4.1 but VRF B can't talk to VRF A (10.15.4.9 <-> 10.15.4.10)
 
FW |--- TRUNK VLANs 1,2,3,4,10 ---------| SWITCH |----- TRUNK VLAN 10,20 -----| ROUTER (vlan 10 = VRF A, vlan 20 = VRF B)
 
I think this is not supported on the C3750, as my promiscuous port is located on a trunk.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 1000v Don't Use Private VLANs

Aug 28, 2012

We have a requirement for private VLANS for DMZ hosting within one of our datacentres. I just want to query how private VLANs would work in our environment.We have physical servers connected to fex ports (2 fex per rack for each 5k) of a 5548UP switch, virtual servers using the nexus 1000v (vmware hosts connected to fex ports) Out firewalls and load balancers are connected to an upstream pair of nexus 7ks using vPCs.My question is this, ordinarily the firewall would be in a promiscuous port but as these reside on a physically separate switch will the normal vPC trunk still be sufficient or would the "switchport mode private-vlan trunk promiscuous" be required on the vPC up to the northbound 7k.As these connections are already in production I do not want to affect the existing traffic that doesn’t use private VLANs.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 5548 - Private VLANs On FEX

Aug 13, 2012

regarding PVLANs and the Nexus, my understanding is that we cannot configure Private VLANs on a FEX trunk port with a NX-OS release older than 5.1(3)N2(1) for the Nexus5548... Is there any known workaround for this limitation (appart from performing a SW upgrade)?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Private Vlans Across 2960 / 2950 Switches?

Nov 12, 2012

I am aware that private-vlans are not supported on edge switches like 2960 series - so my question is would it be possibel to ceate private vlans on say just the core switch which would be a 3570 or 4506 that supports private vlans and then just trunk these to the edge like normal vlans?what I need to achive is to have edge port not able to communicate to each other even across switches - which cannot be done using 'protected' port so need the private vlan feature?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: CBS30X0 - Private VLANs Interaction With Firewall

Nov 29, 2011

We currently have a HP blade platform which has two Cisco CBS30X0 switches built into it running Version 12.2(55)SE. These are connected to two Cisco C2960 aggregation switches running Version 12.2(44)SE6. According to this article I need to upgrade these to 12.2(25)FX: url...
 
1.)This will according to that article only allow me to create edge ports on them, is this a hardware limitation or am I just not finding what firmware I need to upgrade them to, in order to allow the creation of community VLANs? We have these aggregation switches conncted directly to multiple types of firewalls which take care of each of our clients networks including internet access etc. We are wasting many VLANs and IP addresses with our current setup so I am hoping to move over to using private VLANs. The setup of the private VLANs looks simple enough.
 
2.)When the private VLAN's try to communicate, all info will be sent directly to the layer 3 device I gather, which will not need to know anything about the private VLANs?

View 12 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 - Private Vlans Across Multiple Switches

Nov 11, 2012

I am aware that private-vlans are not supported on edge switches like 2960 series - so my question is would it be possibel to ceate private vlans on say just the core switch which would be a 3570 or 4506 that supports private vlans and then just trunk these to the edge like normal vlans?
 
what I need to achive is to have edge port not able to communicate to each other even across switches - which cannot be done using 'protected' port so need the private vlan feature

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: How Many Private Networks 2800 Supports

Oct 29, 2011

i have two cisco 2800 routers ,  and i have three different networks , so can cisco routers supports more than one private network example,My First location i have one public connection of 200.100.100. 1 and private network of 192.168.1.x network and the second router i have one public connection of 200.100.100.10 and two private networks of 192.168.50.x  and 192.168.60.x ,  So can i route my first location to this two different networks , because my router have only two FastEthernet connection , so how it's possible or not.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco AAA/Identity/Nac :: ACS 5.2 Supports IPv6 Clients?

Jun 28, 2011

We are using the Cisco ACS 5.2 for AAA to manage our network devices.  We plan to migrate all our edge's devices to IPv6 soon.  Can or when the Cisco ACS 5 support IPv6 address?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV016 Software That Supports Ipv6

Nov 10, 2010

Is there a new software version that supports full ipv6 for wan and lan?  What may be the replacement for rv016 that supports full ipv6 and may have a density of 8-16 10/1000 ports?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: SRP 540 Series Supports Ipv6 Features Or Remote Vpn

Feb 1, 2012

The products from SRP 540 series line (541w etc) will ever support IPv6 features or remote VPN (eg SSL VPN or Cisco QuickVPN)? If yes, is there a time horizon?

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst WS-C3750G-48TS-E - Virtual Switching System

Sep 10, 2012

I would like to know if Catalyst WS-C3750G-48TS-E recognizes and understand Cisco VSS ( Virtual Switching System) . Is there a List available which tells us which Old Catalyst Switches or current switches understand Cisco VSS?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Can Upgrade 3750 48TS-S To The EMI Software

Jun 13, 2012

Can I upgrade my 3750 48TS-S to the EMI software or does it need to be a 48TS-E?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Random Reboots On WS-C3560G-48TS

Mar 7, 2012

This switch randomly reboots throughout the day. I checked the stacks info and reported it was using crashinfo_12 (report below). I have access to the switch throughout the day if more config info needs to exported.
  
Cisco IOS Software, C3560 Software (C3560-IPBASEK9-M), Version 12.2(50)SE1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
Copyright (c) 1986-2009 by Cisco Systems, Inc.

[Code].....

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: WSC 3750 48TS S / 3750V2 - IOS Compatibility

Jun 12, 2012

My old switch software version is c3750-ipbase-mz.122-35.SE5 and model number is WS-C3750-48TS-S and my new switch Software version is c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-50.SE5.bin and model number is WS-C3750V2 . I want a compatible (prefer same) version of IOS which works on both the switches as both the switch will be  in a stack..

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Can WS-C3750E-48TD And WS-C3750G-48TS Be In Same Stack

Apr 20, 2013

I have two Switches which i need to put in a same stack - WS-C3750E-48TD and WS-C3750G-48TS . Possible to do so and also which IOS to put in both the switches as WS-C3750G-48TS is having lower RAM and flash.Whether can i put following IOS in these switches and connect them in a stack as i have read that IOS -- 15.0.1. SE are compatible with both the switches.
 
a . c3750e-ipbasek9-mz.150-1.SE.bin in switch - WS-C3750E-48TD

b. c3750-ipbasek9-mz.150-1.SE.bin in switch -- WS-C3750G-48TS

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Old WS-C3750G-48TS Works With New Replacement (WS-C3750X-48T-E)

Aug 12, 2012

Situation: Currently WS-C3750G-48TS-(S or E) switches are on stack. Now these units will soon EOL on Jan. 30, 2013 and Cisco recommends that
WS-C3750X-48T-S or WS-C3750X-48T-E will be used.
  
The question is: Will the new SKU works together in a stack with the old ones?  Will there be no changes on the type of stacking cable to be used?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: WS-C3560G-48TS-S / GB Port Shows (err-disabled)

Feb 28, 2013

I've got two two 3560s switchs, (WS-C3560G-48TS-S) that I'm trying to connect to each other using the GB ports over Fibre.  We purchased the following GBICs, SFP 1000SX Transceiver and when we put them in the port it shows (err-disabled).  Below is some information I pulled from one of the ports, but doesn't matter what port I use they all say the same thing. 

ProdSwitchSW1#show run int g0/51
Building configuration...
 Current configuration : 37 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/51
end

[code]....
 
Configuration register is 0xF

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960S-48TS-L Take 10 Minutes To Boot And Start

Oct 4, 2012

May I know why my 2960S-48TS-L takes 10 minutes to boot and start, some just take 1 minute, but one of them take up to 10 minutes, but after that it works fine, why?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Ws-c3750g-48ts / Adding Switch To Stack?

Jan 23, 2013

We have a cisco stack with 5 ws-c3750-24p 12.2)55)SE3 c3750-ipbasek9-m switches. Can i add a switch to the stack that is the following model: ws-c3750g-48ts 12.2(25)see3 c3750-ipbase-m

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960S-48TS-L On Constant Reboot Cycle With Error

Mar 13, 2013

I have a brand new 2960S-48TS-L, plain vanilla with no extra module/boards etc. It boots up ok (the installed version is 12.2 (55) SE5) but then constantly cycles the following error, and doesn't accept any input whatsoever. After 5-10 minutes of cycling the error, the switch reloads and starts the process again.
 
PCIE0: link is NOT up.
--------------CPU's PCIe SDR Registers--------------------
PE_DLPSET =     00401000
PE_UTLSET1 =    00000000

[Code]......

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: WS-C2960S-48TS-L / Reasons To Limit 1Gb Capable Switches To 100Mb?

Jul 8, 2012

Our network administrator restricts all our new 1Gb switches to only 100Mb, to which he claims it will increase overall performance. Preventing devices from bottlenecking the network. (that is, only restricting the main switch ports, not the uplinks)For example we have a new building with 2x WS-C2960S-48TS-L connected together with FlexJack and then a 1Gb Fiber connection back to our core switch.
 
This building is on it's own subnet and there is little broadcast traffic. I don't see the point other than it hinders the potential speed we could use. Labs are set up in this building and 1Gb is MUCH faster when it comes to imaging and software deployment.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: C3750 - Data Center / IP Routing

Feb 21, 2013

I have a problem to solve in our data center, see attached drawing. HW: Our core switches consists of two stacked C3750 with ip routing. What I want to do is probably simple but I haven't been able to figure out the best method.
 
VLAN10 and VLAN20 should not be able to communicate with each other. (ACLs?)VLAN10 will have it's own default route/firewall. Both VLAN10 and VLAN20 should be able to send server backups to server in VLAN30. All 3 V LANs come in on a trunk from a pair of stacked C2960-S. I need it to be able to scale if we have 50 VLANs for instance, hopefully without long complicated ACLs. I've been considering VRF's, PBR but can't decide what's the simplest solution to this problem. I have never done this before so I would prefer to start off on the right foot.

View 1 Replies View Related

SG300-20 - Picking Up 16-24 Port Gigabit Switch That Supports Trunking / VLans For Home Use?

Mar 11, 2011

I've been looking at picking up a 16-24 port gigabit switch that supports trunking, vlans etc. for home use.

I've looked at the Cisco SG2/300's, HP 1810g-24 and the Dell 2816 and 2824 switches, and it seems like the Cisco's are the best buy (layer 3'ish features, same price as the HP) but there isn't much about them.

View 14 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Configure Q-in-Q On WS-C3750-24PS?

Nov 6, 2011

I have  WS-C3750-24PS  version 12.2(55)SE4.  I am configuring PBB VPLS.   MY PE/P routers are alcatel 7710/7750
 
my topology is like that. 
  
CE1<-------> Provider_switch(3750)<-------> PE1 < ----IP/MPLS----> PE2<-------> Provider_switch(3750)<----------->CE2
16                        11                                                                                                 11   

[Code].....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: C3750-X Stacking Configuration

Mar 30, 2013

I am having troubles to get 2 C3750-X switches WS-C3750-X-48P-L) to stack.   They are both running  iOS 15.0(2)-UNIVERSALK9, and are licensed for IP Base.
 
If I connect stack port 1 of switch 1 to stack port 2 of switch 1, and  stack port 1 of switch 2to stack port 2 of switch 2 I get the following:
 
WS-C3750-X_STACK1_SW1>show switch stack-ports summary
Switch#/  Stack   Neighbor   Cable    Link   Link   Sync      #         InPort#     Port              Length    OK   Active   OK    Changes   Loopback          Status

[Code].....
 
I have tried restarting (powering off for about 1 min and turning back on) simultaneously, and powering off switch 1 for 1 min and switch 2 for 2 min.   I have also tried both enabling the stack ports, and disabling followed by enabling.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: C3750 SFP Failure After Reload

Mar 11, 2013

I have a cable from an SFP module in a WS-C3750-48P with 12.2(55)SE1 running to a Gigabit port on a Cisco WLC. After the switch recovers from a power failure, the gigabit autonegotiation fails. The cure is a long drive to unplug and reseat the SFP. Note this happens at too many similar sites for this to be a loose connection. Interface shutdown then 'no shutdown' is not sufficient. The state is 'line protocol is down (not connected)'. Interface is configured for switchport mode trunk (auto speed, auto duplex). Command 'switchport nonegotiate' makes no difference. Is there a more powerful command than 'shutdown' which might toggle the interface signals? Is there some way of resetting the SFP? sh int gi 1/0/1 displays 'media type is 10/100/1000BaseTX SFP' and zero packets received.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Message Error With C3750-I5-M

Jan 2, 2008

I have this system: IOS (tm) C3750 Software (C3750-I5-M), Version 12.1(19)EA1d, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1
 
An error appear in console (many times in one minute):
 
Jan  3 16:25:37: %LINK-3-BADMACREG: Interface StackPort1, non-existent MACADDR registry for link 0
-Process= "<interrupt level>", ipl= 4
-Traceback= 20A364 187F04 58D6FC 58B950 2D7CE0 2E00C8 2E2BEC 2E2F24 2B0BF8
 
What is the problem? What is the solution?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: C3750 - ACL Building For QOS Or Policing

Jun 6, 2012

I would like to apply policing on a C3750 interface, for all traffic matching 10.0.0.0 / 8, except for sub net 10.0.0.0 / 24. I plan to apply the following configuration, with an ACL that denies 10.0.0.0 / 24 then accept 10.0.0.0 / 8. I am quite sure of the answer but need a confirmation about the following configuration correct ? (10.0.0.0 / 24 will be not blocked, and no policing will be apply on it?)
 
ip access-list extended TEST
deny tcp 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 any eq 5000
permit tcp any 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any eq 5000
[code]....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: C3750 - Packets Lost

Nov 21, 2011

I have a stack of 2 C3750-switches (WS-C3750G-24TS-1U) with IPBASE-firmware (12.2(52)SE). 
 
When I ping to a machine (in this case a virtual one), the replies are always received on the port where the machine is connected, but on the port-channel connecting to the stack of the 'pinging device' the reply comes only for certain initiators, and not for all.
 
Setting:
Gi1/0/6: Device/Server I want to connect too ; defined as access port
Gi1/0/25 + Gi2/0/25, as Port-Channel 1: The location of the devices I connect (read as: the uplink to the stack of the PC's), defined for Dot1Q-trunking
 
Monitoring setup: Source ports: Both: Gi 1/0/6, Po1 (or Po1 replaced by both interfaces)
 
For the machines which can ping the server I see 2 echo (ping) requests, followed by 2 echo (ping) replies ... So once seen on the Po1, and once seen on the interface Gi1/0/6.

However for other machines, the 2nd reply is missing ; which must be caused by the dropping of these packets in the switch.  At least, I my opinion this must be the reason... But I can't see any (change of) output drops at int Po1, nor at Gi1/0/6.  The CPU doesn't seem to have high usage, and even then, I don't think the error would be constant, as it's always failing for some PC's, and never for others... (at least for a certain time, a few hours it can be constant, the problem dissapears from time to time).

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved