We are using SRP527 routers with PPPoE ADSL connections. From the SRP527 we create an IPSec tunnel to our core routers (Cisco ASR). We are wanting to change the IPSec tunnels to L2TP, and I need to know if this can be done from the SRP527. I cannot find any L2TP configuration options in the setup options.Can the SRP527W act as an L2TP tunnel initiator over the ADSL PPPoE interface?
View 1 RepliesCurrently we're using Cisco 867 routers, wich connect to a IP-VPN network with internal IP's. I'm trying to test a SRP527W router as a replacement for the current 867 routers, as they are more affordable for our customers in the SMB segment.
However all our 867 routers have 'ip unnumbered' on their dialer interfaces (we're using PPPoA) to avoid NAT and problems with SIP and easy management of the IP Phones behind the router.
Does any know if it is possible to have the same IP on the WAN interface and the LAN interface? If so, how do you configure it in the SRP527W?
I'm installing a new SRP547W for a client and am having trouble setting up a site-to-site vpn. They are using the WAN1 ADSL interface for their internet connection. When I add a sub interface to it I am unable to see the 'Connection Type' drop down like I can see on a WAN2 ethernet sub interface. I have followed the instructions on page 29 provided here: how I can get a a site to site vpn set up on this router using either PPTP or L2TP over the ADSL interface.
View 1 Replies View RelatedMy SRP527W has never had its firmware upgraded since purchase. I had a need to do this recently, but could not find the section under Administration for Firmware upgrade.The only two items under Administration are Time Setup and Switch Setting.I've tried different browsers, to make sure that was not an issue, with no success. Any direct URL to the modem web interface that might allow me to update the firmware. url...Otherwise is there another method using a USB stick or tftp or similar?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have installed a couple of SRP547W's and can't ping the external side of the ADSL interface.
Is there an option to turn on "respond to ping" and also are you able to forward to a internal IP?
Successfull in setting up an L2TP/IPsec tunnel through NAT-T against a Windows 2008/ R2 RRAS server? I am using an 881 router and the layout is someting like this:Client -> 881 -> NAT -> internet -> Windows 2008 RRAS.The tunnel goes form the 881 to the Windows server (not from the client...).
View 4 Replies View RelatedWe have ASA 5520 running 8.2(3) software and we're trying to make Remote Access VPN (l2tp/ipsec) working from Android. We succeeded in making IPSEC tunnel (ending "Phase 2 completed"), but we cannot make L2TP tunnel working.We're using RADIUS for L2TP authentication, but ASA doesn't even try to check credentials entered by use. The same set of credentials entered on Windows {XP, VISTA, 7, Mobile} works ok. Which debugging options should we turned on?
View 3 Replies View Relatedwe have two routers CISCO881-K9 and we have established l2tpv3 pesuduwire between two routers: attached the configuration file for both routers.
Although the l2tp established but we are unable to pass the DHCP or other traffic through l2tp tunnel from router A to router- B. [code]
I have a request from my customer asking to provide a model of cisco router that can support 100k or 50k L2TP tunnel session. I have searching around the cisco website but cannot find the right answer.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to get my Cisco 2811 to authenticate four DSL connections and load balance them by attaching the four DSL to a switch (each DSL going to a seperate VLAN) and then trunking all four VLAN's to a ethernet interface on the 2811. My issue, I can not get more than one DSL to authenticate at a time, for example Dialer1 will connect and then it will disconnect and Dialer2 will connect, etc... I have the modems in bridge mode and I am using seperate user/pass for each DSL account and I have verified that the user/pass are correct.
Below is my config from the router and a couple of messages that came across the console.
*Apr 27 01:12:11.915: %DIALER-6-UNBIND: Interface Vi2 unbound from profile Di1
*Apr 27 01:12:11.927: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Virtual-Access2, changed state to down
[Code].....
I have two Cisco 3845 routers which receive a multicast stram via a tunnel interface, i.e Tunnel163 (PIM Dense mode is enabled). These routers are both connected to a LAN segment (FastEthernet0/1/0) where receivers are. [code] Router1 is the assert winner (highest IP address), it sees igmp joins request, but it's pruning the interface. It happens sometimes and it lasts until I manually issue clear ip mroute.Unfortunately I cannot migrate to Sparse Mode.
View 15 Replies View RelatedI have a IPSec tunnel that is working in one direction. Below is the router config from the side that can connect to the other side perfectly. I believe the issue is with this router as while I was waiting on delivery for the ASA I had an SRP527W sitting in it's place and had exactly the same problem.On one side I have a 887VA router and the other an ASA5505.The network behind the 887VA can access the remote site perfectly, backup services are traversing the link as are web interfaces for applications. In the other direction I can ping hosts but cannot connect. What else is interesting is if from the remote site I attempt to connect to a particular device that performs a port redirect the remote site browser gets so far as being redirected to port 5000 but then hangs.
I am seeing some very generic packet drop debug notices on the 887va on the NAT-ACL access list but I think this is as it should be as it is dropping the tunnel traffic from the NAT'ing.The config for the router is here, I will post the ASA config when I get to the other site shortly but I am convinced the issues is on this device, all the crypto configurations match.I have looked at the MTU's on each side, the path MTU on both sides is 1492. The asa does say the media MTU is 1500 but I believe that is the ADSL link so shouldnt matter?I even went so far as installing CCP and testing the VPN. It says the tunnel is up. It did state a failure:A ping with data size of this VPN interface MTU size and 'Do not Fragment' bit set to the other end VPN device is failing. This may happen if there is a lesser MTU network which drops the 'Do not fragment' packets. [code]
I'm having some problems getting an ipsec tunnel established between a cisco 887VA router and a cisco srp527w router.I am working from a few text books and some example materials. I have worked through many combinations of what I have got and am still struggling a little bit.I look at debug results and it appears as though the policies do not match between the devices:
Jul 23 05:44:37.759: ISAKMP (0): received packet from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX dport 500 sport 500 Global (R) MM_NO_STATE
broute1#
Jul 23 05:44:57.079: ISAKMP:(0):purging SA., sa=85247558, delme=85247558
broute1#
Jul 23 05:45:17.031: ISAKMP (0): received packet from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX dport 500 sport 500 Global (N) NEW SA
[code]....
Some specific questions:
1) on the SRP in the example's I have used (and I have a few SRP->SRP VPN's that work) I see you need to enter the preshared key, I'm not seeing in the examples I have used anything about the IKE preshared key on the IOS box. Any examples where you use the preshared key for IKE? I wonder if this is my primary issue as it states clearly in the log that there is no Preshared key :|
2) I have used a mish mash of names between the various sections as on the SRP the naming convention isnt the same; ie: which parts of the IPSEC negotiation come from the IKE policy section and which from the IPSEC policy section. Do the names really matter across different ends of the VPN?
3) I notice when I perform this command in the(config-crypto-map)#:
set peer FQDN
It is converted to:
set peer XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
Is this expected? I want the device to look at the FQDN as this particular host is using DDNS and not use a static IP address.
I m getting the below debug log and can not get IP from my ISP. It is static IP address and there is modem in bridge mode for the adsl line.
Below Conf and debug out put,interface GigabitEthernet0/1
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
pppoe enable group global
pppoe-client dial-pool-number 2
end
[Code]....
I've got problem trying to connect the CISCO-887VDSL/ADSL OVER POTS ROUTER to internet. Only got the LAN part working.I'm trying to setup PPPoE with dynamic IP Followed CISCO's documentations but the commands used were not recognized by the router.
here's my config.
!
! Last configuration change at 08:31:51 UTC Sat Feb 11 2012
version 15.1
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
[code]....
I need to configure configuring pppoe ADSL on cisco 887VG
View 5 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to set up a WAN interface on a FastEthernet interface of a Cisco 877 Adsl Router ?Due to my ISP, i've to use an external VDSL modem and must connect it to my cisco 877 router (and leave it's adsl interface unused).But i don't know how to set up a wan port, other than the adsl interface itself (dialer0), on my cisco.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI'm in process of purchasing a new Cisco routers for our branches that will be used primary to enable IPSec virtual tunnel interfce with "tunnel mode ipsec ipv4". does the default IOS IP Base supports this feature? or i need to purchase DATA license or SECURITY license?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI would like know is that possible to connect two 5505 ASA in site to site VPN with 1 site using ADSL pppoe connection?
View 5 Replies View RelatedHave an ADSL router (887) at a site which has a GRE tunnel to to a 3745.The GRE tunnel is setup with default ip mtu of 1476.If I ping from the 3745 to the ADSL router (or in the reverse direction)with a packet size of 1500 bytes this works fine.However if I ping from a router (R1) that is directly connected to 3745 to the ADSL router with a pkt size of1500 bytes then the first ping succeeds while the subsequent pings fail.Pkt sizes less than or equal to 1476 work okay.Pinging between R1 and the 3745 with a packet size of 1500 bytes works fine.If I set the tunnel ip mtu size to 1500 bytes then it works.This is obviously something to do with fragmentation, but I don't undertsand why itdoesn't work with the default mtu set to 1476.
View 11 Replies View RelatedWe have a Cisco ASA 5510 with:
-version: asa845-k8.bin
-ASDM: asdm-711-52.bin
Interface "Outside" is a PPPOE configuration.We currently have 36 site to site VPN connections up and running through the "Outside" interface. Now when we try to add, via ASDM, a new site to site VPN connection, we can not choose the "Outside" interface. The interface is just not available. All other interfaces are, bot those are inside interfaces.
I tried running ASDM on a different computer (thought that ASDM or java got corrupted perhaps), but the same problem appeared.Now when we "shutdown" the outside interface and "no shutdown" it again, the "Outside" interface is available again when you add a new site to site VPN profile.
Sidenote: if we check the current profile of a succesful running site to site VPN, it say's that it's using an inside interface. But that is, ofcourse, not possible.
I've been looking to see if its possible to create a GRE tunnel between a Cisco 2901 with 3 adsl WIC cards and a Cisco ASA.The Cisco 2901 is at our remote office and we have 3 adsl lines for resillience as they tend to go down alot.The Cisco ASA is at our Head Office sitting behind our ISP's managed router.
The desired end result would be to have three GRE tunnels, 1 for each DSL line terminating on the ASA at head office and use EIGRP routing protocol to move traffic across to another tunnel should one fail, and encapsulate all of that with IPSEC.
if the SRP527W supports QOS over a site to site VPN.
SITE A will have the main phone system and SITE B will have a couple of phones which hook into the SITE A phone system over the existing IPSEC VPN
Need to be able to set some type of QOS over the VPN connection.
We just purchased the WRVS4400N router with high hopes. For some reason, our ISP provides a connection through L2TP Dynamic for a static IP. I repeat, L2TP Dynamic. Is there anyway to properly configure the router to use such a connection method. I only see L2TP Static, which seems to be the standard method for many routers.
View 1 Replies View Relatedi am now trying to configure a Cisco Small Business Pro SRP 521w router for a branch office, i am trying to get the router to connect to a L2TP VPN server inside my datacenter, but seems to me like L2TP VPN client function is not supported inside the SRP 521w router.
Can Cisco implement L2TP VPN client into the firmware for the SRP 521w router in the future ?
Is it possible to redirect all web traffic to a Symantec web filtering address on a particular listening port. I had a look at the Srp527w Router and can't find where this could be done.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a SRP527W router connected to a L2 managed switch (a TP-Link... I know, it is not a Cisco...). and a PC and a Printer connected to the switch. Now, I want to have the PC and the printer on 2 VLANs.
I've created 2 VLANs on the SRP (192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.2.0/24) and I have assigned Lan port 1 to both. The SRP acts a DHCP server so I have the SRP setup as 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.2.1 providing IP addresses to the 2 VLANs.
I setup VLAN 1 and 2 on the switch, assigning port 2 to VLAN 1 and port 3 to VLAN 2 (port 1 is trunk and connects to the SRP).
When I fire up the PC and printer they get their respective VLANs correct addresses (PC: 192.168.1.30 and printer: 192.168.2.30) but I cannot for the love of Odin see the printer from the PC. The SRP has Inter VLAN routing enabled. By the way, the switch has address 192.168.1.2
I have a network which is based upon a 4507 Core/Dist switch, with 1G fibre to a bunch of radially connected 2960 Access switches. It all works fine and as expected for data and telephony.I have been tasked with setting up one of the VLANs to support multicast, so a bunch of video streams will be injected at the 4507, and will be delivered to client PCs connected to the 2960 switches.The 4507 is running with SVIs to some VLANs, but the VLAN that will have the Multicast on it is isolated, with no SVI.I could change this if required,I need to run IGMP snooping, and probably deploy CGMP to take advantage of the Cisco-proprietary functionaity.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI've got a new Cisco srp527w-u router which is working fine though it's syncing at a lower rate than my Billion (6mbps vs. 8.5 mbps for the billion on the same line). I had tweaked the billion way back to connect with a 4db SNR margin and almost certainly this is why it achieves the higher rate (by comparison the cisco is syncing with an snr margin of 12db). Is there some way that I can configure it to use a lower SNR margin? I realize this might reduce connection stability but I'd at least like to be able to give it a try if possible.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI recently bought a Cisco SRP527W and I'm trying to setup a second wireless network for guests.
I created a "guest" VLAN and I assigned the "guest" SSID which I have created.
I created a "guest" DHCP server and assigned it to the "guest" VLAN.
The "guest" SSID is set to broadcast and has WPA2 Personal (TKIP+AES) authentication. These are exactly the same settings I have for the "non-guest" WiFi.
However, I can't get my clients to connect to the network. The "guest" WiFi is visible and clients are prompted to enter the password but after that they end up with an APIPA address. When I move the "guest" SSID to VLAN1 (along with all the other networks) then it works absolutely fine.
I was just wondering if I'm simply missing something in the configuration ..
The device is running the latest firmware (1.01.24 (003) September 7, 2011)
DHCP server has DNS Proxy setting enabled and WAN Interface configured as "Default Route" (have basically replicated the same settings as VLAN1)
my client has just had the above router supplied by telstra and upon setup can no longer access filemaker server which was accessed prior on their netgear router. I have port forwarded to 5003 and 16000 as per the previous setup. Is there another setting somewhere that i am missing like perhaps static ip or something. I might add that networking is not my strong point.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI've just received a new SRP527W-U-E-K9 router to replace an old D-link router. However Apple IOS devices are not discoverable by iTunes on a Windows PC. The PC is connected to SRP527 by wired ethernet. All IOS devices are on the same SSID and the same VLAN as the wired ethernet devices.I have been reading on several other threads in this site about this exact same problem. The fault was that multicast broadcasts were not being forwarded between wired ethernet and WiFi on the same vlan. url...
The fault in thie above thread was resolved by a firmware update MR3 (v1.1.19) last year however it appears that the SRP527W-U has slightly different firmware to this version.The configuration of my SRP527 is the same as the original poster's config in the above thread. [code] The version information of my SRP is embedded below. As it is brand new, I assume that it is the most recent firmware, so I would have assumed that the bug which was resolved in the above thread above would be incorporated in this firmware version. [code] Is Cisco aware of this problem and is there any other firmware that I can load onto my model of SRP to resolve this?
I have a Cisco SRP527W at my remote office set up. I have configered a VPN connection to it. I installed Cisco VPN Client on my laptop.I can connect to the VPN but can not access the shared folders. I can ping the PC that has the shared folders. I take my PC and connect to the onsite LAN with WIFI, and I can now view the shared folders. I assume it must be somthing in the VPN set up that is blocking the shared folders from being seen. I also have disconnect all firewalls during testing at the remote end. I'am using windows 7 (64) on both PC's.
View 6 Replies View Related