Cisco Switches :: Does SG200 Support VLAN Trunking
Apr 15, 2013does SG200 support VLAN Trunking?
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 - Vlan Trunking Between Switches Not Working
Jun 3, 2012We have two Cisco switches with one 3560 and one 3750 we have created a new Vlan 4 with IP 10.1.3.x 255.255.255.0 - no shut then assigne to gi 2/0/46 on the 3560 Vlan 4 ip address 10.1.3.x 255.255.255.0 no shut then assign to FA0/45. All interfaces are up up along with the Vlan up up, we can ping the local IP address bu not able to pint the other switch.
View 2 Replies View RelatedLinksys Wired Router :: Vlan Trunking 2960 And 2950 Switches
Feb 18, 2011I have a number of class-'c's as a hand-off from my data center fiber to my 2960, which then sprawls the racks with about many 2950 switches, mostly 20 machines per switch. To allow machines on one 2950 to push data to another 2950 without routing back to my ISP's router(which costs money for bandwidth) isn't is possible to trunk one port on each 2950 to another 2950 and adding a addititional vlan8 to them. Then data jumps from 2950 to 2950 without going back to the 2960 or mainly not going back to my ISP's router. Is this the correct way to accoplish this with extra vlan and trunking the 2950's to each other or am I looking at this all wrong?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: SG200 Support For RADUIS Device Authentication
Dec 6, 2011I am unable to successfully authenticate my SG200 to either a Cisco ACS or Windows2008 RADUIS server. (C3750x on the same network authenticates fine).
Q1. Is this feature (management login authentication to a RADIUS server) supported on the SG200?
Q2. Is so is there any configuration guidance available for both the SG200 and CSACS / WindowsServer2008 NPS?
I hav not got as far as 802.1x uthentication yet, but config example of this would laso be useful.
Cisco Switches :: SG200-26 VLAN To SPA303 Not Working?
Apr 16, 2013We recently purchsed a SG200-26 and have several SPA303 with the 2 ports. The other component is a Sonicwall NSA3500.The SG200-26 is on an interface of the Sonicwall that interface has a primary of 172.20.3.x and the sub interface is 172.20.5.x. I labed the VLAN as 5?I went to the "Create VLAN" in the SG200-26 and also created VLAN 5 and under Voice VLAN the ID is 5.Then I went to the SmartPort and assigned GE24 as IP Phone + Desktop. That was OK. But when I go to the SPA303 and Enable VLAN and VLAN ID 5 I get Initializing Network. I am able to ping the 172.20.5.1 which is the gateway for the VLAN but still pull no IP. I also have an DHCP range assinged the subinterface.I also am using Cisco Configuration Assistant. I can see the switch SG200-26 and my IP set but it shows no IP. So I know that the CDP from the phone to the switch is working.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: Unable To Get SG200-26 VLAN Configuration
Feb 20, 2013Below is my configuration so far.
GE1 General 1UP, 100T, 101T
GE26 General 1UP, 100U, 101U
But I could not get port GE1 on vlan 100 to ping to anything on GE26.It only works when i change it to 100UP... BUT the rest of the vlan ID (101) will still unable to work.
Yes. i need multiple vlan on a single port as I am running Virtual machines on the GE1 and GE26 is an uplink I need all vlan to communicate from GE1 to GE26. Is this possible?
Cisco Switches :: Can't Open Port To VLAN Menu In SG200 -08
Jan 29, 2012I get a empty blue window when I try to open "port to VLAN"
We have upgraded the software but it doesn't work.
Cisco Switches :: SV220W / SG200 - Proper Vlan Setup?
May 21, 2013i have a question about the proper method to setup up vlan(s) on a sg200 switch with a sv220w router. Should i setup the vlan on the router or the switch? I have small office setup, i need atleast 2 vlans to separate the networks. i want both to have internet access but be completely isolated from each other.
View 5 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: SG200-26 Switch VLAN And Internet Access
May 9, 2012I start writing this post telling you that I'm not a qualified network admin, so I beg your pardon if I do not use appropriate terms in my question. Also my english in not so good since I'm Italian and my english in almost scholastic.
This is the "story" :
I bought two switches as described above and actually I have to create 2 VLANS as described below :
VLAN id 2 name "Service_A" ports 1-4
VLAN id 3 name "Service_B" ports 7-9
all other ports can stay in default VLAN1.
my network infrastructure have some other very simple swtiches connected and 1 soho router (static ip 192.168.1.1) with dhcp active and ip pool address released from 192.168.1.100 to 200.
the SG200-26 have static ip 192.168.1.254 and 192.168.1.253
MY NEEDS:
I need VLAN for privacy matter so all computer connected to ports in VLAN2 cannot see nor enumerate PCs and resources on other VLANs, but I also absolutely NEED that all computer in every ports (and every VLAN even default VLAN1) can access the internet.
Cisco Switches :: Restricted Inter-VLAN Routing With SG200-26 And SG300-10
Feb 26, 2013My organization wishes to host a LAN gaming event. The setup I have in mind involves a 24-port switch for connecting all the player computers and having that switch connected to a smaller "core" switch which has the the game server and router connected to it. I'd like to know if I can set things up as follows...
SG200-26 with ports 1-24 on seperate VLANs so they cannot talk to eachother. I'd then like ports 25 and 26 to be an aggregated (for bandwidth and redundancy) trunk port to carry all 24 VLANs plus an additional management VLAN (ex. VLAN 100) that will be used for accessing the switch. I'd like those aggregated trunk ports to connect to an SG300-10 "core" switch which will be connected to the game server and to a router for internet access.
I'd like the ability to have two network connections from the game server to the switch, one on the management VLAN and one on a different VLAN (ex. VLAN 50) that will be accessed by the players (ports 1-24 on the SG200-26). The core switch needs the ability to perform restricted inter-VLAN routing, in that it doesn't allow VLANs 1-24 to talk to eachother but they can talk to the server's VLAN but only through specific service ports (ex. port 12345, 12346). Is this possible?
Furthermore how would I configure the SG300-10 to allow VLANs 1-24 to talk to VLAN 50, but not themselves or VLAN 100. As well, I'll probably have the router on it's own VLAN (ex. VLAN 60) and allow VLANs 1-24 to access it but only through HTTP port 80 for web access.
Cisco Switches :: SG200-50 VLAN For VoIP Phones Connected To SRP541W Router
Apr 15, 2013I am new to VLANs although I generally understand the concept. I have a small office with 25 desktop/laptops and 15 VoIP phones connected with a SG200-50 switch and on Port 1 I have the Cisco SRP541W router for DHCP and Internet access. My goal is simple: 1) Segregate the VoIP phones (voice) from the computers (data) and 2) Prioritize the VoIP phones traffic.
I believe this can be accomplished by setting up a second VLAN and maybe a third (if the default should not be used) and then identifying those ports as Voice VLAN ports. I guess I just need to know how to flag each interface and each port so that they all can talk to the router on Port 1 yet the voice and data will be in different broadcast domains. Also, do I need a management VLAN??
Is this setup correct? VLAN 1 - default (data) Port 1 (Trunk) (Tagged)Port 2 - 30 (Access) (Untagged)VLAN 2 - voice Port 1 (Trunk) (Tagged)Port 31 - 48 (Access) (Untagged) What should the interface settings be on each port (General, Access or Trunk)? What should the port VLAN membership be on each port (Tagged or Untagged)??
Cisco Switches :: SG200-08 And SG200-08P Fail To Hold Or Update Date / Time
May 24, 2011SG200-08 and SG200-08P fail to hold or update Date/Time.(New installation for a UC320 setup.)I've got both an SG200-08 and SG200-08P that are failing to maintain date/time when set with "Use Local Settings". Every restart/powercycle causes them to reset to Dec 31 1969. Other settings save fine.I first tried to set time via SNTP Unicast using a variety of public time server addresses including the 3 hard coded to the SG200-08 firmware:
Sadly though it always just shows "Active Server Server Host Address: 0.0.0.0" and continues having 12/31/1969 as the date. Both after a config save and a reboot.I can ping the NTP servers just fine from the switches either by IP or by hostname.At this point I've decided that I must be missing something simple. At least I hope so... otherwise it's a firmware bug which means waiting for a fix.Other devices behind the same firewall/gateway (RVS4000) are updating NTP
Cisco Switches :: SG200-18 To C2960S Trunked - SG200 Cut Off The Net
Apr 29, 2012how to connect our new SG200-18 to an existing Cisco network, in particular a C2960S.Here's what I've got:
<----- Rest of network ------- C2960S ----------- SG200 ----- (PC connected directly to the SG200)
On the C2960S-side here's what I've got on the corresponding interface:
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
switchport mode trunk
On the SG200-side I've set the IP-address and default-gateway accordingly, however:From the SG200 I can't ping any other host on the same IP-subnet as the switchFrom the SG200 can't ping the default-gatewaycan't ping from any other host or the default-gateway *to* the switch But:On the SG200 I've got plenty of MAC-addresses under "Dynamic Address Table" - however only MAC-addresses that belong to the management-VLAN of the SG200 (i.e. VLAN9 in my case)The MAC-address table on the SG200 even includes the MAC-addresses of hosts on the same VLAN I tried to ping without success. For example: I tried a PING from a host having a MAC-address of 00:19:bb:31:91:30. This MAC shows up in the arp table of the SG200. To cross check I connected a dedicated PC to the SG200 and assign it an IP-address out of the management-LAN-range of the SG200 - in this case I can access the switch (i.e. PING, WEB etc.)So to summarize: Connectivity is OK when going from directly connected devices to the SG200. No connectivity from devices that are behind the C2960S towards the SG200 and vice versa. (The problem is definitely not with the C2960S-side since we've got plenty of them hooked together without problems.) I'm enclosing the screenshots of the corresponding definitions on the SG200.
Cisco Switches :: Very Slow Transfers Between SG200-18 And SG200-8?
Apr 16, 2013I'm baffled by the poor performance that I'm seeing when passing traffic between my two Cisco SG switches.
The configuration is as basic as I can make it, no VLANs, QoS or bonding. Both have been updated to current firmware as part of the troubleshooting process.
When I transfer data within one of my switches I see 50/60Mb/s. When I pass the same traffic between both switches I see 0.6 Mbs/ or less.
I have tried to eliminate every possible factor including switching out the cables. No success.
Cisco Switches :: VLAN Support On ESW 500 Switch?
Jul 4, 2009How many VLANs does the ESW 500 switch support?
View 4 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: ASA VLan Trunking To 3750?
Oct 24, 2011I have a rather large network with multiple VLANs and routing. Here's the layout:
5540 subinterface = gi0/2.18 = 10.16.18.1/24 TRUNKED to a 2960
2960 has an interface set to VLAN 18 (no IP) goes to a Cisco 4507 with an int. set to VLAN 18 (no IP)
4507 then has a trunk to a Cisco 7206
7206 then trunks to a Cisco 3845
3845 trunks to a 3750 (single)
3750 (single) trunks to a 3750 Stack
3750 Stack has int. set to VLAN 18 that goes to a 3750(lab) w/ int set to VLAN 18 w/ IP 10.16.18.251/24, VLAN502 = 10.202.255.1/30,
VLAN510 = 10.203.255.1/30
3750(lab) then has a trunk that connects to ASA 5510 w/ subinterfaces: e0/1.18 = 10.16.18.253/24, e0/1.510 = 10.203.255.2/30, e0/1.502 = 10.202.255.2/30
ASA5510 then goes to Internet
Any trunks are set to allow all VLANs. From the 2960 to the 3750 stack it's obviously all Layer 2 with trunking.
Issue:If I sit at the 5540, I can ping 10.16.18.251 and .253 with no problems. I can also ping 10.203.255.1 with no problems. Problem is that I cannot get to the other subinterfaces on the 5510 for VLANs 502 and 510. How do I ensure that my trunk is set up right? I have a route in the 5540 pointing to the 10.203 and 10.202 using the 10.16.18.251 address. It seems like a traceroute gets to the 10.16.18.251 address but then it stops. What route should be on the 5510 to make sure it gets back? The default route on the 5510 points to the Outside. I think it's something to do with the trunk that's just something I don't understand yet.
5510:
show int ip bri:
Ethernet0/1.18 10.16.18.253 YES manual up up
Ethernet0/1.502 10.202.255.2 YES manual up up
Ethernet0/1.510 10.203.255.2 YES manual up up
[code]....
Netwoking :: VLAN Trunking On Router 1700
Feb 11, 2011I have a Cisco 1700 series router (i dont know exact series number) running:
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(7r)XM4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
ROM: Cisco IOS Software, C1700 Software (C1700-K9O3SY7-M), Version 12.3(7)XR3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
installed is a WIC-4ESW card.
This should be simple, cant get it working. in a nutshell... I'm trying to configure fa0 as a vlan "trunk" port trunking vlans 1 and 20 from my managed switch (switch is configured correctly) and i want fa1 on vlan 1 and fa2 on vlan 20.
another words:
fa0 tagged with vlan 1 & 20
fa1 untagged with vlan 1
fa2 untagged with vlan 20
Code:
! Last configuration change at 20:35:48 EST Sat Feb 12 2011
! NVRAM config last updated at 20:47:38 EST Sat Feb 12 2011
version 12.3
[Code] .....
Cisco Routers :: SRP526 VLAN Trunking For AP With Multiple SSIDs
Feb 17, 2013Getting a AIR-AP1141N to work with an existing SRP526.
The SRP has two VLANs and two SSIDS
- VLAN1 - Corporate Wireless
- VLAN100 - Guest Wireless
So far so good. Now we need to extend the Range of the Wireless and bought an AIR-AP1141N. And this AccessPoint works like a charm, BUT only with one SSID,
I configured in the Port Management Area of the SRP526 both VLANs on one Port and configured the Access Point for multiple SSID use, but i don't get an IP from the DHCP Server Range of the VLAN100.
Could it be possible, that die Access Point can not get the tag Information?
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 1000v Private-Vlan Trunking
Apr 14, 2011Having problem pinging from Host A on ESX1 to Host B on ESX2. Each host are assigned the same port-profile. If I put 2 host's on the same ESX machine using the same port-profile, they are able to ping each other.
n1kv-vsm# sh port-profile name xxx-prod-40port-profile xxx-prod-40 description: type: vethernet status: enabled capability l3control: no pinning control-vlan: - pinning packet-vlan: - system vlans: 1 port-group: xxxl-prod-40 max ports: 32 inherit: config attributes: switchport mode private-vlan host switchport private-vlan host-association 40 400 no shutdown evaluated config attributes: switchport mode private-vlan host switchport private-vlan host-association 40 400 no shutdown assigned interfaces: Vethernet3 Vethernet4
System-uplink profile is trunking all vlans.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: HP ProCurve 5406 VLAN Trunking To 3560
Jan 12, 2010I have a HP Procurve 5406 connected to a Cisco 3560 on a temporary cat5e connection and I have Mitel IP phones needing to go on the Cisco switch.Ive configured the HP Procurve port to TAGGING both VLAN 10 (data) and VLAN 20 (Voice). NO is selected for default VLAN 1.The Cisco is configured on the port with switchport encap dot1q and switchport mode trunk.
Ive configured an IP for interface VLAN 10 and i cannot ping it from across the network. The interfaces are up and happy. I have tried changing the VTP status from transparent to server (VTP pruning is off) ive tried setting allowed vlans 10,20. Still not a think. The worse thing is that i have a working Cisco switch with the HP procurve that i checked the config on and its the same! The only difference is that the media type is SX over SFP in that case.
p.s not that im at this stage yet but i initially configure the FastE ports as trunks with native vlans because i was using non-cisco phones. On a spare port i convigured the voice vlan 20 and i say on the mitel phone that it was looking on vlan20! I didnt expect that, i thought the Voice VLAN ID was carried on CDP enabled devices only.
ASA 5505 - VLAN Tagging / Trunking Power-connect 2716?
Oct 30, 2011Having an issue getting my DMZ vlan working. Running my ASA5505 and i have configured e0/2 for DMZ w/ VLAN ID 3. Connected to my 2716 on port2.Inside e0/1 w/ VLAN ID 1. Connected to my 2716 on port1.
I am trying to get my DMZ Vlan to ports3&4 (LAG1) but when i assign the LAG group to PVID 3 i lose connectivity on VLAN1. I want to send both VLANs to that host because the teamed adaptor is used for Hyper-v Network Switch.
Cisco Switches :: SG200-18 Switches With LC Single Mode Fiber SFP's
Dec 2, 2012We have a project in which we are using 34 Cisco SG200-18's each with a MGBLX1 (LC Single Mode Fiber) SFP mini-GBIC.All the fiber's come back to one building where we must "bridge" all 34 fiber connections. What hardware should be used to accomplish this? A L2 switch? For example, a 12 port SFP Switch with Fiber SFP's accepting the first 12 fiber connections, then other switch with SFP for the next 12 and so on, until there is a overall capacity of 36 and having patch cables between the 3 switches?
what cisco or non cisco hardware would work with these SF200-18's to accomplish this?
Cisco Switches :: Trunking On SLM2024
Aug 8, 2011We are trying to implement a SLM2024 into our environment to be used on a lab bench. I am trying to get trunked traffic from a Catalyst 4948 to this switch. The Cisco documentation on how to do this on the 2024 is not very good. Does nyon know the correct way to do this. Currently I have ports 1 and 2 in a LAG and would like to use these as my trunk ports for the switch. I have roughly 10 vlans I am trying to gett over to the switch.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: SG200-50 - Does It Have Support For SNMP?
Jul 4, 2012Does Cisco SG200-50 50 port gigabit smart switch have support for SNMP ? I have updated the firmware and still can not find any option for snmp.Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App.
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: Replacing Some Netgear Switches With SG200
May 16, 2012We are replacing some netgear switches with the Cisco SG200. The situation is relatively straightforward. We have a series of VLAN's coming in on a trunk from a service provider for our Metro Ethernet locations. These trunks then get cross-connect to various location for connectivity. The problem we have is there are two VLAN's that need to go to the same switch which provides access to our public IP block.
I set up the two VLAN's on the SG200 with the trunk port VLAN tagging on the service provider port. Then I set up a separate port for untagging the traffic with the PVID of the respective VLANS's as follows: [code] The public switch has no VLAN's configured (it is an SG200 too). If I connect GE2 to the public switch everything works fine. When I connect GE3 to the public switch, things die. I thought this might be caused by STP although STP should not be detecting issues like this across separate VLAN's. Disabled STP, no change.The same configuration with the Netgear worked without an issue. FYI, the VLAN's cannot be changed...they are defined by the service provider in this particular case. otherwise we'd just make them the same..
Cisco Switches :: ASA5505 - Does IOS Like CLI Exist In SG200 Switches
Aug 28, 2011I need to purchase a few Gigabit PoE switches for a small business and I am thinking that SG200 or SG300 switches are perfect for this purpose.
Layer 3 functionality in SG300 switches is not great - HSRP or any other next-hop redundancy protocol is not supported, dynamic routing protocols are not supported, policy-based routing is not supported, etc. I may get one SG300 switch for inter-VLAN routing so that I do not have to send traffic to a Layer 3 device for this purpose, especially because my Layer 3 device (ASA5505) has only 10/100 Mbps interfaces. All other switches in the network don't have to be Layer 3 switches, and I am thinking of perhaps getting SG200 instead of SG300 swithces. However, because I am a long-time Cisco engineer, and know ins and outs of the IOS CLI, I would much rather administer the switches with CLI rather than GUI. So, do SG200 switches provide CLI (even if it is not officially supported) or is the only Small Business switch platform that supports CLI SG300? I do realize that the OS running on these switches is not IOS, but after having reviewed the CLI manual for SG300, I would say that 90+% of commands are identical to IOS CLI commands.
Cisco Switches :: CLI Access To SG200 Switches?
Dec 27, 2012I just picked up a pair of 18-port SG200s, and I'm trying to figure out of there's some secret trick to getting CLI access to them? I've upgraded to the latest version of firmware (1.2.7.76) hoping that may work, but no luck.I can tell the guts to support a CLI are there, because writing the config out to a TFTP server shows identical an identical config style to the SG500 I have here.Is there some way to enable it?
View 5 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: SG200 Vlans Across Two Switches
May 22, 2011I am trying to set up three vlans across two switches. The switches are Cisco SG200 and SG 300 series. There are 20 devices connected to the two switches including a router for Internet. Among these devices are five wireless access points all hardwired to the LAN. If I understand correctly the first thing I have to do is aggregate the two switches. I ran two cat5 cables to ports 1 and 2 of each switch. As I understand it all I need to do is to create SAG with the two ports on each switch. I think I need to use tagging but I don't really understand how to do this. Once I get the trunking set up correctly I want to create one vlan to which all devices will belong for Internet access. The other two would be for data and VoIP. Do I create vlans with the same name on both switches? When I assign the devices (by port) do I need to enable tagging? Which type of port setting should I use? I am assuming that by including the acess points in the vlans will mean that any wireless device connected to them will have acess to the Internet and the devices in the same vlan.
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: Routing / Trunking Between SG300-10 And Dell Powerconnect
Oct 28, 2012I just purchased a SG300-10 switch and loaded the newest 1.27 firmware on it. Setup my VLANS and trunks but I have this weird issue. My setup:
I have the SG300-10 as my main switch and changed it over to L3 so it can be my main core in my small network. On port 1, vlan 200 is setup as my native PVID untagged and I have it set to trunk vlan's 210(LAN network), 220 (management vlan) tagged over to a Dell powerconnect 5224 24port switch. On port 1 of the Dell switch, I have it setup as a trunk there as well with the same setup (native PVID vlan set to 200 untagged, trunking 210 and 220 tagged).
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Trunking Between Catalyst 2950 Switches?
May 14, 2012have setup a small lab as per CBTNuggets. Everything was going well until I introduced a second switch to create a trunk. Now I cannot ping between my two switches. Both show operational mode as down:
SWITCH1#show interfaces f0/12 switchport
Name: Fa0/12
Switchport: Enabled
Administrative Mode: trunk
Operational Mode: down
Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
[code]....
I have tried to allow all vlans or vlan 1 specifically and the output of the above doesn't seem to change. I am wondering if there is something in the config-register that is preventing trunking, but I don't really know enough yet!
The output of my second switch is identical to this one, the only difference is that I have it configured as a vtp client.
Cisco Switches :: SG-200 To 887 Setup Trunking Between These 2 Devices For Multiple VLANs
Mar 28, 2012We have a Cisco 887 router and a Cisco SG-200 switch.We'd like to setup trunking between these 2 devices for multiple VLANs on the switch to be made available on the router.
With previous routers, you could set the router up in the configuration 'router-on-a-stick' and VLANs worked like a charm but the 887 no longer support sub-interfaces.So how can you get trunking working between the 2 devices?
Is there a VTP configuration menu for the SG-200 which we can setup in order for it to talk 'VTP' with the 887 router??
Cisco Routers :: VLAN To VLAN Firewall Rules Support Missing On RV180?
Jan 12, 2013How do I submit an RFE (Request For Enhancement) to the Cisco SBR team to encourage them to implement the missing support for VLAN to VLAN firewall rules that was available in the RVS4000 (See [URL]) and that was supposedly added to a beta release of the RV220W firmware (See [URL])?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: How To Connect Two Switches 4505 Using Trunking Method
Dec 26, 2011How Can i Connect two switches 4505 using the trunking method,…
View 1 Replies View Related