Linksys Wired Router :: Vlan Trunking 2960 And 2950 Switches
Feb 18, 2011
I have a number of class-'c's as a hand-off from my data center fiber to my 2960, which then sprawls the racks with about many 2950 switches, mostly 20 machines per switch. To allow machines on one 2950 to push data to another 2950 without routing back to my ISP's router(which costs money for bandwidth) isn't is possible to trunk one port on each 2950 to another 2950 and adding a addititional vlan8 to them. Then data jumps from 2950 to 2950 without going back to the 2960 or mainly not going back to my ISP's router. Is this the correct way to accoplish this with extra vlan and trunking the 2950's to each other or am I looking at this all wrong?
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 14, 2012
have setup a small lab as per CBTNuggets. Everything was going well until I introduced a second switch to create a trunk. Now I cannot ping between my two switches. Both show operational mode as down:
SWITCH1#show interfaces f0/12 switchport
Name: Fa0/12
Switchport: Enabled
Administrative Mode: trunk
Operational Mode: down
Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
[code]....
I have tried to allow all vlans or vlan 1 specifically and the output of the above doesn't seem to change. I am wondering if there is something in the config-register that is preventing trunking, but I don't really know enough yet!
The output of my second switch is identical to this one, the only difference is that I have it configured as a vtp client.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 15, 2013
does SG200 support VLAN Trunking?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 2, 2013
Is it possible to run VTP V3 on 2950 and 2960 switches. If so what version of IOS supports V3? Our 2960s are running 12.2(25r)SEE1, and 2950s are running 12.1(22)EA4a. Neither of which supports v3.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 3, 2012
We have two Cisco switches with one 3560 and one 3750 we have created a new Vlan 4 with IP 10.1.3.x 255.255.255.0 - no shut then assigne to gi 2/0/46 on the 3560 Vlan 4 ip address 10.1.3.x 255.255.255.0 no shut then assign to FA0/45. All interfaces are up up along with the Vlan up up, we can ping the local IP address bu not able to pint the other switch.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 12, 2012
I am aware that private-vlans are not supported on edge switches like 2960 series - so my question is would it be possibel to ceate private vlans on say just the core switch which would be a 3570 or 4506 that supports private vlans and then just trunk these to the edge like normal vlans?what I need to achive is to have edge port not able to communicate to each other even across switches - which cannot be done using 'protected' port so need the private vlan feature?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 8, 2011
How do you enable multicast traffic on 2900 series switches?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Aug 27, 2012
I have more than 20 Cisco switches in my office which is basically a soap manufacturing factory. The switches include Cisco 2950, 2960, 3560, 3750 etc. We have routers also which include 2821, 2951 etc. We also have Cisco WLC 2125 and LAP 1262 series. Sometimes all these devices management comes very tough to us.
We need to log on to different devices for troubleshooting/network management which sometimes becomes very tough to us. So I wonder if there any Cisco applications or tools by which we can centrally manage all these devices.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 7, 2012
I am looking into the possibility of using private vlan's for some dmz implementations however I do have what may be some very rudimentary questions. It seems straightforward how to configure the primary/secondary vlan configuration as well as associating them. However in my case I would be looking to configure the PVLAN on a 6500-vss platform acting as the router while all of the hosts which I would desire to have in the isolated vlan would be spread out across a number of older Cisco switches which only support "protected port" setup or Procurve switches all of which I do not have budget to replace with something newer. So in my scenario I would have a 6500 connected by trunk to multiple switches which only support a protected port setup such as a Procurve (top of rack) or a Cisco 2950. As the Procurve or 2950 would not support Private VLAN setup, do I then just configure the secondary vlan to be allowed across the trunk from the 6500, configure that vlan on the Procurve or 2950 (as vtp will not foward the info for the secondary vlan) and assign that vlan to the host port as well as setting it as a protected port and this will communicate just fine across the trunk to the router as well as stopping the protected port in top of rack switch 1 from being able to communicate to a protected port in top of rack 2,3,etc? If the above scenario is what needs to be done, do I just use a regular trunk or do I have to use a PVLAN trunk?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 11, 2011
I have a Cisco 1700 series router (i dont know exact series number) running:
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(7r)XM4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
ROM: Cisco IOS Software, C1700 Software (C1700-K9O3SY7-M), Version 12.3(7)XR3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
installed is a WIC-4ESW card.
This should be simple, cant get it working. in a nutshell... I'm trying to configure fa0 as a vlan "trunk" port trunking vlans 1 and 20 from my managed switch (switch is configured correctly) and i want fa1 on vlan 1 and fa2 on vlan 20.
another words:
fa0 tagged with vlan 1 & 20
fa1 untagged with vlan 1
fa2 untagged with vlan 20
Code:
! Last configuration change at 20:35:48 EST Sat Feb 12 2011
! NVRAM config last updated at 20:47:38 EST Sat Feb 12 2011
version 12.3
[Code] .....
View 15 Replies
View Related
Apr 10, 2011
We had a new building thats gone up and complete now and we're trying to get a ip phone working down that end of the school on a vlan. We seem to be having trouble with the VLAN going through on the 2960 switch but it works fine on our core 3560 switch.
There looks like a slight variation in the config of the switches, the 3560 switch supports the "switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q" command on the interface where as the 2960 doesn't support the "switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q". Is this why the vlan is working on the 3560 and not the 2960, or is it something else?
Both switches are using the 12.2 IOS
Heres the trunk port configured on the 3560 going down to the new building and connecting into the 2960 with a 1gbit fiber link
interface GigabitEthernet1/2 description 3560X Port UpLink as Trunk Mode switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport mode trunk udld port storm-control broadcast level 60.00 spanning-tree guard root
Heres the trunk port configured on the 3560 going to a Linksys switch which then connects to the DHCP server (The other end of the 3560 is also configued as trunk)
interface GigabitEthernet0/6 description Edge Switch port for clients switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport mode trunk spanning-tree portfast
Heres the working vlan port on the 3560, the ip phone is able to get an ip and ring all other phones etc
interface GigabitEthernet0/7 description Edge Switch port for clients switchport access vlan 2 switchport mode access spanning-tree portfast
Ok now heres the config for the 2960
Heres the trunk port configured on the 2960 going back upto the 3560 switch
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/25 description Port UpLink as Trunk Mode switchport mode trunk udld port storm-control broadcast level 60.00
Heres the access port configured on the 2960 which isn't passing on vlan information. Is there another command i need to use to enable encapsulation as dot1q?
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/19 description Edge Switch port for clients
switchport access vlan 2 switchport mode access spanning-tree portfast
View 11 Replies
View Related
Oct 31, 2012
How can I configure Cisco 200 (SG200-08P) to learn Voice VLAN and CoS/DSCP from upstreamCatalyst 2960?
The Cat 2960 is today used together with LLDP-MED to announce config to Aastra IP Telephones. In some cases I need to use a small switch inbetween and plan to use the Cisco SG200-08P for this. However, I would like to avoid manual config of the Cisco 200 switch.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 8, 2012
I have two switches, a 2960 (sw01) and a 2948 (sw02). The sw01 is trunking via dot1q on Gi0/24 to sw02 on 2/48. Why are VLANs 2-4 not active on sw02?
sw01#sh int Gi0/24 trunk
Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan
Gi0/24 auto 802.1q trunking 1
Port Vlans allowed on trunk
Gi0/24 1-4094
[code].....
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 9, 2011
If you have a router with multiple direct vanilla FE (non trunked) interfaces on a switch trying to send QOS tagged packets to a wifi bridge several switches away does the trunking in the switched infrastructure mess with the qos tags if no qos is configured on the switches.
Does it depend on the switch? We have new 2960's running 12.2 and a few older 2950's running 12.1
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 12, 2010
I have two VLANs set up on a Catalyst 2950 switch: VLAN 1 (192.168.1.x) and VLAN 2 (192.168.2.x). VLAN 2 can ping the router on the 192.168.1.x network and nothing else, which is what I want. However, computers on the 192.168.1.x network can ping computers on VLAN 2, which is what I do not want. I want to make it where VLAN 1 and VLAN 2 cannot communicate with one another, but that VLAN 2 can still ping the router on VLAN 1. I've read about access control lists and ip tables
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 24, 2011
I have a rather large network with multiple VLANs and routing. Here's the layout:
5540 subinterface = gi0/2.18 = 10.16.18.1/24 TRUNKED to a 2960
2960 has an interface set to VLAN 18 (no IP) goes to a Cisco 4507 with an int. set to VLAN 18 (no IP)
4507 then has a trunk to a Cisco 7206
7206 then trunks to a Cisco 3845
3845 trunks to a 3750 (single)
3750 (single) trunks to a 3750 Stack
3750 Stack has int. set to VLAN 18 that goes to a 3750(lab) w/ int set to VLAN 18 w/ IP 10.16.18.251/24, VLAN502 = 10.202.255.1/30,
VLAN510 = 10.203.255.1/30
3750(lab) then has a trunk that connects to ASA 5510 w/ subinterfaces: e0/1.18 = 10.16.18.253/24, e0/1.510 = 10.203.255.2/30, e0/1.502 = 10.202.255.2/30
ASA5510 then goes to Internet
Any trunks are set to allow all VLANs. From the 2960 to the 3750 stack it's obviously all Layer 2 with trunking.
Issue:If I sit at the 5540, I can ping 10.16.18.251 and .253 with no problems. I can also ping 10.203.255.1 with no problems. Problem is that I cannot get to the other subinterfaces on the 5510 for VLANs 502 and 510. How do I ensure that my trunk is set up right? I have a route in the 5540 pointing to the 10.203 and 10.202 using the 10.16.18.251 address. It seems like a traceroute gets to the 10.16.18.251 address but then it stops. What route should be on the 5510 to make sure it gets back? The default route on the 5510 points to the Outside. I think it's something to do with the trunk that's just something I don't understand yet.
5510:
show int ip bri:
Ethernet0/1.18 10.16.18.253 YES manual up up
Ethernet0/1.502 10.202.255.2 YES manual up up
Ethernet0/1.510 10.203.255.2 YES manual up up
[code]....
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 17, 2013
Getting a AIR-AP1141N to work with an existing SRP526.
The SRP has two VLANs and two SSIDS
- VLAN1 - Corporate Wireless
- VLAN100 - Guest Wireless
So far so good. Now we need to extend the Range of the Wireless and bought an AIR-AP1141N. And this AccessPoint works like a charm, BUT only with one SSID,
I configured in the Port Management Area of the SRP526 both VLANs on one Port and configured the Access Point for multiple SSID use, but i don't get an IP from the DHCP Server Range of the VLAN100.
Could it be possible, that die Access Point can not get the tag Information?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 30, 2011
Having an issue getting my DMZ vlan working. Running my ASA5505 and i have configured e0/2 for DMZ w/ VLAN ID 3. Connected to my 2716 on port2.Inside e0/1 w/ VLAN ID 1. Connected to my 2716 on port1.
I am trying to get my DMZ Vlan to ports3&4 (LAG1) but when i assign the LAG group to PVID 3 i lose connectivity on VLAN1. I want to send both VLANs to that host because the teamed adaptor is used for Hyper-v Network Switch.
View 17 Replies
View Related
Apr 14, 2011
Having problem pinging from Host A on ESX1 to Host B on ESX2. Each host are assigned the same port-profile. If I put 2 host's on the same ESX machine using the same port-profile, they are able to ping each other.
n1kv-vsm# sh port-profile name xxx-prod-40port-profile xxx-prod-40 description: type: vethernet status: enabled capability l3control: no pinning control-vlan: - pinning packet-vlan: - system vlans: 1 port-group: xxxl-prod-40 max ports: 32 inherit: config attributes: switchport mode private-vlan host switchport private-vlan host-association 40 400 no shutdown evaluated config attributes: switchport mode private-vlan host switchport private-vlan host-association 40 400 no shutdown assigned interfaces: Vethernet3 Vethernet4
System-uplink profile is trunking all vlans.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 12, 2010
I have a HP Procurve 5406 connected to a Cisco 3560 on a temporary cat5e connection and I have Mitel IP phones needing to go on the Cisco switch.Ive configured the HP Procurve port to TAGGING both VLAN 10 (data) and VLAN 20 (Voice). NO is selected for default VLAN 1.The Cisco is configured on the port with switchport encap dot1q and switchport mode trunk.
Ive configured an IP for interface VLAN 10 and i cannot ping it from across the network. The interfaces are up and happy. I have tried changing the VTP status from transparent to server (VTP pruning is off) ive tried setting allowed vlans 10,20. Still not a think. The worse thing is that i have a working Cisco switch with the HP procurve that i checked the config on and its the same! The only difference is that the media type is SX over SFP in that case.
p.s not that im at this stage yet but i initially configure the FastE ports as trunks with native vlans because i was using non-cisco phones. On a spare port i convigured the voice vlan 20 and i say on the mitel phone that it was looking on vlan20! I didnt expect that, i thought the Voice VLAN ID was carried on CDP enabled devices only.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Aug 8, 2011
We are trying to implement a SLM2024 into our environment to be used on a lab bench. I am trying to get trunked traffic from a Catalyst 4948 to this switch. The Cisco documentation on how to do this on the 2024 is not very good. Does nyon know the correct way to do this. Currently I have ports 1 and 2 in a LAG and would like to use these as my trunk ports for the switch. I have roughly 10 vlans I am trying to gett over to the switch.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 20, 2013
I have recovered some configuration files from my 2950 switches with the Configuration Archive Tool in LMS.
Now, I'd like to replace my old 2950s by 2960 switches, which have the same number of ports.
Will there be any issue if I copy the exact same config from 2950 to 2960 ? Will some features not work or is everything interoperable ? Here's an extract of the config :
Global
version 12.1
no service pad
service timestamps debug date time
service timestamps log date time
no service password-encryption
[ code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 28, 2012
I just purchased a SG300-10 switch and loaded the newest 1.27 firmware on it. Setup my VLANS and trunks but I have this weird issue. My setup:
I have the SG300-10 as my main switch and changed it over to L3 so it can be my main core in my small network. On port 1, vlan 200 is setup as my native PVID untagged and I have it set to trunk vlan's 210(LAN network), 220 (management vlan) tagged over to a Dell powerconnect 5224 24port switch. On port 1 of the Dell switch, I have it setup as a trunk there as well with the same setup (native PVID vlan set to 200 untagged, trunking 210 and 220 tagged).
View 12 Replies
View Related
Mar 28, 2012
We have a Cisco 887 router and a Cisco SG-200 switch.We'd like to setup trunking between these 2 devices for multiple VLANs on the switch to be made available on the router.
With previous routers, you could set the router up in the configuration 'router-on-a-stick' and VLANs worked like a charm but the 887 no longer support sub-interfaces.So how can you get trunking working between the 2 devices?
Is there a VTP configuration menu for the SG-200 which we can setup in order for it to talk 'VTP' with the 887 router??
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 11, 2012
With out using any server, will DHCP be configured in cisco 2950/2960 switch?I man cisco it self should work as a dhcp server also.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Dec 26, 2011
How Can i Connect two switches 4505 using the trunking method,…
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 25, 2012
I have a connection between switches, There are a 3560 (Gi0/37) and a 2960 (Gi0/1), the problem is in the port Gi0/37 of the 3560 switch and this is the log. [code]
I dont understand what is the problem, actually i have added the command power inline never on the port and the problem is solved, but we haven´t changed configuration.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 7, 2012
I have an existing stack of 4 x 2960-S switches connected by stack cables.I would like to add another 2960-S switch to the stack but am unable to as the 2960-S will only allow 4 x 2960-S switches per stack.how I would add the 5th 2960-S switch to the existing stack of 4 x 2960-S switches.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Apr 15, 2013
I have been though the setup a couple of time with no luck pinging one pc to another from vlan 10 to vlan 20. I posted the running configs and some other information from my router and switch. I am relatively new to all of this so if you need me to post more information from the hardware let me know and Ill put it up. There are no firewalls in place and I know the cables are good because I switched them around to make sure. Also when I change the ip on my second machine for vlan 10 I can ping from one pc to the other but when I try the same for vlan 20 I get nothing.
**From my 2950 switch**
Current configuration : 2825 bytes
!
version 12.1
no service pad
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
[code]...
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 5, 2012
I've recently purchased a Cisco catalyst 2960S-24TS-L & setup 3 V LANS 10 (no current IP),20 (192.168.2.1) and 30 (192.168.3.1) to reflect the router V LAN configuration & ip information. When connecting my PC to the switch to test connectivity on (2.1 & 3.1) I'm unable to connect to the the net but can successfully ping GW (int FE0.20 & FE0.30) 192.168.2.1 & 3.1.
The router is an Cisco 1801 & it seems this is where the configuration issue is but I'm unable to figure out how to complete the setup. It has been quite awhile since I've configured a Cisco router.
Ive never had this router connected to a switch so all router switch ports are in the default VLAN1 (192.168.1.2), with FE0 disabled. In trying to get the switch to communicate with the router I made the following router config modifications.
FE0 enabled with subinterfaces configured
FE0.10-currently no ip
FE0.20-192.168.2.1/27
FE0.30-192.168.3.1/27
I have two issues I want to resolve:
1) I do not know what additional steps are required to allow 2.1.& 3.1 V LANs to access the net.
2) I want to disable VLAN1 if possible & use the network IP for VLAN10 (192.168.1.0). I'm unsure how to do this as any change on VLAN1 immediately breaks router access and the router reconfiguration becomes more complicated with changes to the FW ACL etc.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 27, 2012
Stumped again with my Catalyst 2950. Everything is working perfectly with wan/dhcp/router on fa 0/1 with all ports assigned to vlan1. All devices plugged in connect to the router correctly with ip's being assigned via dhcp.Instead of hooking up by console port I want to be able to SSH or telnet in to the switch using any port while still maintaining the above functionallity. Is it possible to assign a dhcp assigned ip address to vlan 2 and have vlan1 and 2 bridged? Or is there a better way of doing this ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 4, 2012
spam up the boards with the same basic CCNA level stuff, but I have a couple of questions about ios differences, limitations, and references. I have the following three switches. One appears to be considerably dated in regard to software version. My confusion/ignorance stems from managing VTP settings.
2924XL 12.0 5 WC8
2950 12.1 22 EA6
2950 12.1 22 EA6
When I set either 2950 switch as the VTP server, and the other as a client, the client inherits the server settings as expected. However the 2924 requires that I go into the vlan database from priv exec and manually set vtp client. That's pretty similar to setting any switch to client mode. The problem I am observing is that after setting the 2924 to client, it still doesn't inherit vtp version settings or pruning settings. I still have to manually configure those. Additionally, if I copy run start the 2924 after making these manual settings, and then reload the switch, all the settings are lost and it defaults back to server mode with all features disabled. From my searches, it looks like vlan information is stored in vlan.dat, but all the documentation I've found is on 12.1 ios which doesn't appear to use vlan database for vtp setup, meaning it might still be an issue, but not one I'm focused on at the moment.
Is the vlan database dumped at reload? I've read vlan.dat is stored in nvram and should be saved after a copy run start, but that is not the case for me.I have since set the 2924 as the server, manually configured the server from vlan database, executed copy run start, and reloaded the switch. Oddly, my manual settings saved from the reload, meaning I only lose settings when the switch is in client mode.Am I missing additional necessary client commands to save the config, or is this just a limitation of either the 2924XL or the 12.0 ios?On a related but completed out of scope topic, without a cisco service contract, how am I supposed to make heads or tails of all the different versions of ios, along with the letter-based features and what-not? I can't even find my 2924 in the list of platforms when searching for ios upgrades.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 11, 2011
We have a group of computers on their own VLAN. A router allows internet access while keeping them sandboxed. We don't want them accidentally connect to our production network. We blocked their wireless MACs in unauthorized WAPs. I'd like to do the same thing for their ethernet MACs on our switches, (a mixture of 2950,2960 and 2960G currently testing on C2960-LANBASE-M, Version 12.2(25)SEE2). I've been unable to locate the correct method on google, by searching these boards or in the command reference.
What is the best practice for blocking a group of MACs from accessing a particular VLAN on a network consisting of several Layer 2 Switches?
View 4 Replies
View Related
