I have 2821 router configured with two subinterfaces. This router is connected on cisco 2960 switch. The trunk on 2960 is configured without any prunning of vlans. I noticed that udp broadcast traffic is being forwarded through my router on native vlan 1 (this interaface do not have ip address configured). Below is configuration:
Router:
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
no ip address
duplex auto
[Code]....
Situation: On a Customer Site we have a Cisco ASA5510 in routed mode, and we have 2 networks which are both routed fine. The Customer has one device+ on lets say Network1 and a device2 on Network2.
Problem: Device1 now needs to communicate with Device2. To initiate the communication Device1 sends out a broadcast to find other devices. How can we tell the asa to just take that broadcast from that specific device1 and "route" it through Netzwork2. Is there any chance to get this working?
I have problems to connect a MAC-Server from the wireless-network (WLC-4402-50-K9, Version 5.1.163). The wired clients doesn't have problems to connect to the MAC-Server. The connection works over broadcasts. The wireless-network don't forward this broadcasts. The broadcast-forwarding feature is activated. It is no problem to the MAC-server from the wireless-clients. The hole network is in the same IP-network (one broadcast-domain).
View 1 Replies View Relatedmy question regards to a pair of WLC 4402 with 7.0.98.0 software.Actual, our security policy does not really allow any peer-to-peer communication in a wireless LAN. Therefore we set the 'P2P Blocking Action' to drop, and the 'Broadcast Forwarding' feature to disabled (default).But now there is a special requirement for two mobile endpoints to communicate with each other, because one device controls the other.To test the communication, we first disabled P2P Blocking (without success) and further enabled Broadcast Forwarding to bring the communication up. Now it works, but the configuration disagrees with our policy.
1. Is there an alternative configuration as described possible, so that we do not violate the security policy? To allow only p2p connection between the two devices, ist should also be possible to drop any else by an ACL. But how to fix the problem with the broadcast, because of the needed ARP? My idea was to use a static ARP entry, but as far as i know, one of the both devices is not able for it.
2. Because, I did not find any detailed documentation:
2a. with enabled Broadcast Forwarding, the controller forwards all broadcast for any configured SSID, right?
2b. is the broadcast limited to the source VLAN/SSID?
2c. is the broadcast limited to an AP, to an WLC, or is it broadcasted to every AP on every WLC that has the relevant SSID?
we already have two new 5508 but not in an operational state now, because we plan to implement new 3600 APs.Do these WLCs offer more/another circumstances or possibilities?
We have a cisco 2500 wireless controller with LAPs.Our devices require Broadcasting to be enabled. So I had to enabe broadcast forwarding under the Controller tab.It appears this option is a global seeting. Is there a way to enable Broadcast Forwading for an specific WLAN or SSID?Can we isolate broadcast data to an SSID or a WLAN?
View 1 Replies View RelatedSince a upgrade in IOS XE 3.0.9, our ASR 1002 have a problem with the DHCPDISCOVER.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm working with some 891W's that have the internal 800-series AP. I have this router set up initially using Cisco Config Express, then, using Cisco Config Professional 2.5 I set up the firewall and other featuress that CCE doesn't do. Overall this is a very simple router, meant to be a small business Internet gateway device but is currently in my lab.
The intended WLAN setup is very simple. One SSID, with broadcast enabled, using WPA2-Personal. Auth: open Encryption is both TKIP and AES-CCM.
However no matter what I do I cannot get thhis thing to broadcast . In the past I had sometimes run into issues where if I had more than one AP running independently it would cause a channel conflict and one or both would cancel each other's radio, so I disabled all other AP's in my vicinity.
Also I've had issues in the past where f I enabled both TKIP and AES, sometimes clients can't find the AP as a result. My solution had been to disable one of them leaving just the other - no change here however.
Via the IOS, ssid config shows mbssid guest-mode which I believce is default.
Interestingly, if I do the following:
ap# Config t
ap(config)# dot11 ssid <myssid>
ap(config - ssid)#guest-mode
end
I end up with both "guest-mode" and "mbssid guest-mode" in the sh run for the AP, and voila, my AP broadcasts the SSID. However clients end up joining without any security at all, no prompts for pre-shared key or anything.
how to configure the ASA 5500 with "Directed Broadcast" for Wake of lan from other networksegment. we want pass traffic from 192.168.10.0 network to 192.168.100.0 DMZ Network to turn on the server with Wake on Lan.
I read something about "Static NAT" but how do i make this one?
I am using 1841 LAN router. Recently some broadcast is happening in our network when some users are connected. I need to block them automatically by detecting who are they.
I can block them manually but i want router to detect them and block.
We've got a cisco 2821 router which periodically stops routing all traffic. It seems to happen about once every 2 weeks, and I can't find anything that could be causing it. There are no entries in the log and the router stays up and running but requires a restart to begin processing traffic again. We're running 12.4(13r)T11.Any thoughts, or troubleshooting steps to track this down?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI start configuring Cisco 2821 router for multicast . First short description and attached sheme explanation. Let we say I have small network with 100 users. One router and Cisco switch 3560. Two VLAN’s, one for data another for multicast. Data from internet works fine but now I want to connect multicast servers (or source of more multicast streams) from another subnet. Router have three interfaces.I expect there should be no problems with multicast configuration, but unfortunately it is not like I expect. What I did ?
First step: enable multicast routing
Second step: on both interfaces (Fe 0/1 and Fe 0/2) - ip pim sparse-mode
Third step: configure switch that users are connected to access port in VLAN 222 (temporary to see if multicast work)
When I start VLC on computer nothing happend. If I try to connect computer on same subnet where is source of multicast streams it works fine.What I am doing wrong ? Is there anything about routing ? All subnets are directly connected. RP is not needed if I have one router or ?
I have just bought myself a Cisco 2821 ISR.At present in my home I have a Cisco 2621XM. Fast Ethernet 0/0 is connected to a 3524XL as a trunk to provide my LAN with inter-vlan routing. it works great. Fast Ethernet 0/1 is connected to my ISP's cable modem and uses the command "Ip address dhcp" to get an IP and all other info from my ISP.FA 0/1 is Ip nat outside and the FA 0/0 and all sub interface like 0/0.1 .24 .168 etc all ip nat inside.I get intervlan routing and access to the internet via this router.I have this 2821 to replace the 2621XM as I plan to run CME on it and want gigabit routing on my vlans as at the moment on the 2621 routing between vlans it at half duplex or seems to be.I have configured the 2821 to ip nat outside on gig 0/0 and ip nat inside on gig 0/1 and all of the sub interfaces (same setup as my 2621 but with gig ethernet)I have no access to the internet at all but I can ping www.google.co.uk and other domain names from the terminal session when I am connected to the 2821 via the console or telnet/SSH. the gig 0/0 has an IP assigned from my ISP too but no other nodes on the network can ping outside.Am I missing something here? the version of IOS is V 15.
My access list goes someting like
access-list 1 permit 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 100 permit ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any
access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
and so on
I still cannot access the internet.....
I have a 3945 with a basic DHCP configuration applied to it. This 3945 is connected into one of the access ports of my nexus switch. I'd like to simply have the 3945 hand ip addresses out to other clients connected to the nexus switch. I have zero experience with nexus & haven't been able to turn much up through searching the net.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI recently bought SG-300 28P to create the VLAN. My network hs 3 subnet 192.168.1.0, 192.168.2.0 and 192.168.3.0.My main net work is 192.168.1.0. I want to divide it to VLAN to eliminate the boardcast storm; especially from the domain 192.168.3.0
But I want all the devices from 192.168.1.0 to access other subnet.
We have 2 switches split across 2 datacentres connected via an interconnect. Over the past couple of days the interconnect provider's Cisco kit has shut down our port (err-disabled) due to a broadcast storm. They had the level set at 1 which I thought was a bit low. They say they tried to set to 2, then 5 but still kept tripping the storm-control feature so they set at 10. They say they've always had it set at 1% (on a 100Mb switch) and so we must be generating more broadcast traffic.
I'm trying to identify where the broadcast traffic is coming from. On our Cisco 3750 I've clear interface counters and when I do a sh run | i broadcasts there are a few ports which have what seems like a high broadcast count. The one port that is especially high and the only one tripping the storm-control feature (I've enabled on all our ports to try to identify where the traffic is coming from) is the port connected to the 100Mb interconnect. I've mirrored that port to another port and connected a server with wireshark so I can capture all the traffic across that port.
What I'm struggling to find is the source of the broadcast traffic.I have a few questions are these broadcasts layer 3 or layer 2 broadcasts. Also in the output below when it says broadcasts received is this inbound to the port i.e. from the connected device or is this a total of inbound and outbound broadcasts.
When I use wireshark and filter the capture on broadcasts (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff) I see only 200-300 compared to the thousands the switch is reporting.If I filter on the broadcast IP address I also don't see the numbers corresponding to what I see in the show interface output.
GigabitEthernet1/0/1 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is 0014.a93f.7401 (bia 0014.a93f.7401)
Description: Interconnect
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 4/255, rxload 44/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
[code].....
also I'm currently doing : monitor session 1 source int g1/0/1 both, and also tried just rx incase I just need to be looking at receive traffic but still nothing is standing out.
I have a Cisco 2821 Router. Its ethernet Interface(E1) is connected to an ISP's Gateway.The outside interface IP is 207.x.x.1, The ISP has given 6 public IPs (202.x.x.1- 202.x.x.6) to use in LAN.
I have configured the router`s Internal Interface(E0) with a public IP address. (i.e. 202.x.x.1)
My Internal LAN PCs are in a private range of 192.168.1.0/24 subnet. Now I wanted my PC users to access the Internet while the Routers public IP remains on internal interface. How can I do the same?
I have a 2Fe-2W Card and wanted to find out if it can be picked up and installed on a Cisco 2821? Below is the version
Cisco IOS Software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(8a), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
Technical Support: [URL]
Copyright (c) 1986-2006 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.4(1r) [hqluong 1r], RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
System image file is "flash:c2800nm-adventerprisek9-mz.124-8a.bin"
According to my boss every 3 to 4 months he has to restart our 2821 with a 16-esw module installed because of a low memory issue dealing with CEF. Here is the exact error message.
%% Low on memory; try again laterJun 8 11:18:51.777: %FIB-2-FIBDOWN: CEF has been disabled due to a low memory condition. It can be re-enabled by configuring "ip cef [distributed]" Jun 8 11:19:51.823: %FIB-2-FIBDOWN: CEF has been disabled due to a low memory condition. It can be re-enabled by configuring "ip cef [distributed]" %%
Low on memory; try again later
%% Low on memory; try again later
%% Low on memory; try again later
Jun 8 11:20:51.868: %FIB-2-FIBDOWN: CEF has been disabled due to a low memory condition. It can be re-enabled by configuring "ip cef [distributed]" Jun 8 11:21:51.914: %FIB-2-FIBDOWN: CEF has been disabled due to a low memory condition. It can be re-enabled by configuring "ip cef [distributed
Is there away to disable the mulicasting of eigrp and hsrp to the end user ports on a 6509?
View 2 Replies View RelatedHow do I limit broadcast/mulitcast traffic on a switchport to e.g. 5000 pps ? I don't want the port to shut down, just block or drop broadcast traffic that exceeds 5000 pps.
View 19 Replies View RelatedI have a bunch of 3750x switches that each have a 10 gig routed link back to a central 4507 (loopback = 172.30.255.255).We carved up a /24 (of course, the /24 doesn't really exist except in our address tracking spreadsheet) into a bunch of /30's for routed WAN links and /32's for loopback addresses.We started on the low end for /30 subnets (ie 172.30.255.0/30, 172.30.255.4/30, etc.).We started at the high end for the /32 loopbacks (ie 172.30.255.255/32, 172.30.255.254/32, etc.)
Well, when I try pinging 172.30.255.255 from the access layer 3750x switches, the 3750x seems to be treating it as a broadcast ping where it lists each member that responds instead of the regular !!!!! response (this makes think something is odd with the 3750x). Of course, only one member responds (the core). But even the core seems to respond with the other end of the /30 instead of the actual /32 loopback (which makes me think something is odd in the core). I could have sworn that I've setup similar topologies without problems (ie, using 10.0.0.0/32, 10.255.255.255/32, etc as loopbacks) and as long as the mask is a /32, it should work.Also, I can ping/ssh to that loopback if my laptop is on a directly connected subnet. But I can't do it from any of the 3750x switches (which are also directly connected).I've double checked for overlapping subnets, but nope. I don't see any. Routing looks fine. The actual /32 is being propagated everywhere properly.
We run a network of several 2960G and 3650G switches in a network with a number of VLANs. One one particular VLAN (let's call it VLAN 10) it appears that non-broadcast traffic (i.e. normal unicast traffic) is being copied to every port in VLAN 10 only on one switch . The traffic is not crossing trunk ports and does not appear on other switches that have ports in VLAN 10. We first spotted this by noticing that a UPS port had an unusual amount of activity on our port througput graphs:
This traffic at 4 am is not expected and this profile is repeated across all ports in VLAN 10 on this switch (a WS-C2960S-48TD-L stack running IOS 15.0(1)SE3)\iffed one port using local SPAN (the UPS port) and discovered that this traffic was not broadcast, which was running at a normal low rate at all times. The traffic appeared to be unicast traffic from other ports of the sort you might see on a hub. It was from various hosts that live on VLAN 10, most (not all) of the conversations had one end station homed on the 'problem' switch. There are about 800 non-broadcast packets per hour and this is a busy VLAN so it does not account for all the traffic on the VLAN.
I have recently configured secondary ip address on LAN Interface of Cisco C6509.. We have some application which needs to use broadcast traffic communication to communicate with client... Broadcast is working within subnet & also working from broadcast server to primary subnet. But not working from secondary subnet.. I have checked broadcast within secondary IP range & it's working fine... Secondary not working broadcast with primary and also with broadcast server... broadcast address is different for these subnet but both should be communicate since configured on same interface... When I went through Cisco website found that command "ip directed broadcast" which will pass broadcast to different subnet... But I'm not sure whether any other impact if I enable that command on particular Ethernet interface...
View 6 Replies View RelatedOur network feels slow and trying to find the best way to investigate this properly. We have Cisco chassis 4500 with mix of 3560/2950 Edge switches 1GB backbones and WLC/WCS in place. The network is broken into multiple V LANS and IOS on our switches haven't been updated in 3-4 years.
On a wireless laptop (G) with get throughput of 1-2MB/s transfer speed with usually 10 clients per AP and LAN we get anywhere between 7-15 MB/s transfer. Using wire shark on a wireless laptop we see a lot broadcast traffic from other clients and the same for LAN. What is the best way to troubleshoot performance issues on the network and where do I start?
I am trying to open up port 32400 on my 881w Cisco router but I have not had any success I need to configure manual port-forward to enable my Plex Media server.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a 5412zl 10.215.x.x/16 Most of the connections on this switch are on vlan1. B9 is the port which is connected to a Cisco 2821 Router. The port on that end is GE0/1. The port on the cisco side is not a trunk but configure with an ip of 10.215.1.30/24 Its part of a some ip access group. The network that i now sit on is a 172.x.x.x/24 (behind cisco router, about 3 hops to that main 2821)We current have a system on my side that talks to a server on the 10.215. that has no issues. I'm trying to access some switches on the 10.215. and have had no luck reaching them.
Here is the access list that i found that port is configured to use:
permit ip 10.215.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.18.0.0 0.0.255.255 permit ip 10.254.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.18.0.0 0.0.255.255 permit ip 10.215.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.14.0.0 0.0.255.255 permit ip 10.254.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.14.0.0 0.0.255.255 permit ip 10.215.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 permit ip 10.254.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 permit ip 10.215.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 permit ip 10.254.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 I would think the first permit would allow me to get through to the 10.215 side but maybe i need to set something up on the hp size to let it know how to get back? I'm very new to this stuff.
Currently I have a network that looks like this:
ASA5510 - - - Internet - - - ASA5510
| |
EIGRP EIGRP
| |
2821 -----------MPLS----------1841
BGP
The MPLS connection is currently down, I'm trying to run a failover Site-to-Site VPN over the internet. All of the examples I've read have both connections involved in the failover coming out of one device. Since I'm not working that way, what is going to be the best way to failover? Do I need to set up some sort of IP SLA in the config? Or can I somehow weight routes in EIGRP in a way that the connection will failover from Internet to MPLS when the MPLS goes down and vice versa when the MPLS connection comes back up?
What is the maximum VPN Clients that could be connected to cisco router 2821, with this IOS c2800nm-adventerprisek9-mz.124-20.T.bin
View 3 Replies View RelatedMy 2821 router has an arp table with the wrong ip to Mac mappings. The impact is that I can reach any host in the 10.1.1.1 subnet. I can reach hosts in the 192.168.35.0 just fine. [code] It is as if the 192.168.35.1 device is answering all arp requests as a proxy arp or something. Clear arp-cache nor clear ip arp on my 2821 have any affect.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI need to configure a subinterface eg g0/0.1 and g0/0.2 with a untagged VLAN for each subinterface on a Cisco 2821.
View 5 Replies View RelatedYesterday my router was hangs and my services was stuck. I start the router hard booted and it works fine.This was second time i was facing this kind of scenario. The attached are the "show tech support" of the cisco router 2821.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a cisco 2821 router in rommon and displaying the message '' softwre forced crash '' and '' checksum error'' .I tried to do rommon tftpdnld but as the image is self decompressing into the ram it again crashes with the same error although i have done it with various valid ios but in vain.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a 2821 Router, with a VWIC2-2MFT card in it, with two T1s going into that card. The two T1s are a bundled MPLS line.
I then have a cable modem connection going into the gigabit Ethernet GE 0/1 port on the router.
Right now, the cable modem provides a backup connection in case the T1s go down.
What I was wondering is if there was a way to 'combine' the bandwidth from the two T1s with the cable modem?