Cisco Switching/Routing :: Interconnect Between 2821 And HP 5412zl?
Jan 27, 2012
I have a 5412zl 10.215.x.x/16 Most of the connections on this switch are on vlan1. B9 is the port which is connected to a Cisco 2821 Router. The port on that end is GE0/1. The port on the cisco side is not a trunk but configure with an ip of 10.215.1.30/24 Its part of a some ip access group. The network that i now sit on is a 172.x.x.x/24 (behind cisco router, about 3 hops to that main 2821)We current have a system on my side that talks to a server on the 10.215. that has no issues. I'm trying to access some switches on the 10.215. and have had no luck reaching them.
Here is the access list that i found that port is configured to use:
permit ip 10.215.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.18.0.0 0.0.255.255 permit ip 10.254.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.18.0.0 0.0.255.255 permit ip 10.215.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.14.0.0 0.0.255.255 permit ip 10.254.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.14.0.0 0.0.255.255 permit ip 10.215.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 permit ip 10.254.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 permit ip 10.215.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 permit ip 10.254.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 I would think the first permit would allow me to get through to the 10.215 side but maybe i need to set something up on the hp size to let it know how to get back? I'm very new to this stuff.
How to properly power down the Nexus 5000 and the fabric interconnect switches? I have looked up and down cisco's and google web for steps, but they are all coming back with the answer to just disconnect the power cables after you have power down all the windows os and exs servers. Before i do that, I just wanted to make sure that that's the correct way to do it or if there are actual commands that I will need to run on the devices to properly power down. I know that the FI do have a command to reboot, but i need them to completely be power down.
We've got a cisco 2821 router which periodically stops routing all traffic. It seems to happen about once every 2 weeks, and I can't find anything that could be causing it. There are no entries in the log and the router stays up and running but requires a restart to begin processing traffic again. We're running 12.4(13r)T11.Any thoughts, or troubleshooting steps to track this down?
I start configuring Cisco 2821 router for multicast . First short description and attached sheme explanation. Let we say I have small network with 100 users. One router and Cisco switch 3560. Two VLAN’s, one for data another for multicast. Data from internet works fine but now I want to connect multicast servers (or source of more multicast streams) from another subnet. Router have three interfaces.I expect there should be no problems with multicast configuration, but unfortunately it is not like I expect. What I did ?
First step: enable multicast routing
Second step: on both interfaces (Fe 0/1 and Fe 0/2) - ip pim sparse-mode
Third step: configure switch that users are connected to access port in VLAN 222 (temporary to see if multicast work)
When I start VLC on computer nothing happend. If I try to connect computer on same subnet where is source of multicast streams it works fine.What I am doing wrong ? Is there anything about routing ? All subnets are directly connected. RP is not needed if I have one router or ?
I have just bought myself a Cisco 2821 ISR.At present in my home I have a Cisco 2621XM. Fast Ethernet 0/0 is connected to a 3524XL as a trunk to provide my LAN with inter-vlan routing. it works great. Fast Ethernet 0/1 is connected to my ISP's cable modem and uses the command "Ip address dhcp" to get an IP and all other info from my ISP.FA 0/1 is Ip nat outside and the FA 0/0 and all sub interface like 0/0.1 .24 .168 etc all ip nat inside.I get intervlan routing and access to the internet via this router.I have this 2821 to replace the 2621XM as I plan to run CME on it and want gigabit routing on my vlans as at the moment on the 2621 routing between vlans it at half duplex or seems to be.I have configured the 2821 to ip nat outside on gig 0/0 and ip nat inside on gig 0/1 and all of the sub interfaces (same setup as my 2621 but with gig ethernet)I have no access to the internet at all but I can ping www.google.co.uk and other domain names from the terminal session when I am connected to the 2821 via the console or telnet/SSH. the gig 0/0 has an IP assigned from my ISP too but no other nodes on the network can ping outside.Am I missing something here? the version of IOS is V 15.
My access list goes someting like
access-list 1 permit 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 100 permit ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any and so on
I have a Cisco 2821 Router. Its ethernet Interface(E1) is connected to an ISP's Gateway.The outside interface IP is 207.x.x.1, The ISP has given 6 public IPs (202.x.x.1- 202.x.x.6) to use in LAN.
I have configured the router`s Internal Interface(E0) with a public IP address. (i.e. 202.x.x.1)
My Internal LAN PCs are in a private range of 192.168.1.0/24 subnet. Now I wanted my PC users to access the Internet while the Routers public IP remains on internal interface. How can I do the same?
According to my boss every 3 to 4 months he has to restart our 2821 with a 16-esw module installed because of a low memory issue dealing with CEF. Here is the exact error message.
%% Low on memory; try again laterJun 8 11:18:51.777: %FIB-2-FIBDOWN: CEF has been disabled due to a low memory condition. It can be re-enabled by configuring "ip cef [distributed]" Jun 8 11:19:51.823: %FIB-2-FIBDOWN: CEF has been disabled due to a low memory condition. It can be re-enabled by configuring "ip cef [distributed]" %%
Low on memory; try again later %% Low on memory; try again later %% Low on memory; try again later
Jun 8 11:20:51.868: %FIB-2-FIBDOWN: CEF has been disabled due to a low memory condition. It can be re-enabled by configuring "ip cef [distributed]" Jun 8 11:21:51.914: %FIB-2-FIBDOWN: CEF has been disabled due to a low memory condition. It can be re-enabled by configuring "ip cef [distributed
I have 2821 router configured with two subinterfaces. This router is connected on cisco 2960 switch. The trunk on 2960 is configured without any prunning of vlans. I noticed that udp broadcast traffic is being forwarded through my router on native vlan 1 (this interaface do not have ip address configured). Below is configuration:
Router:
interface GigabitEthernet0/0 no ip address duplex auto
The MPLS connection is currently down, I'm trying to run a failover Site-to-Site VPN over the internet. All of the examples I've read have both connections involved in the failover coming out of one device. Since I'm not working that way, what is going to be the best way to failover? Do I need to set up some sort of IP SLA in the config? Or can I somehow weight routes in EIGRP in a way that the connection will failover from Internet to MPLS when the MPLS goes down and vice versa when the MPLS connection comes back up?
My 2821 router has an arp table with the wrong ip to Mac mappings. The impact is that I can reach any host in the 10.1.1.1 subnet. I can reach hosts in the 192.168.35.0 just fine. [code] It is as if the 192.168.35.1 device is answering all arp requests as a proxy arp or something. Clear arp-cache nor clear ip arp on my 2821 have any affect.
Yesterday my router was hangs and my services was stuck. I start the router hard booted and it works fine.This was second time i was facing this kind of scenario. The attached are the "show tech support" of the cisco router 2821.
I have a cisco 2821 router in rommon and displaying the message '' softwre forced crash '' and '' checksum error'' .I tried to do rommon tftpdnld but as the image is self decompressing into the ram it again crashes with the same error although i have done it with various valid ios but in vain.
Basically I run 3 voice gateways on 2821 routers. In two of my routers I've had fan failures, one router has had two fans die and one has had just the one.
I was going to buy the offical Cisco fan replacement kit but then I thought with such as high failure rate I'd rather buy something else and better guarentee the service to my call centres.
So, what i'm asking is:
- Is there any reason why I cannot procure a standard 80mm 12V fan with a better rating (cooling and reliability) and install this in my 2821's?
I understand this may invalidate any warranties but mine have long expired.
We've got Cisco 2821 for our 90mb/s Internet Access. Its CPU usage is around 80%. Show process cpu does not show any cpu proccess with high utilization. But we have got plenty of policing configured for our clients using policy maps. Can this policing affect cpu usage?
I am having an issue pinpointing why my 2821 router is discarding so many packets when transferring data to our second site. The traffic flows from the local lan, to the router, where it is redirected via WCCP to a WAN optimization device, back to the router and over a GRE tunnel to the second site where the same process happens. The traffic does get there, but the LAN/Repeater router interfaces have around 20,000-60,000 input drops an hour. From the output below, it looks like traffic is being dropped by the RP.
I just restarted the router as a last resort, and here is what has accumulated in the last 30 min: FastEthernet0/0/1 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 0025.840c.7680 (bia 0025.840c.7680) [code]....
And CPU never goes above 40% 100 90 80 70 [code]...
I have customer that we have configured netflow on the 2821 router that their traffic is on. Currently the company they have contracted with for the analysis is seeing data duplication. Below is the configuration for the interface and the router
Cisco 2821;
interface GigabitEthernet0/0 description TVC-FI-Ethernet-Fiber-Ethernet link ip address 216.255.164.33 255.255.255.248 secondary ip address 192.168.5.1 255.255.255.0 secondary ip address 216.255.166.129 255.255.255.128 secondary
I start configuring Cisco 2821 router for multicast . First short description and attached sheme explanation. Let we say I have small network with 100 users. One router and Cisco switch 3560. Two VLAN’s, one for data another for multicast. Data from internet works fine but now I want to connect multicast servers (or source of more multicast streams) from another subnet. Router have three interfaces.I expect there should be no problems with multicast configuration, but unfortunately it is not like I expect. What I did ?
I'm a bit perplexed atm with trying to set up multiple failover routes on a 2821 router. Let me say that I have more experieince in a switched network as routing is seldom required where I work atm. Here's my problem. I have a routing table set up as follows but only the primary routes work. The failover routes will not kick in once the primary route is not there.
ip route 10.32.11.0 255.255.255.0 128.32.8.11 ip route 10.32.11.0 255.255.255.0 128.32.24.11 100 ip route 10.32.12.0 255.255.255.0 128.32.8.12 ip route 10.32.12.0 255.255.255.0 128.32.24.12 100 ip route 10.32.14.0 255.255.255.0 128.32.8.14 ip route 10.32.14.0 255.255.255.0 128.32.24.14 100
Ip addresses are not exact but it gets the point across.
Why the failover routes are not failing over? The failover routes work if I remove the primary route from the config.
we're facing a weird issue lately with a Cisco 2821.An interface stops responding after a few hours.The only way to bring it 'up' again is:
Hardcode: duplex or speed or shutdown -> no shutdown
there are no errors in the "sho interface" and no errors or entries in the log.
FastEthernet0/0/0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is Fast Ethernet, - Description: Infopoint MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit/sec, DLY 100 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
WAN link plugs into a 2821 Router with an switch module in it. About 8 clients are plugged in to the 2821.2821 connects to super cheap netgear switch (I'm 99% sure it's stripping dot1q headers) via one of the ports in the switch module. About 4 people are connected to the netgear.Now, I sent a catalyst 3560g to the branch because they wanted to extend into a new building. Someone decided to run a single cable from the netgear to the 3560. On the 3560, I have about 5 clients and a couple of APs.
So it goes 2821 -> Netgear -> 3560. All of these are single connections.When the 3560 gets plugged in, all clients on the netgear lose their connection, and nothing on the 3560 works. It happens almost instantly. I can't figure out why connections are dropping. The APs have about 4 VLANs onn them, and the PCs are on their own VLAN (the native VLAN).
I am having issues with 'telnet' on port 2821 to a range of servers connecting through vlan interface from my core switch 6513 running s72033_rp-DVIPSERVICESK9_WAN-VM) version 12.2(33)SXH7, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3). The telnet on port 1556 and 13724 is ok.
We have several DMVPN-connected sites that are connected to our 2821 ISR pair.They're all configured as eigrp stub connected summary. Yesterday, a few of the sites went inaccessible, but the VPN tunnels were still up and running. Upon further investigation, we noticed that the remote sites stopped receiving routing updates from our 2821's. As a quick fix, we added static routes to bring the sites back up.Later that night, we removed the static routes and cleared the eigrp neighbors, hoping it would fix the problem. When it didn't, we cleared them two more times.Suddenly, the router lost all downstream adjacencies. While we were adding statics to at least bring the sites back up, all of the adjacencies came back.
One of our client wants to know "How many route entries a 2821 router or 881 router can support" Such as the 3750 can support 11k routes in ‘desktop routing’ mode. But I want to know the limitations on routers.
I have a design hurdle that I cannot seem to cross. I have two sites and I need the same VLAN to span both sites. I have accomplished this using L2TP but my issue is that I can no longer assign a gateway for this VLAN on the router. The 2 routers are 2821's and are connected with a dedicated fiber run.
Ant recommendation for how this could be accomplished? It would be great if I could have the same gateway at both sites by leveraging some sort of bridged interface (BVI so I've heard) but I am at a loss as to where I should start with this. Also, this is not the only VLAN that needs to traverse the link.
I have a LAN with 6 vlans and a 2821 router. By default, intervlan routing is enabled for all vlans, however, I want specific vlans to be denied access to others, though all should still be able to use the Internet being served from GE/0.
I have a cisco 2821 router where as a cisco 2960 switch with connect on router as a trunk & one user vlan . this is my WAN router all traffic are internal . i have 2MB data connectivity on my WAN side. i have to Give a specific Bandwith on my SAP traffice . like when SAP traffice will come they all time get around 50 % bandwidth of my channel. If SAP resuest are not comming then other traffice will get full bandwith .
