Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 - Discards And No Buffer On Trunk Ports

Oct 17, 2012

I have been experiencing discards and no buffers errors on my 2950 switches. These switches are connected to two core switches 4948 and 3560G. I have noticed previous posts regrading these problems but have been unable to find any cases that were resolved. We are using 12.1(22)EA11 software on our 2950 switches.
 
Outputs:
flrnet3#SH controllers ethernet-controller gigabitEthernet 0/2
Transmit                                Receive  22204993 Bytes                        904542488 Bytes   

[Code]....

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 - Ports To Put In Trunk Mode

May 10, 2012

I've previously used trunkports and vlans between my ASA and accesspoints, connected directly. Now I want to put a 2960S-24PS-L bewteen. Where should i define the vlans (in the switch or in th ASA?) and what ports to put in trunk mode? (the ones on the switch or the one between the switch and the ASA?)

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 Storm Control On Trunk Ports

Feb 9, 2012

We have around a dozen Catalyst 3560 and 2960 switches in a ring topology. We are considering adding storm control to our trunk ports. Up until now we have only used it on edge ports with default values and without error-disable.I am proposing that we also add storm control to trunk ports at a lower level and that we error-disable only the redundant links that make up our loops.
 
-storm-control broadcast level 25.00 20.00
-storm-control multicast level 2.00 1.00
-storm-control action shutdown [only on redundant links]
 
In a storm all links will restrict broadcast which should work accessing remote switches, but the redundant links should errdisable and block the redundant path. It is important that the action line is not applied to links that are not redundant as we could isolate parts of the network. Any reason not to use storm control on trunks?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Adding VLAN To Trunk Ether-channel Ports On 2960?

Dec 25, 2012

I have trunk etherchannel ports 47,48 which both have Vlans allowed on trunk 70,71. Everything works pretty fine. Now I am trying to add a new VLAN 72 to these ports.

conf t
interface FastEthernet0/47
switchport trunk allowed vlan add 72
exit
exit

So far so good. But when making the same command for port FastEthernet0/48 my switch stuck.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 / Traffic In Same VLAN Goes Up Trunk?

Feb 11, 2013

I have 2 hosts, 1 plugged in fa 0/21 in VLAN 101 and another in fa 0/22 in VLAN 101 on our L2 Cisco 2960.  If I try and transfer files from either host the gig 0/1 trunk port on the 2960 leading tot he 3750 fa 0/1 port hits 100mb (using a real time bandwidth monitor tool), but why?  This VLAN is on the same switch, why does it go one way up the trunk to the L3 3750 switch?  The L3 3750 is the VTP server and the 2960 is a client.  I would of thought the traffic stays local.  The 2 hosts don't even have a gateway set.To sum up the typology the 2960 and 3750 are trunked using a single cable.  The 3750 hangs of a ASA firewall using SVIs.Here is whatthe traffic looks like when copying a file between hosts (2gb file).
 
3750 L3 Switch (VTP Server)
  interface FastEthernet1/0/4
description Trunk to Cisco 2960 Gig 0/1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate

[code]....

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 / Verifying Trunk Vlan Tagging?

Jul 5, 2012

I have a 2960 switch connected to another. The I need to verify that vlan0010 on one switch is forwarding tagged traffic between the other switch it is hooked up to through the Gi0/1 port. How do I verify this? I have a server that's multihomed (Broadcom) on the other side an it is supposed to be on this vlan with one of it's network interfaces. We had a pwer outage and now it cannot communicate on this vlan. However, everything else on the vlan can reach all the other nodes accept this server in the front of my building. All the devices in the same room are linked to the same switch which has one port (fa0/17) on vlan0010 and can ping eachother just fine. The server is hooked to port 24 on my server room switch and Gigabit port one goes to a fiber converter all the way to the back. It then gets converted from fiber to cat5e again and links into the switch (2960) in the backroom.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3550 - Set Up With 6 VLans And 2 Trunk Ports?

Oct 9, 2012

I have a test switch (Cisco 3550) that I want to set up with 6 Vlans and 2 trunk ports. I want to be able to access a virtual server conected to the trunk ports from the switch ports. Ports Fa0/1 to 8 are in a vlan port fa0/9 to 16 another vlan etc. Ports Fa0/47 and 48 are the trunk ports. This is a lab environment so the the switch is the only device being used.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Wireless :: Output Errors / Transmit Discards And Big Buffer Errors On 1121 AP?

Sep 13, 2011

I have a AIR-AP1121G-A-K9 running c1100-k9w7-tar.123-7.JA2 (Autonomous)We have monitoring setup with Orion NPM and we consistently see output errors, Transmit discards and big buffer errors The users at the site have not reporting any issues but was wondering how to prevent these or are these normal?What causes the output errors on Wireless Radio ? How to troubleshoot further ?
 
Radio0-802.11G
Total Output Errors         0              47749
Small Buffer Misses
4 misses
139 misses

[code]....

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 - Ports Going Up And Down?

Nov 7, 2012

we hava a couple of 2960 switches and we are logging to a syslog server. Ports keep going up and down is it normal severity (error)   ?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 Switch Ports Using POE?

Feb 5, 2013

I have a statck of 4 2960s switches, with POE powered access points on 2 of them. All of the access points appear to be functioning normally. For some reason, on 3 interfaces connected to access points, I get the following when issuing show interfaces status:
 
Gi3/0/9                      connected: T 7          a-full a-1000 10/100/1000BaseTX
^
 
My question is regarding the "T" in the status field. I can't find any documentation on this.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 And VLan Ports

Feb 25, 2013

New to Cisco and want to know if I can segment a port. I have two v lans. I have one internet connection at the opposite end of the building. Can the port the internet is connected to serve both V lans?

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 Ports Which Only Allow Machine On Network

Feb 7, 2012

it is possible to let cat3750 or 2960 ports which only allow machine on network which it use dhcp, not static ip? if so, how to configure it?

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: WS-2960-48PST - To Use 4 Ports At A Time

Feb 25, 2013

I have an doubt about some port in 2960.He have 2 SFP and 2 Fixed Ethernet. Can I use these 4 ports in the same time? Use 2 Ethernet and the 2 SFP with Fiber?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 Set Ports To Untagged VLAN XX

Aug 6, 2012

I have two questions for a Cisco 2960 (WS-C2960-24TC-L)
 
1. I am working to setup a few Cisco 2960 switches for HP iLO access to our servers. We are going to segregate the iLO network (VLAN 40) from the data network (VLAN 10) by using a different VLAN. All of the HP servers will be configured with static addresses. My question is, how do I set all the ports to VLAN 40 so that untagged devices will automatically go onto VLAN 40? I don't want to have to configure the VLAN on each iLO port on the server. I tried to set the port to: "switchport trunk native vlan 40", but that didn't work.
 
2. Also, how do you access the web GUI for these switches? I get a login box, but putting in the enable password doesn't work. I have the following commands in the config: [code]

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 Is Shutting 2 Ports Down On Network

Dec 27, 2011

We have a 2960 switch  which is connected to the core via a VLAN trunk. We have disabled broadcast port suppression but, the 2960 is shutting  is shutting 2 ports down on the network and this looks like excessive braodcast. How and why would the switch start dropping traffic when the default is don't do anything? It had to be rebooted to get the port active again

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 - Disable Ports Looping?

May 10, 2013

Disable ports looping Users connect the network cable at two points in the network generating looping. which command to disable two ports of a Cisco 2960 when they are connected at the same time with the same network cable?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 Switch Ports Flapping

Feb 4, 2013

I have a 2960 switch and every then and now the ports are flapping, while i was on console i saw ports going down and coming up...when the ping to machine ip addresses timed out the port status on switch was still up...no errors collisions seen on sw port. Below is sh int when the port was flapping
 
[code]...

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching / Routing :: WC2948G - Configure LACP Trunk And Multiple Trunk

Feb 12, 2012

we recently aquired a managed services job and have to do a overhaul of the vlan configs and have a whole dozen WC2948G's trunk between a set of ports as well as trunk out a LAG channel setup to non cisco equipment. the deal is the lacp-channel works properly on both ends but no routing of vlans between ports and between the lag trunk are working.
 
theres alot of settings in the config and im planning on clearing it and starting from scratch but before i do i want to know where my problem lies.

[code]...
 

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 / 2960 - How To Configure 2 Ports To Provide Redundancy

Jan 21, 2013

As per the attached diagram: How do I configure the 2 ports on the 3560 (Ports 6 & 7) and the connected ports on each of the 2960 switches (Port 25) to provide redundancy.
 
If the up link from Switch A dies then I need the traffic to flow through the trunk and utilize the up link on Switch B with minimal delay (milliseconds).

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960 Series Ports Disabled When Connecting Vmware

May 21, 2012

I have a Cisco Catalyst 2960 series switch. When I connect another switch or a VMWare Esx server on one of the ports, the port blinks for few seconds and then goes off. When I connect a desktop or laptop or a windows server the ports stay led and I can access resources on the network. However, when connect another switch or a vmware esx server, the port is disabled.
 
What config in the switch can I check to make sure the ports stay on regardless when I connect a desktop / laptop, switch or vmware server?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 6509Es / Sup 720 ARP Discards

Dec 11, 2011

We have a failover pair of load balancers (non-Cisco) which are connected to each other via Catalyst 6509Es with Sup720 supervisor cards. Failover is achieved by the newly active load balancer GARPing all its service IP addresses with the relevant MAC address in order to update nearby ARP tables (failover GARPs are fired out by the load balancers at a rate of 200 per second). Failing over services between these load balancers has been found to be problematic, with numerous services not failing over in a timely manner.
 
Some of the load balanced networks involved are routed on the Sup720s, the rest are routed on FWSM modules in the same chassis. Problems occur only with VLANs routed on the Sup720s; all VLANs routed on the FWSMs fail over without issue.
 
Investigation has shown that this is due to a proportion of the ARP table entries not being updated in the Sup720 and (with the default 4 hour ARP table timeout) subsequently requiring a manual flush of the "wrong" ARP entries.
 
Testing by throwing GARPs at both the FWSM and the Sup720 has revealed the following:

we can quite happily throw ~200 GARPs per second at the FWSM and all the relevant ARP table entries are updated with the correct MAC address. This fits with the sucessful failovers for any FWSM routed networks. however, repeating the same test with a VLAN routed on the Sup720 results in GARPs being dropped by the Sup720. The Sup720 keeps discarding a proportion of GARPs until we drop the rate of GARP to <~75 per second. We're not rate-limiting ARP anywhere in the Sup720 - hardware or otherwise - and the FWSM handles the rate of GARP without issue. Is there any built-in restriction on the Sup720 we're not aware of that would cause the observed behaviour, is it configurable.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 / Make Ether Channel On Switch 1 Which Has 24 Fast Ethernet Ports

Oct 8, 2012

I have 4 cisco 2960 switches to which many users are connected. No vlans are the only default vlan 1 is there. Now I want to make ether channel on switch 1 whcih has 24 fast etherenet ports. Can I make port 1- 8 as one ether channel which are connected to users or i can only make ethere channel of ports that are connectd to other switchs. If I can, how the other switchs will comnicate with the switch ports bundalled in the ether channel in switch 1.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 3560 Discards Second Device With Same IP?

Dec 10, 2012

I have  one specific trouble with Catalyst 3560CG switch and Stardom reserved industrial  controller. Controller has 2 processors, one of them after(!) negotiation become  main with IP 192.168.1.1, other one stays in reserve with IP 192.168.1.129. If  main one shuts down, spare one becomes main with IP 192.168.1.1. This perfectly  works with DLINK and MOXA level 2 switches, but fails with Catalyst 3560,  because spare one cannot even connect to switch port. I don't know  the exact reason of it, but i suspect, that it happens because of before  negotiation both controllers have ip 192.168.1.1 (i know, that it is wrong and weird, but so it goes).   First of them correctly  connects to switch port, which goes up and passes pings. Second  processor tries to connect  to switch port, which goes several times up and very soon down, then  processor lefts his tries to connect to anybody and become idle.  The switch  seems to some way check IPs of 1-st and 2-nd port packets, and shuts  down 2-nd  port. I have connected via hyperterminal and tried to disable some level 3  functions and checks of the switch, but this wasn't useful. how exactly(or at least approximately) should i configure a switch to make this  bundle work?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6513 - Transmit Discards On Certain Interface

Feb 25, 2012

We have a Cisco 6513 Switch.  During some parts of the day it is having large amounts of transmit discards on a certain interface because of the amount of data we are pushing.  We have determined it is a link problem and not a problem with the switch.  The link cannot handle the amount of packets the switch is pushing out.  I was wondering if there is a way to create a buffer or a way to regulate the maximum amount of packets that can leave that interface without losing any packets? 

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2821 High Interface Discards

Apr 8, 2013

I am having an issue pinpointing why my 2821 router is discarding so many packets when transferring data to our second site.  The traffic flows from the local lan, to the router, where it is redirected via WCCP to a WAN optimization device, back to the router and over a GRE tunnel to the second site where the same process happens.  The traffic does get there, but the LAN/Repeater router interfaces have around 20,000-60,000 input drops an hour.  From the output below, it looks like traffic is being dropped by the RP.
 
I just restarted the router as a last resort, and here is what has accumulated in the last 30 min: 
FastEthernet0/0/1 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 0025.840c.7680 (bia 0025.840c.7680)
[code]....  

And CPU never goes above 40%
   100
   90
   80
   70
   [code]...

View 17 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Auto-QoS Egress Discards

Dec 18, 2011

I have an issue where I'm seeing output discards on pretty much all my ports configured for QoS. The switches are cisco WS-C3750V2-48PS running 12.2(50)SE1. There are four switches stacked using stack cables. The QoS implemeted was auto-qos with no modifications to the standard config. All ports are in queue-set 1. The phones connected are Cisco 7942's. Already did the standard check for speed duplex mismatch, crc's, runts, giants, etc...No discards before the QoS was applied. No bug ID's I could find regarding these switches and this IOS version. The one thing noticed is that 99% of all the drops are from queue's 2 and 4 or 1 and 3 doing the below command.
 
**I've limited the cut and paste as to not clutter the discussion until someone requests something else**
 
show platform port-asic stats drop
Port 18 TxQueue Drop Statistics
  Queue 0
    Weight 0 Frames 0
    Weight 1 Frames 0
[Code]....

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Priority Queue Out Transmit Discards

Dec 13, 2011

After opening up Solarwinds NPM, I noticed that a few of my interfaces had lots of discards (who knows how long it's been sets the counters were reset)
 
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/25description Etherchannel to MamaCassswitchport trunk encapsulation dot1qswitchport mode trunkswitchport nonegotiatepriority-queue outchannel-group 4 mode on
 
interface GigabitEthernet2/0/25description Etherchannel to MamaCassswitchport trunk encapsulation dot1qswitchport mode trunkswitchport nonegotiatepriority-queue outchannel-group 4 mode on
 
interface Port-channel4switchport trunk encapsulation dot1qswitchport mode trunkswitchport nonegotiate,It looks as if priority-queue was configured outbound on these interfaces, could this be the cause of the transmit discards which are now up to 79,835, I just reset the counters on the interfaces a little while ago.
 
I'm not the best in the world when it comes to QoS, we do have some VoIP phones, but they are only a specific network, and do not travel outside, since there are used mainly for VoIP training. I do know both interfaces are running the default of FIFO.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 TX-queue Buffer Sizes

May 29, 2013

We're having some issues with a 3560 CPE. It's uplink is a GE fiber link, customer port is FE RJ45. We see a lot of TX-frames being dropped at the FE port,but none at the GE port. Even when the customer is only at ~50Mbit/s downstream traffic. When customer sending ~50Mbit/s upstream, there are no TX- drops at the GE link. Is this a normal behaviour? From what I know the physical medium shouldn't have any inpact on this since drops occurs in the port- asic, and not in physical transmission.Do the buffer-sizes between GE and FE differ? What could we do to optimize the flow and reduce drops? QoS is set to off and no modifications on the queues have been made on the interfaces.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: C2960S How To Calculate Buffer Allocation Needed

Jan 2, 2011

I need to configure these qos settings in a C2960S. [code]How I calculate the buffer allocation needed? [code]

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2691 Router Buffer Leak Due To Syslog?

Dec 3, 2011

On my 2691 Router i see the buffer leak due to syslog
 
2691Router#                         sh buffers leak
Header DataArea  Pool  Size Link  Enc    Flags      Input     Output User
650743C4  F200084 Small     0    0    0        0       None       None Init

[Code].....

View 17 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960S - Default Queue / Buffer Settings When MLS QoS NOT Enabled

Feb 13, 2013

I have a customer that is seeing output drops on a 2960S with mls qos not enabled.  It appears that they are getting bursts traffic on the switch that is filling up the buffers, hence causing the drops.  I have a couple of questions:
 
1. What are the default queue/buffer settings when mls qos is NOT enabled on the switch.
2. Is there any good documentation out there regarding the buffer sizes of the different switch models
 
The customer is looking for an answer as to whether or not replacing the 2960S with a higher model would eliminate the output drops WITHOUT having to mess with QOS/buffer/drop threshold settings on the switch, and Cisco doesn't seem to make the buffer sizes readily available for the the smaller Catalyst switches.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Add 2960 To Stack Of 4 X 2960 Switches

Feb 7, 2012

I have an existing stack of 4 x 2960-S switches connected by stack cables.I would like to add another 2960-S switch to the stack but am unable to as the 2960-S will only allow 4 x 2960-S switches per stack.how I would add the 5th 2960-S switch to the existing stack of 4 x 2960-S switches.

View 12 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960-S To 2960-LST Configuration Over Fiber?

Feb 11, 2013

I have a 24 port 2960-S that is not communicating with a 2960-LST that it is directly connected to over fiber.  The link is up on the LST but will not come up on the -S.  What command should I use to bring up this link?  I have tried no shut from the (Config-if)# prompt.         

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved