I need to enable/disable a mac access-list on a 2960 scheduled by time. The switch has lanbasek9-mz.122-44.SE6. As the mac access-list can not support time ranges, I tried EEM but seems like it is not supported in this device.
View 1 Replies
I have one 2621 router i want to creat time base access list so that one of my subnet user(10.128.194.0 255.255.255.128) use only internet between 11am to 2pm.
View 15 Replies View RelatedI want to implement port-based and MAC-based in these two switches: 2960 & 3560 (both of them have this IOS version: 12.2(55)SE1). And I haven't found a way to implement both of them at the same time. This is what I got:
ip dhcp use subscriber-id client-id
ip dhcp subscriber-id interface-name
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.0.0 192.168.0.2
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.0.251 192.168.0.255
[code]....
With this configuration I can use port-based, but not MAC based. If I remove the first two lines and change the last line for this one:
address 192.168.0.7 client-id 0112.ae1d.af58.60
Then, the computer with that MAC address got the correct IP, but then the port-based doesn't work. Also, I got this line in the interface what I want to use MAC-based:
ip dhcp server use subscriber-id client-id
Does the 2960 switches with LAN-Lite support DHCP Server Port-Based Address Allocation?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have an doubt about some port in 2960.He have 2 SFP and 2 Fixed Ethernet. Can I use these 4 ports in the same time? Use 2 Ethernet and the 2 SFP with Fiber?
View 2 Replies View RelatedMy environment have two device ,a cisco css11501 and a cisco 2960 ,when I reboot CSS11501 then 2960 shutdown fa0/41
I command "sh logging | in 0/41" just up down two time,not five times in 10 seconds
.May 17 11:13:18: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthernet0/41, changed state to down
.May 17 11:13:19: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/41, changed state to down
.May 17 11:14:53: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: link-flap error detected on Fa0/41, putting Fa0/41 in err-disable state
.May 17 13:44:35: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/41, changed state to up
.May 17 13:44:36: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthernet0/41, changed state to up
I have a 10nos of cisco 2960 switches and 1no of cisco 3725 gigabit switch. all 2960 switches are parallaly connected to 3725 switch though fiber.
all the switches are having same vlan and public ips for management.
Now I want to upgrade IOS for all 2960 switches at a time, how to up grade IOS same time for all switches.
I implemented access list on cisco 3560 switch but it never works. I want to block access from network B to Network A and allow from Ato B
Network A. 10.0.12.0/24
Network B 10.0.24.0/24
The configuration is
interface Vlan1
description Data VLAN
[Code].....
I'm looking to implement a vlan filter to keep unnecessary stuff off my access-layer. Things like IPv6, IPX etc. I really only want IPv4, ARP and 802.1q on these 4500s. I know on 3750, 3560s etc, when I create the mac access-list, I can do it by ethertype, but on the 4500, I dont have that option.
4th_floor(config)#mac access-list extended Drop-traffic
4th_floor(config-ext-macl)#permit any any ?
protocol-family An Ethernet protocol family
<cr>
4th_floor(config-ext-macl)#permit any any protocol-family ?
appletalk
arp-non-ipv4
decnet
[Code]....
I have an 1800 isr that is running with port forwarding only. It is running a series of ip nat inside source static address port address port commands. It does not have an access list bound to the outside interface. This is working fine, but i am wondering if this is a security concern?
View 1 Replies View RelatedExtended IP access list VLAN20
10 permit tcp any any established
11 permit icmp any any
20 permit tcp any 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 eq 80
30 permit tcp any 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 eq 443
40 deny ip any any log
[code].....
Above is the network diagram and access list for VLAN 20 and VLAN 30, applied on incoming direction of each valn.But still able to access other port which is not on access list, tried changing the direction with no luck.Inter vlan routing is enabled on CoreSwitch default router is 192.168.10.10
i have one Cisco 3750, am using it as Core Switch where i have 6 more access switches are connected deirectly, and we are using VLANs in our network with the IP reange of 172.16.0.0 , now we had a new Internet connection which is dedicated to Exchange Server only.So we have TWO internet connection One for internet access to all users and another one for only Exchange Server.internet connection for the users is termiated at a Cisco 1700 Series Router and Internet for Exchage Server is terminated at a Cisco ASA Firewall.Now the problem is how can i write an access list, which says that all packets from Exchange server should be routed to ASA Firewall , and all other packets shoulde route to Cisco Router.IP address os Exchange server is 172.16.2.1, 172.16.2.2.
View 13 Replies View RelatedI have one computer connected to the 4506 that management does not want this PC to have access to anything on our network except our DHCP server and the one printer that resides on our network. I created an extended access list as follows. Our network is the 10.10.x.x and the external addresses the PC needs to access is 11.1.x.x. Once this PC is rebooted, it is unable to access DHCP to get the needed IP address it bounces back to a 169.x.x.x address and stops working.
Extended IP access list 2000
permit tcp host 10.10.200.242 host 11.1.200.1 (gateway)
permit tcp host 10.10.200.242 host 11.1.2.151 eq smtp (access from the pc to external server for smtp)
permit tcp host 10.10.200.242 host 11.1.2.149 eq 5721 (access from the pc to external server for remote access)
[ code]...
Then I applied the access-group 2000 on the interface the PC is connected to. What am I missing for DHCP to work and for this PC to always get the ip address that is reserved?
I am trying to harden my Nexus box and I am not able to ACL assigment command. Following are the commands I am trying to add.
interface cmp-mgmt module 5
Ip access-group NETWORK_MANAGEMENT_ACCESS in
I configure multiple static RPs and one of the ACLs denies a source will it move on to the next entry that covers it in another acl? [code] i.e. 1.1.1.1 will be used as the RP for 224 to 238 and 2.2.2.2 will be used as the RP for 239.Will that work correctly, i.e. if a source is trying to register with the router and its for the group 239.1.1.1, will it be denied against the first RP and then permitted against the second RP?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a layer 3 switch, 3550.I have several vlans on there just for playing around with. One of the vlans, has a vonage linksys box attached to it with a UK number attached. From time to time telemarketers call at 03:00 in the morning, this as I'm sure you can imagine is not much fun. The linksys box gets 192.168.3.3 as it's ip.The switch is connected to a non cisco router at 192.168.0.1
interface FastEthernet0/24
no switchport
ip address 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.0
I was thinking a time based access list would work best I have tried several variations but the phone still rings. I have tried access-list 1 deny host 192.168.3.3 permit ..... and more extensive lists but the phone still rings. I have not applied the time-range yet, so that's not the problem.I have applied the list to the vlan interface and to fa0/24 but it's not working.
I have a LIII Switch Cisco 3750x ,with diffrent Vlans , Some users are in Vlan 102 (10.10.2.0) and Some Users are in Vlan1 (10.10.1.0) , now i want to restrict the Vlan102 users to access Vlan1 , i am pasting my configuration below , how to create a access list .
interface Vlan1
ip address 10.10.1.36 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 10.10.1.36
[Code].....
In my core Switch,there are 2 v LAN(V LAN 1 & V LAN 2)my switch is Cisco 4948,so be default ip routing is enable in it. My all servers (DHCP,HTTP,HTTPS) are in v LAN 1 & internet is also in v LAN 1.
My requirement is that v LAN 1 user should not communicate with the v LAN 2 and vice versa. But the v LAN 2 users need an access of all servers and internet which is in v LAN 1. How to configure the access-list. I have try on Packet tracer which i have attached.
note:v LAN 2 user should get the IP from dhcp server which is in vlan1.
I'm having an issue accessing a clients router on the WAN interface with Cisco config pro. I can get CLI access with SSH without any issue. I have port 22 and 443 allowed as management access from my public IP - SSH working fine but config pro being refused connection, Possibly a certificate issue?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have a gateway on a 4503, say on port 2/1, and we only want the other devices that are plugged into the 4503 to be able to talk to the gateway and thats it. The other devices are Motorola TUT DSL devices and they plug into the 4503 directly.
Normally "switchport protected" would make this very easy to keep stuff on one port from talking to other ports but with 4500's you are not able to do that command. So we implemented a MAC Access-List Extended ACL. Here is what we did
mac access-list extended BLAH
permit #host 0000.XXXX.YYYY any
interface range fa 2/5 - 20
mac access-group BLAH out
The MAC address 0000.XXXX.YYYY is the MAC address of the gateway that is plugged into Fa2/1 and the DSL TUT devices are plugged into ports Fa2/5-20. We would think that this config would only allow devices on the TUT DSL to talk only to the Gateway but we don't really think this is happening. The TUT devices are learning about MAC addresses that are on other TUT devices.
I have 3 3560 switches which are configured with trunks between them. They run vlan 10, 11 & 12. I have a 'core' switch (switch 1) of these 3 to which an MPLS router is connected on vlan12. I in addition have another switch hanging off the 'core' switch via a routed link (switch 4). I have EIGRP configured as a stub and as such the IP address on the routed link at the core switch end is of a /24 from v lan 1 on the other switch. This makes the route directly connected and therefore distributed via EIGRP stubs. Switch 1 is then exchanging routes with the MPLS router (via EIGRP).
The problem I have is that from any sub net on any switch (switch 1, 2 or 3) I can ping 192.168.13.1 (switch 4). When I try and ping switch 4 from over the MPLS I am unable to. If I trace to the switch I see it reaches the outside of the MPLS router, but is then unresponsive. The same applies if I try to ping switch 1 on 192.168.13.2. Any of the other IP addresses of switch 1 respond.
The MPLS network is a managed solution to which I have no access. I'm told that the MPLS provider is able to ping switch 1 & switch 4 on the 192.168.13.x addresses from a remote router (192.168.32.2). I have tried from a switch on the same L2 sub net (192.168.32.1) and I don't get a response.
From switch 4 I am able to ping the switch on 1 of it's interfaces (192.168.19.1), but not the interface I mentioned above 192.168.32.1. There are no access lists in place on the switches and no firewalls between the sites.
Not sure why the N7K M1 card doesn't take this command. It works on other N7K at different site. [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have two 5548's in sync mode: I have an existing ACL and I want to add a new line to it, but after I do and try to commit it states the verify failed. [code]
I have to add access list to both switches not in config sync mode.
I am using cisco 1841 LAN router, I need to block MAC address i have applied the command access-list 1102 deny 0000.0000.0000.0000 mac address..... but it does not work.
View 24 Replies View RelatedMy management has tasked me to give them a high level overview of the different switching we can choose for our new building.
This is what I know so far.4 Closets, each closet has 450 ports,One MDF room that is will contain one UCS Chassis and a Nimble iSCSI SAN.
I am working on the spreadsheet and it looks like this (Not totally filled):
2960s3560x3750x45064510Approx cost (Each, 48PORT, POE+, 10G uplink, Dual PS, IP BASE)
6K7K8K45K75KMax Capacity192432432192384Backplane speed206464520520ProLeast ExpensiveStackable to 9Stackable to 9ProDual PSDual PSDual PSDual PSDual PSProLayer 3 opt
Layer 3 optDual SupsDual SupsConExpensiveExpensiveConNo Dual PSConLayer 2 OnlyCannot stack more than 4
For the MDF I would like to use 2 Nexus 5548's with FEX's, and the layer 3 daughter board. For the IDF's I was thinking of two 4010's.
I'm getting this error message on syslog server (Kiwi syslog)access-list logging rate-limited or missed XXXX packets i did the following commands but still I'm getting the error :logging buffered 16386 debugginglogging rate-limit all 5000no logging consoleno logging monitorip access-list logging interval 30000ip access-list log-update threshold 30000 i don't want to report to the console or monitor i want to report direct to syslog server, because I'm monitoring all the traffic (permit ip any any log) !
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a 2960-S running the lastest software for testing on my bench:
[code]
Switch Ports Model SW Version SW Image
------ ----- ----- ---------- ----------
* 1 24 WS-C2960-24-S 15.0(1)SE2 C2960-LANLITEK9-M
[/code]
I have set up VLAN 2 on 192.168.2.0/24 with the switch as the DHCP server. The switch is connected to an RV082 router which is at 192.168.1.65/27. Once I figure out what I doing I'll eventually shift that to 192.168.1.0/24 or something similar. So I have my switch acting as the DHCP server for VLAN 2 but I can't figure out how to get it to access the internet.
I found this example to set up the DHCP server:
[code]
###################################
this works to get vlan 2 to serve ips
conf t
[Code].....
The RV082 doesn't support trunks AFIK and I'm pretty much a newb at this stuff. TIA. I guess I should get a real router and I most likely will but I'd like to get this working if possible before taking the next plunge.
I have 2960 switch and i can't access it using my console cable .I can access other switches in my network ( 3560 & 2960 ) but i can't access only this switch.may be the console port in the switch damaged? or it's a bug ?? !!! although the switch is worked normally.
View 11 Replies View RelatedWhat is the difference between sdm prefer access & sdm prefer default & sdm prefer lanbase-routing? When do we use these options?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhat all the catalyst models support VPC with Nexus ? I knew Cat6K and 3750. Any other model supports VPC ? Can I configure vpc between 2960 and N7K ?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI had a strange issue yesterday when onsite installing a new access switch.Port capacity full on a two switch stack of 3750 x48 PS switches (WS-C3750- 48PS-E)- New 2960 x48 PS - WS-C2960S-48FPS-L racked, with the plan of using it just as an edge switch via SFP Stacking cable.Setup the two connecting ports with simple initial config: - switchport mode trunk- no encapsulation option on the 2960, default dot1q- dot1q set on 3750 port- no shut on both sides.Connected the SFP Stacking cable but it didnt work:- %PHY-4-SFP_NOT_SUPPORTED: The SFP in Gi1/0/1 is not supported
This is ok as I had a backup:- Next step tried using 2 x Short Haul SFP SX GBIC's with LC - LC OFNP 50/125 fibre patch lead - no joy- Extra backup of 2 x Long Haul SFP LX GBIC's with the same fibre patch - no joy- Checked the fibre and it was not a cross over so transmit and receive going down the same side, switchedand still would not come up.- Used Fibre as a straight through and still the same.In all cases there was no indication of any life in the connection.It is pointing to a faulty fibre patch lead but I know it has worked in the past. Could it be something to do with the config or device incompatibility? Or any setting I need to activate?
I have a 2960 SI lan lite switch that I am configuring for admin and guest access. I have wireless AP's plugged into trunked ports 2 and 3. I am using two vlan's (in addition to the native VLAN). Vlan 5 for Admin and Vlan 10 for guest access. I have ACL configured on the router preventing guest users from accessing the Admin network. I want to prevent those on the guest network from seeing other hosts in the vlan however the lan lite software does not support port ACL's. Any way to accomplish this with this switch.
version 12.2
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
[Code]...
I have an existing stack of 4 x 2960-S switches connected by stack cables.I would like to add another 2960-S switch to the stack but am unable to as the 2960-S will only allow 4 x 2960-S switches per stack.how I would add the 5th 2960-S switch to the existing stack of 4 x 2960-S switches.
View 12 Replies View Related
