I configured Auto QoS on some access ports on two 4506-E (Sup 6E-L) and I wanted to apply the same generated config on the port channel/port channel members but it didn't work.
Ex:
int gig1/3
service-policy input AutoQos-VoIP-Input-Cos-Policy
% A service-policy with non-queuing actions should be attached to the port-channel associated with this physical port.
[Code].....
I am trying to implement priority queuing (LLQ) on a pair of 10GE links between a 4507 with Sup6E and a 4948 which are configured as an etherchannel. I am unable to configure a priority queue on the 4507. I am running into the following issues:
I want to have a priority queue for voice traffic and specify minimum bandwidth for a critical application. If I configure a class with the priority command it will not let me use the bandwidth command on another class unless the priority class is policed. If I try it without the police command I get the message "bandwidth kbps/percent command cannot co-exist with strict priority in the same policy-map ". If I add a police statement to the priority class then I don't get this error.
When I try to apply the resulting service-policy to the physical interface it says "% A service-policy with non-queuing actions should be attached to the port-channel associated with this physical port" and does not add the command to the config.
If I try to associate the same policy-map to the port-channel rather than the physical interface it says "% A service-policy with queuing actions can be attached in output direction only on physical ports" and does not add the command to the config.
All of the other interfaces on the 4500 are working OK. The trunks have auto qos voip trust configured and access ports are marking the critical application traffic.
The 4507 is running 12.2(44)SG1 EnterpriseK9. I don't have the luxury to upgrade blindly to fix the problem unless I can identify a specific bug that is causing the problem.
We are facing cold start issue on 4500 series switch. The switch is restarting automatically almost weekly twice or thrice.As per show tech. output , there is "cold start log".Please find the attached logs for your reference.After time change , auto restart happening & am not found any log for power failure also.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have configured a SVI in my 4500 ( Sup 7-E 10GE,,,,,,and,,,,,cat4500e-universalk9.SPA.03.02.00.SG.150-2.SG.bin) switch and it is showing Down Down, because there were no active switch port in the vlan, I added one switch port to this vlan but this port also in the down state, so i added the SWITCH PORT AUTO STATE EXCLUDE command under this port, even after this also the SVI never came up, So i added one systen to the port so both the switch port and the SVI came up...So why SWITCH PORT AUTO STATE EXCLUDE command have no effect in this model of the switch..
View 4 Replies View RelatedSwitch A connects to Swich B and C using port channel. I am going to bring down one link on each.
switch A is server farm , switch B and C are core 01 and 02 . and all are 3750 switches.
1. what will be the impact on the network in terms of spanning tree recalculation
2. what duration are we talking about until the spanning tree convergence happens?
3.I plan to shut down the link from CLI to bring down the links
switch catalyst 4500 with ios cat4500e-universal.SPA.03.02.00.XO.150-2.XO.bin. I need to configure modules 3 and 4 of supervision, the problem is that I need the 4-port module 3 are active but only the first turn on both the module 3 and the first port on the module 4. [code]
View 1 Replies View Relateda 6509 and a 4506 with 2, 1gb interfaces in a portchannel. Bring it up and everything is fine. Save the config and reload either switch and the interfaces stay in Not Connected state. Either doing a No Shut or a physical unplug the SFP and plug it back in will bring it up with no issues. Interfaces do not go into Err Disabled state they stay in Not Connected like there is no fiber plugged into it. No error mesages in the log. The Just the Interface is now up.Both are running very new code,
6509 - s2t54-ipservicesk9-mz.SPA.150-1.SY1.bin ( 15.0.(1)SY1 )
4506 - Version 03.02.00.XO
I'm trying to make MGSCP solution. I have Cisco 7609 with following configuration:
Mod Ports Card Type Model
--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------
3 8 CEF720 8 port 10GE with DFC WS-X6708-10GE
5 5 Route Switch Processor 720 10GE (Activ RSP720-3CXL-10GE
7 24 CEF720 24 port 1000mb SFP WS-X6724-SFP
8 24 CEF720 24 port 1000mb SFP WS-X6724-SFP
9 48 CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet WS-X6748-GE-TX.
I have webcams that need port 8081 opened and I did that, everything worked fine until my DIR655 jammed up and power cycling it and the modem 3-4 times DID not make it work: no internet access and it was definitely a DIR655 problem. So, out with the paperclip to do the big reset, causing me to lose my configuration. When "most" of it came back up with my new config (I had screen prints), all was okay EXCEPT the webcams. Addresses and ports were all configured properly, address was fixed too on the client computer rather than use DHCP. I had a DNS relocation service running (DYNDNS) for the WAN side, but that address (My IP) didn't change either. I tried EVERYTHING. Finally, I realized in all my screwing around that I had enabled UPnP in my application, something I hadn't done before, but did this time as a desperation move. UPnP had always been checked off in the router. So.....I REMOVED my port forwarding and virtual server settings (either one worked before), and voila, everything working, Is this a normal occurrence, that if you have UPnP running, that this auto configuration overrides any manual configuration?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a 4507R-E chassis with Supervisor IV running IOS 12.2(50)SG. I am trying to configure "auto qos voip trust" on some of the uplink ports. When I try to configure it on a port that is in a channel group, I get the error "AutoQoS Error: AutoQoS can not be configured on member port(s) of a port-channel". I have also tried configuring it on the channel interface, but it is not an available command under the channel interface. Is there a way to do auto qos on the channel interfaces or their member ports or does it have to be configured manually?
View 12 Replies View RelatedI have a 3750 that when a client computer shuts down the switch will not discover it on start-up unless I bounce the switch. Pretty dependable product so,.... did I miss something in my config? Switch is GBIC'd for Fiber?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have 4948E module switch at customer site and below is the show version output. Image on the switch is not supporting 'AUTO QoS' as i need to enable Auto Qos on it to prioritize Voice traffic. Which image supports Auto QoS feature . Image should have L3 functionality also i mean it should support Routing protocols. I tried to enable auto QoS using by configuring "QoS' globally but no luck...with existing image.
{ URL}
ROM: 12.2(44r)SG9
Hobgoblin Revision 20, Fortooine Revision 1.22
Switch up time is 12 hours, 1 minute
System returned to ROM by reload
[ code]...
Configuration register is 0x2012
Switch#sh boot flash:
-#- --length-- -----date/time------ path
1 25793234 May 31 2011 15:20:20 cat4500e-entservicesk9-mz.122-54.SG.bin
2 25005209 Mar 08 2013 09:53:18 cat4500e-entservices-mz.122-54.SG1.bin
70033408 bytes available (58249216 bytes used)
why the AutoQoS macro does not implement "priority-queue out" when configured on the 3750 platform running certain versions of software. The only other platform I have experience with AutoQos is on the 4500 and it enables priority queuing as expected. So what's up with autoqos on the 3750 on version 12.2(35)SE5?
When it comes to configuring QoS on campus user/phone access ports there are some important settings that can and should be considered but one can argue that enabling the priority queue is the single most impactful or important command. So I was very surprised and concerned when I didn't see priority-queue out. Cisco describes AutoQoS as a simple, quick way of deploying QoS on the LAN and it precludes you from having to learn all of the differences between hardware platforms. But is it true that this tool produces an incomplete config solution? Let me know if I am missing something.
Here is an example of what AutoQoS produces when applied to a 4507 with WS-X4648-RJ45V+E:(other interface commands are left out for simplicity)
interface GigabitEthernet5/25description XYZ
switchport mode accessauto qos voip cisco-phoneqos trust device cisco-phoneservice-policy input AutoQos-VoIP-Input-Cos-Policyservice-policy output AutoQos-VoIP-Output-Policy
policy-map AutoQos-VoIP-Output-Policy
class AutoQos-VoIP-Bearer-QosGroup
set dscp ef
[code]......
Here is an example of what AutoQoS produces when applied to a 3750 running version 12.2.(35)SE5: (no priority-queue out)
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/36
switchport access vlan 8
switchport mode access
srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20
srr-queue bandwidth shape 10 0 0 0
[code]......
I have an issue where I'm seeing output discards on pretty much all my ports configured for QoS. The switches are cisco WS-C3750V2-48PS running 12.2(50)SE1. There are four switches stacked using stack cables. The QoS implemeted was auto-qos with no modifications to the standard config. All ports are in queue-set 1. The phones connected are Cisco 7942's. Already did the standard check for speed duplex mismatch, crc's, runts, giants, etc...No discards before the QoS was applied. No bug ID's I could find regarding these switches and this IOS version. The one thing noticed is that 99% of all the drops are from queue's 2 and 4 or 1 and 3 doing the below command.
**I've limited the cut and paste as to not clutter the discussion until someone requests something else**
show platform port-asic stats drop
Port 18 TxQueue Drop Statistics
Queue 0
Weight 0 Frames 0
Weight 1 Frames 0
[Code]....
We just replaced our Cisco 1240 AP in one of our shops with a Cisco 1141 AP. This is not controller based.
We use several wireless (infrastructure mode) auto diagnostic tools which connect to the AP. We also have many laptops which run the diagnostic software.
We had no problems with our 1240AP. With our 1141, we cannot connect to the wireless tools if both the laptop and the tools are connected to the 1141. If I connect one to the 1240 and one to the 1141, they can see each other and work fine. IF they are both connected to the 1141, they show up as connected in the AP, they can ping each other, but the software does not communicate.
[URL]
I ran autosecure on my 1841 routere and now I cant do ping or traceroutes. What should I do to enable the pings and traceroutes after auto secure is done.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have a switch that, when configuring auto qos on and edge port facing video equipment, the upstream port channel drops. I was wondering if no auto qos would have to be configured on the member ports of the port channel prior to enabling auto qos on any other ports.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a switch(6500) with 2 vlans(2 SUBNETS) and from the other side of my network i have 2 terminal servers.
I want to have a VIP in my 6500 switch which i have the 2 vlans and when the first vlan(network) try to connect to the VIP
my switch will forward to first terminal.When the second vlan try to connect to VIP the switch will forward to second terminal.
I'd like the switch to decide in wich terminal server will forwared the packet based on source network.
I am not sure how i can do this???I use VIP with SLB???I use NAT???PBR?
One of our customer has 3 ISP Line, out of which Two are Broadband and One is Leased Line. All 3 ISP interfaces are Etherent.
Now, they want Auto Failover with Load balancing among these 3 ISP lines.
Can we do same implementation in Cisco 1941 Router?? What licenses required in router for same?
Are there any differences between the autoqos commands on a WS-C2960S switches (or in any other series)? Follow the commands:
- auto qos trust
- auto qos voip trust
I was checking the documentation on this link:
URL
And couldn't find any great difference between the two commands, as far as I could see they'll set the Ingress and Egress queues the same way.
Are there any differences between those two commands (auto qos trust and auto qos voip trust)? If so, when should I use one and the other?
I'm using Packet Tracer for testing since I don't have the actual equipment. I have configured etherchannel between two 2960 Switches. I have used the trunk ports FE 0/23 and FE 0/24 on both switches to create the etherchanel. I have connected one PC with each switch. The PCs are in the same VLAN and can ping each other. Howver, when I take down one of the links in the etherchannel, the other link does not take over and I get 100% packet loss. I don't know what seems to be the problem. I'm quoting the configurations below:
Switch0:
Switch#sh running-config
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 1179 bytes
!
version 12.2
no service timestamps log datetime msec
no service timestamps debug datetime msec
[code]....
Are there issues with the auto upgrade feature for 3750X stacks, either historically or currently?
Some people prefer to upgrade switch stacks manually by disconnectiong the stack cables and uprading code on each switch.
I've done the manual procedure in the past and have not tried the auto upgrade (I have the procedure for the auto upgrade).
We are facing to an annoying issue. We have a 6509 running in Catos 8.3(4) with WS-X6548-GE-TX, WS-X6348-RJ-45 and WS-X6148-RJ-45. When we configure the mode in auto negotiation, it comes up in half duplex. We need to configure the speed mode at 100Mbit/Full to make it work. But if the chassis or port restarts (not the server), the link becomes half duplex. This happens only on module in Gigabyte like WS-X6548-GE-TX.
Cable have been replaced but does not work. It is not happened on another chassis running on IOS 12.2(18)SXF17b with WS-X6548-GE-TX.
Nexus 5500 support auto negotiation on 1gig sfp port? There is an end device that only support auto negotiation and cannot be manually set speed/duplex.
View 0 Replies View RelatedI have a port on 7600 connecting via Single Mode Fibre to my service provider. Service provider has 1000-Full with auto-negotiate. I am seeing following output on my 7600. [code] if this interface is only capable of doing 1000Mb, how come it is showing 100-Full. If I change to nonegotiate option (both my side and provider side), link goes down. My provider has confirmed they have 1000Full their side.
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to create a job what automatically export the devices configs that are in the folder CSCOpxfiles medemushadow? It would be wonderdul if CW could export the .cfg files into a .rar and send in email or something like this.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI need to know if Catalyst 4500-X does PBR in hardware?
View 1 Replies View RelatedDoes the 4500 support VSS (Virtual Switching System) ? On the official product overview page it says: 1.6 Terabits capacity with Virtual Switching System (hardware-ready)What means Hardware ready ? Does it mean that it supports VSS in the same manner as the 6500 ? The reason I'm asking this question is that I didn't find any info on the Internet about this. We would like to upgrade our network by interconnecting the 2 sites with Layer 2 redundant links (Layer 2 extension), but I'd like to use the both links in a load-balancing manner, which can be a real pain in the *** with STP. The choice is between 4500 and 3750 stackable core switches. The 6500s are very expensive.
View 6 Replies View Relatedquestion on 4500 SUP-7LE, this documentation is not 100% clear:
[URL]
When in single sup mode, can I have the following combinations?
1 SFP+ and 1 SFP << pretty sure this is supported
1 SFP+ and 2 SFP << think it's supported
1 SFP+ and 3 SFP << doubtful
2 SFP+ and 2 SFP << think it's supported
3 SFP+ and 1 SFP << doubtful
I'm seeing the following error on a 4500 running 12.2(46)SG
C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-4-INLINEPOWEROVERWARNING: Module 5 inline power exceeds threshold: status changed to 'Pwr Over'
All the ports on module 5 have "power inline never" applied, in fact the whole switch has POE disabled.
I've attached a txt file with the show power detail output.
How to know 4500 SUP7-E's MIB ?Our customer use MS SCOM 2012 SP1 get the OID are 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1286, but we use IOS MIB locator, we can not find this MIB id.
below are the IOS sh version information :
Cisco IOS Software, IOS-XE Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software (cat4500e-UNIVERSAL-M), Version 03.02.00.SG RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc4)
Technical Support: [URL]
Copyright (c) 1986-2011 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Tue 26-Apr-11 18:09 by prod_rel_team
[code]....
I live in a shared house, and I am the only one who has been experiencing issues connecting to the internet. I have to ask a housemate to reset the server, as this is the only thing that works.
When I am unable to connect, and I use command ipconfig, the following appears: Autoconfiguration IPv4 169.254.23.29 On the occasions when I am connected, the following appears in its place: IPv4 IP Address: 192.168.0.2
One tip that I came across was to check the box (Wireless Network properties, Connection tab) for "Connect even if the network is not broadcasting". I had hoped this simple solution would assist, but to no avail.
I have a 4510R-E chassis with SUP7-E running IOS XE version 3.01.01.SG. I am unable to create a port-channel and apply auto-qos for VOIP.If I configure auto-qos on the physical interfaces, I get this message when I try adding them to the port channel:
"The attached policymap is not suitable for member either due to non-queuing actions or due to type of classmap filters."
Auto-qos is not an available command in the port-channel interface configuration, but if I try adding the service policies that were created by auto-qos to the port channel manually, it lets me apply the input policy but on the output policy I get this message:
"A service-policy with queuing actions can be attached in output direction only on physical ports."
With the input policy applied to the port-channel interface, I tried addign the output policy to the physical ports and I got this message:
"A service-policy with non-queuing actions should be attached to the port-channel associated with this physical port."
Is there a way to get the auot-qos policies applied to the port-channel properly?