Cisco Switching/Routing :: Bridging 2 Different Networks With A RV042?

Aug 6, 2012

I have 2 networks.
 
NETWORK 1:EOC connection fro ISP going into a router (not the RV042) with a static WAN address from ISP.  This router is hooked up to a switch that all the computers are connected to.  All the computers on this network are using 192.168.1.x addresses.  Most of these addresses are static, but the router is running DHCP in case we hook up temporary computers like laptops or client machines to this network.
 
NETWORK 2:DSL connection going into a router (not the RV042) with a static block of IPs from ISP.  (8 IPs, 5 usable for the WAN interface, 1 static IP is being used for WAN interface).  This router has a VPN connection set up for remote access to the linux machines on this network.  This router is running DHCP on the LAN interface for this network with addresses 172.16.1.x.  All the computers on this network are tied together with another switch, completely seperate from the 192.168.1.x network switch.
 
PROBLEM:We needed computers on the 192 network to be able to access computers on the 172 network.  Someone decided to just run a cat 5 cable from the 192 switch to the 172 switch (not the routers, the switches).  This "worked" - badly.  Appearently there is a DHCP conflict (or something else going on) that was causing the router on the 172 network to try and assign addresses to the 192 network computers, and it was also "resetting" a connection about once an hour.  This crashed our server on the 192 network.  I disconnected that cat 5 cable between the two siwtches, and now each of the two networks are working properly, but they are now completely isolated from one another.
 
I need to create a bridge between the 2 networks so that machines on the 192 network can access machines on the 172 network while filtering out DHCP broadcasts from either network router to the other network.  (I may need to filter out other protocols as well, but don't know yet.)So, I see 3 potential ways of doing this but don't know if they will work:
 
1) Can I just set up multiple subnets on the LAN interface of the RV042 and just run 2 cat5 cables from each switch on the two networks to the LAN ports of the RV042?

1a) If I do set up multiple subnets on the LAN interface of the RV042, do I need to assign the two ports to different VLANs?  (I don't see any way to set each port to a specific IP address.)

2) Can I set up the 2 WAN ports on the RV042, one static for each network, and will the RV042 route traffic from 1 WAN port to the second WAN port?

3) Is there some other way I should consider setting this up?
 
Finally, someone mentioned that once I get the RV042 set up correctly as a bridge, I will need to route 172 addresses on the 192 network to the 192 interface of the RV042 via the DHCP router on the 192 network, and conversely, I will need to route 192 addresses on the 172 network from the DHCP router to the 172 IP interface of the RV042.  I think this will be easy enough to set up in each of the DHCP routers...

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Bridging Two Wireless Networks?

Aug 27, 2012

My current project is to have a printer that actually works. You don't need one often, but when you do you really need one. I'd like the printer to be wireless as we all use laptops but don't want to have the printer near the router.

The simple solution is to shell out for a wireless printer, but I have access to a cheap (and good) ethernet only printer. Now, how to connect it? I have a spare old router, which I'm thinking of connecting to the printer. I'd then have to get the router to join the network (is that possible?) or somehow bridge them. The to devices to join would be this and this.

View 1 Replies View Related

Bridging 2 Different DHCP Controlled Networks?

Aug 4, 2012

we have 2 DHCP controlled networks at our work:

Network 1: Transparent EOC connection to Internet. Directly behind the EOC box is a router using a static (WAN) address provided from our ISP. Internally, the router uses DHCP (LAN) to manage a 192.168.1.x network. All computers on this network are using 192.168.1.x addresses via DHCP from that router - (rather, they should be). We use this for Internet access, office computers, a POS server and our POS systems. Mostly windows xp and some win 7 systems. Server is Windows 2008 server, but is not controlling DHCP nor a domain. It's just a Win 2008 computer on the network running as a "virtual box" on a VMware-based server.

Network 2: Comes in on a separate DSL line. This DSL modem is set up as a bridge. The router behind the bridge is using a static IP block (8 static IP addresses, 5 usable) from our ISP. Internally, this router uses DHCP (LAN) to manage a 175.69.10.x network (or some address similar to that). All machines on this network are using 175.69.10.x addresses via DHCP from the 2nd router. There is external VPN access to this network via one of the static IP addresses. This is routed correctly. This is Primarily a Linux network controlling several linux based machines. So, someone decided to "bridge" these two networks by simply plugging each network into the same central switch via Cat 5 cable.

The first problem we had (of course) was that the DHCP servers conflicted immediately, so we had to set half of this "mongrel" network to static IPs like 192.168.1.x, and the other computers are getting their addresses via DHCP from the 176.68.1.x network router. The second router keeps "resetting" the network, causing IP address problems on the first network, screwing up our POS system in the process. But we still need to access the linux machines on network 2 (via http) from the machines on network 1.The goal is to be able to be sitting at machine 192.168.1.x on one network, open a web browser, type in a 175.69.10.x address on the other network and have the linux web-based application come up from the machine on the second network. (We may need more services bridged besides just http.)Putting both networks on the EOC connection controlled by a single router is NOT an option.

View 3 Replies View Related

Bridging Two DHCP Controlled Networks Via Bridge?

Aug 4, 2012

We have 2 DHCP controlled networks at our work:

Network 1: EOC connection. We use this for Internet access, office computers, a POS server and our POS systems. Mostly windows xp and some win 7 systems. Server is Windows 2008 server, but is not controlling DHCP nor a domain. It's just a computer on the network. Directly behind the EOC box is a router using DHCP to manage a 192.168.1.x network. All computers on this network are using 192.168.1.x addresses via DHCP.

Network 2: Comes in on a separate DSL line. Primarily a Linux network controlling several linux based machines. This network has it's own router behind the DSL modem managing DHCP using 175.69.1.x (or something close to that) addresses.

Someone decided to "bridge" these networks by simply plugging each network into the same switch via Cat 5 cable. Bad idea.

The first problem we had (of course) was that the DHCP servers conflicted immediately, so we had to set half of this "mongrel" network to static IPs like 192.168.1.x, and the other computers are getting their addresses via DHCP from the 176.68.1.x network router.

This works - badly. The second router keeps "resetting" the server address on network 1, screwing up our POS systems. But we still need to access the linux machines on network 2 (via http) from the office machines on network 1.

I am thinking the solution to this issue is to place a 3rd router as a bridge between the two networks. Is this correct?

The goal is to be able to be sitting at machine 192.168.1.x on one network, open a web browser, type in a 176.67.1.x address and have the linux web-based application come up from the other network.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Bridging F4 And VLAN On C881SRST

Feb 20, 2013

I am trying to have F4 (the WAN interface) bridged to a VLAN interface. I have put my VLAN interface and my F4 in the same bridge-group, set an IP in the BVI Interface, and made sure that VLAN was properly trunked and configured on one of the router's switch ports
 
In other words, I need F4 to be treated as a switchport in access mode on my VLAN 10.
 
(...)
bridge irb 
(...)
 interface FastEthernet0
description trunk
switchport trunk native vlan 10

[Code].....
 
A ping in my vl10 VRF to 10.0.0.1 does not work. ARP does not resolve.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Bridging In 7600 Platform

Apr 24, 2013

I am trying to bridge the traffic(including different vlan traffic) from rtrA to rtrB using "bridge-group" functionality.I achived the same using a 7200 using the below configuration. [code] When I tried the same using 7600 router ping failed between rtrA and rtrB. Then from the documents it seems "bridge irb" is not supported in 7600.Is there any other way we can achieve the same fuctionality ( eg: using switchport also fine) ?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Vlan Bridging On ASR1001?

Mar 25, 2013

I have following requirements to implement on cisco asr1001 router.
 
1.G0/0/0 and G0/0/1 interfaces are connected to a swith through trunk. Multiple customers  are will be using this trunk interface . Each customer will have subinterface with dot1q tag.
 
2 I want both sides of the ASR1001 to be in same segment .
 
3 If above two is possible I would like to implement shaping on each customers sub-interface level
 
is above implementation is possible on asr1001. configration and ios information. I found a technology called EVC . but I am not sure is that the one suited for me.
 
 network diagram is attached seperately.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2811 - Bridging Wireless And LAN?

Jan 19, 2012

I currently have a 2811 and a LAN setup via a sub-interface FA0/1.3 and using a HWIC-AP I have a sub-interface dot11radio 0/1.5.  I have them setup to work and surf the inet great, but I have recently been overly annoyed with the fact that the wifi cannot access windows shares on desktops and visa versa with the laptops.
 
The trick to make this happen is currently they are not on the same subnet.  I know the answer is bridging the interfaces but when I do this using the simple commands:
 
bridge 1 protocol ieee
interface x & y
bridge-group 1
 
Although what should be simple has failed (good thing I tftp'd my working config).  Here is my current configuration.
 
interface FastEthernet0/1.30
encapsulation dot1Q 30
ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0

[Code].....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3725 - Bridging Wired And Wireless?

Jan 30, 2012

Cisco 3725
IOS: (C3725-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(15)T9
Wireless Module NME
 
Brief current running config below:
 
interface FastEthernet0/0
description WAN LINK
bandwidth 8192

[Code].....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2950 - Bridging Loops / STP Protection

Jan 20, 2012

I have a network where if an end user attaches an hub to the network, or rather one of those cheap unmanaged 8-port mini-switches and then plugs the two ends of the same cable into two ports of that mini-switch, all the network goes down. Loops are generated and many uplinks are shut down in err-disable state due to the loopback reason.
 
I know I could discourage the use of those mini-switches using port security. I even have NAC (cisco) deployed on the network, but there are cases where that mini-switches are allowed by the managment.In those cases, is not possible to exactly know wich hosts (mac addresses), and even how many of them will attach the network concurrently.As I know, they could even chain many mini-switch one to another. Of course, when even a single mini-switch is allowed on the network, it raises as a security hole.
 
Is there a way to allow the use of those devices without the risk of network outages? Some STP protection method? The best would be to have the Cisco access switch to get aware of the loop on its affected switchport (where the mini-switch is attached), immediately shutting down that port (to avoid loops on the network) and maybe sending an SNMP trap or a syslog message.
 
We are using Cisco Catalyst 2950 and 2960 for our access layer.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 / Bridging On Router Sub-interfaces?

Aug 13, 2012

I need to bridge 2 subinterfaces; F0/0.301 and F0/0.302 on a single router.The router interfaces with a Cisco 2960 (LAYER-2) switch.QUESTION is, does a Cisco router support bridging on subinterfaces on the same physical interface?Currently this is NOT operational Spaiing-tree on F0/0.301 and F0/0.302 is down, switch side is forwarding for both Vlans.show ip interface brief shows up/down status of F0/0.301, F0/0.301 and BVI6 is down/down?

:
SETUP:
 bridge irb
!
!
Interface F0/0
no ip address

[code]....

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G Server Farm Switches STP With NIC Bridging

Jan 23, 2013

I have faced a problem with configuring Cisco 3750G series switches as Sever farm switches with redudance.
 
 servers have 2NIC (1GBps) and both are bridged for redundant connections.In both switches all ports get green coluor except one port on Secondary SW. I saw some Spanning tree block port status on that switch.when i type Show cdp neghbor command on switch i can see other switch through a server connected port. Also Spannig tree root bridge election is occured through that port . Simply i need to configure both switches to pass traffic through there uplinks them selves.. but it seems like Secondry switch pass its traffic through primary switch ( i think according to STP ) usinginterconnection of bridge port of a server. [code]

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Bridging Routed Ethernet Ports To L2 Switchports On 2801?

Jan 1, 2013

I have a Cisco 2801 with a 4 port Layer2 switch card installed (HWIC-4ESW).
 
How do I bridge Ethernet0/1 to the 4ESW so if you were to plug a computer into the 4ESW, it would be on the same network as Eth0/1?  see my config below:
 
interface FastEthernet0/1
description Internal Interface
ip address 10.1.2.1 255.255.0.0

[Code].....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3845 / 3560 - Bridging Multiple VLANs Over Router

Aug 27, 2007

We have a customer that is relocating thier headquarters. They have a temporary requirement to bridge multiple vlans or a router T3 link to the new location as they cannot change the IP subnets. Setup is  3560 switch connecting to a 3845 then T3 to remote 3845 and 3560. I need to bridge multiple VLANs. I have seen a good example on how to do it over sonet but I don't see how to translate that to an HDLC or Frame Relay encapsulation for the T3 Link.

View 5 Replies View Related

Setup Multiple Networks On One Rv042?

May 19, 2012

We have 36 cctv cameras slowing down our oracle network pc's all in same subnet. I want to remove the dvr's of cctv to a separate network to improve performance. How to accomplish that with a Rv042 linksys router? Or is there any other better way around. 5 Users access the cctv cameras all the time.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Route Between Two Private Networks And One ISP

Nov 2, 2011

I have two private networks and want/need to route traffic between them.  I also have an ISP connection and want/need to provide internet to at least one of the private networks.  Providing internet access to both is not required or desired.
 
Can this be accomplished with an RV042?  If so, how?
 
P.s.  The problem space, once again, in a non-narrative form with some addresses thrown in:
 
Private Network A: 192.168.200.0/24
Private Network B: 10.50.3.96/27
ISP Network C: 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.0.1GW   192.168.0.2 is WAN1 address on RV042
 
Required Traffic Flow
A <--> B
A  ---> C

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Can One 891 Run Two Networks

Jul 17, 2012

We have an 891 router at our resort but our internal private traffic and public wifi traffic are mixed (two wireless ap are providing the wireless). The boss wants to seperate out the internal private traffic. I felt I could do this with two vlans and one internet connection pretty easily.
 
The boss threw me a screwball and and said he was going to get a seperate DSL account for our internal private traffic. So what he wants is the 891 to handle two internet connections and have two seperate lans (vlans?).
 
I see talk about using the 891 for failover and two internet connections, but I'm just not quite sure and I don't want to play with it for hours before knowing what I'm getting into,
 
So can I run two internet connections and keep the traffic seperate (one lan/vlan per internet connection seperated)?

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: ASA 5505 Two Networks

Jan 7, 2012

I'm fairly new to cisco and the  ASA 5505 I have the asa connected to the internet on 0/0 I have a computer connected to port 1 and on port 2 I have a netgear router. the asa is 192.168.1.1 and the netgear router is 10.1.5.1  I cannot get the computer connected to the asa to communicate with the devices on the netgear router and visa versa. Here is the show version.
 
ASA Version 8.0(4)!hostname ciscoasaenable password Yn8Esq3NcXIHL35v encryptedpasswd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encryptednames!interface Vlan1nameif insidesecurity-level 100ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0!interface Vlan2nameif outsidesecurity-level 0ip address dhcp setroute!interface Ethernet0/0switchport access vlan 2!interface (code)

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Rv042 - Firewall Setup On Vpn?

May 3, 2012

I have the rv042 vpn router which is the main gateway for our internet, connected to the vpn is one server for a software and then another computer is connected for a web server software, well i need to get these setup like so
 
Setup firewall rules that will block all inbound Internet access to the web server except port 443Setup firewall rules that will block all  communication between the two internal networks, except ports 7000 and 1702These must be on two different internal networks

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1941 - Set Up 2 VLANs To Connect To Two Networks?

May 27, 2013

We have a Cisco 1941 with the 8 port EHWIC (with 8 layer 2 gig ports). We are trying to do something very basic .We need to set up 2 VLANs (vlan 10 & vlan 20) to connect to 2 networks - Server & Users.The Internet connection (via a comcast modem) is connected to the G0/0 port of the 1941 and it just gets a DHCP address.
 
[code]...

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 - Setup VRF For Guest Networks?

Dec 10, 2012

I am trying to set up a vrf for guest networks and am having issues on one of the switches.A quick overview (since I dont really know what i am doing ) we have two sites that are connected via lanex. each site has a 3750. The only internet connectivity is the remote site (so all the users at the local site route out through the remote site to get to the internet)I need to make a guest network at the local site using our current infrastructure but it cannot have any access to our network resources.
 
I have created a vlan here (vl166) and on the remote switch

ip vrf TRAINING
didnt do any route distribution
then added "ip vrf forwarding TRAINTING" and readded the ip to the vlan interface
gave it an ip address of 172.16.166.1
 
did the exact same thing on the remote switch but with interface address of .2
 
enabled ospf on both switches.... router ospf 3 vrf TRAINING
 
I cant ping from one interface to the other... when I try pinging from the remote switch I get :
 
CISCO3750MCI-1#ping vrf TRAINING 172.16.166.1
% VRF does not have a usable source address
 CISCO3750MCI-1#show ip vrf interfaces TRAINING
Interface              IP-Address      VRF                              Protocol
Vl16                   172.16.16.2     TRAINING                        down
 
I cant see why the interface is down. Nothing in the logs (even when I do no shut... it just accepts the command but doesnt come up)

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Setting Up Triple Router Y Configuration Using RV042?

Mar 3, 2013

i am currently using 2 DSL WIFI modem and wants to combine them to my RV042 dual wan router but as i set them up using WAN1 and Wan2 as "Obtain IP Automatically" there is no internet connection?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: RV042 - Direct One Computer On Network To Access Particular WAN

Sep 1, 2011

I have a RV042 Dual WAN router.  What I would like to be able to do is to direct a computer on my network to access one particular WAN.  For example, WAN1 is a DSL line and WAN2 is a cable line.  I would like to direct a computer on our LAN to access the cable line always, even though I have Smart Link Backup set to WAN1.  Is this possible?

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1941w Samsung Galaxy Note LTE Cannot See Wi-Fi Networks

Mar 20, 2012

I have a number of devices in my house connecting without issues:
 
1.) PS3
2.) XBox 360
3.) HP CM1415FNW
4.) Sony Dash
5.) iPone 4g/4gs
6.) Asus EP121
7.) Six Laptops
8.) TV
9.) Denon A/V
 
My android cant even pickup the SSIDs, I stand beside and still nothing, the SSIDs are not hidden, Ive tried different encryptions, changed from AES to TKIP, tried different channels.  I have two seperate SSIDs, one 2.4GHz with B/G/N and a 5.0 with A/N Available, neither SSID is getting picked up

View 4 Replies View Related

Protocols / Routing :: Hosted VPN / IP Forwarding / Routing And Bridging?

Apr 5, 2011

I have got a PC at work (Windows XP Pro SP3) that is on two networks with the IPs 10.20.30.167, subnet 255.255.255.0 (internet enabled) and 10.0.0.20, subnet 255.255.255.0 (no internet). On the 10.0.0.X network there is a gateway with the IP 10.0.0.200 allowing access to another network; 192.168.60.X, subnet 255.255.255.0 (no internet). I have added the route on my work PC to access the 192.168.60.X network via this gateway and I can access all PCs on all three networks from this PC.Now, I am using LogMeIn Hamachi so that I can access the networks at work from home. The PC at work is the 'gateway' PC on the Hamachi network. When installing Hamachi it created a new network connection and bridged this connection with my 10.20.30.167 network adapter to allow access to the 10.20.30.X network from an external PC when connected using the Hamachi VPN connection. I have manually configured my Hamachi connection on my PC at home to the IP 10.20.30.169, subnet 255.255.255.0, with the default gateway set to 10.20.30.167. I can ping all computers on the 10.20.30.X network from my PC at home.

I then added a route on my PC at home for 10.0.0.X to go via 10.20.30.167 (the 'gateway' on the Hamachi network). I also enabled IP forwarding on the 'gateway' PC (my PC at work). I can not ping any PC on the 10.0.0.X network from my PC at home apart from 10.0.0.20 (the other NIC in the Hamachi gateway PC) and 10.0.0.30 (another PC on the 10.20.30.X network that is also on the 10.0.0.X network).Now, with IP forwarding enabled on the Hamachi gateway PC I would assume after adding the route on my PC at home for 10.0.0.X traffic to go via 10.20.30.167 that I would be able to ping all PCs on the 10.0.0.X network...I also tried adding a route on my home PC to send all traffic for the 192.168.60.X network via 10.20.30.167 which has a route via 10.0.0.200 to the 192.168.60.X network, but this also did not work.I then tried adding the 10.0.0.20 network adapter into the network bridge that the Hamachi connection made, also keeping both IPs (10.20.30.167 and 10.0.0.20) on this network bridge by adding them into the 'IP Settings' in the 'Advanced TCI/IP Settings'. I also added the 10.0.0.200 gateway for good measure. I still cannot ping any PC on the 10.0.0.X or 192.168.60.X networks from my PC at home.

I have also added the route to the 10.20.30.X network on a PC on the 10.0.0.X network to go via 10.0.0.20 and tried pinging a PC on the 10.20.30.X network but this also has not worked. Also setting the default gateway on a PC on the 10.0.0.X network to 10.0.0.20 does not allow this...Surely bridging the networks 10.20.30.167 and 10.0.0.20 on my work PC would allow another PC on the 10.0.0.X network to access the 10.20.30.X network after adding the route or setting 10.0.0.20 as the default gateway?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: RV042 - Firewall Blocks Ports Though Access Rule

Dec 10, 2011

I have a Cisco RV042 Wired Router. I've got a static IP and a MS Small Business Server in my Router Network. I have forwarded the essential ports to use the IIS and the Exchange Server of my SBS2011 (HTTPS, HTTP, smtp, rpc). I have also created some access rules for these ports, but I don't have any access on my server services, if the firewall is activated.
 
Here are my Firewall Access Rules from the RV042 Web Interface:

View 16 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750V - Mixing Public And Private Networks On Same Switch

Oct 23, 2012

We have many remote offices that we want to add public wifi and a couple of other services that would be completely outside of our internal network.  Each office has a 3750 with plenty of open ports.  How can I safely create a vlan for public access on these switches which currently have our internal network on.  I have read that people are doing this to save on the cost of purchasing a dedicated switch.  Some people are using access lists and one person mentioned creating a private vlan for the public network.  I looked up private vlan and it seemed bit confusing.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4500 Max Spanning-tree Instance When Merging Networks

Feb 23, 2013

I have been tasked with migrating 24 access switches from their current distribution switches, 2x stack 3750's to a their new 4500 distribution switches. Ideally with no downtime. My plan for this was to connect the 4500's to the 3750's and create replica vlans on the 4500's therefore spanning the L2 broadcast domain across both sets of switches.
 
Each one of the vlans that had been created on the 4500's would have the STP bridge priority set to 4096 and 8192. When one of the uplinks from the access switches to the old 3750 stack is connected to the 4500's, as I understand this should have a stp cost of 4 and move the old uplink into discarding therefor passing traffic across the new link. This would then allow me to disconnect the old link and connect it to the second 4500 as the L2 traffic is spanned between all switches. Not ideal but the only way I can see this working.
 
Once each of these switches have been moved, the SVI's and static routes will be moves from the 3750 stack to the 4500s.The problem I have is that I've ran out of the available STP instances I can use, these 3750's all seem to be at 128 already so as far as I know, is that if a loop was to be formed when the 128 allocation is hit this would indeed cause loop in the network.I have a total of in use vlans to be spanned of 700. I'm unaware how many instances of stp the 4500's can deal with however I can bet it's not 700. 3000 logical interfaces I believe is the maximum I can see online with regards to how many stp instances the 4500's can use.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 - Local Subnet To Edge Router Two Networks

May 13, 2012

I need to make some changes on our network. We currently have two sites 150 miles apart we join both by way of fiber and on each side we have Cisco 3750 stack switches, configure trunking for all V lans on one port in site one then through the the long haul fiber to site two with site one using 10.1.1.30 and site two using 10.1.1.40 as their default gateway, with static routing all V lan sub nets to the other sites default gateway life is good.
 
My question - seeing how we have sites using the same sub net 10.1.1.x to trunk all data to each site through switches; we need to now change the network and add each site to the MPLS network, site one switch 1 IP address 10.1.1.30 going to MPLS router one with FA0/0/0 using IP 10.1.1.31, site two having switch 1 IP address 10.1.1.40 going to MPLS router one with FA0/0/0 using 10.1.1.41. I need to know will this work.
 
We have the same sub net in each site 10.1.1.x to the MPLS routers then the external router interface connecting each site to local switches, will this cause any problems by using the same local sub net for each site?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 887m - Unable To Route Data Between Primary And Secondary IP Networks

Jan 7, 2013

We an 887m router in our office with an unmanaged switch. We have two networks, 192.168.0.x and 192.168.11.x connected to router on the same interface (192.168.11.253 is a secondary ip) but I can seem to be able to route packets from one network to the other. Internet traffic is fine from both networks. I can't see what I'm doing wrong here. I can ping the 192.168.11.253 (router) from the 192.168.0 network but nothing beyond that.
 
I tried this at home with no other config and its the same. Is this by design?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4507 Extreme Networks Black Diamond Switch That Doesn't Support STP

Jun 28, 2012

We have a customer that has a fiber rum between 2 building. They want to have 2 seperate fibers active that terminate into the same switch on each end. (redundancy).
 
In building A they have an extreme networks black diamond switch that does not support STP.In bulding B they have a Cisco 4507.
 
We will ahve to use a layer 3 routed connection due to the fact their switch in building A does not support STP.Our tech does not want to use static route becuase he does not want to setup IP SLA for the redundant connection.
 
Will RIPv2 work for this scenario and failover to the other fiber if needed? The hop count is the same for each fiber path..

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Infrastructure :: 877W / Integrated Routing And Bridging Is Not Configured Bvi

May 28, 2012

We had one 877W Cisco Soho Router ,I am planing to do a Site-Site VPN connection .while i configuring the router i am facing issue in assighning IP address in BVI interface .It gave me  error "integrated routing and bridging is not configured bvi" .how can i resolve  the issue .

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 3900 Routing And Bridging Multiple Interface Configuration

Dec 5, 2011

I know this is not a the preferred way to do it, but this just an interim network configuration until the Remote Site gets re-located and reconfigured. I'm trying to bridge and route traffic and hoping the community can offer a review of the sample configuration and/or some ideas to make this a reality.

Existing network is bridged across site-to-site private line (p-2-p) so 192.168.100.0/24 devices exist at both locations. In order to reduce bandwidth consumption across the p-2-p, the 172.20.100.0/24 devices (end user PCs and new to the environemnt) will be routed out a local Internet connection which in turn reduces the p-2-p traffic to just private network traffic for the two networks. That same network requires routing through the 192.168.100.0/24 network in order to access the private WAN connected to the 3900 router with IP 192.168.100.1.

View 0 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved