Cisco Switching/Routing :: 887m - Unable To Route Data Between Primary And Secondary IP Networks
Jan 7, 2013
We an 887m router in our office with an unmanaged switch. We have two networks, 192.168.0.x and 192.168.11.x connected to router on the same interface (192.168.11.253 is a secondary ip) but I can seem to be able to route packets from one network to the other. Internet traffic is fine from both networks. I can't see what I'm doing wrong here. I can ping the 192.168.11.253 (router) from the 192.168.0 network but nothing beyond that.
I tried this at home with no other config and its the same. Is this by design?
I have recently configured secondary ip address on LAN Interface of Cisco C6509.. We have some application which needs to use broadcast traffic communication to communicate with client... Broadcast is working within subnet & also working from broadcast server to primary subnet. But not working from secondary subnet.. I have checked broadcast within secondary IP range & it's working fine... Secondary not working broadcast with primary and also with broadcast server... broadcast address is different for these subnet but both should be communicate since configured on same interface... When I went through Cisco website found that command "ip directed broadcast" which will pass broadcast to different subnet... But I'm not sure whether any other impact if I enable that command on particular Ethernet interface...
Today I ran a failover test between our primary and secondary ACS systems (ran 'acs stop' on the primary) and in the process decided to promote the secondary while I had the primary down. All was fine until I brought the primary back up and tried to re-register the secondary to it. I get the following error message: I went into System Administration >Operations >Distributed System Management on each and it showed the other device as deregestered, tried to promote from there but it failed too, so I deleted them and tried to register the secondary again. After that didn't work I tried rebooting both but that didn't work either. I know the user/pass I'm using is good and I've tried using both the IP address and the hostname.
ACS/admin# sh app version acs Cisco ACS VERSION INFORMATION-----------------------------Version : 5.3.0.40.5Internal Build ID : B.839Patches :5-3-0-40-5
I have an MPLS network router(Router1) and an internet router(Internet1) at a site of mine(Site1). the MPLS router sends all unknown traffic out the internet router. Router1 is the default gateway for all hosts and directs the traffic.I also have another network at an alternate site (Site2) on the same mpls network also with an internet egress. It is composed of an MPLS router (router2) and an internet router (Internet2).I would like Router1 to send internet bound traffic out Internet2 if Internet1 is down. Basically the statement on Router1 for the unknown traffice is ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.31.1.254I have never heard of IP SLA before but it seems to be the best method for this situation.
I've recently tried to update the modem firmware on an 887M that is actually using an Annex M service and after rebooting to kick in the new modem firmware, the router loses sync. I've tried this with various other 877, 877M, 887 and 887Ms on normal Annex A services with no problems, but this Annex M service doesn't like it at all.
but on interface gi 1/0/1 i want to have data from vlan 10 tagged as VLAN 20. At this time i have solved this issue very primitively
I have set up gi 1/0/2 as int mode acces, acces vlan 20 and i have connected gi 1/0/2 with gi 1/0/3 with eth cable. int gi 1/0/3 is switchpor mode acces, switchport acces vlan 10
How can you figure out your primary and secondary DNS? I have a linksys router, and i'm trying to figure out what my primary and secondary DNS are so i can hook up my PS3 online.
i have a Layer3 Switch Cisco WS-c3750G -24T , initially i have a IOS version c3750-Ipbase , recentely i have upgraded my IOS to c3750-Ipservices-M to enable to PBR for my network , i have created all the acl and tried to give the route-map with PBR , the command was initiallying but i am not able to see the applied route-map in my policy route , i have gone through the blog and enabled SDM prefer routing , but no luck .
I have been having problems when trying to host servers on games, etc.I have 2 routers. A modem router, which is a Thomson router. That is the main one. It has a wire connecting from it, to a D-Link router that is near my Computer, and my brother's one. Then that D-Link router has 2 wires from each port, to mine, and my brother's computer.So, I am trying to host games.I didn't connect to the Thomson one, which is also wireless. I am connected to the wired one (D-Link). When I try to host while connected to it, my brother, and other people can't find the server. My brother and me can find it on LAN, but not Internet.But when I disconnect from the Wired, and connect to the Thomson wireless one, and then when I host, I can find it on INTERNET. Even my brother can. He can connect to it perfectly.
I do not want to connect to the wireless, because then it will cause lag spikes every 5 minutes.So, when I disconnect from the wireless, and connect to the wire, I went into the CMD, and typed in ipconfig. I found out that the Default Gteway is the D-Link IP.When I connect to the wireless, and disconnect the wired, I went into CMD, and then the Default Gateway is the Thomson one, which is the main router.So what I want to do, is use the D-Link router, and that router will have the same IP as my thomson one, so that I can host perfectly with no lag spikes, and using a wired connection.
I have a question about the number of Cisco licenses needed in two cases for ACS 5.3 Virtual Machine.One primary + One secondary : Just one license for all or one license for the primary + another one for the secondary ?One primary + several secondaries : Just one license for all or one license for the primary + just one license for all the secondaries ?
We are trying to configure vrf aware GET VPN with COOP having primary and secondary key servers and also 3 GM routers. All GM routers we use are Cisco 888 and Key servers we use cisco 2911 routers. All GMs crypto maps have been applied into Vlan interface as there's no L3 interface on 888 routers.
Always members can form a tunnel with primary KS, we have configured redundancy with secondary key server and listed on each GM primary and secondary KS on GDOI group.
The issue we facing is that whenever we shutdown the primary or secondary servers the tunnel is not forming with available KS unless otherwise we mannually clear the crypto session. In another way when primary KS down it doest not fall back to secondary KS and no GM get registered. We have already played with all the timers such as DPD, SA lifetimes, GDOI rekey lifetime etc and also exchanging the keys (import/export) with KS and COOPs but there's no luck. We could see the following message was seen on both KS.
[code] 192.168.1.3 is the primary KS and 192.168.1.6 is the secondary KS.I captured attached debug output from 1 GM and secondary KS while I shutdonw the primary KS and also attached is our senario we were trying get work.
Also attached is the show output from both KSs when it form a tunnel with GM.
On 1811W Router i have OSPF running and i do not need this static route.ip route 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.3,when i try to delete i get error ,1811w#,config t,Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.,1811w(config)#no ip route 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.3,%No matching route to delete,1811w(config)#.
Here is my configuration below , i have upgraded my C-3750 switch IOS from IPbase to IPservices , after upgrading i have tried to apply PBR on my Vlan 4 and failed , when i am tying to apply route-map to Vlan4 the command was taking but i am unable to see the route-map when sh run , i am giving the command as "ip policy route-map TTSL" in my Vlan4 , below is the configuration.
In Vlan2 i have connected one ISP and Vlan4 I have connected one ISP , my local subnets are 192.168.1.x and 192.168.2.x , now i want to route the 192.168.1.x traffic from Vlan2 and 192.168.2.x Traffic from Vlan4 .
sh boot coreswitch#sh boot BOOT path-list : flash:c3750-ipservices-mz.122-35.SE5/c3750-ipservices-mz.122-35.SE5.bin
I have more than 5000 sq. ft home and have some dead places other end of the house. Now I am looking for Range Extender/Repeater to boost signal. My primary wireless router is Motorola Surfboard SBG6580 and Secondary Linksys E3000 (planning to update firmware to DD-WRT). So I wanted something such that I can roam between the two routers without switching SSID (use single SSID name for primary and secondary DD-WRT routers) and connect automatically to whichever the best signal (or) strength router. In work place we have same thing like that single wireless SSID name which automatically connect wireless SSID from one end to another end of the building.
We have 2 ASA 5505s in a data center at a remote site.
Whilst troubleshooting another issue I noticed the below. I don't know much about fail over but this would suggest that the secondary ASA is active and the primary ASA is on standby.
if the primary is "active" then how come the secondary is the active ASA? I would have thought that once the primary ASA became active this would assume the "main" role".
Management purchased a HA package from Cisco consisting of 2 5508's with pre installed 500 users license on the Primary WLC and none on the secondary WLC. We have 5508's already so I am familiar with setting them up and so forth. What I am not familiar with is setting them up using HA for failover and license sharing. I've looked and looked and can't find documentation online showing how to set this up. I have found some but nothing that is complete. I have spent 2 days spinning my wheels.
I have a couple of ACS 5.2 configured as active and backup and I am doing dot 1x authentication using these servers . I have configured the switch with the bellow configuration.
IP address of Primary had to be changed, to respond to a hardware failure of TACACS server with IP in many device configs.
Now the Secondary fails to respond to repeated "Deregister from Primary" requests, even after reload - apparently because it cannot reach the Primary at its old IP address.
Requesting Deregister in GUI generates pop-up that says, "This operation will deregister this ACS Instance from the Primary Instance. Management applications on this ACS instance will be restarted and you will be required to login again. After performing this operation
Cisco ACS 5.2 secondary server is configured as a log collector for both primary and secondary server .Now i am facing problem in log collection from primary server .ACS secondary server is not collecting any logs from primary .
I have a pair of ASA5520s in active/active failover - this works fine. Both primary and secondary ASAs are running 8.2(2) code.I have a 30-day temp 50 seat SSL license that I applied to the primary. I then started having problems with L2L tunnels.
I noted that if the 'show crypto isakmp sa' state for an L2L was MM_STANDBY, then the remote protected net could not reach my side. However, I could ping across to the other side at which time the state changed to MM_ACTIVE as I would expect and the remote could then reach my side.
I believe this results from the differences between the two licenses. When I applied the 50 seat SSL lic. it disabled failover, but I was willing to risk that for a few days to do show my customer the benifits of SSL connectivity. Note license differences. Is this causing the MM_STANDBY IKE issue and if so can I overcome it and use the 50 SSL VPN Peers lic.
Cisco ASA 5505 Security Plus 1 link with PPOE dialup for internet access
desirable situation: Primary link with a PPOE dialup Secondary Link with DHCP address Asignment
Problem: i want to configure Dual ISP Failover modus, but the problem exist when i configure the ip sla syntax it looks good in the running config. but after a reload the secondary line becomes primary
It looks like the ppoe client authentication is busy when the ip sla tracking mechanism becomes active. can i tweak the settings that the ip sla tracking mechanism starts later?
What i the correct config for Dual ISP setup with primary PPOE and secondary DHCP
We have a customer who has a network consisting of two ISPs, one as a primary and the other as a backup. We are trying to create a configuration that would allow the primary link to fail and the secondary link to automatically pick up traffic and begin routing .how to set something like this up. Both routers are non Cisco routers and there for HSRP is out.
I am trying to get my workstation to talk to a workstation on a different sub-net through a Cisco 3560 switch. The switch is running the following IOS version: [code]
My primary network is 172.16.0.0 and I am trying to connect to a device on a 192.168.111.0 sub-net. [code]
What would be the best way to get the two workstations talking via the switch?
I configure HSRP on Router 2951 as a primary router, and Router 2811 as backup router. But when I am switching off my Primary router the backup router is taking 2 mins to take over form primary router.
I have 6509 with dual sups, the secondary sup has failed and I am not able to bring it up even after reboot. the state says unknown/other. What that state" unknown" means?. I could not find any documentation about this state. [code]
I have a few old 2600 routers (2621, different IOS's) which I'm now replacing for new one's from the 2900 series (2901, Version 15.1(4)M4).In my configuration I have two IP addresses in my LAN interface and I have HSRP configured within the secondary IP subnet range. It would be something like this:
interface GigabitEthernet0/1 ip address 172.x.x.x x.x.x.x secondary ip address 10.z.z.z z.z.z.z
[Code].....
Now, in the new 2900 routers, my interface configuration hasn't changed however I can see that the hello packets are now sent with the source within the respective HSRP IP subnet so I had to edit my acl for that:
I have the above firewall which is working as it should but I have came across an issue with a recent upgrade to Microsoft Exchange 2007 and Outlook 2010 Autodiscovery due to the way the port forwarding has been configured for Outlook Web Access (OWA) on the router.
The router is forwarding OWA requests to the exchange server on port 8080 and the default website in IIS on the Exchange Server under which OWA sits and unfortunately Autodiscovery has been set with an SSL port of 8080. I think the reason for this is that we have an RDP server and the router is forwarding all port 443 requests to this server. Due to this Outlook clients cannot connect to Exchange through autodiscovery and cannot therefore get FREE/BUSY and a few other things.
I have 5 public IP addresses and only use two at the moment, one on the ADSL router and one on this firewall. I have no spare interfaces on either the router or the ADSL router.
My question is, is it possible to have a secondary ip address set on the public facing interface and set different rules for this IP which would allow me to forward requests on that IP to a different server?
We have a bit of a problem when deploying VTP v3 in our network. When command vtp primary vlan is issued, switch typically send query to appropriate multicast address in order to find out whether there is already some other one. The problem we are experiencing is that old primary server is not discovered, because it fails to reply on those multicasts.
This debug messages (from the old primary server )may be more describing.
We have Cisco 4503-E switch and software version is cat4500e-universal.SPA.03.01.01.SG.150-1.xo1.bin. Now i have uploaded cat4500e-universal.SPA.03.02.01.SG.150-2.SG1.bin IOS-XE software in the switch and want to boot the switch from this image.
When quoting a Catalyst 3750X with PoE (WS-C3750X-48P-E) the Dynamic Configurator Tool allows to include as the secondary power supply option the Catalyst 3K-X 350W AC Secondary Power Supply (C3KX-PWR-350WAC/2), but the default included primary power supply is the Catalyst 3K-X 715W AC Power Supply (C3KX-PWR-715WAC). My questions are the following:
1. Will this combination of power supply work?
2. Will the C3KX-PWR-350WAC/2 be able to power up the switch if the primary power supply of 715W fails?
3. Will the PoE will be lost if the primary power supply fails and only the secondary power supply of 350W keeps working?
4. If this secondary power supply of 350W is not suitable for PoE, why it is available as a secondary power supply option in the Dynamic Configurator Tool for a PoE switch?
