Cisco Switching/Routing :: Cat6509 Switches With VSS Capable Sups
Nov 24, 2011I currently have 2 Cat6509 switches with VSS Capable Sups. One of the switches has an extra 10Gig Lincard. Will VSS still work in this scenerio?/?
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3550 - IP Routing In L3 Capable Switches?
Apr 11, 2012Is L3 ip routing on by default in 3550s? If so is the "ip routing" command visible in the config file? If no - I assume that one would enable L3 routing with that config command.In general terms are there any IOS devices where ip routing is enabled and one would not see the "ip routing" command in config. I.E. if that command is not visible in the config could you assume there is no L3 capablity in that device?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 - Switches Capable Of 10GB Port Density
Feb 5, 2013I have 3560's in my current environment, operating in the core/distro/access layers. The switches are in a star configuration, performs only layer 2 switching, and utilizes copper (no plans on moving to fiber).
With a fairly limited budget, I've been contemplating on upgrading the central node to a stacked 3750X to eliminate that single point of failure, and trunk the rest of the 3560's to the stacked switch. I wanted to be sure that the 3750X switches will be right for my environment (90-100 hosts), and if what I explained above is a good solution.
I'm also looking like to upgrade 6-7 of my servers (and SAN) with 10GB network cards. Do the ports on the 3750X have port densities capable of 10GB? If not, what switches provide that capability?
Cisco Switching/Routing :: WS-C2960S-48TS-L / Reasons To Limit 1Gb Capable Switches To 100Mb?
Jul 8, 2012Our network administrator restricts all our new 1Gb switches to only 100Mb, to which he claims it will increase overall performance. Preventing devices from bottlenecking the network. (that is, only restricting the main switch ports, not the uplinks)For example we have a new building with 2x WS-C2960S-48TS-L connected together with FlexJack and then a 1Gb Fiber connection back to our core switch.
This building is on it's own subnet and there is little broadcast traffic. I don't see the point other than it hinders the potential speed we could use. Labs are set up in this building and 1Gb is MUCH faster when it comes to imaging and software deployment.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / 720 Sups Random ROMmon Boots
Dec 27, 2012Got a long lingering, year long issue that has spanned about 8 supervisor cards and a complete chassis swap. The 6509 acts as a ITN in our facility. The active sup card at random points of pipe usage boots into rommon mode, seriously inhibiting our company. I'm able to swap the 2 fiber pairs that we had going into the active supervisor card into the secondary and usually this works for another random amount of time, however, today it occured within minutes of hooking up the fiber links. Sitting there for about 5 minutes it booted into ROMMON. When this happens, I'm able to boot the sup card back to good status. Previous remedial actions, other than replacing sup cards/chassis, was checking the config register and making sure it was x2102. Previously, it was not, and we corrected and reloaded and it took, we thought this would fix the problem, until today.
[code]....
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Add WS-X6716-10GE Card In CAT6509
Sep 8, 2011I will be adding two WS-X6716-10GE cards in a CAT6509 soon, and will create 4 port channels with 3 ports each in the new cards, but I do have a few questions:
1 - I will be adding cards in slots 3 and 8, can I mix and bundle ports from both modules into a single etherchannel, I mean, like two ports in slot 3 and 1 port in slot 8 to create a PortChannel ?! Or can I only bundle ports in the same card/port-group in a Etherchannel using this WS-X6716-10GE card?
2 - Do I need to issue the hw-module slot x oversubscription port-group y command in order to be able to bundle ports in the Etherchannel I need to create ?! I will be using 4 Etherchannels (LACP) with 3 ports each, running in trunk mode. So I guess, I will be using something like:
int tengig 3/1
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
logging event link-status
[Code] ....
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Configuring Netflow For Layer 2 Switched Traffic On Cat6509
Jul 10, 2012I want to configure layer 2 switched netflow on my cat 6509 running vss,
I have configured the 2 commands below
ip flow ingress layer2-switched vlan 1,2,3
ip flow export layer2-switched vlan 1,2,3
However, if I look in the config the export bit isnt there after?
It is running a PFC
VS-F6K-PFC3C
Should layer 2 switched netflow work in this chassis ? it says on the Cisco site that it works on the below
"The command is supported on Supervisor Engine 720 in PFC3B and PFC3BXL mode only and on Supervisor Engine 2 with a PFC2"
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Is 3750 SW Capable Of Handling Full Routing Tables
Oct 8, 2012Is a 3750 sw capable of handling full routing tables and what can you recommend in a small mutihomed BGP router or switch capable of handling full routing tables?
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: ASA 5520 - NAT Capable Device With High Throughput
Jan 26, 2012I'll have to replace an old WS-C3550-24. Reasons for this: EOL/EOS & we'll need a NAT capable device...
As I understood, the only L3 catalyst that is able to perform NAT is a 6500? Is that correct? If the above is correct, it seems I can only replace the setup by using a router/ASA with a L2 switch. A router with high throughput (+/- 300Mbps) is hard to find, especially as NAT will require CPU resources...
So, my best (affordable price) solution is getting an ASA5520 (450Mbps FW throughput) and a L2 switch?
Cisco Switching/Routing :: POE Switch Capable Of Powering 9971 / Cam And Think Client
Nov 4, 2011Which smaller POE switch is capable of powering a 9971 IP phone with a cam and a think client attached?
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960-48 - Capable Of Being Backbone Switch For 1000+ Users Network
Feb 6, 2013Wondering if this switch is capable of being a backbone switch for a network of about 1000+ users and if the switch can handle a sustained 30Meg of data going across it?
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Stackable Switches Etherchannel To Core Switches
Nov 18, 2011If I have two stackable switches one switch uplinks to one 6509 core switch and the other connection uplinks to another 6509 core switch, and also the other stackable switch does not connect to the core switches. Because I am using hsrp and also we are not using vss then one uplink to the core is not in used only ones is so then how does creating an etherchannel between does two uplinks to both core switches benefit me in anyway such as more bandwith and using both uplinks at the same time or I'm I wrong?
View 7 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Stackable Switches And 6509 Core Switches
Nov 14, 2011If I have two stackable switches were only one stackable switch has two uplinks one uplink goes to one core 6509 switch and the other uplink goes to the other 6509 core switch can a Layer 3 etherchannel be used if each uplink go to a different core switch, by the way hsrp is running between both switches and also can you give an example how data will be routed from the stackable switch through the ethernetchannel to one of the core switch accross the WAN to another core switch?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Wireless :: Radios On 1242AG Stay Down With Injector And Cat6509
Apr 18, 2012i noticed that the 1242AG does not bring up the Radios, when there is a Power Injector connected.I see in the Logs of the AP:
%CDP_PD-2-POWER_LOW: All radios disabled - NEGOTIATED WS-C6509 <Switchport MAC Add>
The Module in the 6500 is a WS-X6348-RJ-45 The Option "Power Injector installed" on the WLC is also enabled, with the MAC Address from the Switchport, but no change.When i disable CDP on the mentioned Switch Port and reload the AP, it comes up and runs fine.
Cisco Wireless :: Cat6509 - WiSM Module Not Coming In OPER-UP Status
Aug 15, 2012The problem is WiSM module not coming in OPER-UP status , it’s in Started-Keepalive status.I did run debug wism events on cat6509 and seeing below logs:
[code]...
It’s receiving garp request from controller and assign ip to controller but then keepalive time expired and it’s put the controller in started-keeplaive status.
Cisco Firewall :: Cat6509 / FWSM - Default Route Per Bridge Group In Transparent Mode
Nov 14, 2011I want to set up FWSM 4.1 on Cat6509 with multiple bridge groups in one transparent context. (as the manual says it can support up to 8 bridge-groups and the intent is to save security contexts) For a host in VLAN21 (b1_inside) to talk to a host in VLAN41 (b2_inside), traffic needs to be go out to MSFC which routed back the traffic through the FWSM. My question is how can I define a default route per bridge-group, I would assume FWSM should take the following two default routes per bridge-group interface but it won't;
route b1_outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.11.75.1 1
route b2_outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.11.76.1 1
seems like it allows only one default route per the context and gives me an error - "ERROR: Cannot add route entry, possible conflict with existing route"
How can I achieve outside per individual bridge-group?
FWSM context config:
Interface VLAN11
nameif b1_outside
bridge-group 1
security-level 0
!
Interface VLAN21
nameif b1_inside
[code]...
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Pair Of N7K Distribution Switches Connected To A Pair Of Aggregation Switches
Mar 11, 2012We have a pair of N7K distribution switches connected to a pair of N7K Aggregation switches.We run vPC on both pairs of n7k's.
-n7k-d1 has two interfaces in a Port-Channel connecting to n7k-a1 & n7k-a2. (PC1)
-n7k-d2 also has two interfaces in a Port-Channel connecting to n7k-a1 & n7k-a2. (PC2)
My problem is that Spanning-Tree is blocking PC2 and all traffic from n7k-d2 is traversing the Peer-Link before reaching the Aggregation layer. Is this the best design for connecting two pairs of n7k's with vPC or if a better design would be to connect all 4 links into the same Port-Channel and vPC?
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2906 So Much Switching Capacity In Switches
Sep 13, 2012Why Cisco implements so much switching capacity in their switches Obviously,16 Gbps of permutation performance is too much for the 8,8 Gbits (24*200+2*2000) needed by ports so why they put so many bandwidth?
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Configuring Intervlan Routing Between 2801 And HP Switches?
Aug 5, 2012I'm trying to configure intervlan routing between a cisco 2801 router and HP/Amer switches. Using int fa0/1 and subinterfaces I was sure I had it configured correctly, but I cannot ping the default gateways when I place a host in a particular vlan. Below is what I have configured.
HP switch - port 9 connects to fa0/1 on 2801
ip default-gateway 10.1.100.1
trunk 9 Trk1 trunk
trunk 10 Trk2 trunk - to another switch
[code].....
Cisco Switching/Routing :: InterVlan Routing With 3750 And 2960 Switches?
Nov 21, 2012I am using a 3750 as a default gateway for multiple Vlans on a few 2960 switches. The trunk lines are configured and working and I have assigned ip addresses to each of the Vlan interfaces on the 3750. My issue is that I can only ping the ip address on the Vlan interface of the 3750 if I have a working computer plugged directly into the Vlan on the 3750. I only have 3 vlans on the 3750 that have hosts directly connected (vlans 2, 10 and 40) the other vlans ( 20 and 70) don't have any clients plugged into them on the 3750 but the hosts reside on 2 different 2960s that connect via trunk ports. How do I keep the vlan interface on the 3750 switch pingable when I don't have hosts directly connected in that vlan on the 3750? (yes, I have enabled ip routing on the 3750)
View 5 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Policy Based Routing With 3750 Switches
Oct 17, 2011I have a simple design with 3750. I configured a route-map which define a next hop. I defined this route-map on a policy on a vlan interface.When I test some ping and a debug ip policy and it seems that my policy never match.Is there any mechanism that prevent the switch from using PBR? I think of CEF .
View 5 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Policy Based Routing And 3750 Switches?
Sep 5, 2012I have a simple design with 3750.I configured a route-map which define a next hop.I defined this route-map on a policy on a vlan interface.When I test some ping and a debug ip policy and it seems that my policy never match.Is there any mechanism that prevent the switch from using PBR?
View 10 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 4506 Connecting Switches Together With IP Routing
Aug 31, 2012CiscoSwitch1(4506) has 3 VLANs(12,13,14) and Switch2(4948) has 3 different VLANs(22,23,24) and IP routing has been enabled in both switches with SVI interfaces for each vlan. intervlan routing is works fine.Now there is a requirement to connect these switches together. Vlan 12 on the Cisco switch 4506 has to be made available from vlan 22 from Switch2(4948). basically Vlan 12 is having a multicast source (225.0.0.0 & 226.0.0.0) which should be accessabile from vlan 22 of cisco switch 4948.I got 2 ideas
1) Create a trunk between these switches and configure L2 vlan(12) in cisco 4948...i know theoritically it should work but what my concern is Ip routing enabled in both switches will it create any issues? is it a gud solution to this requirement?
2) Create a separate IP network on the ports connecting to both switches and set up routes to the networks.ex- console(config)#ip route 192.168.10.10 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.1.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: L3 Routing On 3750 Switches?
Jan 21, 2013I have a small campus network using 3750 stackable switches and a 3725 router (see diagram below). Currently the 3725 router is handling inter-vlan routing for the campus and it looks like it's not able to handle the amount of traffic we're pushing. The router CPU sometimes hits above 90% due traffic load. What I would like to accomplish is move L3 process over to the 3750 MDF stack and the IDF1 stack. I am thinking creating SVI's on both MDF stack and IDF1 stack, run HSRP between the two stacks and may be do load balance traffic between the two stack as well.
View 8 Replies View RelatedCisco VPN :: 1841 Router - IOS VPN Capable
Aug 24, 2011I have a 1841 Router running C1841-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M ver 12.4(12), is this IOS VPN capable, if not what IOS would I need to run a VPN?
View 2 Replies View RelatedCat 5 Cable Capable For 1000Mb Per Second
Dec 23, 2011Currently I'm using BT Broadband with a Cat 5 Ethernet cable.My laptop has a gigabit Ethernet port, and I have the cable plugged in.Is there a way to determine whether or not the cable is capable of 1000Mbit/s, as I am receiving 100Mbit/s, when I check the connection.Also, will replacing the cable with a new one achieve the full 1Gbit/s?
View 14 Replies View RelatedCisco :: Use Poe From 6504 Switch Which Is Capable To Burn A NIC?
Dec 24, 2011i wanted to know if there is any way to use poe from 6504 switch which is capable of burn a NIC?if there is a Way ' can you tell me how i can do it ??
View 10 Replies View RelatedWay To Tell What Networking Level Laptop Is Capable Of?
Oct 31, 2011Is there any easy way to tell what networking level my laptop is capable of? Its an older IBM, T30.Wireless works fine but I'm thinking of upgrading the router and want to make sure the laptop will connect using the faster N network speed.
View 5 Replies View RelatedSearch For A Multicast Capable Router?
Oct 16, 2012I run an Allen & Heath digital mixer. The iDr32 mixrack sits on the stage and has a 2 port Ethernet switch on board, which allows the device to be controlled with a PC. If you then add a WiFi router then you can have wireless remote control from a laptop. Allen & Heath also sell an app for iPad to do the same. I have this working quite well although I am receiving no metering data from the Mixrack. Allen & Heath say this is probably because my router does not support multicasting. They list some routers which are recommended, but the list is rather out of date. I am trying to find a suitable dual band router with decent range on both bands. I would prefer a cable type, but since it will not be connected to the internet, it isn't important. When I Google "Multicast capable wifi router" all that comes up is a lot of stuff about video streaming. None of the manufacturers seem to list if their product supports multicasting. I understand that multicasting is usually used for video streaming, but in my case it seems to be a requirement to speed up data between the iPad and the Mixrack. Apparently some users of similar systems have encountered problems with multiple smartphone users in the audience seeking WiFi connections. The solution to this is to use 5GHz band, and switch off the SSID. Some have also found it best to use MAC filtering for security.
View 4 Replies View RelatedLinksys Cable / DSL :: Wag 200 Is Capable For Upgraded Firmware
Mar 17, 2011Tell me whether my router is Ipv6 capable.Firmware Version: A1.01.09 , 2008-06-13Boot Version: 0.22.02,My Isp is not using this protocol yet, but I want to be ready.
View 2 Replies View RelatedE3200 Router Capable Of 250mbps Throughput?
Feb 5, 2013just upgraded my internet to 150/10 but with speedboost DL speeds hit 250 mbps. I currently have a e3200 and it tends to max out at 110mbps, any router recommendations that will support the full 250?
View 18 Replies View RelatedWifi Drivers Of Hp Pavilion Dv1000 Capable For Windows 7?
Jun 15, 2012I can't access my wi-fi network
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: MGMT0 Connecting Across Switches
Jun 18, 2012I have two C2960 switches which have the management VLAN for other switches. These two switches are connected with each other via portchannel. Now the mgmt0 of few switches is connected to switch 1 and few other connect to switch 2.I have also connected the mgmt0 of switch 1 to an access port of switch 2 and vice versa.However in this set-up I am unable to reach switch1 via the mgmt0 IP address. However I can reach the mgmt0 Ip address of switch 2.I can also reach switch 1 and 2 via their int vlan IP.Has some one else experienced this and is their any specific reason why mgmt 0 IP address of switch 1 is not reachable.I have tried doing similar set-up on C3750, but have acheived same result i.e. I am unable to reach mgmt0 of switch 1.
View 4 Replies View Related