Cisco :: Use Poe From 6504 Switch Which Is Capable To Burn A NIC?
Dec 24, 2011i wanted to know if there is any way to use poe from 6504 switch which is capable of burn a NIC?if there is a Way ' can you tell me how i can do it ??
View 10 Repliesi wanted to know if there is any way to use poe from 6504 switch which is capable of burn a NIC?if there is a Way ' can you tell me how i can do it ??
View 10 RepliesWe have network topo ( attach file)Two switch run VRRP, if I ping 10.0.10.3 from switch SW-6504-01 with source 10.0.10.2, ping lost one packet every 10 packets.We have other interface vlan with same problem
this is some config:
!
interface Port-channel1
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
no ip address
!
interface GigabitEthernet3/47
[code]....
Which smaller POE switch is capable of powering a 9971 IP phone with a cam and a think client attached?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWondering if this switch is capable of being a backbone switch for a network of about 1000+ users and if the switch can handle a sustained 30Meg of data going across it?
View 3 Replies View RelatedIs there a place on microsofts web site that I can download or burn to a CD the software for MN-500? I had to dump my laptop and I cant finf the CD to reinstall the wireless router.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI need the drive for smc to burn on a cd so i can load it on my desktop?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have IMG burn but for some reason, I can't burn the AVI file to a DVD. It doesn't see the file.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI Have A emachine with windows 7 and we had a storm and now i cant get on line so had a tec come to my house and he said my ethernet driver was not there i need to know how to burn one so i can put it back so i can get online?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have just been setting up a WISM2 in a test lab and for some reason the Supervisor is not creating a port channel on my 6500 as suggested in the WISM2 Deployment Guide. WISM2 is installed in an appropriate slot (according to same doco) and have attempted reset to factory defaults, removing and power cycling several times.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI just got 2 Cat6504 Chassis and 2 ASASM pluged in them. show version from submodule ASA as follow:
SVC-APP-HW-3#show ver
Cisco IOS Software, trifecta Software (trifecta-SP-M), Version 15.1(1)SY, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
[Code].....
I want to upgrade new OS for ASA to 8.5 (asa851-smp-k8.bin) but after copy this soft to the module, I can not "write" command or when I reload this box, everything was no changed. SVC-APP-HW-3#write startup-config file open failed (No such device)
We have implemented VSS on Cisco 6504-E switches using the 10GE links on the Sup-720-10GE. Two Cisco WLC 5508 controllers are planned to be connected in a LAG configuration, (consisting of eight links per LAG bundle) to each of the 6504-E chassis( Total of four WLC, two for the primary location and two for secondary location). WLC HA feature may be implemented on the primary and secondary WLC controllers using the 7.3 latest code release.
In this scenario, i would like to seek clarification on some of the design /configuration requirements on the 6504E switches:
1. VLAN 100 - 200 is configured for the Active Primary 6504-E switch and VLAN 200-300 for the Standby 6504-E switch. The IP scopes for the VLAN are defined in the 172.16.x.x range on the Primary and 172.17.x.x on the secondary. As there no cross links(Multichassis LAG) from the WLC controllers to the 6504-E switches, is it better off implementing a single common VLAN range on a single subnet block for the VSS, which in the event of say Primary switch failure, the Wireless APs do not have to re-associate with a different IP range on the secondary? What is the best design practise in this case?
2. What is the best practise for implementing a single management loopback address for the VSS domain- is this implemented using a port channel (Layer 3 MEC) as below? and is the loopback IP address on a totally different IP range reference to point 1 above?
Can the VLAN IP ranges on the 6504-E VSS be assigned in two different subnets say 172.16/12(100-200) and 17.17/12(300-400) and the common loopback (lo0) in 172.18.x.x/32 or is it better to have one common 172.16/12 subnet spanning the entire VLAN range (100-400). Cisco documentation describes creating port channels from the line card card physical ports as opposed to just creating lo0 and advertising this into the IGP.
int g1/x/1
desc VSS Management
channel-group mode 101 active
int gi2/x/1
channel-group mode 101 active
int po101
desc VSS Management
ip ad 172.18.x.x/32
We have implemented VSS on Cisco 6504-E switches using the 10GE links on the Sup-720-10GE. Two Cisco WLC 5508 controllers are planned to be connected in a LAG configuration, (consisting of eight links per LAG bundle) to each of the 6504-E chassis( Total of four WLC, two for primary and two for secondary). WLC HA feature may be implemented on the primary and secondary WLC controllers using the 7.3 latest code release.
View 9 Replies View RelatedWe recently wanted to swap our existing WS-SUP720-base with a WS-SUP720-3B in a 6513 chassis.Had the existing configuration config saved in a txt file and replaced the supervisor. Booting went fine and we pasted in the original config. There was one failure message about unnsupported command but didnt take further notice."boot system flash sup-bootflash:" was probaly the line that the 720-3B didnt support.After wr mem and reload it went in continious loop and rebooting due to inncorrect boot device. Had to put back the old supervisor and have now the 720-3B in a 6504 chassis. Tried some commands in rommon, but are not getting any further.
View 8 Replies View RelatedI am in the process of configuring load balancing on ACE module but struggling to configure virtual IP address for ACE module. I'm working on ACE30 module and using software version A5 (1.2). ACE module is in slot of Catalyst 6504 switch.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a 1841 Router running C1841-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M ver 12.4(12), is this IOS VPN capable, if not what IOS would I need to run a VPN?
View 2 Replies View RelatedOn our 6504 - 12.2(33)SXH, we currently have a single connection to our ISP (GI1/1) and want to add another connection (GI1/2) Is there a way to bond the two connections to form a single connection (a single pipe) to double the throughput?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe currently have a WS-C6506 chassis with a line-card WS-X6408A-GBIC. Currently we need to replace the chassis by a Ws-6504-E and also the line-card. My question is: What must buy line-card and meets the same specifications of WS-X6408A-GBIC?.
View 4 Replies View RelatedCurrently I'm using BT Broadband with a Cat 5 Ethernet cable.My laptop has a gigabit Ethernet port, and I have the cable plugged in.Is there a way to determine whether or not the cable is capable of 1000Mbit/s, as I am receiving 100Mbit/s, when I check the connection.Also, will replacing the cable with a new one achieve the full 1Gbit/s?
View 14 Replies View RelatedAfter rebooting a pair of 6504's configured for vss, both switches show active on the sup modules. A show switch virtual redundancy however shows the pair working in an active/standby mode. We have 6509's in vss pairs and they show active on switch1 and standby on switch2 led's. For the 6504's switch 1 was booted first and then the second switch about 30 seconds later. Is there something different with the 6504's? [code]
View 4 Replies View RelatedIs there any easy way to tell what networking level my laptop is capable of? Its an older IBM, T30.Wireless works fine but I'm thinking of upgrading the router and want to make sure the laptop will connect using the faster N network speed.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI run an Allen & Heath digital mixer. The iDr32 mixrack sits on the stage and has a 2 port Ethernet switch on board, which allows the device to be controlled with a PC. If you then add a WiFi router then you can have wireless remote control from a laptop. Allen & Heath also sell an app for iPad to do the same. I have this working quite well although I am receiving no metering data from the Mixrack. Allen & Heath say this is probably because my router does not support multicasting. They list some routers which are recommended, but the list is rather out of date. I am trying to find a suitable dual band router with decent range on both bands. I would prefer a cable type, but since it will not be connected to the internet, it isn't important. When I Google "Multicast capable wifi router" all that comes up is a lot of stuff about video streaming. None of the manufacturers seem to list if their product supports multicasting. I understand that multicasting is usually used for video streaming, but in my case it seems to be a requirement to speed up data between the iPad and the Mixrack. Apparently some users of similar systems have encountered problems with multiple smartphone users in the audience seeking WiFi connections. The solution to this is to use 5GHz band, and switch off the SSID. Some have also found it best to use MAC filtering for security.
View 4 Replies View Related I'm having with VSS Failover. Currently I have two 6504's setup for VSS with one connection to the sup engine (10Gig__Connection) and the other connection on the Module 3 10Gig Blade and the same setup on the other 6504.My question is: If the active 6504 has a power outage or the link on the sup engine goes down, and the standby 6504 becomes active, what happens when the Failed 6504 comes back online with a higher priority and preempt set? What happens with the 6504 that took over as Active and now eeds to go back to Standby, what's required?
What I'm seeing is once the Standby took over and became Active in order for him to go back to Standby mode it's asking for a reload to take place is this NORMAL?
Tell me whether my router is Ipv6 capable.Firmware Version: A1.01.09 , 2008-06-13Boot Version: 0.22.02,My Isp is not using this protocol yet, but I want to be ready.
View 2 Replies View Relatedjust upgraded my internet to 150/10 but with speedboost DL speeds hit 250 mbps. I currently have a e3200 and it tends to max out at 110mbps, any router recommendations that will support the full 250?
View 18 Replies View RelatedI currently have 2 Cat6509 switches with VSS Capable Sups. One of the switches has an extra 10Gig Lincard. Will VSS still work in this scenerio?/?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI can't access my wi-fi network
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'll have to replace an old WS-C3550-24. Reasons for this: EOL/EOS & we'll need a NAT capable device...
As I understood, the only L3 catalyst that is able to perform NAT is a 6500? Is that correct? If the above is correct, it seems I can only replace the setup by using a router/ASA with a L2 switch. A router with high throughput (+/- 300Mbps) is hard to find, especially as NAT will require CPU resources...
So, my best (affordable price) solution is getting an ASA5520 (450Mbps FW throughput) and a L2 switch?
[code] Started laptop and couldn't connect to wireless network, which used to work. I tried "netsh..reset.log" , "netsh.." , Repairing the network connection but still not working.
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have 3560's in my current environment, operating in the core/distro/access layers. The switches are in a star configuration, performs only layer 2 switching, and utilizes copper (no plans on moving to fiber).
With a fairly limited budget, I've been contemplating on upgrading the central node to a stacked 3750X to eliminate that single point of failure, and trunk the rest of the 3560's to the stacked switch. I wanted to be sure that the 3750X switches will be right for my environment (90-100 hosts), and if what I explained above is a good solution.
I'm also looking like to upgrade 6-7 of my servers (and SAN) with 10GB network cards. Do the ports on the 3750X have port densities capable of 10GB? If not, what switches provide that capability?
There are a total of 7 systems on the network. The network has evolved from two small shops (3-4 computers each) to a single one with a sum total of 7 systems. Historically there were two ISP (which the new management would like to continue). Thus there are two NAT enabled devices at the last-mile from each ISP
Belkin F7D1301
Baton iBLR6111A
Networking is almost an unknown to me. An ip config on the computers in the network brought the realization there are 2 sub-nets ... at least it looks like there are 2 sub-nets (192.168.1.x, and 192.168.2.x).
My gut tells me the above mentioned modem/router cannot be connected & configured to be used transparently for the computers connected to the other modem/router without additional hardware. Is this right?
Our network administrator restricts all our new 1Gb switches to only 100Mb, to which he claims it will increase overall performance. Preventing devices from bottlenecking the network. (that is, only restricting the main switch ports, not the uplinks)For example we have a new building with 2x WS-C2960S-48TS-L connected together with FlexJack and then a 1Gb Fiber connection back to our core switch.
This building is on it's own subnet and there is little broadcast traffic. I don't see the point other than it hinders the potential speed we could use. Labs are set up in this building and 1Gb is MUCH faster when it comes to imaging and software deployment.
we need to install a line cards (WS-X4548-GB-RJ45, chassis WS-C4510R-E), on a chassis Ws-6504-E.where I can find information about compatibility?
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs a 3750 sw capable of handling full routing tables and what can you recommend in a small mutihomed BGP router or switch capable of handling full routing tables?
View 2 Replies View Related