i have a cisco Netowtk Analysis module installed on a 6513 core switch which is NAM-1, the version on the NAM is 5.1 and we need to upgrade to the latest version which is 5.1(2)
View 1 RepliesMy company has acquired a Catalyst 6513 with a FWSM module installed on it. I have been reading lot of documentation on [URL], but still have some problems configuring the FWSM:
The 6513 has 10 SVIs configured, each of them with an IP address. These 10 SVIs are binded to 10 VLANs which I need to secure. These SVIs are used for routing all the Inter-VLAN traffic inside the switch. The documentation says it is recommended to use just one SVIs for connecting the switch to the FWSM, although you can use more than one using the command "firewall multiple-vlan-interfaces". I don't want to use this command because it seems a pretty more difficult configuration, since you have to use policy routing after using this command (or that is, at least, what documentation says).
When I try to "send" to the FWSM more than one VLAN that are configured as SVIs on the switch I get this error message:
"No more than one svi is allowed, command rejected."
If I delete the IP address of those SVIs, then I can to "send" those SVIs to the switch with no problem at all. But I need the SVIs to have IP address configured, since they are needed for routing Inter-V LAN traffic.
So, the question is: how can I route all the inter-VLAN traffic using just one SVI on the switch? Should I use the FWSM for inter-VLAN traffic routing?
I have a Cisco catalyst 6513 with sup720-3bxl and WS-X6724-SFP modules , the switch was working fine until yesterday ,but after a maintenance the modue WS-X6724-SFP failed to bring online , the error code is (Module Failed SCP dnld) does it mean the module has hardware problem or i need to replace it ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ios version
s72033-adventerprisek9_wan-vz.122-33.SXH7.bin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
show module
Mod Ports Card Type
Model
[code]....
We have Communication Media Module (WS-SVC-CMM) mounted on 6513 switch. It went down twice and we brought it up by applying "power enable module".
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco 6513 switches connected to HP VC Flex 10 Module. The (2) 10Gb ports on a Cisco Switch connected to VC Flex-10 in LACP mode.
I need to move those (2) 10Gb ports on Cisco Switch 10Gb Module to a different 10Gb module on a same Switch without bringing the ports down since it is a live environment.
What I would do is to configure a same port channel ID on a new 10Gb module and then move port one by one. unplug one port and connect to the new port on a module. While I will be unplugging the first port the other active port will keep sending traffic and as soon as I plug in on another port, both ports will be active.
After a power problem at our data centre we find Module 11 of our Cisco 6513 Core Switch in PWR Down state.Show Module 11 returns: Status: PWRDownShow Power Status Module 11 returns: OperStatus Off (Module Reset due to an exception or user request).The command:
Power enable Module 11 was issued and returned the following: %PM_SCP-SP-1-LCP_FW_ERR: System resetting module 11 to recover from error: Linecard received system exception. Errcode = 2509000001.%OIR-SP-3-PWRCYCLE: Card in module 11 is being powercycled Öff (Module reset due to exception or user request%C6KPWR-SP-4-DISABLED: Power to module in slot 11 set off (Module Reset due to exception or user request),We have restarted the switch twice. The module is currently not passing traffic causing downtime to services.
I have a supervisor blade, (VS-S720-10G-3C), in a 6513 that is faulty and needs replaced. Do I need to replace the IOS on the new supervisor blade to make sure it is the same as the IOS image that is on the Active supervisor module, or will it synchronize automatically?
In the synchronization process, the active supervisor engine checks the standby supervisor engine run-time image to make sure that it matches its own run-time image. The active supervisor engine checks three conditions:
#
•If it needs to copy its boot image to the standby supervisor engine
#
•If the standby supervisor engine bootstring needs to be changed
#
•If the standby supervisor engine needs to be reset
I was reading the above documentation that mentioned the active supervisor should copy the image if it detects a newly installed standby supervisor blade with a different image, is this correct or was it referring to synchronizing the configuration file?
I am running a network comprising of Catalyst 6513's with SUP7203B's. at present we have 800 VLAN's as we make use of a VLAN per access layer switch model.
I know have a problem that as soon as I enable multicast routing my SUP720's CPU runs at 100% and the system goes into a slowdown.where I can find information on the scalability of Multicast?
I can not enable to rapid- protocol in catalyst 6513, does not support for it, only support pvst.
Someone how can i enable to rpvst? You know if is necessary to upgrade IOS, it has
s72033_rp-ENTSERVICESK9_WAN-M - 12.2(18)SXF9 IOS. The cisco software Advisor could not localized the features fot this IOS.
The SuperVisor engine in slot 1 of a Catalyst 6513 needed to be replaced because a hardware defect. The SuperVisor engine in slot 2 is active and running CatOS 8.5. The new SuperVisor engine for slot 1 came with CatOS 6.3 and was not syncronized auromatically after insertion. When the customer enter the command "Show boot" he get the output:
AG-A6513-51> (enable) sh boot
BOOT variable = bootflash:cat6000-sup2k8.8-5-5.bin,1;bootflash:cat6000-sup2k8.7-6-2.bin,1;
[Code].....
i want to know if 1port of the 16 10Gbase-t Module (WS-X6716-10T-3C) for the Catalyst 6500E Series, can be connected to a 1Gbase Port of a 2900 ISR Routers, are they gonig to work at 1Gbps or, simply, they are not compatible?
If it is true, can i create a 4ports etherchannel between them? of course using the 16 1Gbase-T switch module on the Router.
Is it possible to mix 1 and 10 Gigabit links on a 1/10Giga Network Module of the Cat3750X? I mean porte GE1/1/1 and GE1/1/2 used with SFP and port TE1/1/2 used with SFP+; that makes TE1/1/1 not available as GE1/1/3 and 1/1/4
View 7 Replies View Relatedswitch catalyst 4500 with ios cat4500e-universal.SPA.03.02.00.XO.150-2.XO.bin. I need to configure modules 3 and 4 of supervision, the problem is that I need the 4-port module 3 are active but only the first turn on both the module 3 and the first port on the module 4. [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have a core switch with the following ios and supervisor engine. Can we add a16 port LR (x2)or LRM(X2) ON the core switch?if not what modifications has to be done?if an ios upgrade is necessary is it a costly affair?At present we have two 1gb up link modules in single and multimode fiber .
#sh moduleMod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ ----------- 1 16 SFM-capable 16 port 1000mb GBIC WS-X6516A-GBIC SAL0803T308 2 48 SFM-capable 48 port 10/100/1000mb RJ45 WS-X6548-GE-TX SAD07500600 5 5 Supervisor Engine 720 10GE (Active) VS-S720-10G SAL1439UMZK
#sh versionCisco IOS Software, s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-IPBASE-M), Version 12.2(33)SXI4a, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)Technical Support: [URL] Copyright (c) 1986-2010 by Cisco Systems, Inc.Compiled Fri 16-Jul-10 19:51 by prod_rel_team
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(17r)SX7, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) uptime is 1 year, 27 weeks, 4 days, 23 hours, 30 minutesUptime for this control processor is 1 year, 27 weeks, 4 days, 22 hours, 58 minutes(code)
we have a chassis 6513-E and a module WS-X6748-GE-TX, I'd like to know if could I put this module in any slot, since the documentation from Cisco says that any slot from a chassis 6500-E Series can support this module. And then in the documentation of WS-X6748-GE-TX says that this module is not compatible in the slots 1-8 of the 6513 chassis, only from 9th to 13th slots, in those slots from the 6513-E we already have 4x WS-X6748-GE-TX, and we'd like to know if could we put the module in the rest of the slots. The 6513, and 6513-E is kind of confusing.
View 4 Replies View Relatedi have an issue for collect data on adapter 1, that don´t collect data but see that adapter 2 if collect data on module 4.
monitor session 1 source vlan 102 rx
monitor session 1 destination analysis-module 4 data-port 1
monitor session 2 source vlan 106 rx
monitor session 2 destination analysis-module 4 data-port 2
I reconfigured newly monitor and continues with that issue. Always ok by data-port 2.
- show version Cisco 6513
Cisco IOS Software, s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-ADVENTERPRISEK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(33)SXH7, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
. show version NAM
NAM application image version: 3.5(1b)
- sh module
Ports Card Type Model
----- -------------------------------------- ------------------
8 Network Analysis Module WS-SVC-NAM-2
Hw Fw Sw Status
------ ------------ ------------ -------
2.0 7.2(1) 3.5(1b) Ok
Well I have been back and forth on this a while now...I have a 6513E chassis that is getting prepped for prod. I am currently testing sso functionality and I can only get it to work using the following images on both Sup Cards.
s72033-adventerprise_wan-mz.122-33.SXI5.bin
If I try any other image, smaller or bigger in size...it forces my Sup card in mod 8 to recycle " proxy request from peer ". I have tried K9 images and non K9 images. Here is an output from sh redundancy.
Redundant System Information : Available system up time = 4 minutes Switch overs system experienced = 0 Standby failures = 0 Last switchover reason = none [code]...
I have a new 6513 with 2 sup32's with IOS. This chassis will replace a working 6513 with 2 sup2's with CatOS.I need to pull the running config from the CatOS chassis and make it work on the IOS chassis. i can do this manually but was wondering if there are any trade secrets on doing this.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am replacing a faulty sup720 on a 6513. It s the backup/hot not the active sup. It has the same IOS on it. Is it correct that all I need to do is remove the faulty and replace it with the new sup and do a wr mem? Fromwat I have read their should be no down time all connectivity should remain stable?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have a 6513 with redundant sup 720-3B's that I cannot get onto. In short, one of the power supplies failed, it still passes traffic but I can't console or ssh to the box. Other than the two sup 720's, I have a 4 port 10gig card, a 16 port GBIC Card and an IDS module. I have tried removing the 10Gig, IDS and one of the sup's but still don't get anything on the console. I have rebooted the entire chassis and don't get anything on my console while booting. I have tried changing the speed of my terminal to every setting available incase someone has changed it at some stage but to no avail. I have tried swapping sup's, using only one at a time in the chassis but not getting anything. Is there anything else I can try to get onto this chassis? The power supply is a 3000w with a 32amp input. The failed power supply had tripped a switch, when i brought it back up, the power supply came out but the output failed LED is on. My #questions are, is there anything else I can do to try get onto the console, and is the power supply goosed when the RED LED is lit? I have reseated the power supply also but the same result.
View 2 Replies View RelatedAre there any EOL notices out for the Catalyst 6513, 6509 etc E chassis? I cant find anything on the internet for the E variant, so assume this hasn't had a notice published yet.
View 2 Replies View RelatedMy question is regarding VSS configuration on Cisco 6513 switches. My understanding is that the hardware and software configuration on the devices must be exactly the same for the VSS to function correctly. Do the Bootstrap versions also have to be identical?
The production switch is running Bootstrap Version 12.2(17r)SX5, while the new switch is running Bootstrap Version 12.2(17r)SX7.
I was working on adding a Cisco 6513 to TACACS but ran into trouble. While I work on the issue offline (recreate and test another switch), I wanted to place this switch on radius temporarily.
For some reason i cant undo/delete the AAA commands in order to point to my radius server. Below was done via console: [code]
I disabled my telemetry port on the Cisco 6513 as a precaution. The IOS im using is "s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI5.bin".how to remove the AAA authentication statement. Hope its not intrusive cause i have a customer on the box.
I have a need to capture some traffic but my core 6513's are already using the limit of 2 span sessions. I can't edit any of the sessions either because I want to source traffic from vlans and you can only do one or the other. Is using a VACL with 'switchport capture' on the destination interface an option ? E.g. I want to source traffic from vlan 10,20,30,40 and send the all to interface Gi10/10 ? Is there any caveats ? I dont need to be too granular with the ACL's but just capture all traffic in those vlans.
View 2 Replies View RelatedNeed your expert input in sorting out the below problem.I have a cisco 6513 switch which is going into SP mode after a reboot whci i have done during BCP activity in my organization.Below are the log for your reference.
Code...
i have a Cisco 6513 it is used one, i have tryed to boot it but it did not work, it alwayes go to rommon mode and i am not able to know what is the issue,
when it boot i get the below outpot from the switch.
System Bootstrap, Version 8.1(3)
Copyright (c) 1994-2004 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Testing lower main memory - data equals address
[Code].....
I am getting conflicting info about this, and need to get confirmations.Is the older 6513 (non E) model compatible with WS-X6407-10GE blade?The switch we're getting this for have WS-SUP720-3B, 6000W power supply, and WS-C6K-13SLT-FAN2.From what I read they are compatible if entered in slot 9-13, but I also heard that 10GE modules are not compatible with the non E chassis.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have 2 6513's that are linked via 2 10 gig interfaces, using an LACP channel.I received an alert this aft stating that the far 6513 was unreachable and the port channel int PO3 had gone down, the 2 10 gig interfaces had also gone down on either side. 5 mins later PO3 had resestablished itself and has been fine since. [code]
View 4 Replies View RelatedWe have a pair of 6513s and upgraded the IOS version to 12.2(33)SXI4a. After the upgrade we noticed VTP Pruning was disabled: [code] Is there any effect to production we need to to consider when re-enabling? (In other words, do we need to wait until a maintenance window to enable?)Also, we are using VTP v2 (and v1...) on our VTP Client 3560 access switches.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have a Cisco 6513 Switch. During some parts of the day it is having large amounts of transmit discards on a certain interface because of the amount of data we are pushing. We have determined it is a link problem and not a problem with the switch. The link cannot handle the amount of packets the switch is pushing out. I was wondering if there is a way to create a buffer or a way to regulate the maximum amount of packets that can leave that interface without losing any packets?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have just buy a 10G card for Cat 6513, these are information: PDCMSFC-1>sh module
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.
--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ -----------
2 16 SFM-capable 16 port 1000mb GBIC WS-X6516A-GBIC SAL08373Z37
7 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Active) WS-SUP720-BASE SAD08330322
Mod Sub-Module Model Serial Hw Status
--- --------------------------- ------------------ ------------ ------- -------
7 Policy Feature Card 3 WS-F6K-PFC3A SAD083207AL 2.4 Ok
7 MSFC3 Daughterboard WS-SUP720 SAD0832037Y 2.3 Ok
About card: WS-X6716-10G-3C
When I install this card on Cat 6513, has a message: " fan tray no support"
We have a 6513 with about 8 switches in it. I installed a Intel Pro PT NIC in a Dell PE2850 and setup the Team setting which created a bridge in the network connections.
10 minutes later, every server connected on that 'blade' went down and rebooted.
This happened once before to another tech here (I didn't know at the time it would do this but after he saw it he pointed it out)
We currently run 1 Cisco 6509 (CatOS) for our production network. It has multiple vlans which feed distribution switches on each floor in 2 buildings. Essentially each floor is its own vlan. Each floor switch is connected back to the 6509 via fiber connections. We also have several production vlans that our VMware and AIX environments connect to.
I would like to phase out the the 6509 and replace it with a new 6513 chassis, sup720's etc. Currently it is sitting next to the 6509 in the rack. I need to limit downtime as much as possible but can get one shutdown window over a weekend. However I dont think it would be enough time to move all of the existing etherconnections etc etc
So I am looking to run them both at the same time and slowly migrate over to the 6513 over the next few months.My solution was to use the 6513 (IOS) in L2 mode only for now and trunk it back to the 6509 via 4 1 gig connections in a LACP config.
So the 6509 would still be handling all of the L3 routing for now.Once I had moved all of the fiber and ethernet connections over to the 6513, I would use the shutdown weekend to configure the 6513 for L3 and essentially turn off the 6509 at that point.
My questions are
- Is there a better way to do this ?
- By trunking the 6513 to the 6509 do I need to worry about any loop issues ?
- I am aware of the oversubscription issue for the port channel and have spread the 4 interfaces over the different groups of asics.