Cisco Switching/Routing :: Configuring 1841 With ISP And Static IPs?
Sep 12, 2012
We upgrade our Internet service in our India office which required a new router. The local vendor suggested an 1841, so that is what we have. It has two fastethernet ports on it.
The ISP (Airtel) provided the following IP address information:
Public WAN IP : 122.181.23.200/30
WAN IP : 122.181.23.202SUBNET MASK : 255.255.255.252GATEWAY : 122.181.23.201Pri DNS : 125.22.47.125Sec DNS : 202.56.250.5
I have a Cisco 1841 router at home with version 12.4(13r)T advanced ip services. The setup is extremely simple:
1) PPPOE dialer to my service provider over ADSL 2) Nat overload on the dialer interface. 3) 2 V LAN s one for home network (wired) and one for wireless both v LAN's are connected through interface v LAN s respectively.
My problem is when I configure static NAT to map RDP or any other protocol to inside hosts this does n`t work. " ip nat source static tcp 192.168.20.3 2222 interface Dialer1 2222 ip nat source static tcp 192.168.20.3 3389 xx.xx.xx.xx 3389 extendable ip nat inside source list 20 interface Dialer1 overload "
When I open wire shark and sniff the traffic on home computer which is the one I`m trying to reach I can't see any traffic. And While performing Nat debugging I am also not able to see traffic going to that port (for example 3389).
I guess i am just getting old and forgot how this works, or i have an IOS load with an undocumented feature in it.A customer of ours wishes to have their exchange server appear to the outside world on a seperate IP address as their public pool address is.in the past this has not been an issue, however in the current configuration we are unable to get the source address to appear per the NAT statement it always sources on the overloaded IP. below is the relevant NAT config, am i missing something, or have i hit a IOS feature? [code] There is a 45% chance i have forgotten everything i learned on the NOC desk and a 50% chance that it is somethine really stupid and 5% IOS is broken
I'm at a FOX affiliate TV station, and in order to connect our EAS Device to the internet & Fox Splicer, I need to setup a Statio NAT, so we picked up an 1841 on eBay.
I've done a little configuration in HyperTerminal.
I've done these ip addresses:
FE0/0 10.1.10.13 this is the subnet our EAS device is on FE0/1 10.110.81.174 this is the subnet of the Fox Splicer.
I need to have NAT translate 10.1.10.11 to 10.110.81.170 and I also need to set a route for 10.110.81.0/24 pointing to 10.110.81.161
Configuring static routing, how can i get a ping to go through a diff. route depending which host pinged? I want to ping host B from host A. Host A is connected to router1, which is connected to 2 other routers, router2 and router3. On the other end, routers 2 & 3 meet router4. Like a diamond topology. So basically routers 2 & 3 lead to the same place, router4, which is connected to host B. I need to configure static routing so that when I ping host B from A, both ping request and ping reply go through router1, 2, 4, host B, and back. THEN the part I dont understand, doing it the other way around: When I ping host A from host B, how can I get both ping request and ping reply to go through router4, THEN THROUGH ROUTER 3, then router1, then A, and back again to host B?
I have a CISCO 1841 with a HWIC interface to my ISP. I want to make a ADSL connection and my current running-file is: [code] The problem I have is that the ISP connection is established but then goes down.
I only know a little about programming a CISCO router but I know the config I setup is not working...
Here is what I want to do...
The ISP provides us with IP Addresses via DHCP. Our public address is NOT static so the interface on the DSL Module needs to be provisioned to get a DHCP address with a CLASS C License.The IP address of the Router should be 10.0.0.10 subnet=255.255.255.0The LAN Clients need receive their IP address via DHCP EXCEPT for a range of 100 addresses. The lan Clients only need about 40 DHCP addresses.ONE of the Lan Clients (10.0.0.3) needs to have ports 25, 1723, and others forwarded to it.
Below is the config I am trying to use but I can't even ping the router from the LAN.
VPN 1841, and static nat. I have to create VPN to connect to remote network, but problem is that they already use same subnet as mine. How to configure static nat on cisco 1841 so static nat will work and address will be translated in different IP when connection trough VPN.I have address 192.168.235.1 and I want to translate to 192.168.100.1,This 1841 is border router, and all VLNAs and VLANs routing is on 3650.
I am trying to configure a Cisco 871 router.There are 3 servers on my network that need static public IPs but also still need to communicate on the local network.I have given my WAN interface the first IP in the block and set up PAT for the rest of the computers on the network with that IP which is working fine. Next I set up static NAT rules for the servers translating 3 of the remaining public IPs to the internal addresses of the servers.I can access those servers internally using the public IPs but not from outside the network. A traceroute from outside the network gets dropped when it gets to my ISP.I've never configured more than one static ip for a network before and i know i've just missed a step here. Do I also need to use static routes? Will that update the next hop's routing table? Do I need to make an ACL to permit any host to the servers? If so, do I use the internal or external address? [code]
I have configured a L2L VPN on a Cisco 1841 ISR. I am statically NATing some of my internal hosts to IP addresses that are included in the encrypted traffic. Please note that not all of the internal hosts are being NATed. I am doing this to hid some of the real IP addresses on the inside network. I have confirmed that the VPN works, as well as the NATing of the VPN traffic. I have traditionally configured L2L VPNs on Cisco ASA 5500 series appliances, and this is my first attempt with the 1841 ISR. I just want other to take a look a see if I missed anything, or, could I have done some of the configuration more efficiently. All comments are welcome.
I have a Cisco 1841 with a DSL and 3G HWIC interface. I would like to setup the DSL as the primary link and then use the 3G as a backup interface. I am trying to accomplish this using the Floating Static routes with SLA object tracking.
I have tried various options, like having two tracked routes, one tracked route, changing administrative distances, multiple SLA's, etc etc.
My problem basically is that when the DSL (Dialer0) goes down and the 3G (Cellular0/1/0) takes over, that the SLA never changes back when the DSL is available again, so that the DSL can take over as the primary link again. [code]
I'm trying to configure intervlan routing between a cisco 2801 router and HP/Amer switches. Using int fa0/1 and subinterfaces I was sure I had it configured correctly, but I cannot ping the default gateways when I place a host in a particular vlan. Below is what I have configured.
HP switch - port 9 connects to fa0/1 on 2801 ip default-gateway 10.1.100.1 trunk 9 Trk1 trunk trunk 10 Trk2 trunk - to another switch
I'm just getting started with cisco kit so you will have to bare with me.I have a cisco 1841.i have a very wierd issue of routing...i cannot ping and browse through this.
I have two VLANs - 10 and 20. 2 DHCP pools are configured on 2 1841's interfaces - 192.168.1.0 /25 and 192.168.1.128/26 with default router sitting on 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.129 respectively. No issues with obtaining IP address from any of those pools.Laptop connects to L3 3550 switch (switchport access vlan 10), which, in turn, connects to 1841 router through trunk (with VLANs 10 and 20 allowed).3550 is connected to 2960 through trunk with VLANs 10 and 20 allowed.Wireless router is connected to 2960.I can successfully ping my wireless router and outside world from 1841 from fa0/1 interface, but not from fa0/1.10 or fa0/1.20 sub-interfaces - all packets got dropped. My laptop can obtain IP from both pools (depending on port I connect it to), but can't ping my wireless router and anything beyond it.
I am having some trouble configuring dual NAT on a Cisco 1841.
The 1841 has three interfaces. Fa0/0 - LAN Fa0/1- Different private network Fa0/1/0 - Connection to DSL modem
NAT overloading is configured on Fa0/1 and we have traffic that must be router there. We would like to have all internet access go through the DSL modem. Currently internet access is obtained through fa0/1 but is not ideal. I have floating static routes configured if the DSL link goes down. (Which is currently unplugged) I do not have physical access to the router at this moment. We would like to keep the config a simple as possible. It seems like route-maps may be one of our only options.
I have a 1841 router attached to 2 ISP's. Each ISPs provides different bandwithd. I want to do load balance between them, but I want to do some sort of weighted load blance, so as to assign more traffic to one ISP than the other. A kind of 70/30 (70% of traffic via ISP1, and 30% of traffic via ISP2).Is there a way to acomplish that? I already tried creating bogus /32 routes, but "cef" seems to be more clever and groups the bogus routes as one gw.
Basically I have an internet router (1841ISR) with 1 internal (LAN) connection and 2 internet connections. What I want to do is route specific traffic for 3 of my internally hosted services (smtp, https, etc) through one internet connection (fa0/0) and then route all other traffic through the unmanaged/dynamic IP ADSL connection (Dialer 0).
I have a stack of 2 x 3750X switches these are running 12.2(55)SE5. I needed to add some static IP routes and found that the ‘ip routing’ command is not supported. I came across a document that stated “On switches running the LAN base feature, static routing on VLANs is supported only with Cisco IOS Release 12.2(58)SE and later.” So I have upgraded to 12.2(58)SE2, but ‘ip routing’ is still not a valid command.
The release notes state:“On the Cisco Catalyst 3560-X and 3750-X Series, it adds support for 16 static IPv4 routes in the LAN Base image.”
I have read other posts that talk about running the ‘sdm prefer routing’ command which I have done, but I am still unable to add any routes or run the ‘ip routing’ command.
Configuring an application using routing mode on cisco ace clients ---asa--3750--cisco ace--- servers behind vip,visa card transaction servers.i am able to setup a vip on ace using routing mode on ACE,as the servers need to see the client ip ,so we are not performing SNAT,this part is working fine,when a request comes from the client ,it goes to the vip and to one of the backend servers ,and the request will be forwaded back to the ace ,as the default gateway on the servers is pointing to the server vlan on ace.but if the transaction from the servers need to go to the visa card transaction servers ,how can we achieve this ,and after fetching the data from visa servers,does the reply will be fwd to the ACE or ASAs directly.
I currently have a Cisco 891 running with a FTP running on port 21. I currently have the NAT from external IP to and internal IP 192.168.12.6 for port 21. And the firewall allowing that traffic through and client software is working fine. However I need this FTP to be running on port 990 and anytime I change the NAT and the firewall, the external FTP clients connect but then drop when recieving the directory listing.
I have IP phones connected to 2960 i want to segregate traffic traffic comming from IP phones which has a COS value of 5 and want to allocate a band width of 200 MBPS for those traffic .
Can any one share sample QOS configuration for achiving this in 2960 ?
Two Cisco C2960G Switches connected with each other using an EtherChannel Trunk Ports.IOS Image has been upgraded to c2960-lanbasek9-mz. 122- 58.SE2.bin.The global command "sdm prefer lanbase-routing" has been executed to set the default template to "lanbase-routing".The global command "ip routing" has been executed to enable the ip routing.An IP route has been configured in each switch to point to each other for the static routing purpose (Please see the 2 attached configuration files) The hosts in VLAN 111 and VLAN 110 are not able to see each other even the ip static routes have been configured.May be I have misconfigured some settings but not sure what's the actual problem.
I've got an 1841 router and am using NAT to expose certain IPs and ports to the outside world so that external users can see internal resources (namely, web sites). However, I can't seem to get it running such that I can visit the external IP address from inside the network and get the router to turn the request around so that it is redirected back inside the network. Shouldn't this be possible? Our previous router (a non-Cisco) was able to do this, but I can't seem to get the new one to do it.
A couple of key config lines: interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address a.b.c.178 255.255.255.240
I'm looking for some input on configuring vPC on the Nexus 3048.I know that it's supported to use 1G interfaces for the vPC Peer-Link, but using 2x1G for the Peer-Link would make the Peer-Link a bottle-neck if the 10G ports are used in a vPC. What about using 2x10G ports for the Peer-Link and using the remaining 10G ports in one, or potentially two vPCs. Should that work or is it in any way not recommended? The reason I'm asking is that the 10G ports are called "Uplink" ports in the data sheets for the 3048.
We are planning to connect some servers to the 3048s using vPC with each server connected by 4x1G interface (2x1G for each switch), and then we want to connect a Netapp storage system with two controllers using 2x10G each (the controllers are active/passive, so you can think of it as two separate systems). We would connect controller A with vPC 1x10G to each switch, and controller B in the same way with vPC 1x10G to each switch.
I am about to configure 4 Gig ports for EtherChannel. I've been reading about EtherChannel and it seems easy enough to configure. I have a host (server)which I am going to connect to these 4 - gig ports. This is new for me and would like some feedback for those that have used EtherChannel on their layer 2 switches. The gig ports will be an access port with VLAN XX.
I tried to connect a 1841 to a Linksys with a static route. I am able to ping from a computer in the 1841 to a computer in the linksys network, but I can't ping from a computer in the Linksys network to a computer in the 1841 network?
I want to SSH into a Cisco 1841 router and depending on the suffix added to the SSH (i.e ssh myrouter.myroute.com 2002), would like it to forward this request to a terminal server.Can this be done? If so, how does one accomplish this? I have done something similar with RDP but I was not sure about SSH.
What is the command to shutdown a cisco 1841 (say, to add a module)? I know how to reload / reboot, but does not seem to find any command with an obvious name.
