Cisco Switching/Routing :: Management Port On WS4507R
Apr 3, 2012How does the IP address is assigned on management port of WS4507 R, syntax.
View 2 RepliesHow does the IP address is assigned on management port of WS4507 R, syntax.
View 2 RepliesI have an all gigE 3560. I don't use the management FE0 port on the back. I was thinking to use that for a 100Mbps WAN connection.
Seems to work just fine when I plugged in an test. But I am not routing across that link yet as I still need to setup the far end.
Is there any reason this would not work? I would like to not burn a gig port if the max throughput of the circuit is 100Mbps.
Is there some kind of trick to getting the fastethernet 0 management port to come up? My adjacent switch is up/up, but fe0 is down/down. I dont' see how this could be possible. I am getting all my info remotely, but I am pretty sure it's wired up correctly.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhat is the point of it? It is not a remote console. If i reboot the switch i cannot get back to the out of band management port unless the switch is fully running. Is this only for security purposees? so all telnet/ssh is from an Out of band network?
View 15 Replies View RelatedI can not find any information about management port of Cisco ISR 2911, 2921 and so on. There is management port in specification of 2911 and 2921 and I do not know if this port can be as a simple Ethernet port – forward traffic in/out on L3.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to get an IP_ADDR set on the management port in SWITCH: mode but for some reason the port seems disabled. PC shows connection unplugged. MGMT_INIT is not a valid command (not listed under '?' ). Bootloader version is 12.2(53R)SE2 FC1.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI've got a client with a Management Port set up for Out-of-Band management. Here's the configuration of the interface and some relevant static routes:
interface Management0/0
description MGT
speed 100
duplex full
nameif Mgt
[code]...
The route through Mgt interface is required as my client accesses the device from a subnet that isn't local to M0/0.Unfortunately, now any traffic originating from outside and destined to 10.48.0.0/16 is choosing the Mgt interface. I had thought that the 'management-only' keyword prevents this from happening (traffic traversing between interfaces).
There is a broad scope of /16 addresses on the 'inside' so just swapping destinations won't work (the client wants to avoid a routing table with 50+ static entries, understandably)My temporary solution was to do this:
route inside 10.0.0.0 255.128.0.0 10.38.103.1
route inside 10.128.0.0 255.128.0.0 10.38.103.1
route Mgt 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.38.100.254
If 'management-only' doesn't prevent traffic from using the Mgt interface, what is the point of the command?
I have got ASA 5520. How to use the management port as a normal port on ASA. What are the basic reqirements for that.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am just going to deploy some new 4900Ms for a customer. Want to know if configuring management for 4900 (everything like NTP, AAA, SNMP , DNS ) is doable through management interface in management VRF and there are no caveats to be aware of.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a stack of 3750-X that are used to both switch traffic inside V LAN and also to route a couple of WAN ranges from our up link provider to the DMZ v LAN.Now I'd like to have a SVI Vlan1 with an IP in the "management v LAN", but I'd like that SVI not to be rout able.
More exactly :
- no traffic should ever exit that interface that's not the generated by the router itself (ssh/snmp/...)
- no incoming traffic on that interface should be forwarded anywhere
- I'd also like to have a different default gw to be used by traffic generated by the switch itself. (for eg, ssh traffic coming from any another sub net like 10.2.0.0/24 to the switch SVI Vlan1 ip 10.1.0.1/24 should be routed back through the Vlan1 gw and not through out up link ptp gateway)
I think I can achieve the first two with ACLs on the SVI. But not sure about the last one ...
In mucking around with my 4500 I accidently deleted the ip address that I use to get into it with telnet and CNA. I have a console cable hooked up to and I'm in that way but the commands I got off the internet did not work. Those commands were set interface sc0 10.x.x.x/xx and set interface me1 10.x.x.x/xx. It didn't like interface and I notices when I did a set ?
View 6 Replies View Relatedi have a small network with Polycom phones connected to the sf300 switch and have the pc's daisy chained via the second switch port on each phone. i have the pc traffic running on the default vlan 1 and the voice traffic running on the voice vlan 100. can i do bandwidth management on a vlan/port basis or is that not necessary. i want to ensure that the voice traffic is never impacted by the pc traffic on the same cable.
View 2 Replies View Related spam up the boards with the same basic CCNA level stuff, but I have a couple of questions about ios differences, limitations, and references. I have the following three switches. One appears to be considerably dated in regard to software version. My confusion/ignorance stems from managing VTP settings.
2924XL 12.0 5 WC8
2950 12.1 22 EA6
2950 12.1 22 EA6
When I set either 2950 switch as the VTP server, and the other as a client, the client inherits the server settings as expected. However the 2924 requires that I go into the vlan database from priv exec and manually set vtp client. That's pretty similar to setting any switch to client mode. The problem I am observing is that after setting the 2924 to client, it still doesn't inherit vtp version settings or pruning settings. I still have to manually configure those. Additionally, if I copy run start the 2924 after making these manual settings, and then reload the switch, all the settings are lost and it defaults back to server mode with all features disabled. From my searches, it looks like vlan information is stored in vlan.dat, but all the documentation I've found is on 12.1 ios which doesn't appear to use vlan database for vtp setup, meaning it might still be an issue, but not one I'm focused on at the moment.
Is the vlan database dumped at reload? I've read vlan.dat is stored in nvram and should be saved after a copy run start, but that is not the case for me.I have since set the 2924 as the server, manually configured the server from vlan database, executed copy run start, and reloaded the switch. Oddly, my manual settings saved from the reload, meaning I only lose settings when the switch is in client mode.Am I missing additional necessary client commands to save the config, or is this just a limitation of either the 2924XL or the 12.0 ios?On a related but completed out of scope topic, without a cisco service contract, how am I supposed to make heads or tails of all the different versions of ios, along with the letter-based features and what-not? I can't even find my 2924 in the list of platforms when searching for ios upgrades.
regarding to the out of band Management interface , if I configured an intervace vlan to be as a managment interface for one vdc ( the default vdc ), when I connected to this vdc via telnet , can I switch to any other vdc ? ( suppose that I have the Admin role which allows me to enter and config all the vdc's )If that is possible so that I dont have to make a dedicated managment ip for each VDC I need to do that only if I want to make vdc admin's account to allow some users to access specific vlans only , is that true ?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI want to configure management for some Nexus 5548's?I wanted to manage the switches via an SVI. I have read the following document which gives details about the Management SVI but doesn't answer all questions.[URL]I am not running any layer 3 functionality on the switch, no layer3 license (which it mentions in the above link) Will I still be able to create a management SVI. I know I will need to enable the feature 'interface-vlan' to setup a Management SVI, does that require a license?
View 6 Replies View RelatedWhat is the Best way to protect management access ofrece the switch and how to create monitoring users whitout access to configuration Mode?.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a Nexus 5548UP that would be managed by two organizations. Is it possible to set IP addresses for mgmt0 and an SVI (or an L3 interface) without using the L3 daughter card? I don't want to route between VLANs, just to separate management traffic.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am just going to deploy some new 4900Ms for a customer. Want to know if configuring management for 4900 (everything like NTP, AAA, SNMP , DNS ) is doable through management interface in management VRF and there are no caveats to be aware of.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a client who is changing their management IP scheme as a bridge to replacing equipment and much of the old equipment (Catalyst 4000) is running CatOS and I am a bit weak in CatOS. The existing Management IP is setup as follows:
set interface sc0 1 192.168.252.209/255.255.255.0 192.168.252.255
set ip route 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 192.168.252.1
What we want to change this to is as follows:
set interface sc0 110 192.168.197.209/255.255.255.0 192.168.197.255
set ip route 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 192.168.197.1
The devices are spreadout over a large area and visiting each device is almost out of the question due to a time deadline I was wondering if I run this set of commands will this allow me to keep a remote session (SSH) running until the change is complete?
set ip route 192.168.197.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.197.1
set interface sc0 110 192.168.197.209/255.255.255.0 192.168.197.255
set ip route 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 192.168.197.1
I' ve three 4900M switches equipped with the WS-X4920-GB-RJ45 module and the WS-X4908-10GE module. Now I'm started to setup these switches in our lab environment for the first time. They behave a little bit strange in comparison with the C3750 series which I used before and which I will replace by these powerful machines.
I tried to setup these switches to be managed through the management port. I configured IP address, default route in the management vrf, set the source-interface for tftp,ssh,ftp and tacacs to use the management port. Ping using the manangement port was successful. After finishing theses steps I configured the TACACS and AAA settings accordingly the informations I found on CCO. I tested the settings with "test aaa group authentication" command- without success. On my Cisco ACS no request was received and the switch told me he could't reach the tacacs server. Other switches in the same IP subnet are working without failure, so firewall or server should not be the problem.
i have: two nexus 5596 connected each other the mgmt0 is NOT in use SVI for keepalives with IP address and /30 netmask vpc-keepalives running over fiber in e1/1. this works well uplinks to datacenter distribution switch (Cat 6500 VSS) over fiber on port-channel 1 (e1/2 and e1/10), also carrying the management VLAN (vlan 14). SVI with an IP address for management purposes
I can't get this to work. i can ping my whole network from the nexus, but not the nexus from my network. also pinging inside the mgmt vlan is not possible.
We have a 2960 switch (switch2), whose Management IP cannot be reached/Ping'd. Could not Ping . We have checked the following, but still no clue on the root cause. Haven't tried a reboot yet.
Topology.
All switches are cascaded through trunk and allows all v lan's.
L3switch1 <-> switch1 <-> switch2 <-> switch3 <-> L3switch2
Switch 2 has correct ARP entries for the other switches that we try to ping.Mac address table is fine.Switches other than Switch 2 has proper ARP and Mac entries.This Mgmt v lan is not pruned across any trunks. (we are able to ping switch3 crossing switch2 when tried from switch1)Switches are running PVST and convergence is fine.No access list to deny the traffic.Tried sut/no shut on the V lan interface.
But still switch 2 could not be reached.
How separate is the management interface on a Nexus 5548?
In context - what's the risk of having a layer 2 only Nx5K in a DMZ and running the managment ports down into an internal managment VLAN, to form peer-keepalive links and software upgrades.
We have a couple of Nexus 7010's split into Core and Distribution VDCs. MGMT0 interfaces on each of the Nexus VDC's (including the Admin VDC) are configured with different IP address, but on the same subnet i.e 10.10.10.1/24 for admin, 10.10.10.2/24 for Core and 10.10.10.3/24 for Distribution. The MGMT 0 physical port on each Nexus is connected to a physical gig port on a 3750 X switch, and the 3750X has uplinks back to the Nexus configured for vPC.
When i ssh to the VDC MGMT0 IPs from the 3750X, i can access each of these VDCs without any problems. But if i enable routing on each of these links(OSPF) and advertise it to the WAN, i cannot see these routes advertised and also cannot see any of these routes in the local routing table.Just wondering if i have to enable these links on a VLAN and then advertise it to the WAN..But if this the case, VLANs cannot be created on the Admin(default VDC).
I'm trying to figure out how to (or if I can) setup the management interfaces (fa1) on a couple of new 4500X switches. My issue is that the 4500X's themselves are the gateway for my management VLAN (.1 HSRP virtual, .2 and .3 SVIs on the pair of switches).
I would like to assign addresses from the management VLAN to the router Fa1 management interfaces but the software configuration guide seems to note this is not supported (and indeed it doesn't seem to work).
Physically I have Fa1 from core-1 into a port on an adjacent switch. Fa1 from core-2 also goes into a port on that adjacent switch. Both are in my management VLAN, whose SVIs are on the cores themselves.
I am trying to setup the management vrf on the 4948 10GE so that my TACACS requests will use that vrf for out-of-band purposes. The vrf is working properly because I can ping the TACACS server using the vrf but the logins do not work. I see this error in the tacacs debug:
TPLUS(00000016)/0: Connect Error No route to host
Looking at the release notes, it states that my version (12.2.54 SG1) does support vrf aware tacacs but the documentation seems to be a bit off because i do not get a server private command option as stated in the configuration doc after configuring a tacacs server group:
[URL]
Here is my config:
ip vrf mgmtVrf
rd X:X
!
interface FastEthernet1
ip vrf forwarding mgmtVrf
ip address x.x.x.x
[code]....
I am planning to change the management IP (VLAN 5) to one of my Cisco 2950 switch, Here I am creating a new VLAN101 and assign new IP
When I am doing this VLAN 2 is going admin down.
we do not have an out-of-band management network and setting one up at this point is not being planned. We are mainly a swtiched environment and the only devices that are using L3 are the core switch for WAN purposes and the lab because it is mimicking the production environment. I have two Nexus switches that are sitting on the other side of a 3750 switch which is currently acting as a L3 device because this is a pre-production environment for a new project. We had an issue with management of the devices before but our workaround was to put them on the management vlan direcltly off of the core, allowing only management traffic to pass by means of mgmt0 on each device. The problem I'm having now is that I've now setup the mgmt0 interfaces on both for the keepalive link for vpc only (vpc traffic is going accross 2x10gb connections and the link to the 3750 is 1gb each trunked) and have lost my ability to use the mgmt0 connections for management. How to connect my management connection through either the 3750 or directly off the core switch (as that's what will happen once it's put into production)
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe have quite a few 3560 & 2960 on our edge network - what I have been looking at was to access switches via web-interface i.e. web-browser. Only problem with this is it always gives you access on privilige level 15 which is not ideal as not all who we decide to give access to these switches will be admin and allowed to configure these swicthes - In the 3560/2960 data-sheet states:
"Alternatively, a local username and password database can be configured on the switch itself. Fifteen levels of authorization on the switch console and two levels on the Web-based management interface provide the ability to give different levels of configuration capabilities to different administrators"
Where as there is no mention of how to configure these two levels of Web-based management in the configuration guide.
Randomly when I try to access to 2950 from management tools, switch is unreachable, I have to access from other switch and reload 2950.
Problem only is from managemt tool to managament vlan 1 2950.
The strange thing is that management interface is encountering a very fast increase of throttles, broadcast and ignored packets:
2950#show interfaces vlan 1
Vlan1 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is CPU Interface, address is 0023.3488.fd65 (bia 0023.3488.fd65)
Internet address is xxxxxxxxxx
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
[code]....
It could be a hardware problem?, IOS has been upgraded.
I've got a bunch of 3750-X switches all running IP Base and acting as a routed access layer. They run OSPF in a totally stubby area with the distribution layer (Nexus 7K) as the ABR. We also have a physically separate management network into which the fa0 management interface of the 3750-X is connected. The management network itself runs OSPF and has multiple subnets and external access.
On the 3750-X, I'd ideally like to be able to run some sort of separate OSPF process for the management network or at the very least have a static default route for management traffic pointing out the fa0 interface, but clearly not have it interfere with the main default route for data traffic coming from the N7K ABR. Normally I'd just create a management VRF, sling the fa0 interface into it and run a separate OSPF process in that VRF. The problem is you can't create VRFs in IP Base! Surely there must be a way to do this? Cisco don't really expect customers to upgrade to IP Services just to have a working OOB Management network, do they?!
when I was using image 1.0.0.27, I was able to move the management VLAN from 1 to which ever VLAN I wanted. For some reason, after switching the image to 1.1.1.8, I no longer have that function.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am setting up a link between buildings that uses wireless links. I'm using Layer 3 routed ports on 2 3560 switches to handle the routing between sites. Normally I would just put these in a /30 and then the switches handle the rest. However, the wireless access points have a web interface for managing them that I want to be able to access, but it's only available on the single NIC that also carries traffic. What would be the best way of making this work? Should I make the link a /29 and give the access points an IP in the same range? If this is the case what do I use for the default gateway for the access points?
I have included a diagram to try to explain the issue clearer. The IP addresses in black are what I would do if this were a standard cable (and indeed this will work, but I wont be able to access the admin interface of the wireless AP) and the red ip addresses are the alternative if I use a /29 (but as I said, I'm not sure what to use for the default gateways).